|
|
|
Ex-Premie.Org |
Forum II Archive
# 5 |
|
From: Feb 4, 1998 |
To: Feb 13, 1998 |
Page: 2 Of: 5 |
|
|
Rick
-:- Knowledge
Selection -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 18:30:36 (EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
Knowledge Selection -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 19:54:28 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Knowledge Selection -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 01:05:19 (EST)
Selena -:- Attaining
balance -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 15:25:59 (EST)
Mr Ex -:- Malibu
fairy tale -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:34:58 (EST)
___lg -:- Re:
Malibu fairy tale -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 13:36:29 (EST)
___Selena -:- Re:
Malibu fairy tale -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 15:33:26 (EST)
___lg -:- Re:
Malibu fairy tale -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 16:29:27 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Malibu fairy tale -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 16:53:12 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Malibu fairy tale -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 18:49:00 (EST)
___CD -:- Re:
Malibu fairy tale -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 22:54:37 (EST)
___Mr Ex -:- Re:
Malibu fairy tale -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 03:49:36 (EST)
John Cavad -:- Selena's
thought on premies -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:14:56 (EST)
John Cavad -:- Ira
Woods -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:04:47 (EST)
___Mr Ex -:- Re:
Ira Woods -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:38:23 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Ira Woods -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 16:48:45 (EST)
___CD -:- Re:
Ira Woods -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 19:19:46 (EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
Ira Woods -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 20:11:49 (EST)
___CD -:- Re:
Ira Woods -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:16:47 (EST)
___A gossip -:- Re:
Ira Woods -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 00:11:29 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Ira Woods -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 00:19:35 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Ira Woods -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 01:06:22 (EST)
Scott T. -:- Dalai
Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun) -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 09:29:29
(EST)
___Joy -:- Re:
Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun) -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:11:15
(EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun) -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 13:59:52
(EST)
___Joy -:- Re:
Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun) -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 19:44:36
(EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun) -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 13:07:59
(EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun) -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 13:15:40
(EST)
StephenB -:- Seeker
-:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 00:40:14 (EST)
___Katie
-:- Re:
Seeker -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 10:45:04 (EST)
Joy -:- Recommended
Reading -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 00:15:01 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Recommended Reading (David Lane) -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:00:38
(EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
Recommended Reading -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:20:19 (EST)
___lg -:- Re:
Recommended Reading -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:48:54 (EST)
___more titles -:- Re:
Recommended Reading -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 13:11:15 (EST)
Scott T. -:- Homer
Simpson as 'The Chosen One' -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 21:34:57
(EST)
VP -:- Cult
List -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 19:30:48 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Cult List -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 19:43:56 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Cult List -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 20:02:23 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
gay laws -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 20:07:55 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Cult List -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 20:29:36 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
gay laws -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 20:33:15 (EST)
___bftb -:- Re:
Cult List -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 20:59:03 (EST)
___Selena RE: CAN and ELLE -:- Re:
Cult List -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 20:59:51 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Cult List -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 21:35:13 (EST)
___VP -:- EV
list and Scientology -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 21:48:46 (EST)
___Steve A -:- Re:
EV list and Scientology -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:17:04 (EST)
___Steve A -:- Re:
EV list and Scientology -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:19:14 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
EV list and Scientology -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:31:16 (EST)
___Jw -:- Re:
Cult List -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:49:51 (EST)
___Mr Ex -:- Re:
EV list and Scientology -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 05:55:36 (EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
EV list and Scientology -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:35:25 (EST)
___JW: Gay Rights/ -:- Re:
Gay Rights -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 17:31:41 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Gay Rights -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 18:11:52 (EST)
___cult list -:- My
personal -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 19:01:26 (EST)
Scott T. -:- Good
Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 16:53:19 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 18:12:01 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 19:03:33 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 19:34:14 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 19:57:02 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Good Charisma, Addendum -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 20:12:03 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 20:40:17 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 21:07:24 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:26:58 (EST)
___VP -:- Video
God -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:43:38 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Video God -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:57:49 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 23:19:28 (EST)
___CD -:- Re:
Video God -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 23:29:34 (EST)
___Joy -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 00:29:42 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 09:14:40 (EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:44:39 (EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
Less Sex After Satsang -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:52:44 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Video God -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:58:51 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:39:27 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Good Charisma -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:49:16 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Video God -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 13:10:55 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Video God -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 14:00:55 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Video God -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 18:30:30 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Less Sex After Satsang -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 22:07:57 (EST)
___CD -:- Re:
Video God -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 22:56:56 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Video God -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:02:34 (EST)
___CD -:- Re:
Video God -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:28:49 (EST)
___Mr Ex -:- Low
profile -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 05:52:22 (EST)
___Mr Ex -:- Lame
charlatan=Low profile -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 09:28:37 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Low profile -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 11:52:18 (EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
Less Sex After Satsang -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 18:35:00 (EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Less Sex After Satsang -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 22:38:46 (EST)
Scott T. -:- Badnesh
bus -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 16:02:26 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Sorry.
I goofed. -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 16:41:35 (EST)
John Cavad -:- PAM
-:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 11:56:24 (EST)
___Mr
Ex -:- Re:
PAM -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 12:20:29 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
PAM -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 14:10:25 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
PAM -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:40:37 (EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
PAM -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:08:01 (EST)
John K. -:- Question
-:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 10:44:41 (EST)
___-Scott T. -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 11:15:50 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 11:21:00 (EST)
___Selena -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 12:25:52 (EST)
___John K. -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 12:30:08 (EST)
___Selena -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 13:01:46 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 13:17:07 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 13:23:52 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 14:36:43 (EST)
___John K. -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 16:22:57 (EST)
___Scott T. -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 16:36:37 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 16:57:13 (EST)
___Brian -:- Re:
Question -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 22:34:36 (EST)
___Mr Ex -:- Re:
Question -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 06:18:22 (EST)
___Katie -:- Guilt
about Maharaji -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:10:35 (EST)
___A premie -:- Re:
Guilt about Maharaji -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:44:33 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Guilt about Maharaji -:- Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at 00:12:57 (EST)
ex-mug -:- Rugu
-:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 04:35:24 (EST)
___Scott -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 09:34:38 (EST)
___ex-mug -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 10:41:05 (EST)
___Scott -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 11:03:43 (EST)
___lg -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 13:20:11 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 13:32:49 (EST)
___lg -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 14:14:26 (EST)
___ex-mug -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 14:19:09 (EST)
___lg -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 14:44:39 (EST)
___ex-mug -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 15:09:06 (EST)
___lg -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 16:14:08 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Rugu -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 17:35:51 (EST)
Steve A -:- Who
are the real Premies -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 23:13:40 (EST)
___Diver Dan -:- Re:
Who are the real Premies -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 01:07:12 (EST)
___Steve A -:- Re:
Who are the real Premies -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 02:26:29 (EST)
___ex-mug -:- Re:
Who are the real Premies -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 14:49:59 (EST)
___A premie -:- Re:
Who are the real Premies -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:56:57 (EST)
Sir David -:- A
Father & His children -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 20:48:24
(EST)
Selena -:- Homer
Simpson and Realization -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 19:31:22 (EST)
___Scott Talkington -:- Re:
Homer Simpson and Realization -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 22:40:26 (EST)
___Mickey the Pharisee -:- Re:
Homer Simpson and Realization -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 23:12:17 (EST)
___Selena -:- Re:
Homer Simpson and Realization -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 13:33:11 (EST)
___Marge and -:- Homer
Simpson and Realization -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 17:02:47 (EST)
___Selena -:- Re:
Homer Simpson and Realization -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 17:19:45
(EST)
JW -:- Devotion
Quotes -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 17:46:23 (EST)
___Selena -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 18:35:01 (EST)
___Katie -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 19:29:05 (EST)
___John K. -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 22:04:03 (EST)
___de -:- ca
-:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 22:28:32 (EST)
___Jw -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 23:41:51 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes -:- Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 23:53:36 (EST)
___JW -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 05:19:17
(EST)
___Mr Ex -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 06:14:17
(EST)
___Brian -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 07:13:38 (EST)
___Mr Ex -:- Recent
quotes? -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 09:33:40 (EST)
___Selena -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 10:38:59
(EST)
___VP -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 15:38:56 (EST)
___John Cavad -:- Re:
Devotion Quotes -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 16:18:33 (EST)
___Mickey the Pharisee -:- Re:
Recent quotes? -:- Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at 23:00:22 (EST)
___Brian -:- Re:
Recent quotes? -:- Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 22:09:16 (EST)
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 18:30:36 (EST)
Poster: Rick
Email: [email protected]
To:
Everyone
Subject: Knowledge Selection
Message:
The
thread about Ira Woods jogged my memory of begging him to reveal knowledge to me
in 1976. As stupid as it sounds, I would have done anything to receive it; it
meant more than anything to me. I went to satsang every night, and did all the
service I could. I couldn't possibly have been more devoted. I remember a young
woman in the same room, who was only marginally interested, who was accepted by
Ira. I was infuriated and "stayed after class" to beg him some more, but to no
avail. I didn't pass muster and I was humiliated. Eventually, Stuart MacDougall
did the dirty work. So the $64,000 question is... How did they really determine
if someone was ready for knowledge? We were led to believe they had some sort of
hotline to maharaji or the cosmos, that allowed them to peer inside someone's
heart and know how guileless they were. Were they really just playing favorites?
Although my exposure to him was limited, I found Ira Woods just as insidious as
David Smith.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 19:54:28
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email: [email protected]
To: Rick
Subject: Re: Knowledge Selection
Message:
Rick, I also begged for knowledge in the Summer of 1976,
NYC, and was turned down. The criteria to receive knowledge was part of Ira's
psychosis. He believed anything he impulsively did or said was the will of God
(aka GMJ). (Mr. Ex, did you ever think like that at times?) I wrote a paragraph
about it in my Jouneys entry. I thought Ira was a total arrogant ass back then.
He was only one of about seven or so initiators back then. Most were cut prior
to then and they (GMJ) were starting to initiate new initiators into DLM.
Perhaps Ira thought he was the "special one" to have survived the massive cut?
Years later he admitted he was "in his mind" regarding those days. I guess GMJ
humbled him?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
01:05:19 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: John Cavad
Subject: Re: Knowledge Selection
Message:
Rick, I also begged for knowledge in the Summer
of 1976, NYC, and was turned down. The criteria to receive knowledge was part of
Ira's psychosis. He believed anything he impulsively did or said was the will of
God (aka GMJ). (Mr. Ex, did you ever think like that at times?) I wrote a
paragraph about it in my Jouneys entry. I thought Ira was a total arrogant ass
back then. He was only one of about seven or so initiators back then. Most were
cut prior to then and they (GMJ) were starting to initiate new initiators into
DLM. Perhaps Ira thought he was the 'special one' to have survived the massive
cut? Years later he admitted he was 'in his mind' regarding those days. I guess
GMJ humbled him? So I guess David Smith wasn't the only one who
believed that whatever stupid or maniacal thought that came into his head was
god talking. Ira gave new meaning to the word "intense." He was truly a maniac.
I recall in the late 70s he got into going to parks and screaming satsang, which
M apparently approved of, until he didn't anymore and then Ira had to stop.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 15:25:59
(EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To: Everyone
Subject: Attaining balance
Message:
Brian, forgive me
if I didn't wait long enough but I think I posted while you were testing and it
went into cyberspace. At least i hope that's where it is and not someplace I
wouldn't want it. If not, I'll live. I've been embarrassed before. So, I'll try
again. I have noticed intermittant postings by premies here at this site, and
more often than not the theme is an accusation that we are negative. This is
understandable of course, but simplistic to say the least. I find this site to
be extremely positive, any veteran of Usenet would agree I am sure. I have found
the comments to my postings to be very intelligent and insightful. I see a lot
of honest open communication from people who are tryiing to recover or have
recovered from something they found to be destructive. Thanks again everyone. I
have been exploring career development and have been taking those personality
tests. The results keep surprising me. I am categorized as an extrovert who
prefers thinking to feeling, and sensing to intuition. Of course these things
are not totally accurate and reflect a person's environment, etc. Still it is
helping me see why I don't fit the premie mold well at all. The tests explain
that the goal for anyone, no matter what their type, is to seek balance. It got
me thinking about the positives of my experiences with M and premies. Early on,
there was a lot of love. I like the meditation, though I don't see it as the
only way to feel love or a connection with the spiritual world, and more
importantly, i don't see it as better than some other ways. Actually I feel that
energy more after running a few miles. At one time not so long ago I would have
judged the running to be not as cosmic or spiritual or something, and it's a
relief not to have that value judgement anymore. As to my thoughts on the
premies; take it all with a grain of salt. I am bitter and have been hurt rather
badly. We all have our faults. Their changes can be explained in other ways in
addition to M's influence - getting older, having more responsibilities, the
cultural atmosphere of the 90's vs. the 70's. It's hard to let go of a dream.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:34:58
(EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: Everyone
Subject: Malibu fairy tale
Message:
Some Malibu premies
told me an interesting story. Land was for sale some years ago, around BigM’s
palace. As the Ex-Lord didn’t want to have some new neighbors close to him, he
decided to buy that piece of land. But there was a problem : his neighbors on
the hill don’t like him very much, and didn’t want to let him buy it. What he
then decided is to have PAM making a company and buy this land. So did they. Lot
of Grace and Bliss, and Maharaji lives happily on his quiet hill. Who gave them
the money? What is the name of that company? Who is in it (beside Alvarro
Pascotto?) Do anybody have details about this fairy tale?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 13:36:29
(EST)
Poster: lg
Email:
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Re: Malibu fairy tale
Message:
Some
Malibu premies told me an interesting story. Land was for sale some years ago,
around BigM’s palace. As the Ex-Lord didn’t want to have some new neighbors
close to him, he decided to buy that piece of land. But there was a problem :
his neighbors on the hill don’t like him very much, and didn’t want to let him
buy it. What he then decided is to have PAM making a company and buy this land.
So did they. Lot of Grace and Bliss, and Maharaji lives happily on his quiet
hill. Who gave them the money? What is the name of that company? Who is in it
(beside Alvarro Pascotto?) Do anybody have details about this fairy tale?
Yes. It's around 1986. I remember money was being collected as
donation for M. for that purpose. It seemed the first time M was asking money
for himself, as we were being told. We were contributing monthly for his plane
too! That's the period when my enchantment took the back door. I don't think I
was around anymore at that time to find out the outcome of that event.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 15:33:26
(EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To: lg
Subject: Re: Malibu fairy tale
Message:
Some Malibu premies told me an
interesting story. Land was for sale some years ago, around BigM’s palace. As
the Ex-Lord didn’t want to have some new neighbors close to him, he decided to
buy that piece of land. But there was a problem : his neighbors on the hill
don’t like him very much, and didn’t want to let him buy it. What he then
decided is to have PAM making a company and buy this land. So did they. Lot of
Grace and Bliss, and Maharaji lives happily on his quiet hill. Who gave them the
money? What is the name of that company? Who is in it (beside Alvarro Pascotto?)
Do anybody have details about this fairy tale? Yes. It's around
1986. I remember money was being collected as donation for M. for that purpose.
It seemed the first time M was asking money for himself, as we were being told.
We were contributing monthly for his plane too! That's the period when my
enchantment took the back door. I don't think I was around anymore at that time
to find out the outcome of that event. Was that when and where the
new house started being built? I was in Malibu in 95 and it surprised me to see
this whole new, much bigger house. Did the money for the house come from the
same sources?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 16:29:27
(EST)
Poster: lg
Email:
To: Selena
Subject: Re: Malibu fairy tale
Message:
Some Malibu premies told me
an interesting story. Land was for sale some years ago, around BigM’s palace. As
the Ex-Lord didn’t want to have some new neighbors close to him, he decided to
buy that piece of land. But there was a problem : his neighbors on the hill
don’t like him very much, and didn’t want to let him buy it. What he then
decided is to have PAM making a company and buy this land. So did they. Lot of
Grace and Bliss, and Maharaji lives happily on his quiet hill. Who gave them the
money? What is the name of that company? Who is in it (beside Alvarro Pascotto?)
Do anybody have details about this fairy tale? Yes. It's around
1986. I remember money was being collected as donation for M. for that purpose.
It seemed the first time M was asking money for himself, as we were being told.
We were contributing monthly for his plane too! That's the period when my
enchantment took the back door. I don't think I was around anymore at that time
to find out the outcome of that event. Was that when and where the
new house started being built? I was in Malibu in 95 and it surprised me to see
this whole new, much bigger house. Did the money for the house come from the
same sources? No Selena I can't recall M wanting a house being built
in the 80's. Only the land was in the picture at that time. (unless the house
came after I left the group).
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 16:53:12
(EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: lg
Subject: Re: Malibu fairy tale
Message:
Some Malibu
premies told me an interesting story. Land was for sale some years ago, around
BigM’s palace. As the Ex-Lord didn’t want to have some new neighbors close to
him, he decided to buy that piece of land. But there was a problem : his
neighbors on the hill don’t like him very much, and didn’t want to let him buy
it. What he then decided is to have PAM making a company and buy this land. So
did they. Lot of Grace and Bliss, and Maharaji lives happily on his quiet hill.
Who gave them the money? What is the name of that company? Who is in it (beside
Alvarro Pascotto?) Do anybody have details about this fairy tale?
Yes. It's around 1986. I remember money was being collected as
donation for M. for that purpose. It seemed the first time M was asking money
for himself, as we were being told. We were contributing monthly for his plane
too! That's the period when my enchantment took the back door. I don't think I
was around anymore at that time to find out the outcome of that event.
Was that when and where the new house started being built? I was in
Malibu in 95 and it surprised me to see this whole new, much bigger house. Did
the money for the house come from the same sources? No Selena I
can't recall M wanting a house being built in the 80's. Only the land was in the
picture at that time. (unless the house came after I left the group).
Actually, we raised tons of money from premies to buy the residence
in Malibu in the first place in the 70s. Then, in the later 70s there was
another big fundraising to get the money to buy land AROUND the residence, that
I think may have cost even more than the residence itself. Apparently, he wanted
even more land, to keep those annoying human beings away from him, later on. BTW
-- do people recall when M wanted a heliport at the residence around 1981 and
there was a big political bruhaha in Malibu, because his neighbors opposed it?
[I would be happy to tell that story again, if anyone wants to hear it.]
Apparently, it was just too too burdensome for the poor perfect master to sit on
his fat ass in a luxury car to LAX before taking off in his private luxury jet.
He had to have a helicopter. Actually, I don't know if he ever got the heliport.
Does anyone know?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 18:49:00
(EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Malibu fairy tale
Message:
Some
Malibu premies told me an interesting story. Land was for sale some years ago,
around BigM’s palace. As the Ex-Lord didn’t want to have some new neighbors
close to him, he decided to buy that piece of land. But there was a problem :
his neighbors on the hill don’t like him very much, and didn’t want to let him
buy it. What he then decided is to have PAM making a company and buy this land.
So did they. Lot of Grace and Bliss, and Maharaji lives happily on his quiet
hill. Who gave them the money? What is the name of that company? Who is in it
(beside Alvarro Pascotto?) Do anybody have details about this fairy tale? Yes.
It's around 1986. I remember money was being collected as donation for M. for
that purpose. It seemed the first time M was asking money for himself, as we
were being told. We were contributing monthly for his plane too! That's the
period when my enchantment took the back door. I don't think I was around
anymore at that time to find out the outcome of that event. Was that when and
where the new house started being built? I was in Malibu in 95 and it surprised
me to see this whole new, much bigger house. Did the money for the house come
from the same sources? No Selena I can't recall M wanting a house being built in
the 80's. Only the land was in the picture at that time. (unless the house came
after I left the group). Actually, we raised tons of money from premies to buy
the residence in Malibu in the first place in the 70s. Then, in the later 70s
there was another big fundraising to get the money to buy land AROUND the
residence, that I think may have cost even more than the residence itself.
Apparently, he wanted even more land, to keep those annoying human beings away
from him, later on. BTW -- do people recall when M wanted a heliport at the
residence around 1981 and there was a big political bruhaha in Malibu, because
his neighbors opposed it? [I would be happy to tell that story again, if anyone
wants to hear it.] Apparently, it was just too too burdensome for the poor
perfect master to sit on his fat ass in a luxury car to LAX before taking off in
his private luxury jet. He had to have a helicopter. Actually, I don't know if
he ever got the heliport. Does anyone know? JW, Sure, tell us again.
I need a good laugh tonight! Thanks, VP
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 22:54:37
(EST)
Poster: CD
Email:
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Re: Malibu fairy tale
Message:
>But there
was a problem : his neighbors on the hill don’t like him very much O.K. Why
don't they like him?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
03:49:36 (EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: CD
Subject: Re: Malibu fairy tale
Message:
>But there was a problem : his neighbors on
the hill don’t like him very much O.K. Why don't they like him? Why
don't you ask them? They even went to court against his helicopter frenzy made
petitions etc Could be: dangerous crazy guru too many parties (and not being
invited) to many bongos running around up and down the hill thefts in the
neigborhood people sleeping in cars and vans everywhere dangerous bodyguards
weapons? Make some investigations get copies of the petitions could be very
enlightening ... etc
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:14:56
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email: [email protected]
To: Everyone
Subject: Selena's thought on premies
Message:
Here's Selena's quote: 'Maybe it's because I hang around
so long. What I see happening more and more is the sense of community is gone or
going away...." Selena, what you have seen is very cyclical in cults. It
happened in 1975 when GMJ married an American girl and broke his family up; it
happened in the early 80's at the time ashrams were about to be closed; it
happens frequently and it's quite normal under the circumstances. The life cycle
of an average premie is not long, maybe three to five years. (Don't look at
premies around 25 years. They're the exception.) They eventually come down to
reality and have problems relating to each other; so they may only concentrate
on GMJ at those times casting most premies aside, or they may just drop out of
the whole scene perhaps still holding on to some part of Knowledge or GMJ (out
of fear of leaving or letting go altogether). In short, premies get disociated
with themselves as a result of living a lie.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:04:47
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email: [email protected]
To: Everyone
Subject: Ira Woods
Message:
Anyone know whatever happened with Ira Woods (surviving
initiator from the early 70's into the early 80's)? I heard he had once moved to
Santa Barbara (long ago?). Has he woken up yet from the dream or is he he still
a devotee of the incarnation of God?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:38:23
(EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: John Cavad
Subject: Re: Ira Woods
Message:
he even got married,
divorced ..... still involved in EV usual typical story in the 90s
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 16:48:45
(EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Re: Ira Woods
Message:
he even got
married, divorced ..... still involved in EV usual typical story in the 90s
I know this is gossip, but who did he marry, by the way? Was it
someone I might have known? Can't imagine begin married to someone as intense as
Ira for very long. Sorry to hear he is still involved with M. Masochism
sometimes runs deep.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 19:19:46
(EST)
Poster: CD
Email:
To: John Cavad
Subject: Re: Ira Woods
Message:
He was in San Diego a
few months back giving a talk. CD San Diego
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 20:11:49
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
To: CD
Subject: Re: Ira Woods
Message:
He was in San
Diego a few months back giving a talk. CD San Diego San Diego? If I
was a living premie, I would have been right there at Lindberg field giving him
personal taxi service.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:16:47
(EST)
Poster: CD
Email:
To: John Cavad
Subject: Re: Ira Woods
Message:
>San Diego? If I was
a living premie, I would have been right there at Lindberg field giving him
personal taxi service. Yeah, San Diego. I was there. Also saw M the 5 times he
came here. O.K. Cavad So you are not living but hiding out in San Diego. What
part? Driving a taxi? I used to be a big Coast Cab customer. Now I stay close to
the beach and walk. CD Pacific Beach - San Diego, CA
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
00:11:29 (EST)
Poster: A gossip
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Ira Woods
Message:
he
even got married, divorced ..... still involved in EV usual typical story in the
90s I know this is gossip, but who did he marry, by the way? Was it
someone I might have known? Can't imagine begin married to someone as intense as
Ira for very long. Sorry to hear he is still involved with M. Masochism
sometimes runs deep. And I hear he's a cross-dresser. Oh JW, you
guys are so into this stuff. BTW I notice that gossip has become the main
currency on this forum. Good gracious don't we get enough television!?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
00:19:35 (EST)
Poster: Katie
Email:
To: A
gossip
Subject: Re: Ira Woods
Message:
And I
hear he's a cross-dresser. Oh JW, you guys are so into this stuff. BTW I notice
that gossip has become the main currency on this forum. Good gracious don't we
get enough television!? My friend's husband is a social
anthropologist and he says that gossip is important in the spread of information
in societies. So gossip is not necessarily bad (unless it's malicious gossip, or
lying gossip, I suppose). Maybe JW just wants to find out what happened to the
guy. I know I'd be interested if I had known him personally - wouldn't you?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
01:06:22 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: A gossip
Subject: Re: Ira Woods
Message:
he even got
married, divorced ..... still involved in EV usual typical story in the 90s I
know this is gossip, but who did he marry, by the way? Was it someone I might
have known? Can't imagine begin married to someone as intense as Ira for very
long. Sorry to hear he is still involved with M. Masochism sometimes runs deep.
And I hear he's a cross-dresser. Oh JW, you guys are so into this stuff. BTW I
notice that gossip has become the main currency on this forum. Good gracious
don't we get enough television!? Hey, lighten up, will ya? Geezzzz.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 09:29:29
(EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email: [email protected]
To: Everyone
Subject: Dalai Lama and Good Charisma
(Kundun)
Message:
Hi: I'm just trying to bring this "good
charisma" thread back to the top, and was also interested in whether people had
seen the movie Kundun. I haven't seen it yet, myself. There's an
enclave of the Tibetan sect (sect is not the same as cult, another story) in
northern California. I had a Chinese roommate for awhile, and his take on the
Tibetan hierarchy was very different. He saw them as fundamentally political,
and very savvy. He pointed out that the image of the Tibetans as a put-upon
small enclave of enlightened people was a propaganda ploy. Claimed that at one
time Tibet had ruled China, or most of it, and that it is still a powerful group
of Chinese, like the Mongolians. Personally, I think his rendition is
propaganda, but interesting. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:11:15
(EST)
Poster: Joy
Email: [email protected]
To:
Scott T.
Subject: Re: Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun)
Message:
Hi: I'm just trying to bring this 'good
charisma' thread back to the top, and was also interested in whether people had
seen the movie Kundun. I haven't seen it yet, myself. There's an
enclave of the Tibetan sect (sect is not the same as cult, another story) in
northern California. I had a Chinese roommate for awhile, and his take on the
Tibetan hierarchy was very different. He saw them as fundamentally political,
and very savvy. He pointed out that the image of the Tibetans as a put-upon
small enclave of enlightened people was a propaganda ploy. Claimed that at one
time Tibet had ruled China, or most of it, and that it is still a powerful group
of Chinese, like the Mongolians. Personally, I think his rendition is
propaganda, but interesting. -Scott I've seen Kundun, and it's
absolutely gorgeous. Visually, it is just spectacular, and is very moving.
Highly recommended. Scott, your Chinese roommate's views are shocking. The
Tibetans are anything but savvy political maneuverers. The Chinese propaganda
machine is working overtime to portray the Tibetans (what's left of them) in a
negative light, and also to stop films like Kundun, Seven Years In Tibet and The
Red Door being made (I think Red Door is the right name for it, it's the new
film starring Richard Gere). These three were all made around the same time
before the Chinese government realized what was happening; they have now exerted
sufficient pressure on Hollywood that no more movies are going to be made
focusing on Tibet. The Chinese have imposed upon Tibet a genocide. Over one
million people have been destroyed due to famine. People, including monks and
nuns, imprisoned and tortured. All but a handful of the 6,000 monasteries
completely destroyed and looted. Their natural environment has been plundered,
forests clear-cut and strip-mined, and it is being used as a nuclear waste dump.
But the most insidious of all, according to the Dalai Lama, has been the Chinese
ploy of population transfer to obliterate the Tibetans as a race and a culture.
Millions of native Chinese are being offered financial incentives to move to
Tibet, and Lhasa now looks almost like any other Chinese city, and the Tibetans
are now a minority in their own country. And all these "politically savvy
maneuverers" have done is to nonviolently and peacefully try and call the
world's attention to what has happened. I urge anyone interested to go and see
Kundun (or Seven Years in Tibet) to get a small idea of the scale of what has
happened there. My only complaint about Kundun was that it was too light on the
Chinese government, barely hinting about the famine, and showing little of the
scale of the destruction and oppression. There are many, many web sites and
accurate sources of information about Tibet on the www. Please do searches to
find info from the Tibetan Rights Campaign, etc. if anyone is interested in the
TRUE facts.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 13:59:52
(EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email: [email protected]
To: Joy
Subject: Re: Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun)
Message:
Hi: I'm just trying to bring this
'good charisma' thread back to the top, and was also interested in whether
people had seen the movie Kundun. I haven't seen it yet, myself.
There's an enclave of the Tibetan sect (sect is not the same as cult, another
story) in northern California. I had a Chinese roommate for awhile, and his take
on the Tibetan hierarchy was very different. He saw them as fundamentally
political, and very savvy. He pointed out that the image of the Tibetans as a
put-upon small enclave of enlightened people was a propaganda ploy. Claimed that
at one time Tibet had ruled China, or most of it, and that it is still a
powerful group of Chinese, like the Mongolians. Personally, I think his
rendition is propaganda, but interesting. -Scott I've seen Kundun,
and it's absolutely gorgeous. Visually, it is just spectacular, and is very
moving. Highly recommended. Scott, your Chinese roommate's views are shocking.
The Tibetans are anything but savvy political maneuverers. The Chinese
propaganda machine is working overtime to portray the Tibetans (what's left of
them) in a negative light, and also to stop films like Kundun, Seven Years In
Tibet and The Red Door being made (I think Red Door is the right name for it,
it's the new film starring Richard Gere). These three were all made around the
same time before the Chinese government realized what was happening; they have
now exerted sufficient pressure on Hollywood that no more movies are going to be
made focusing on Tibet. The Chinese have imposed upon Tibet a genocide. Over one
million people have been destroyed due to famine. People, including monks and
nuns, imprisoned and tortured. All but a handful of the 6,000 monasteries
completely destroyed and looted. Their natural environment has been plundered,
forests clear-cut and strip-mined, and it is being used as a nuclear waste dump.
But the most insidious of all, according to the Dalai Lama, has been the Chinese
ploy of population transfer to obliterate the Tibetans as a race and a culture.
Millions of native Chinese are being offered financial incentives to move to
Tibet, and Lhasa now looks almost like any other Chinese city, and the Tibetans
are now a minority in their own country. And all these 'politically savvy
maneuverers' have done is to nonviolently and peacefully try and call the
world's attention to what has happened. I urge anyone interested to go and see
Kundun (or Seven Years in Tibet) to get a small idea of the scale of what has
happened there. My only complaint about Kundun was that it was too light on the
Chinese government, barely hinting about the famine, and showing little of the
scale of the destruction and oppression. There are many, many web sites and
accurate sources of information about Tibet on the www. Please do searches to
find info from the Tibetan Rights Campaign, etc. if anyone is interested in the
TRUE facts. Joy: I figured Lee's perspective was more than a little
wierd. When I lived in Ashland, OR we used to go to the Colestine [sp?] valley
where the Tibetans had a monastery and temple. They used to have Tibetan Dance
festivals there from time to time. The attitudes of the Chinese regarding Tibet
as well as Taiwan are very dangerous. They brook no deviation from there
position, and are used to getting their way. Don't know how it will turn out,
but I don't believe the US will back down much on Taiwan, so that could become a
real problem. We'll see.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 19:44:36
(EST)
Poster: Joy
Email:
To: Scott T.
Subject: Re: Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun)
Message:
Yes, it's interesting to watch how the U.S. will handle
this one, and what it will do if they actually try and take over Taiwan the same
way they did Tibet in the 1950s. They seem to have the exact same views on
Taiwan as they do on Tibet -- that it' an ancient part of China and needs to be
returned to the "motherland" (sound like Nazi Germany?). But the U.S. is too
tied into Taiwan economically to let it go, unlike Tibet. People have commented
that Tibet's main export was spirituality (and at the time it was invaded, it
wasn't an export, they were very isolated and happy that way). Therefore it
wasn't important enough for major world powers to step in. Had Tibet been an oil
producing country it would've been a different kettle of fish. Kundun made me
feel even more love and respect for the Dalai Lama and Tibetan people than I
already do. They used a lot of real Tibetans as actors so it seems very
authentic. It's the kind of film you think about for days afterwards, the images
are so haunting.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
13:07:59 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Joy
Subject: Re: Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun)
Message:
Yes, it's interesting to watch how the U.S.
will handle this one, and what it will do if they actually try and take over
Taiwan the same way they did Tibet in the 1950s. They seem to have the exact
same views on Taiwan as they do on Tibet -- that it' an ancient part of China
and needs to be returned to the 'motherland' (sound like Nazi Germany?). But the
U.S. is too tied into Taiwan economically to let it go, unlike Tibet. People
have commented that Tibet's main export was spirituality (and at the time it was
invaded, it wasn't an export, they were very isolated and happy that way).
Therefore it wasn't important enough for major world powers to step in. Had
Tibet been an oil producing country it would've been a different kettle of fish.
Kundun made me feel even more love and respect for the Dalai Lama and Tibetan
people than I already do. They used a lot of real Tibetans as actors so it seems
very authentic. It's the kind of film you think about for days afterwards, the
images are so haunting. I wouldn't be so sure about Taiwan. The U.S.
is much more economically involved in China that in Taiwan, and given how
corporations run this country, the U.S. would abandon Taiwan in a second if it's
continued relationship threatened the lucrative Chinese market. And Tibet isn't
even on the charts. BTW- The U.S. adopted the "one China" policy almost 20 years
ago. If things go okay with the Hong Kong/China relationship, I think Taiwan
will eventually follow, with encouragement (read, threats) from the U.S. if it
sees it as an economic advantage. BTW -- with the economic turmoil in Asia, just
watch as U.S., European, and to some extent, Japanese corporations and banks
(with the help of the "big stick" of the IMF) go in and buy up what's left of
those economies at bargain basement prices. Because it basically controls the
IMF, the U.S. has become truly an economic predator nation (really,
international corporations which don't have to answer to anyone), as well as
being a military one. [Excuse me, this is the editorial opinion of the day.]
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
13:15:40 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Dalai Lama and Good Charisma (Kundun)
Message:
And by the way, the IMF will see that international
banks, Goldman, Sachs and the like will not lose a penny in Asia, despite
irresponsible investments, paid for out of the hides of ordinary working people
in places like Indonesia and Thailand, who will work even hard for fewer,
inflation-ravaged, currencies. It should be quite a boon for Nike, Chevron and
the U.S. arms exporters, who will sell more arms to these countries to keep
their populations in check.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 00:40:14
(EST)
Poster: StephenB
Email:
To: Everyone
Subject: Seeker
Message:
Hi I am seeking the webmasater
for this site...I am really amazed that it is not available as a link...I think
his name is Brian. Thanks in advance
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 10:45:04
(EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: StephenB
Subject: Re: Seeker
Message:
Hi I am seeking the webmasater for this
site...I am really amazed that it is not available as a link...I think his name
is Brian. Thanks in advance His email address is [email protected]
(I think). Tell me if this doesn't work.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 00:15:01
(EST)
Poster: Joy
Email: [email protected]
To:
Everyone
Subject: Recommended Reading
Message:
I'm
putting together a list of books for the "Breaking Free" section that are
relevant to people who are wanting to leave MJ, or who have left in the past,
whether two weeks or twenty years ago. We have already talked about The Guru
Papers by Kramer and Alstad here on the site, but does anyone know of any other
books which would be appropriate? I have heard of a book called Cults: Faith,
Healing & Coercion by Marc Galanter, but have not read it. Has anyone out
there read it and can recommend it? There's also a book called Snapping which is
pretty good, and deals with people "snapping" themselves out of cult-like
thinking and behavior. Any other suggestion?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:00:38
(EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To: Joy
Subject: Re: Recommended Reading (David Lane) (Re: Recommended
Reading)
Message:
Joy: How about David Lane's book on the
evolution of "Shabd Yoga." I can't recall the title, but he has several
chapters, or perhaps the whole book, on his website at:
http://weber.ucsd.edu/~dlane/ He also has a number of very good contributions
that are quite scathingly critical of various movements and personalities,
including that guy who was on PBS (can't recall his name). Lane's research
demonstrates pretty conclusively that Maharaji does not have exclusive
propietorship of either Knowledge, or it's techniques. In fact Maharaji is a
relatively minor player. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:20:19
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
To: Joy
Subject: Re: Recommended Reading
Message:
Cults: Faith,
Healing & Coercion Reprint Edition; Paperback; Published by Oxford Univ Pr
(Trade); Publication date: October 1, 1990 ISBN: 0195066588 I have read about 20
pages of this book in the book store. It's an excellent book to recommend. It's
a non-judgemental approach is powerful way to approach the subject, but quite
different in context from The Guru Papers. It addresses DLM as well as other
cults. There's some fascinating factual information in this book about premies.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:48:54
(EST)
Poster: lg
Email:
To: Joy
Subject: Re: Recommended Reading
Message:
I'm
putting together a list of books for the 'Breaking Free' section that are
relevant to people who are wanting to leave MJ, or who have left in the past,
whether two weeks or twenty years ago. We have already talked about The Guru
Papers by Kramer and Alstad here on the site, but does anyone know of any other
books which would be appropriate? I have heard of a book called Cults: Faith,
Healing & Coercion by Marc Galanter, but have not read it. Has anyone out
there read it and can recommend it? There's also a book called Snapping which is
pretty good, and deals with people 'snapping' themselves out of cult-like
thinking and behavior. Any other suggestion? I have found these
titles: Singer, Margaret Thaler Cults in our midst / Margaret Thaler Singer with
Janja Lalich ; foreword by Robert Jay Lifton 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers, c1995. 381 p. ISBN: 0787900516 (acid-free paper) ISBN: 0787902667
(pbk.) ISBN: 0787900516 SUBJECTS: Cults -- Controversial literature Psychology,
Religious Persuasion (Psychology) United States -- Religion -- 1960- -----
Conway, Flo, 1941- Snapping : America's epidemic of sudden personality change /
Flo Conway and Jim Siegelman 2nd ed. New York : Stillpoint Press, c1995. 401 p.
ISBN: 0964765004 (pbk. : alk. paper) SUBJECTS: Personality change Psychotherapy
-- United States Group relations training -- United States Conversion --
Comparative studies Experience (Religion) ----- Cialdini, Robert B Influence :
the psychology of persuasion. Rev. ed. New York : Morrow, c1993. 320 p. ISBN:
0688128165 (alk. paper) : SUBJECTS: Influence (Psychology) Persuasion
(Psychology) Compliance ----- Kramer, Joel, 1937- The guru papers : masks of
authoritarian power / Joel Kramer and Diana Alstad Berkeley, Calif. : North
Atlantic Books/Frog, 1993. 385 p. ISBN: 1883319005 (pbk.) : SUBJECTS:
Authoritarianism Control (Psychology) Authoritarianism -- Religious aspects
Control (Psychology) -- Religious aspects Gurus -- Psychology
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 13:11:15
(EST)
Poster: more titles
Email:
To: Joy
Subject: Re: Recommended Reading
Message:
I'm
putting together a list of books for the 'Breaking Free' section that are
relevant to people who are wanting to leave MJ, or who have left in the past,
whether two weeks or twenty years ago. We have already talked about The Guru
Papers by Kramer and Alstad here on the site, but does anyone know of any other
books which would be appropriate? I have heard of a book called Cults: Faith,
Healing & Coercion by Marc Galanter, but have not read it. Has anyone out
there read it and can recommend it? There's also a book called Snapping which is
pretty good, and deals with people 'snapping' themselves out of cult-like
thinking and behavior. Any other suggestion? Raphael, Marty
Spiritual vampires : the use and misuse of spiritual power 1st ed. Santa Fe,
N.M. : Message Co., c1996. 255 p. ISBN: 1572820063 (alk. paper) SUBJECTS:
Religious addiction Control (Psychology) -- Religious aspects Authority --
Religious aspects Manipulative behavior Sex -- Religious aspects ------- Storr,
Anthony Feet of clay : saints, sinners, and madmen : a study of gurus New York :
Free Press Paperbacks, 1997. ISBN: 0684834952 (pbk. : alk. paper) New York :
Free Press, c1996.- 253 p. ISBN: 0684828189 SUBJECTS: Gurus -- Biography
Spiritual biography Cults -- Biography Gurus -- Psychology Authoritarianism --
Religious aspects Control (Psychology) -- Religious aspects Charisma
(Personality trait) -------- Kavanaugh, Philip R., 1931- Magnificent addiction
1st ed. Lower Lake, CA : Aslan Pub., c1992. 237 p. ISBN: 0944031366 SUBJECTS:
Compulsive behavior -- Religious aspects Substance abuse -- Religious aspects
Control (Psychology) -- Religious aspects Addicts -- Religious life -------
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
21:34:57 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To:
Everyone
Subject: Homer Simpson as "The Chosen One"
Message:
Just wondered if anyone saw tonights episode of the
Simpsons. It's an older one, about "the Stonecutters," an exclusive group with
secret initiation rites, etc. Homer becames a member, and after running afoul of
the group, gets chosen as the leader because he has a sacred symbol on his butt.
He wears a special suit reminiscent of the Chinese Child Emperor. Anyway, after
enjoying his "Maha" status by lording it over everyone for awhile he becomes
convinced by his daughter that he needs to "help people." At that point,
however, his followers start a new group, called the "No Homers." I guess the
moral is that even as a "Chosen One" you can only get people to do what they are
really willing to do anyway. Typically cute. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
19:30:48 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: Everyone
Subject: Cult List
Message:
Anyone correct me if I am
wrong, or let me know if you have already written a thread on this. There used
to be a cult list in this country. I understand that EV is on this list. (Along
with the Mormon church and other religious denominations). The point that I
would like to make is that if you are a member of a cult on the list, you can be
excluded from obtaining employment in various fields (the teaching field and
government are two examples). I don't know how an employer would find out this
information. (You may have to supply it to them) This might be something for
people who are questioning whether or not to receive knowledge to take under
advisement. Does EV keep records of who is initiated?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
19:43:56 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email: [email protected]
To: VP
Subject: Re: Cult List
Message:
Anyone correct me if I am wrong, or let me know
if you have already written a thread on this. There used to be a cult list in
this country. I understand that EV is on this list. (Along with the Mormon
church and other religious denominations). The point that I would like to make
is that if you are a member of a cult on the list, you can be excluded from
obtaining employment in various fields (the teaching field and government are
two examples). I don't know how an employer would find out this information.
(You may have to supply it to them) This might be something for people who are
questioning whether or not to receive knowledge to take under advisement. Does
EV keep records of who is initiated? I assume different
people/groups have lists of "cults" that vary from group to group. Frankly, I
think it can be a pretty subjective thing, although CAN (Cult Awareness Network)
for one, tries to strictly apply criterea for each group as to whether it is a
cult or not. As to being denied employment because you are a member of a cult,
that's illegal, because it is essentially religious discrimination, which is
illegal in all 50 states. You are entitled to believe whatever stupid religious
thing you want, and no one can deny you employment, or housing, or public
accommodations, on the basis of what you believe. Now, on the other hand, in all
but 11 states, you can be fired from your job because you happen to be gay, and
there isn't a damn thing you can do about it. It's completely legal. Not exactly
fair, now is it?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
20:02:23 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Cult List
Message:
Anyone
correct me if I am wrong, or let me know if you have already written a thread on
this. There used to be a cult list in this country. I understand that EV is on
this list. (Along with the Mormon church and other religious denominations). The
point that I would like to make is that if you are a member of a cult on the
list, you can be excluded from obtaining employment in various fields (the
teaching field and government are two examples). I don't know how an employer
would find out this information. (You may have to supply it to them) This might
be something for people who are questioning whether or not to receive knowledge
to take under advisement. Does EV keep records of who is initiated? I assume
different people/groups have lists of 'cults' that vary from group to group.
Frankly, I think it can be a pretty subjective thing, although CAN (Cult
Awareness Network) for one, tries to strictly apply criterea for each group as
to whether it is a cult or not. As to being denied employment because you are a
member of a cult, that's illegal, because it is essentially religious
discrimination, which is illegal in all 50 states. You are entitled to believe
whatever stupid religious thing you want, and no one can deny you employment, or
housing, or public accommodations, on the basis of what you believe. Now, on the
other hand, in all but 11 states, you can be fired from your job because you
happen to be gay, and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it. It's
completely legal. Not exactly fair, now is it? JW- Just because
something is illegal doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. I know someone who is
a Mormon and was denied employment teaching at a preschool. They blatantly told
her that it was because she was on a cult list. She did not pursue this with a
lawyer. I used to do a little investigative work for HUD. We would go to
different housing (Apts, condos, etc.) after a black couple was denied housing
due to "no openings" and check out whether or not this was legitimate. Most of
the time, sadly, I was offered housing after the black person/couple was denied.
I know your point that this is not supposed to happen is correct, but our
systems do fail from time to time. Of course you do not have to give out the
information that you are the member of a cult in your office, but do you want to
live a lie? That is something for a premie to consider. The gay issue that you
brought up is a whole other issue. I could write for days on this one, but for
brevity I will just agree with you that that is one of the DUMBEST LAWS I have
ever heard of!!! Speaking fo having to live a lie...
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
20:07:55 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: gay laws (Re: Cult List)
Message:
Anyone correct me if I am wrong, or let me know
if you have already written a thread on this. There used to be a cult list in
this country. I understand that EV is on this list. (Along with the Mormon
church and other religious denominations). The point that I would like to make
is that if you are a member of a cult on the list, you can be excluded from
obtaining employment in various fields (the teaching field and government are
two examples). I don't know how an employer would find out this information.
(You may have to supply it to them) This might be something for people who are
questioning whether or not to receive knowledge to take under advisement. Does
EV keep records of who is initiated? I assume different people/groups have lists
of 'cults' that vary from group to group. Frankly, I think it can be a pretty
subjective thing, although CAN (Cult Awareness Network) for one, tries to
strictly apply criterea for each group as to whether it is a cult or not. As to
being denied employment because you are a member of a cult, that's illegal,
because it is essentially religious discrimination, which is illegal in all 50
states. You are entitled to believe whatever stupid religious thing you want,
and no one can deny you employment, or housing, or public accommodations, on the
basis of what you believe. Now, on the other hand, in all but 11 states, you can
be fired from your job because you happen to be gay, and there isn't a damn
thing you can do about it. It's completely legal. Not exactly fair, now is it?
JW- Just because something is illegal doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. I
know someone who is a Mormon and was denied employment teaching at a preschool.
They blatantly told her that it was because she was on a cult list. She did not
pursue this with a lawyer. I used to do a little investigative work for HUD. We
would go to different housing (Apts, condos, etc.) after a black couple was
denied housing due to 'no openings' and check out whether or not this was
legitimate. Most of the time, sadly, I was offered housing after the black
person/couple was denied. I know your point that this is not supposed to happen
is correct, but our systems do fail from time to time. Of course you do not have
to give out the information that you are the member of a cult in your office,
but do you want to live a lie? That is something for a premie to consider. The
gay issue that you brought up is a whole other issue. I could write for days on
this one, but for brevity I will just agree with you that that is one of the
DUMBEST LAWS I have ever heard of!!! Speaking fo having to live a lie...
P.S. But of course, someone has a choice, in my opinion on whether
or not to join a cult. A person has no choice over their sexuality. I believe
that people are born with their sexual orientation. Some external things
influence this, perhaps, but it has been my experience that this is not a
choice.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
20:29:36 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: Cult List
Message:
Anyone correct me if I am wrong, or
let me know if you have already written a thread on this. There used to be a
cult list in this country. I understand that EV is on this list. (Along with the
Mormon church and other religious denominations). The point that I would like to
make is that if you are a member of a cult on the list, you can be excluded from
obtaining employment in various fields (the teaching field and government are
two examples). I don't know how an employer would find out this information.
(You may have to supply it to them) This might be something for people who are
questioning whether or not to receive knowledge to take under advisement. Does
EV keep records of who is initiated? I assume different people/groups have lists
of 'cults' that vary from group to group. Frankly, I think it can be a pretty
subjective thing, although CAN (Cult Awareness Network) for one, tries to
strictly apply criterea for each group as to whether it is a cult or not. As to
being denied employment because you are a member of a cult, that's illegal,
because it is essentially religious discrimination, which is illegal in all 50
states. You are entitled to believe whatever stupid religious thing you want,
and no one can deny you employment, or housing, or public accommodations, on the
basis of what you believe. Now, on the other hand, in all but 11 states, you can
be fired from your job because you happen to be gay, and there isn't a damn
thing you can do about it. It's completely legal. Not exactly fair, now is it?
JW- Just because something is illegal doesn't mean that it doesn't
happen. I know someone who is a Mormon and was denied employment teaching at a
preschool. They blatantly told her that it was because she was on a cult list.
She did not pursue this with a lawyer. I used to do a little investigative work
for HUD. We would go to different housing (Apts, condos, etc.) after a black
couple was denied housing due to 'no openings' and check out whether or not this
was legitimate. Most of the time, sadly, I was offered housing after the black
person/couple was denied. I know your point that this is not supposed to happen
is correct, but our systems do fail from time to time. Of course you do not have
to give out the information that you are the member of a cult in your office,
but do you want to live a lie? That is something for a premie to consider. The
gay issue that you brought up is a whole other issue. I could write for days on
this one, but for brevity I will just agree with you that that is one of the
DUMBEST LAWS I have ever heard of!!! Speaking fo having to live a lie...
Oh, absolutely right VP. Those laws are still violated, that's why
there are the laws in the first place. I would suggest that if your friend who
was denied the teaching job because of her religion hired a lawyer and sued the
school, she (and the lawyer) could make LOTS of money, and definitely discourage
the school from ever trying that again. But if the preschool was a religious
school, they might be exempt from the law, but I think the exemption is pretty
narrow.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
20:33:15 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: gay laws (Re: Cult List)
Message:
Just because something is illegal doesn't mean
that it doesn't happen. I know someone who is a Mormon and was denied employment
teaching at a preschool. They blatantly told her that it was because she was on
a cult list. She did not pursue this with a lawyer. I used to do a little
investigative work for HUD. We would go to different housing (Apts, condos,
etc.) after a black couple was denied housing due to 'no openings' and check out
whether or not this was legitimate. Most of the time, sadly, I was offered
housing after the black person/couple was denied. I know your point that this is
not supposed to happen is correct, but our systems do fail from time to time. Of
course you do not have to give out the information that you are the member of a
cult in your office, but do you want to live a lie? That is something for a
premie to consider. The gay issue that you brought up is a whole other issue. I
could write for days on this one, but for brevity I will just agree with you
that that is one of the DUMBEST LAWS I have ever heard of!!! Speaking fo having
to live a lie... P.S. But of course, someone has a choice, in my
opinion on whether or not to join a cult. A person has no choice over their
sexuality. I believe that people are born with their sexual orientation. Some
external things influence this, perhaps, but it has been my experience that this
is not a choice. Well, my experience is also that you can't do
anything about your sexual orientation, nor should you be made to feel that you
should even want to. You can also change your religion, but that is protected
too. I live in San Francisco, a place that is amazingly tolerant, and I
sometimes forget that not everywhere is like here.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
20:59:03 (EST)
Poster: bftb
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Cult List
Message:
Hopefully someone
reading this will be able to set the record straight:a short while ago I saw a
piece on 60 minutes that was all about how the church of scientology had
effectively sued(and consequently broken financially),and once weakened actually
bought and took over control of one of the best cult information resources. This
is where I'm hoping someone reading can confirm which group it was but unless
there's another organization with a very similar sounding name I believe that it
was 'can' or'cult awareness network'. Their insidiousness knows no bounds.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
20:59:51 (EST)
Poster: Selena RE: CAN and ELLE
Email:
To: everyone
Subject: Re: Cult List
Message:
Well, I admit this isn't the most cerebral magazine, but
you have to read something when your car is getting fixed and it beats auto
machanics weekly, for me at least. Anyway ELLE had an interesting small blurb
about CAN: (I won't quote all of it): ========================== "CAN was
conceived as an unbiased resource for complaints reports and court cases on
associations accused of brainwashing and deception.......Some, however, felt
persecuted. .......... Several organizations forced its sale with lawsuits
claiming religious discrimination and use of "deprogrammers". "Tolerance" is the
new party line, though many new CAN volunteers (many are Scientologists) fail to
see the contradiction " ... etc... The gist is that the new workers refer people
directly to the cult members, perhaps collaborating with the cults in some
cases. I know this isn't really what the thread is about, but I did want to
mention it, since CAN was brought up. I am wary of them now, specifically
because of the Scientology connection. In my opinion, they make M look like a
teddy bear. If I am warong and someone knows more please let me know. RE: a cult
list, well, I am sure that a potential employer who is computer savy and who
doesn't want to hire someone can find many reasons online. Ever get help for
emotional problems? depression, etc.? Drug or alcohol dependency? It's all there
and they can purchase it. It sucks but that's the down side of our new
technology, the same one that lets us speak freely and support each other. I
guess there is always some duality.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
21:35:13 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Cult List
Message:
Anyone
correct me if I am wrong, or let me know if you have already written a thread on
this. There used to be a cult list in this country. I understand that EV is on
this list. (Along with the Mormon church and other religious denominations). The
point that I would like to make is that if you are a member of a cult on the
list, you can be excluded from obtaining employment in various fields (the
teaching field and government are two examples). I don't know how an employer
would find out this information. (You may have to supply it to them) This might
be something for people who are questioning whether or not to receive knowledge
to take under advisement. Does EV keep records of who is initiated? I assume
different people/groups have lists of 'cults' that vary from group to group.
Frankly, I think it can be a pretty subjective thing, although CAN (Cult
Awareness Network) for one, tries to strictly apply criterea for each group as
to whether it is a cult or not. As to being denied employment because you are a
member of a cult, that's illegal, because it is essentially religious
discrimination, which is illegal in all 50 states. You are entitled to believe
whatever stupid religious thing you want, and no one can deny you employment, or
housing, or public accommodations, on the basis of what you believe. Now, on the
other hand, in all but 11 states, you can be fired from your job because you
happen to be gay, and there isn't a damn thing you can do about it. It's
completely legal. Not exactly fair, now is it? JW- Just because something is
illegal doesn't mean that it doesn't happen. I know someone who is a Mormon and
was denied employment teaching at a preschool. They blatantly told her that it
was because she was on a cult list. She did not pursue this with a lawyer. I
used to do a little investigative work for HUD. We would go to different housing
(Apts, condos, etc.) after a black couple was denied housing due to 'no
openings' and check out whether or not this was legitimate. Most of the time,
sadly, I was offered housing after the black person/couple was denied. I know
your point that this is not supposed to happen is correct, but our systems do
fail from time to time. Of course you do not have to give out the information
that you are the member of a cult in your office, but do you want to live a lie?
That is something for a premie to consider. The gay issue that you brought up is
a whole other issue. I could write for days on this one, but for brevity I will
just agree with you that that is one of the DUMBEST LAWS I have ever heard of!!!
Speaking fo having to live a lie... Oh, absolutely right VP. Those laws are
still violated, that's why there are the laws in the first place. I would
suggest that if your friend who was denied the teaching job because of her
religion hired a lawyer and sued the school, she (and the lawyer) could make
LOTS of money, and definitely discourage the school from ever trying that again.
But if the preschool was a religious school, they might be exempt from the law,
but I think the exemption is pretty narrow. It was a private
religious school and could be exempt from the law. I agree that she should have
investigated whether or not something could have been done. I personally think
that a lot of religions have their own cult aspects going on within. Secrets,
etc. For one organized religion to name another a cult seems wrong to me. You
are right, a list is a purely subjective thing. I forgot to agree with you on
that earlier.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
21:48:46 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: Selena RE:
CAN and ELLE
Subject: EV list and Scientology (Re: Cult List)
Message:
Well, I admit this isn't the most cerebral
magazine, but you have to read something when your car is getting fixed and it
beats auto machanics weekly, for me at least. Anyway ELLE had an interesting
small blurb about CAN: (I won't quote all of it): ==========================
'CAN was conceived as an unbiased resource for complaints reports and court
cases on associations accused of brainwashing and deception.......Some, however,
felt persecuted. .......... Several organizations forced its sale with lawsuits
claiming religious discrimination and use of 'deprogrammers'. 'Tolerance' is the
new party line, though many new CAN volunteers (many are Scientologists) fail to
see the contradiction ' ... etc... The gist is that the new workers refer people
directly to the cult members, perhaps collaborating with the cults in some
cases. I know this isn't really what the thread is about, but I did want to
mention it, since CAN was brought up. I am wary of them now, specifically
because of the Scientology connection. In my opinion, they make M look like a
teddy bear. If I am warong and someone knows more please let me know. RE: a cult
list, well, I am sure that a potential employer who is computer savy and who
doesn't want to hire someone can find many reasons online. Ever get help for
emotional problems? depression, etc.? Drug or alcohol dependency? It's all there
and they can purchase it. It sucks but that's the down side of our new
technology, the same one that lets us speak freely and support each other. I
guess there is always some duality. I don't know a lot about
Scientology. I also would be interested in some more specifc info on them if
anyone knows about it. Are they the folks who teach self improvement and you
attain various levels of self awaremess through watching videos? I think I saw
an expose on 20/20 or one of those shows where the celebrity scientologists had
these plush places to practice their religion and the average Joe on the street
had to go to these dives... Again, does anyone here know if EV keeps records of
those whom they initiate? Did DLM do this? Thanks! VP
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:17:04 (EST)
Poster: Steve A
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: EV list and Scientology (Re: Cult List)
Message:
Dear VP I know when I was initiated, they added my name
to the list of Divinely awakened, mind vacuumed, foot kissing, Arti singing,
Maharaji grovelling and well and truly hooked line and sinker community. P.S.
Good to here from you again VP.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:19:14 (EST)
Poster: Steve A
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: EV list and Scientology (Re: Cult List)
Message:
Oops, sorry for the bad spelling that should read Good to
HEAR from you again VP.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:31:16 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: Steve A
Subject: Re: EV list and Scientology (Re: Cult List)
Message:
Oops, sorry for the bad spelling that should
read Good to HEAR from you again VP. Dear Steve A., Thanks and it's
good to hear from you, too--" Goodaye to you, too mate!" (Just my little Aussie
imitation accent for you) Don't worry, I always think that all spelling errors
are typos. Mine are (ha ha). Wow! That was quite a post. I think it's
interesting. Why would they need to keep a list of people's names? Do they send
people literature? Donation forms? Magazines? Do they sell the names to baragon
vendors? No, seriously though I'm curious. How about it CD? JW?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:49:51 (EST)
Poster: Jw
Email:
To: bftb
Subject: Re: Cult List
Message:
Hopefully
someone reading this will be able to set the record straight:a short while ago I
saw a piece on 60 minutes that was all about how the church of scientology had
effectively sued(and consequently broken financially),and once weakened actually
bought and took over control of one of the best cult information resources. This
is where I'm hoping someone reading can confirm which group it was but unless
there's another organization with a very similar sounding name I believe that it
was 'can' or'cult awareness network'. Their insidiousness knows no bounds.
As a matter of fact, Scientology went after CAN, the Cult Awareness
Network, through SLAP lawsuits, actually put them into bankruptcy. The 60
Minutes program interviewed former Scientology lawyers who admitted that it was
Scientology's goal to destroy CAN. They also interviewed the leaders of
Scientology who had all the charisma of Dracula and all the annimation of a
sawhorse. Very scary, really.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 05:55:36
(EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: EV list and Scientology (Re: Cult List)
Message:
>Again, does anyone here know if EV keeps records
>of those whom they initiate? Did DLM do this? >Thanks! VP The answer is
no, as far as I know. At least not officially inside the organization. Some
local EV might, who knows? BUT Lists are made here and there when k sessions
occur, in order to call and invite aspirants etc Lists of aspirants are made
here and there also to invite them to aspirants meetings, etc EV has mailing
lists as you know, you’ve very likely been on these. EV has a database of people
who pre-register to big events with m (with their credit card #) EV has lists of
people who regularily donate to the Swiss foundation. Etc etc, EV has plenty of
lists. Who knows what’s done with those: statistics, that’s for sure. M is a
statistics maniac, that’s also for sure.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:35:25
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Re: EV list and Scientology (Re: Cult List)
Message:
DLM did keep phone list of all premies and aspirants and
donators in the local communities in the 70's and early 80's that were updated
monthly and always available to anyone. But that's pre-PC days, and no computer
data bases were kept locally. Who knows what happened with all those lists?
Probably many premies/ex-premies kept some of this stuff in their attic. I burnt
almost everything - especially anything with satsang.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 17:31:41
(EST)
Poster: JW: Gay Rights/
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: Gay Rights (Re: Cult List)
Message:
I'm
sure you may have heard that the nice people of the state of Maine, just
REPEALLED their gay rights'ordinance, so it's now in all but only 10 states that
you can be legally fired from your job just because you happen to be gay (or
denied housing or be served in a restaurant or store, etc.) One step forward,
two steps back. I understand that the repeal initiative was instigated and
financed by those wonderful, caring, unbigoted people at the "christian"
Coalition.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 18:11:52
(EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: JW: Gay Rights/
Subject: Re: Gay Rights (Re: Cult List)
Message:
I'm sure you may have heard that the nice
people of the state of Maine, just REPEALLED their gay rights'ordinance, so it's
now in all but only 10 states that you can be legally fired from your job just
because you happen to be gay (or denied housing or be served in a restaurant or
store, etc.) One step forward, two steps back. I understand that the repeal
initiative was instigated and financed by those wonderful, caring, unbigoted
people at the 'christian' Coalition. I didn't hear that yet and I'm
very sorry about it. I'm sure that Jesus would be very proud of his "loving"
followers. (Heavy sarcasm here).
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 19:01:26
(EST)
Poster: cult list
Email: VP
To: JW
Subject: My personal (Re: Cult List)
Message:
I'm sure you may have heard that the nice
people of the state of Maine, just REPEALLED their gay rights'ordinance, so it's
now in all but only 10 states that you can be legally fired from your job just
because you happen to be gay (or denied housing or be served in a restaurant or
store, etc.) One step forward, two steps back. I understand that the repeal
initiative was instigated and financed by those wonderful, caring, unbigoted
people at the 'christian' Coalition. I didn't hear that yet and I'm very sorry
about it. I'm sure that Jesus would be very proud of his 'loving' followers.
(Heavy sarcasm here). This is kind of off subject, but the Christian
Coalition is on my personal cult list...
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
16:53:19 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To:
Everyone
Subject: Good Charisma
Message:
Hi: I've been
thinking about starting this thread concerning "good charisma." I intended to
post something along those lines on David Lane's website: The Neural Surfer.
However, I have been completing my Ph.D. and never got around to it. Getting
some direct feedback from people who I know have wrestled with this issue would
be helpful for me, and might be useful for others. The basic idea is that we
have to deal with charismatic leaders, and some of them do more than a little
good. So, what are some examples of "good charisma" and what differentiates them
from the bad guys? If no one is interested in pursuing this just let me know and
I'll shut up. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
18:12:01 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Scott T.
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Hi: I've
been thinking about starting this thread concerning 'good charisma.' I intended
to post something along those lines on David Lane's website: The Neural Surfer.
However, I have been completing my Ph.D. and never got around to it. Getting
some direct feedback from people who I know have wrestled with this issue would
be helpful for me, and might be useful for others. The basic idea is that we
have to deal with charismatic leaders, and some of them do more than a little
good. So, what are some examples of 'good charisma' and what differentiates them
from the bad guys? If no one is interested in pursuing this just let me know and
I'll shut up. -Scott Examples of "good charisma" or people who used
their charisma for good. Mother Theresa Mahatma Ghandi Martin Luther King
Princess Diana(?) -- especially in he later years Ralph Nader (in my opinion)
Paul Robson
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
19:03:33 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Hi: I've
been thinking about starting this thread concerning 'good charisma.' I intended
to post something along those lines on David Lane's website: The Neural Surfer.
However, I have been completing my Ph.D. and never got around to it. Getting
some direct feedback from people who I know have wrestled with this issue would
be helpful for me, and might be useful for others. The basic idea is that we
have to deal with charismatic leaders, and some of them do more than a little
good. So, what are some examples of 'good charisma' and what differentiates them
from the bad guys? If no one is interested in pursuing this just let me know and
I'll shut up. -Scott Examples of 'good charisma' or people who used their
charisma for good. Mother Theresa Mahatma Ghandi Martin Luther King Princess
Diana(?) -- especially in he later years Ralph Nader (in my opinion) Paul Robson
JW Thanks for the list. Wouldn't argue with any of those, except
that the public's reaction to Diana's death was pretty scary. I was one of those
who thought it deserved a 15 minute coverage. I'd like to add a few names to
your list, which I think may be to "unproblematic." The following people are not
any better or worse than those folks, but they give a clearer example of what
differentiates "good" from "bad." After all, we can't really decide based
entirely on "good works." Well anyway, my list, from secular to religious, is:
George Washington Nelson Mandela R. Buckminster Fuller J. Krishnamurti Jesus
Christ I probably know more about Washington and Fuller than the others. People
don't have much of an idea how much power Washington had after the Revolution.
He was literally the symbol of the new country, which really didn't have much
legitimacy apart from him. A new country with an untried system of government,
very little military or economic power, a group of states that were in a
constant fight with one another... etc. What Washington did was to step down. It
doesn't sound like much, but it was every thing. In relinquishing power,
peacefully, to his ideological opponents he established the precedent for the
peaceful transition of power. He also allowed his own personal charisma to be
transferred and institutionalized in the government and constitution of the new
country. In a real sense Washington lives on in the US Constitution, because it
would not now enjoy the reverence and respect we hold for it had he chosen to
retain his power. Look an all the failed attempts to copy the US Constitution.
Well, that's my two cents for the moment. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
19:34:14 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Scott T.
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Hi: I've been thinking about starting
this thread concerning 'good charisma.' I intended to post something along those
lines on David Lane's website: The Neural Surfer. However, I have been
completing my Ph.D. and never got around to it. Getting some direct feedback
from people who I know have wrestled with this issue would be helpful for me,
and might be useful for others. The basic idea is that we have to deal with
charismatic leaders, and some of them do more than a little good. So, what are
some examples of 'good charisma' and what differentiates them from the bad guys?
If no one is interested in pursuing this just let me know and I'll shut up.
-Scott Examples of 'good charisma' or people who used their charisma for good.
Mother Theresa Mahatma Ghandi Martin Luther King Princess Diana(?) -- especially
in he later years Ralph Nader (in my opinion) Paul Robson JW Thanks
for the list. Wouldn't argue with any of those, except that the public's
reaction to Diana's death was pretty scary. I was one of those who thought it
deserved a 15 minute coverage. I'd like to add a few names to your list, which I
think may be to 'unproblematic.' The following people are not any better or
worse than those folks, but they give a clearer example of what differentiates
'good' from 'bad.' After all, we can't really decide based entirely on 'good
works.' Well anyway, my list, from secular to religious, is: George Washington
Nelson Mandela R. Buckminster Fuller J. Krishnamurti Jesus Christ I probably
know more about Washington and Fuller than the others. People don't have much of
an idea how much power Washington had after the Revolution. He was literally the
symbol of the new country, which really didn't have much legitimacy apart from
him. A new country with an untried system of government, very little military or
economic power, a group of states that were in a constant fight with one
another... etc. What Washington did was to step down. It doesn't sound like
much, but it was every thing. In relinquishing power, peacefully, to his
ideological opponents he established the precedent for the peaceful transition
of power. He also allowed his own personal charisma to be transferred and
institutionalized in the government and constitution of the new country. In a
real sense Washington lives on in the US Constitution, because it would not now
enjoy the reverence and respect we hold for it had he chosen to retain his
power. Look an all the failed attempts to copy the US Constitution. Well, that's
my two cents for the moment. -Scott I agree with your list too,
except I have a hard time getting past the idea that Washington owned slaves. I
actually always admired Jefferson more, but then he owned slaves, too. I also
agree the Diana funeral was a "media riot," but god, that woman always was
absolutely georgeous. She always looked like a million bucks and she seemed to
be using her charisma for good causes, like AIDS research and the elimination of
land mines. Here are a few more of mine. Obviously, they give you my political
leanings. Noam Chomsky Archbishop Romero The people of East Timor Earl Warren
William Brennan (the Supreme Court Justice, not the actor) Medgar Evers
Frederick Douglas The King of Denmark during WWII who put on the yellow star The
entire population of that town El Chambon in France That guy with the shopping
bags standing in front of the tank Beijing Anan Su Chee in Burma Bobby Sands
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
19:57:02 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Hi: I've
been thinking about starting this thread concerning 'good charisma.' I intended
to post something along those lines on David Lane's website: The Neural Surfer.
However, I have been completing my Ph.D. and never got around to it. Getting
some direct feedback from people who I know have wrestled with this issue would
be helpful for me, and might be useful for others. The basic idea is that we
have to deal with charismatic leaders, and some of them do more than a little
good. So, what are some examples of 'good charisma' and what differentiates them
from the bad guys? If no one is interested in pursuing this just let me know and
I'll shut up. -Scott Examples of 'good charisma' or people who used their
charisma for good. Mother Theresa Mahatma Ghandi Martin Luther King Princess
Diana(?) -- especially in he later years Ralph Nader (in my opinion) Paul Robson
JW Thanks for the list. Wouldn't argue with any of those, except that the
public's reaction to Diana's death was pretty scary. I was one of those who
thought it deserved a 15 minute coverage. I'd like to add a few names to your
list, which I think may be to 'unproblematic.' The following people are not any
better or worse than those folks, but they give a clearer example of what
differentiates 'good' from 'bad.' After all, we can't really decide based
entirely on 'good works.' Well anyway, my list, from secular to religious, is:
George Washington Nelson Mandela R. Buckminster Fuller J. Krishnamurti Jesus
Christ I probably know more about Washington and Fuller than the others. People
don't have much of an idea how much power Washington had after the Revolution.
He was literally the symbol of the new country, which really didn't have much
legitimacy apart from him. A new country with an untried system of government,
very little military or economic power, a group of states that were in a
constant fight with one another... etc. What Washington did was to step down. It
doesn't sound like much, but it was every thing. In relinquishing power,
peacefully, to his ideological opponents he established the precedent for the
peaceful transition of power. He also allowed his own personal charisma to be
transferred and institutionalized in the government and constitution of the new
country. In a real sense Washington lives on in the US Constitution, because it
would not now enjoy the reverence and respect we hold for it had he chosen to
retain his power. Look an all the failed attempts to copy the US Constitution.
Well, that's my two cents for the moment. -Scott I agree with your list too,
except I have a hard time getting past the idea that Washington owned slaves. I
actually always admired Jefferson more, but then he owned slaves, too. I also
agree the Diana funeral was a 'media riot,' but god, that woman always was
absolutely georgeous. She always looked like a million bucks and she seemed to
be using her charisma for good causes, like AIDS research and the elimination of
land mines. Here are a few more of mine. Obviously, they give you my political
leanings. Noam Chomsky Archbishop Romero The people of East Timor Earl Warren
William Brennan (the Supreme Court Justice, not the actor) Medgar Evers
Frederick Douglas The King of Denmark during WWII who put on the yellow star The
entire population of that town El Chambon in France That guy with the shopping
bags standing in front of the tank Beijing Anan Su Chee in Burma Bobby Sands
JW: Well, this is beginning to sound like "famous people who've done
good works," which presents some difficulties in recognizing "good" from "bad."
However, I have to say that Maharaji fails even this rather mild test, for I
don't recall his having done anything that could remotely be referred to as
"noble." I mean, he hasn't done anything that I would refer to as evil either
(except for the general lies and economic exploitation). Noam Chomsky is an
interesting choice. I admire his work a great deal. It seems to me to play a big
part in solving the great human puzzle (which MJ claims no have solved w/o
effort). Bobby Sands fits the same set of criteria I had for Washington, in the
sense that he was willing to put himself out of the way for the sake of the
larger cause. Just to play Devil's Advocate for a second though... why would not
David Koresh and Jim Jones also fit that pattern? -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
20:12:03 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Good Charisma, Addendum (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
JW: I just wanted to add that the guy with the shopping
bags in front of the tank at Tienannmen [sp?] was the most extraordinary thing
I've ever seen. Clearly this person was not famous, though I think his name is
known. In fact, I'd have to say that what happened there passes my
understanding. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
20:40:17 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Scott T.
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
David Koresh and
Jim Jones, in my opinion, trashed their own lives out of megalomania and
paranoia, not out of a desire to better the conditions of people or for a noble
cause. Plus, their deaths obviously benefited no one. I grew up with a father
you really believed in service to others as an obligation of a human being. One
of the difficult things about Maharaji for me, is how he denigrated getting
involved to benefit others. He just said to focus on HIM and your own
experience, period. Accordingly, I found he and premies to be incredibly
self-absorbed and without any feeling of obligation to make the world a better
place. That's why, I think, if you go to a program, you see a big emphasis on
all the stuff M is into. Like really nice designer clothes that all the premies
wear.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
21:07:24 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To:
Anyone and everyone
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
I've been thinking about this charisma stuff for quite
awhile, so wonder if you'd bear with me through three rather mind-bending
paragraphs. The sociologist Max Weber, who wrote The Protestant Ethic and
the Spirit of Capitalism, linked charisma to magic and to the capacity
to perform "extraordinary acts" that transcend the rules of the conventional
order. Charisma was also the first in his progression of sources of
legitimation: charismatic, traditional, and legal-rational. In the last chapter
of The Protestant Ethic... Weber talked about the consequences of
this progression, resulting in an "iron cage" that compels people to live lives
of quite desperation, and to the degradation of the noble aspirations of the
Puritan Ethic to become what he called derisively "sport." What is implied in
Weber's writings, but which he was never able to make explicit because he died
prematurely in the Influenza Pandemic of 1918, was that he saw charisma
as a possible way out of the iron cage. This leads to the concept of a
legitimation cycle, where charisma is a way to break out of the confines of the
legal-rational and start the process again (George Washington, and the Founders,
etc.) The other thing Weber failed to see, but which is implied in JW's list, is
the notion of a "charismatic society" or group. The Muslim name for a society
centered around virtue, rather than rationality, is the Umma. It is
extremely important to be able to tell good from bad charisma because when you
are under it's influence your ability to apply rational tests in very very weak.
However, I think it is possible to get some kind of handle on this, by comparing
JW's list with some of the religious leaders and groups we know about...
Maharaji is not even a close call, but his group of followers almost qualify as
an Umma if you discount the fact that they are so enthralled. I don't
know about things recently, but I've always considered premies to be one of the
most attractive groups I've seen, and that applies to ex-premies as wall.
Actually, this opinion is really in retrospect, and in comparison to a lot of
groups I've encountered, both religious and secular. I did not think they were
really so hot whon I was an active premie. I think this all has to do with a
balance between individualism and empathy, or something. Well, anyway... what do
you think? -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:26:58 (EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: Scott T.
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Dear Scott - I won't comment on the philosophical
material you brought up (for now anyway). I think Weber's ideas (I'd heard of
him but never knew anything about what he wrote) about charisma as "a way out of
the iron cage" are fascinating though. I did want to comment on premies as an
"Umma" (society centered around virtue rather than rationality). Something
Selena said in one of the threads on the very bottom really struck me. I have
kept meaning to bring it up to the top, but your description of premies as an
attractive group of people (which I totally agreed with back in the 1970's, and
which is one of the reasons I became a premie and stuck with it for five years)
was a good reason to. Here's Selena's quote: "Maybe it's because I hang around
so long. What I see happening more and more is the sense of community is gone or
going away. The premies I know seem to have come to some rationalizations that
sort of make it all focused on M and they seem to care less and less about each
other. When the Long Beach event let out one night it was raining hard, and I
got shoved getting into the bus, the premies were as rude trying to get on the
bus first as any subway commute. It's hard to explain but an oversimplified
explanation is that they blame premies lack of understanding or clarity when
things go wrong, or they blame 'the world', but then they give M all the credit
for the good times or experiences. For example, the hotel room wasn't ready on
time, that's the world for you, the hotel management is stupid, etc.. but, let's
say you ended up getting an upgraded room for the same price, well, that's M's
grace. [Note from Katie: in the "olden days" if the hotel room wasn't ready, we
would have said that THAT was M's grace, too!] This depersonalization has
happened more and more, the events seem to be a lot less friendly, people will
say things like 'I am only here for M and the experience, not for the premies,
etc..' Am I making sense? Brian said it well when he said that a hall of people
facing a stage is very different than a small group gathered in a circle sharing
an experience." I was really surprised to read this posting. In my opinion, and
I think Brian may have been trying to say this too, premies act differently now
because they're not allowed to have satsang (and talk about their personal
experiences) anymore. I wonder if you can even get to know the people in your
community the way you can when there was nightly satsang? Actually, I wonder if
there is such a thing as the "premie community" anymore. With videos, all you
really get to know is Maharaji, and you only get to "know" some image of him
that the people who edit the videos want you to see.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:43:38 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
Dear
Katie, Think about how M made everyone stop having Satsung and closed the
ashrams and how the focus just went to him. It all makes sense. If you have too
much contact with others you will be exposed to other points of view, other
thoughts, maybe even some doubts. If it is all so personal and one on one then
he has total control over your experience with EV. There is no community- just
you and your video God. Wow, who said M doesn't like technology? He IS
technology. Don't you think this is the perfect religion for the 90's? You can
drive up and get your food and money from machines. Machines talk to you on the
phone. We talk across oceans with machines and now we can get devotion to the
guru and to "God" this way, too. Haleluiah!
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:57:49 (EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: VP
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
Hi VP - I still think it's strange. I think it would be
to Maharaji's advantage to have the premies know, like, and care about each
other. I know it might still be like that in some places (for example Mili
talked about the people in his community in Croatia like that - even though they
watch videos instead of having Satsang). But I suppose that you're right - that
premies expressing their own experiences in Satsang didn't parrot Maharaji's
official party line exactly and that's why he stopped it. By the way, I forgot
to comment on one more thing in my post above. I think Selena and Joy and maybe
JW have posted about people wearing expensive designer clothing to go to
programs. This surprised me very much too. For one thing, a lot of the premies
that I knew when I was a premie couldn't have afforded clothes like that, and
for another thing the programs were outside, or in places where you were sitting
on the concrete floor, etc. NOT a good place to wear expensive clothes.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
23:19:28 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To:
Katie
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Dear Scott - I won't comment on the
philosophical material you brought up (for now anyway). I think Weber's ideas
(I'd heard of him but never knew anything about what he wrote) about charisma as
'a way out of the iron cage' are fascinating though. I did want to comment on
premies as an 'Umma' (society centered around virtue rather than rationality).
Something Selena said in one of the threads on the very bottom really struck me.
I have kept meaning to bring it up to the top, but your description of premies
as an attractive group of people (which I totally agreed with back in the
1970's, and which is one of the reasons I became a premie and stuck with it for
five years) was a good reason to. Here's Selena's quote: 'Maybe it's because I
hang around so long. What I see happening more and more is the sense of
community is gone or going away. The premies I know seem to have come to some
rationalizations that sort of make it all focused on M and they seem to care
less and less about each other. When the Long Beach event let out one night it
was raining hard, and I got shoved getting into the bus, the premies were as
rude trying to get on the bus first as any subway commute. It's hard to explain
but an oversimplified explanation is that they blame premies lack of
understanding or clarity when things go wrong, or they blame 'the world', but
then they give M all the credit for the good times or experiences. For example,
the hotel room wasn't ready on time, that's the world for you, the hotel
management is stupid, etc.. but, let's say you ended up getting an upgraded room
for the same price, well, that's M's grace. [Note from Katie: in the 'olden
days' if the hotel room wasn't ready, we would have said that THAT was M's
grace, too!] This depersonalization has happened more and more, the events seem
to be a lot less friendly, people will say things like 'I am only here for M and
the experience, not for the premies, etc..' Am I making sense? Brian said it
well when he said that a hall of people facing a stage is very different than a
small group gathered in a circle sharing an experience.' I was really surprised
to read this posting. In my opinion, and I think Brian may have been trying to
say this too, premies act differently now because they're not allowed to have
satsang (and talk about their personal experiences) anymore. I wonder if you can
even get to know the people in your community the way you can when there was
nightly satsang? Actually, I wonder if there is such a thing as the 'premie
community' anymore. With videos, all you really get to know is Maharaji, and you
only get to 'know' some image of him that the people who edit the videos want
you to see. Katie, et al. That is quite interesting. Weber refered
to the process leading to the iron cage as "rationalization," by which he meant
that it was related to a systemitazation of profit taking and acquisition.
That's not quite what Selena means by the term, but it fits anyway. The "mature"
group is almost completely rationalized, from the leader's perspective anyway. I
also should say that I notice a lot of the attractive traits I used to see in
premies in a minority of the larger society. Thanks for briniging me up to date.
One more thing crosses my mind. There's a guy name Colin Campbell who wrote a
take-off on Weber called The Hedonist Ethic and the Spirit of Modern
Consumerism, or something like that. It's not quite a classic, but he has some
good ideas about haw hedonism evolves into a search for virtue. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
23:29:34 (EST)
Poster: CD
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
> people wearing expensive designer clothing to go to
programs. There is still quite a variety of people to be found at the programs.
Some rich and some poor. Some plain and some dressed for a fashion show.. Some
like to go to bed early and a few are party animals. Most seemed to get along
pretty well at Long Beach. When I was at Rome in July 96 I met some characters
who had driven a van from England and were camping out in party land. CD
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 00:29:42
(EST)
Poster: Joy
Email:
To: Scott T.
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Joe and Scott,
please add The Dalai Lama to your lists.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 09:14:40
(EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email: [email protected]
To: JW
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
David Koresh and Jim Jones, in my opinion,
trashed their own lives out of megalomania and paranoia, not out of a desire to
better the conditions of people or for a noble cause. Plus, their deaths
obviously benefited no one. I grew up with a father you really believed in
service to others as an obligation of a human being. One of the difficult things
about Maharaji for me, is how he denigrated getting involved to benefit others.
He just said to focus on HIM and your own experience, period. Accordingly, I
found he and premies to be incredibly self-absorbed and without any feeling of
obligation to make the world a better place. That's why, I think, if you go to a
program, you see a big emphasis on all the stuff M is into. Like really nice
designer clothes that all the premies wear. JW: I agree that Koresh,
Jones, and GMJ were very self-absorbed phenomena. There was a cute episode of
the Simpsons (not OJ) about Homer being the "Chosen One." After lording it over
everyone for awhile his daughter convinces him to use his power to "help
others." At that point his followers all leave. There's a symbiosis between
leader and follower that locks both into a pattern of behavior. That's why I
think that one of the "clues" to "good charisma" is the willingness to step
down, to grant your followers the sovereignty of "exit." I'm still waiting to
see how Mandela and Yeltsin handle this. Reportedly, both see George Washington
as a role model. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:44:39
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Bobby Sands?
Interesting. I was at his gravesite in Belfast not that long ago. I saw Ronald
Regan on his last speech campainging for President in 1984 (I was right up there
in front of him wearing my funny hat). Regan had lots and lots of charisma
(that's about it in my opinion). He brought all his Hollywood friends like Frank
Sinatra, Charton Heston and Wayne Newton (now that guy has no talent but lots of
charisma to pull off a show getting women to fall all over him). Most
celebrities in Hollywood that make it big don't necessarily have great talent,
but rather great charisma on film.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:52:44
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: Less Sex After Satsang (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
I would presume that because premies don't get to know
each other, there's a lot less sex after an evening of satsang. Don't laugh,
now. We all know how seductive satsang could be: listening to all your sisters
(or brothers) speak to you, all blissed out, smiling, feeling all that love
(real or illusion - who cares) winking at you, etc.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:58:51
(EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: CD
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
> people wearing expensive designer clothing
to go to programs. There is still quite a variety of people to be found at the
programs. Some rich and some poor. Some plain and some dressed for a fashion
show.. Some like to go to bed early and a few are party animals. Most seemed to
get along pretty well at Long Beach. When I was at Rome in July 96 I met some
characters who had driven a van from England and were camping out in party land.
CD Dear CD - That's a relief, although it's weird to hear about
ANYONE wearing expensive designer clothes to go to a program. It's just so
different from the way it used to be. By the way, CD, I know that you are a nice
guy. For example, I know that you like other premies and even ex-premies as well
as Maharaji. And you probably wouldn't shove people aside if you were getting on
to a bus in the rain after a program!
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:39:27
(EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: John Cavad
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
Bobby
Sands? Interesting. I was at his gravesite in Belfast not that long ago. I saw
Ronald Regan on his last speech campainging for President in 1984 (I was right
up there in front of him wearing my funny hat). Regan had lots and lots of
charisma (that's about it in my opinion). He brought all his Hollywood friends
like Frank Sinatra, Charton Heston and Wayne Newton (now that guy has no talent
but lots of charisma to pull off a show getting women to fall all over him).
Most celebrities in Hollywood that make it big don't necessarily have great
talent, but rather great charisma on film. Whether Ronald Reagan had
"charisma" is definitely a matter of opinion. I personally couldn't stand to
hear him speak because it was so obvious he was just mouthing the words someone
else wrote. The fact that the American people fell for that, as well as his
voodoo economics that quadrupled the national debt, has always been profoundly
disturbing to me.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:49:16
(EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Scott T.
Subject: Re: Good Charisma
Message:
I agree that
premies were an "attractive group" when I got involved. But what is "attractive"
to a person depends on what that person is looking for. I was attracted to
premies because they appeared simple, open, and they seemed to accept me were I
was at without judgment. And, it didn't hurt that they seemed to espouse those
"hippie values" so prevelent at the time, and so attractive to me. But what I
found was that once in the cult, premies were extremely intolerant of any
diversion from the cult norms, especially the ashram premies, the initiators and
PAM. There always were premies on the fringe who were more open and accepting,
but they often felt, and probably were, marginalized and judged as being "spacy
premies" who were lacking in the devotion department. I also found that as time
went on, by the late 70s and early 80s, premies as a group, became more and more
miserable, stagnated, and competitive with each other over climbing the ladder
of the cult hierarachy, in an attempt to either get power, or to get access to
or attention from Maharaji. So, premies became less and less attractive, at the
same time Maharaji got more and more heavy and nutty, and propogation almost
died out, because M and the group was "less attractive" to most people by that
time. JW
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 13:10:55
(EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
> people wearing expensive
designer clothing to go to programs. There is still quite a variety of people to
be found at the programs. Some rich and some poor. Some plain and some dressed
for a fashion show.. Some like to go to bed early and a few are party animals.
Most seemed to get along pretty well at Long Beach. When I was at Rome in July
96 I met some characters who had driven a van from England and were camping out
in party land. CD Dear CD - That's a relief, although it's weird to
hear about ANYONE wearing expensive designer clothes to go to a program. It's
just so different from the way it used to be. By the way, CD, I know that you
are a nice guy. For example, I know that you like other premies and even
ex-premies as well as Maharaji. And you probably wouldn't shove people aside if
you were getting on to a bus in the rain after a program! I agree
Katie. Probably by the time you left, the "hippie style" was still in full
swing. However, even by the late 70s and early 80s that had changed. The
designer clothes deal really began for premies, especially at programs. Some of
the initiators were really into it, wearing really expensive clothes (that they
got some community or other to buy for them) and the premies kind of imitated
that. Not everyone of course, but the DLM-types definitely got into it. The guys
used to wear suits to programs (3-piece suits, which were the style then),
especially on the day M gave darshan. Also, there was a strong dictate from M
and PAM that premies should be more "relatable" to the public for propogation
purposes. Unfortunately, that was translated into meaning that one should look
like a young republican and that didn't work too well for the very group that
was most open to getting involved with M in the first place, which were the
younger, "counter-culture" types.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 14:00:55
(EST)
Poster: Katie
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
JW
- As I recall, we were definitely NOT supposed to look like hippies in the early
to mid seventies, although some premies still did. If you were really devoted,
though, you cut your hair (guys) and wore long skirts (girls) and tried to look
"straight" and "sharp" (ha ha). The problem is that many of us were trying to
look like straight people with absolutely no idea how to do it. Also, Maharaji
(or someone) wanted the women to wear long skirts and it is really hard to look
straight when you are wearing a long skirt. (Some of the women used to try and
look professional by wearing a blazer and a long skirt but it just didn't make
it.) And I am sure you remember the horrible looking suits and sport coats that
the guys used to wear back then - if they didn't have any money (which most of
us did not) they'd wear used polyester suits from Divine Sales. I recently
looked at some pictures from a friends premie wedding in 1974 and the clothes
are a riot. It seems kind of funny and endearing now, but I remember that we
took the whole dress code thing really seriously back then.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 18:30:30
(EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
Hi VP - I still think it's strange. I think it
would be to Maharaji's advantage to have the premies know, like, and care about
each other. I know it might still be like that in some places (for example Mili
talked about the people in his community in Croatia like that - even though they
watch videos instead of having Satsang). But I suppose that you're right - that
premies expressing their own experiences in Satsang didn't parrot Maharaji's
official party line exactly and that's why he stopped it. By the way, I forgot
to comment on one more thing in my post above. I think Selena and Joy and maybe
JW have posted about people wearing expensive designer clothing to go to
programs. This surprised me very much too. For one thing, a lot of the premies
that I knew when I was a premie couldn't have afforded clothes like that, and
for another thing the programs were outside, or in places where you were sitting
on the concrete floor, etc. NOT a good place to wear expensive clothes.
Katie, I agree that it would be to M's advantage to have a close
premie community where the love is flowing! ( I was just feeling a bit sarcastic
yesterday) I think a lot of things would be to his advantage: 1) a web site 2) a
listing in the phone book 3) interviews and/or adverstising I'll bet you that if
he had these things,(and especially great sex after Satsang!) I would be a real
live initiated premie writing you hateful mail on this site (well, maybe not
hateful). I wonder why he keeps such a low profile. I'll bet it has something to
do with the research that JW (or Mr. Ex?) is undertaking. (i.e.
finances/lifestyle)
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 22:07:57
(EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: John Cavad
Subject: Re: Less Sex After Satsang (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
I would presume that because premies don't get
to know each other, there's a lot less sex after an evening of satsang. Don't
laugh, now. We all know how seductive satsang could be: listening to all your
sisters (or brothers) speak to you, all blissed out, smiling, feeling all that
love (real or illusion - who cares) winking at you, etc. John, I
needed that laugh, thanks! That one was up there with the big cheese thread.
Some friends of mine lived in a premie house and even though there was not
supposed to be any sex happening...well, suffice it to say that you should have
seen the looks that they gave one another at Satsang. There was some partner
swapping happening without a doubt.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 22:56:56
(EST)
Poster: CD
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
>I wonder why he keeps such a low profile. I'll bet it
has something to do with the research that JW (or Mr. Ex?) is undertaking. (i.e.
finances/lifestyle) You must be kidding?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:02:34
(EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: CD
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
>I wonder why he keeps such a low profile.
I'll bet it has something to do with the research that JW (or Mr. Ex?) is
undertaking. (i.e. finances/lifestyle) You must be kidding? CD-
Kidding about them doing research or kidding about M hiding out? I do not
understand why he keeps such a low profile. I keep asking this and unless I have
missed a post, no one has answered this. I am really interested and not being
sarcastic (for now).
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:28:49
(EST)
Poster: CD
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Re: Video God (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
Let
me emphasize that the dress of people at Long Beach covered a very wide
spectrum. If there was a standard it was anything-goes. A very interesting crowd
of people without being a riot. An excellent expression of diversity and unity.
I hitchhiked across the US a couple of times in the past but these days like a
plane ride and nice hotel if I can get one. CD
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
05:52:22 (EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Low profile (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
>Katie, >I agree that it would be to M's advantage
to have a close premie community where the >love is flowing! ( I was just
feeling a bit sarcastic yesterday) I think a lot of things would >be to his
advantage: M doesn’t care about your life, your relationships etc (that’s my
opinion, some premies won’t agree I’m sure). His purpose is to establish peace
in this world (remember?) ..... I’ m kidding, he’s probably become more
realistic by now, and he knows very well that very few people will ever be
interested by him and whatever his message is. Not that many people want to live
a life of devotion. Even premies will agree. Using EV and his precious devoted
premies (they are not that many BTW) and their precious resources (time, money,
technical skills, etc) to take care of a ‘premie community’ would be a waste of
those resources, every organizer in EV would agree. When it comes down to
organizing events and managing EV on a regular basis, you don’t find that many
dedicated people (willing to surrender to such a stupid organization). If those
people (or a part of them) were involved in community activities (like it used
to be in the 70s and early 80s), EV would lose it’s purpose which is to organize
m’s events (not speaking of the ‘unofficial’ activities like Amtext, NSA,
building residences, etc). + it becomes something like a club, which is very
deterrent for many of those people he’d like to be able to reach. (premies will
agree) According to places, it might become something like some new age
community or any other type of group you can imagine (Indian freaks, business
freaks, sex club, whatever), and who’s going to have control over this? Again,
this is what happened in the past, and m didn’t have much control on that type
of groups. If you think about m’s income, he desperately NEEDS to have as many
events as possible (EV and him are in huge debts). If you don’t take his income
into account, it’s the same thing : he needs EV’s events to have as many
aspirants as possible ready for receiving k, cause it’s his goal, and he’s
totally dedicated to it (premies will definitely agree). I’ll be nasty now: as
90% of the premies leave, sooner or later (premies will admit this with some
difficulties, but they will), he desperately needs more new people to keep his
business (whatever this word means for you) running. Make some simple
calculations. I’ll be more nasty: he can’t give k to enough people these days,
that’s why he’s depressed. His depressive mood obviously affects the whole
business. He needs as many events as possible (and with quality) to keep (as
long as possible) that devotion bound with the premies (they crave for this),
and they will dedicate their life (for some time, until they’re fed up with him
and EV) to have these events possible. If everything was smooth and cool, much
more premies would be involved (IMHO), and you could maybe have all these fancy
activities. BUT It’s not that cool and smooth! IF things were cool, IF m was not
so stupid (sorry but this is what I convinced of) and not so psychotic (sorry
for the offense, but I’m absolutely convinced he is), lots of things could be
different in EV (that’s just a wild theory). BUT Mr Rawat should be different,
which is of course not possible. He probably agrees with a lot of what I just
said. As he’s obviously not going to question himself (why not after all, there
is no harm to do that, believe me Prempal), nothing is ever going to change,
unless some very unexpected things happen. .................... >I wonder why
he keeps such a low profile. I'll bet it has something >to do with the
research that JW (or Mr. Ex?) is undertaking. >(i.e. finances/lifestyle) Mr
Rawat has already had lots of problems with exs. That’s very likely why he has
such a huge security day and night wherever he is, not speaking about his
paranoia. IRS and various people have already been after him. He can’t do
anything about the Internet. He might have some problems with customs or IRS
again, in the future, but he’s used to. US gov has every mean to access to a lot
of stuff, and if they want to chase him they can, they don’t need our help. He
might have some problems with his neighbors, he’s going deal with them or move,
that’s all. Publishing documents about m is nothing really harmful (for him).
Some premies or aspirants might question the whole business: that’s definitely
my purpose. I suffered of this, and I can’t help but thinking about these
thousands of new people who are going to endure this BS and waste their lives.
If they can think twice before getting involved, that’s a good thing. He can’t
do anything but drink, and have some fun with his friends. I perfectly
understand. If the Internet forces him and EV to keep a lower profile, that’s
fine.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
09:28:37 (EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Lame charlatan=Low profile (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
Now let’s try to go one step further. 1/ Let’s suppose
this is not a cult. EV is really some kind of meditation teaching organization.
With a non-profit & charity status. If Mr Rawat claims to be a meditation
teacher, he would then have to interact ‘normally’ with his students, in a
regular environment. Same thing with any media or curious people. As a teacher I
wouldn’t have any problem interacting with anybody, like you and I do everyday
in our job or day to day life. I don’t know any teacher, as famous as you can
imagine, having any problem making his point and explaining his theory in front
of anybody. Even the most dubious scientists can do that. Otherwise it’s very
questionable, and people would really question everything. Can you imagine this?
Maharaji walking freely amongst anybody and his students, without bodyguards and
realized souls around him? Unless some major change occur in Mr Rawat’s
personality and behavior, I can’t imagine this. Let’s say it’s not a cult, and
the teacher has a very strange behavior, like Mr Rawat does. What’s your
reaction? Mine would be that he is a strange guy, that he is hiding something,
whether in his teaching or in himself. I don’t know if I would be interested.
Meditation is supposed to give him some wisdom, some love, and he should be able
to reflect it in his behavior and in his organization. Otherwise there is
something wrong. What are the alternative? I don’t think there is any. 2/ Let’s
suppose this is a cult, hiding behind a so-called teaching. Everything falls in
place. I don’t have anything against people being in a cult. I can’t understand
why Mr Rawat has a problem claiming this. I would like to see him claiming that
he is The Lord of the Universe, the Word made Flesh, like he does sometimes in
private. I don’t have any problem with this. Millions of people will follow him.
Millions of people are waiting for the Messiah. He is just a chicken. He doesn’t
dare to claim what he is convinced of. Lame charlatan.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
11:52:18 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Re: Low profile (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
Mr. Ex, Thanks for a straight answer. I guess the reason
I keep harping on this secrecy/disclosure issue is because I really want other
people to think about it, too, if they haven't already. To me it is one of the
big eye openers (and I'm not talking about the third eye, either!) I agree that
people need to think twice before getting involved. I understand what you are
saying about not burning up his resources to support a premie community or
ashrams. I think what Katie and I meant was that if he allowed people to have
Satsang and some of the more "love" elements that DLV had, he might draw more
followers- get more support. Maybe we were just getting nostalgic. I am just
questioning him, pointing out the stupid way that he operates (in my opinion) so
that maybe others will question him. I am saying: If I were the prince of peace
and I had something fantastic that I was going to share with humans (who I
loved) I would get my butt out there with the message. Wouldn't you? If he is
going to bring peace to this world he'd better get the hell out of his bedroom!
But of course, you are right, he doesn't give a fig about me or you or any of
the aspirants or about any of the premies or about giving peace. His actions (or
lack of them) speak volumes. Thanks again, VP
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
18:35:00 (EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
To: VP
Subject: Re: Less Sex After Satsang (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
Hey VP, we both know it, and I'm sure we're not the only
ones. Let's face it, with all that talk about love and happiness, it was easy to
take those good feelings right down to your pants. Seriously, there was more sex
in those situations than at a college dorm. Those poor Ashram premies missed
out...well, at least most of them did. :)
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
22:38:46 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: John Cavad
Subject: Re: Less Sex After Satsang (Re: Good Charisma)
Message:
Hey VP, we both know it, and I'm sure we're not
the only ones. Let's face it, with all that talk about love and happiness, it
was easy to take those good feelings right down to your pants. Seriously, there
was more sex in those situations than at a college dorm. Those poor Ashram
premies missed out...well, at least most of them did. :) Hey, John!
I didn't even have a driver's licence, let alone any hormones...and even I knew
what was happening! Man, I should have gotten initiated, 'cause we had loads of
sex in our college dorms! Hope your getting some now and so does the GMJ
appreciation society above. More seriously, I think a good orgasm beats the hell
out of the nectar technique. I know that's not very enlightened but it's the
truth. V(oversexed)P
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
16:02:26 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
[email protected]
To: eb
Subject: Badnesh bus
Message:
eb: Who are you? It's pretty clear that you were on the
crazy bus. Do you recall Bob's brother-in-law who had a manic-depressive episode
on the way out, and we had to leave him in an assylum in Arizona? What a trip!
Would you consider contacting me via email? I've also got an ICQ number. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
16:41:35 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To:
Scott T.
Subject: Sorry. I goofed. (Re: Badnesh bus)
Message:
eb: Who are you? It's pretty clear that you
were on the crazy bus. Do you recall Bob's brother-in-law who had a
manic-depressive episode on the way out, and we had to leave him in an assylum
in Arizona? What a trip! Would you consider contacting me via email? I've also
got an ICQ number. -Scott Sorry. I didn't mean to start a new
thread. Was just attempting to contact eb. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
11:56:24 (EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
[email protected]
To: Everyone
Subject: PAM
Message:
Greetings. Is PAM an acronym for "people around maharaji"
or is it a real person, or perhaps both? Thanks.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
12:20:29 (EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: John
Cavad
Subject: Re: PAM
Message:
Greetings. Is
PAM an acronym for 'people around maharaji' or is it a real person, or perhaps
both? Thanks. maybe we could try to make the name's list of those
PAM ....
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
14:10:25 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Re: PAM
Message:
Greetings. Is PAM an acronym for
'people around maharaji' or is it a real person, or perhaps both? Thanks.
maybe we could try to make the name's list of those PAM ....
Could you? That would be helpful. I assume: Michael Dettmers, David
Smith, etc.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:40:37 (EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: John Cavad
Subject: Re: PAM
Message:
Greetings. Is PAM an acronym for 'people around
maharaji' or is it a real person, or perhaps both? Thanks. Hi John.
The ex-premies started using the word PAM on the forum after the disappearance
of the premie site (I think JW used it first). "People around Maharaji" was used
when I was in DLM twenty years ago, usually as someone to blame something on.
Anyway, PAM is an acronym, not a real person, as far as I know. Apologies to
anyone who is really named Pam (unless they're a PAM, too.) P.S. My husband
(not/never a premie) suggested we use SPAM instead of PAM.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 11:08:01
(EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Re: PAM
Message:
P.S. My husband (not/never a
premie) suggested we use SPAM instead of PAM. Is that for "Sick Premies Around
the Maniac"??? Thanks, Katie.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
10:44:41 (EST)
Poster: John K.
Email:
To:
Everyone
Subject: Question
Message:
I know this might
be considered old news, but I never got the real story because it happened
before I found this ex page. Why is it that the premies do not have their own
web page? I heard they did have one at one time, and then that they were ordered
to get rid of it? Do we know who actually ordered that it be closed down? I
assume it must have been M, but I mean did 'he' make a declaration in a program
or was it done through using the people around M to let it be known what his
wishes are? Where I work we have videos that we can watch on the web of, for
instance, our CEO speaking to us. I find it amazing that M does not make use of
this technology. When I followed him, he was always so into computers. I cannot
think of any reason other than he thinks his message cannot be communicated
across the web. Perhaps grace cannot travel across the web?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
11:15:50 (EST)
Poster: -Scott T.
Email:
To:
John K.
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
That's very
interesting isn't it? I can only surmise that he doesn't want the exposure just
yet. This is all very cagey on his part, but if I read the history and actions
of the guy correcrly he is really not the same sort of power-for-it's-own-sake
kind of person as David Koresh. Basically, it's just a very good living for MJ
and he doesn't really want to flame out. If he has things the way he wants them
then it's better to be conservative. Sort of flies in the face of the notion
that he really wants to propagate Knowledge though, doesn't it? Also, the web it
too open. Not really his kind of medium. Frankly, I read that as somewhat
hopeful. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
11:21:00 (EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: John K.
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
I know this might be considered old news, but I
never got the real story because it happened before I found this ex page. Why is
it that the premies do not have their own web page? I heard they did have one at
one time, and then that they were ordered to get rid of it? Do we know who
actually ordered that it be closed down? I assume it must have been M, but I
mean did 'he' make a declaration in a program or was it done through using the
people around M to let it be known what his wishes are? Where I work we have
videos that we can watch on the web of, for instance, our CEO speaking to us. I
find it amazing that M does not make use of this technology. When I followed
him, he was always so into computers. I cannot think of any reason other than he
thinks his message cannot be communicated across the web. Perhaps grace cannot
travel across the web? As far as we know, it was the ubiquitous PAM
("people around Maharaji) that asked premies not to post on the internet
anymore. Apparently print reporters in Australia used quotes from both the
now-defunct premie.org site and the ex-premie.org site in a news article, and
this made somebody mad. For further info read "Calling All Premies" at:
http://www.ex-premie.org/pages/calling.htm I personally think that the premies
should be able to have their own web page, but that's just my humble opinion.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
12:25:52 (EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To:
everyone
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
He did say
something about the web in LB. It was during his great participation speech I
think. It was something about spreading k and he said, 'and we don't need the
web to do it either, we'll do it the old way like it's always been done' (I may
not have the exact words, he didn't elaborate) I found it an odd thing to say.
Especially from someone who likes to brag about his technological acquisitions,
etc.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
12:30:08 (EST)
Poster: John K.
Email:
To:
Selena
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
Selena: what do
you mean by 'great participation speech'. What does 'participation' refer to? Re
his attitude about the web, to me that sounds like some old fashioned fuddy
duddy from India.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
13:01:46 (EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To: John
K.
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
Selena:
what do you mean by 'great participation speech'. What does 'participation'
refer to? Re his attitude about the web, to me that sounds like some old
fashioned fuddy duddy from India. Participation=service and
propogation, I guess. Like traveling to Amaroo and pulling up weeds for a week
or getting people to come to introductory videos. One of the days of the event,
he started in about how we need to be involved to really have an experience of
knowledge. He really got into it. Talked about how many people are receiving
knowledge, how many aspirants there are, how much there still is to do. People
got stirred up, from what I could see. Someone commented on the shuttle, when M
talks like that she just asks him in her heart to show her how to participate
because she doesn't understand. What I want to nkow is, how could anyone expect
to understand? It doesn't make any sense that one needs to do something directly
involved with M or EV for an experience when the experience is inherent with
life itself. oh well, there I go thinking again.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
13:17:07 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: John K.
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
I know this
might be considered old news, but I never got the real story because it happened
before I found this ex page. Why is it that the premies do not have their own
web page? I heard they did have one at one time, and then that they were ordered
to get rid of it? Do we know who actually ordered that it be closed down? I
assume it must have been M, but I mean did 'he' make a declaration in a program
or was it done through using the people around M to let it be known what his
wishes are? Where I work we have videos that we can watch on the web of, for
instance, our CEO speaking to us. I find it amazing that M does not make use of
this technology. When I followed him, he was always so into computers. I cannot
think of any reason other than he thinks his message cannot be communicated
across the web. Perhaps grace cannot travel across the web? I think
Brian and Katie explained how Maharaji decided he didn't want premie.org around
anymore and apparently discouraged, although I don't think he has actually
forbidden, premies from talking about knowledge (and I guess HIM) on the
internet. I was interested in what Katie said about the Australian news article
being the catalyst for this. Katie, where did you hear that? I think M doesn't
like the internet because it is so "democratic" and allows for two-way
communication. Of course when it existed "premie.org" hardly even allowed for
that. People could just post comments and there were not "subjects" and very
little discussion, although I guess there was a little. M knows that open
discussion of him and what he does is deadly for him. It encourages people to
THINK about him and knowledge and he doesn't want that. Hell, he doesn't even
allow premies to give satsang anymore. He is the ultimate control freak. Kind of
sad, really.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
13:23:52 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Selena
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
Selena: what do you mean by 'great
participation speech'. What does 'participation' refer to? Re his attitude about
the web, to me that sounds like some old fashioned fuddy duddy from India.
Participation=service and propogation, I guess. Like traveling to
Amaroo and pulling up weeds for a week or getting people to come to introductory
videos. One of the days of the event, he started in about how we need to be
involved to really have an experience of knowledge. He really got into it.
Talked about how many people are receiving knowledge, how many aspirants there
are, how much there still is to do. People got stirred up, from what I could
see. Someone commented on the shuttle, when M talks like that she just asks him
in her heart to show her how to participate because she doesn't understand. What
I want to nkow is, how could anyone expect to understand? It doesn't make any
sense that one needs to do something directly involved with M or EV for an
experience when the experience is inherent with life itself. oh well, there I go
thinking again. It sounds like he is reintroducing the whole
discipline of "service" which he used to say you HAD to do (serve Guru Maharaj
Ji) or you won't get the true and complete experience of knowledge. [It used to
be that knowledge was the experience you got only if you did all three:satsang,
service and meditation.] Service is a way to REALLY bind people to him, because
it creates a whole hierarchy for people to aspire to, gives the possibility of
getting close to M and/or becoming part of PAM, and probably increases
donations, because people can consider that part of "service", or I guess he now
calls it "participation." So, since the "internal experience" is so limited for
most people, they may well try "service" along with "devotion/gratitude" to see
if it gets them where they want to go. It won't, but people, unfortunately, can
spend costly years pursuing it, all the M's personal/financial benefit.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
14:36:43 (EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: JW
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
I know this might be considered old
news, but I never got the real story because it happened before I found this ex
page. Why is it that the premies do not have their own web page? I heard they
did have one at one time, and then that they were ordered to get rid of it? Do
we know who actually ordered that it be closed down? I assume it must have been
M, but I mean did 'he' make a declaration in a program or was it done through
using the people around M to let it be known what his wishes are? Where I work
we have videos that we can watch on the web of, for instance, our CEO speaking
to us. I find it amazing that M does not make use of this technology. When I
followed him, he was always so into computers. I cannot think of any reason
other than he thinks his message cannot be communicated across the web. Perhaps
grace cannot travel across the web? I think Brian and Katie
explained how Maharaji decided he didn't want premie.org around anymore and
apparently discouraged, although I don't think he has actually forbidden,
premies from talking about knowledge (and I guess HIM) on the internet. I was
interested in what Katie said about the Australian news article being the
catalyst for this. Katie, where did you hear that? I think M doesn't like the
internet because it is so 'democratic' and allows for two-way communication. Of
course when it existed 'premie.org' hardly even allowed for that. People could
just post comments and there were not 'subjects' and very little discussion,
although I guess there was a little. M knows that open discussion of him and
what he does is deadly for him. It encourages people to THINK about him and
knowledge and he doesn't want that. Hell, he doesn't even allow premies to give
satsang anymore. He is the ultimate control freak. Kind of sad, really.
Oops, JW, maybe I deduced it. I thought I talked to someone about
it, but can't remember who, so perhaps it was my theory. Anyway, it happened
right after Amaroo, and I know that during Amaroo the papers quoted the
premie.org page (as well as the ex-premie stuff). If you recall, some of the
things written on the premie.org page were pretty devotional and out there and
not the greatest PR for Maharaji.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
16:22:57 (EST)
Poster: John K.
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
Katie, I'm shocked!
spreading rumors! But you may be right about the sequence of events that lead to
stopping the web site. So, it sounds like we still really don't know why or even
if M made this decree. I find it amazing that 'direct', 'clear' direction is
still not given by M. I think the followers eat it up because it adds an element
of secrecy and mystery to M's actions. His actions and decisions are beyond
normal human scrutiny and beyond normal human judgement. M is the master, he can
do whatever he wants. It's all perfect. Why? Because 'he' is doing it. Question
it, and you become a negative, skeptical element.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
16:36:37 (EST)
Poster: Scott T.
Email:
To:
Katie
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
I know
this might be considered old news, but I never got the real story because it
happened before I found this ex page. Why is it that the premies do not have
their own web page? I heard they did have one at one time, and then that they
were ordered to get rid of it? Do we know who actually ordered that it be closed
down? I assume it must have been M, but I mean did 'he' make a declaration in a
program or was it done through using the people around M to let it be known what
his wishes are? Where I work we have videos that we can watch on the web of, for
instance, our CEO speaking to us. I find it amazing that M does not make use of
this technology. When I followed him, he was always so into computers. I cannot
think of any reason other than he thinks his message cannot be communicated
across the web. Perhaps grace cannot travel across the web? I think Brian and
Katie explained how Maharaji decided he didn't want premie.org around anymore
and apparently discouraged, although I don't think he has actually forbidden,
premies from talking about knowledge (and I guess HIM) on the internet. I was
interested in what Katie said about the Australian news article being the
catalyst for this. Katie, where did you hear that? I think M doesn't like the
internet because it is so 'democratic' and allows for two-way communication. Of
course when it existed 'premie.org' hardly even allowed for that. People could
just post comments and there were not 'subjects' and very little discussion,
although I guess there was a little. M knows that open discussion of him and
what he does is deadly for him. It encourages people to THINK about him and
knowledge and he doesn't want that. Hell, he doesn't even allow premies to give
satsang anymore. He is the ultimate control freak. Kind of sad, really. Oops,
JW, maybe I deduced it. I thought I talked to someone about it, but can't
remember who, so perhaps it was my theory. Anyway, it happened right after
Amaroo, and I know that during Amaroo the papers quoted the premie.org page (as
well as the ex-premie stuff). If you recall, some of the things written on the
premie.org page were pretty devotional and out there and not the greatest PR for
Maharaji. It is all very fascinating, and supports the concept that
MJ is really very conservative. Personally I'm somewhat relieved. He could stir
up a lot of trouble if he got savvy to the internet, which I suppose he
eventially will. Maybe not. I mean, I hope he's not just biding his time, like a
cobra... or like Bill Gates.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
16:57:13 (EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: John K.
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
Katie, I'm shocked! spreading rumors! But you
may be right about the sequence of events that lead to stopping the web site.
So, it sounds like we still really don't know why or even if M made this decree.
I find it amazing that 'direct', 'clear' direction is still not given by M. I
think the followers eat it up because it adds an element of secrecy and mystery
to M's actions. His actions and decisions are beyond normal human scrutiny and
beyond normal human judgement. M is the master, he can do whatever he wants.
It's all perfect. Why? Because 'he' is doing it. Question it, and you become a
negative, skeptical element. Yeah, I know, it's shocking. Apologies
to everyone. I have the flu and am running a fever and probably shouldn't be
posting. But Brian's phone call story is NOT a rumor. I think one of the reasons
M never comes out and says stuff like that and instead lets "PAM" do it is so he
never has to take responsbility for things. I'm sure you've experienced how many
things premies blame on DLM, the ashram premies, Maharaji's family, Bob Mishler,
and any other people around Maharaji that may have been around at the time
something happened. NOTHING is ever Maharaji's fault, though. I would feel a lot
better about him if he took responsibility for making bad decisions once in a
while.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
22:34:36 (EST)
Poster: Brian
Email:
To: Scott
T.
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
It is all very
fascinating, and supports the concept that MJ is really very conservative.
Personally I'm somewhat relieved. He could stir up a lot of trouble if he got
savvy to the internet, which I suppose he eventially will. Maybe not. I mean, I
hope he's not just biding his time, like a cobra... or like Bill Gates.
Maharaji strikes me more as a paranoid control freak than a conservative
anything. It used to be that premies gathered to together nightly to talk about
their experiences with each other. Remember satsang being an activity that
required active participation? Now premies gather together to watch
videos of MJ droning on about their experience. If they feel that the
tape really touches something close to what they feel by proxy, then they can
buy a copy for 20 dollars US (the price went up recently) and be able to
be in touch with their own feelings any time that they want to view it again.
Life, truth, and peace by proxy. How sad for premies that they buy into it. How
profitable for Maharaji. Were MJ to have an actual web presence, I would link to
every page as an example of the tripe that we used to swallow and how we came to
view it as being "truth". How about it, Maharaji? Let's really share
this with the World!
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 06:18:22
(EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Re: Question
Message:
That recalled me the
whole rhetoric of PAM and many EV organizers: they would do ANYTHING to
'protect' maharaji! There is some kind of feeling like m is very vulnerable.
Poor dad, he is so small, so uneducated, so ridiculous, everybody is after him,
the media are after him, so many people could sue him, etc Nobody understands
him, his love exposes him so much, he does so much for the world and there is
nobody to help him beside his premies .... bla bla Haven't you heard this too
much? What does it mean?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 12:10:35
(EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Guilt about Maharaji (Re: Question)
Message:
That recalled me the whole rhetoric of PAM and
many EV organizers: they would do ANYTHING to 'protect' maharaji! There is some
kind of feeling like m is very vulnerable. Poor dad, he is so small, so
uneducated, so ridiculous, everybody is after him, the media are after him, so
many people could sue him, etc Nobody understands him, his love exposes him so
much, he does so much for the world and there is nobody to help him beside his
premies .... bla bla Haven't you heard this too much? What does it mean?
I have heard premies who post on here talk this way about Maharaji.
Like he needs to be protected, and like he is sacrificing himself for all of us,
and that's why he needs all the expensive toys, etc. I never personally felt
that way about Maharaji, either because I was brought up to feel that way about
my own father, or because I never thought M was sacrificing himself for me
(Maharaji always looked like he way enjoying himself to me) I do remember Jim
Heller saying that he thought that if he moved out of the ashram, he would hurt
Maharaji's feelings! Amazing! There is a similar feeling among some people about
Jesus. For example: if you do something wrong, you're putting one more nail in
Jesus' cross, and so forth, because Jesus sacrificed himself for you. It's a big
guilt trip. I would have to think that it originates from Maharaji himself.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:44:33
(EST)
Poster: A premie
Email:
To: Katie
Subject: Re: Guilt about Maharaji (Re: Question)
Message:
That recalled me the whole rhetoric
of PAM and many EV organizers: they would do ANYTHING to 'protect' maharaji!
There is some kind of feeling like m is very vulnerable. Poor dad, he is so
small, so uneducated, so ridiculous, everybody is after him, the media are after
him, so many people could sue him, etc Nobody understands him, his love exposes
him so much, he does so much for the world and there is nobody to help him
beside his premies .... bla bla Haven't you heard this too much? What does it
mean? I have heard premies who post on here talk this way about
Maharaji. Like he needs to be protected, and like he is sacrificing himself for
all of us, and that's why he needs all the expensive toys, etc. I never
personally felt that way about Maharaji, either because I was brought up to feel
that way about my own father, or because I never thought M was sacrificing
himself for me (Maharaji always looked like he way enjoying himself to me) I do
remember Jim Heller saying that he thought that if he moved out of the ashram,
he would hurt Maharaji's feelings! Amazing! There is a similar feeling among
some people about Jesus. For example: if you do something wrong, you're putting
one more nail in Jesus' cross, and so forth, because Jesus sacrificed himself
for you. It's a big guilt trip. I would have to think that it originates from
Maharaji himself. >>I would have to think that it originates
from Maharaji himself. Katie, please recognize the difference between conjecture
and fact. You draw no lines of fact to support your hypothesis. I know it's hard
when everybody you're talking to agrees with everything you're saying but do try
to exercise some honesty in your points. Thanks.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Thurs, Feb 12, 1998 at
00:12:57 (EST)
Poster: Katie
Email: [email protected]
To: A premie
Subject: Re: Guilt about Maharaji (Re:
Question)
Message:
I have heard premies who post on here
talk this way about Maharaji. Like he needs to be protected, and like he is
sacrificing himself for all of us, and that's why he needs all the expensive
toys, etc. I never personally felt that way about Maharaji, either because I was
brought up to feel that way about my own father, or because I never thought M
was sacrificing himself for me (Maharaji always looked like he way enjoying
himself to me) I do remember Jim Heller saying that he thought that if he moved
out of the ashram, he would hurt Maharaji's feelings! Amazing! There is a
similar feeling among some people about Jesus. For example: if you do something
wrong, you're putting one more nail in Jesus' cross, and so forth, because Jesus
sacrificed himself for you. It's a big guilt trip. I would have to think that it
originates from Maharaji himself. "I would have to think that it originates from
Maharaji himself." Katie, please recognize the difference between conjecture and
fact. You draw no lines of fact to support your hypothesis. I know it's hard
when everybody you're talking to agrees with everything you're saying but do try
to exercise some honesty in your points. Thanks. Dear "a premie" - I
said "I would have to THINK that it comes from Maharaji." which to me
indicates that it IS my conjecture, NOT fact. I guess I don't understand what
you think I'm saying is "fact", except the things that I have heard other
premies say. It is a fact that I have heard them saying these things, but
anything I have deduced from what they are saying is my conjecture. I feel that
I've clearly labeled it as such in the above. Just thinking out loud, basically.
I do take issue with you implying that thinking and conjecture are somehow
"dishonest". I certainly don't believe so. P.S. Everyone on here does NOT agree
with what I'm saying, believe me. You're not the only premie who posts on here!
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
04:35:24 (EST)
Poster: ex-mug
Email:
To:
Everyone
Subject: Rugu
Message:
The more I think about
my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the accounts of
others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
09:34:38 (EST)
Poster: Scott
Email:
[email protected]
To: ex-mug
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more I think about my involvement with M
from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the accounts of others, I am convinced
that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru. ex-mug: This kind of word game
is fun and sometimes useful, but it can also be very disingenuous. Some of the
radical deconstructionists hide behind these kinds of games. My point is that I
don't know what you mean by "Rugu." If GMJ has it backwards... how is it
backwards... and what does that mean to you and us? I enjoy the wordgames played
by the deconstructionists, ala Derrida etc. Just wish they'd connect the stuff
with themselves and to real life experience more often. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
10:41:05 (EST)
Poster: ex-mug
Email:
To: Scott
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more
I think about my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the
accounts of others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru.
ex-mug: This kind of word game is fun and sometimes useful, but it
can also be very disingenuous. Some of the radical deconstructionists hide
behind these kinds of games. My point is that I don't know what you mean by
'Rugu.' If GMJ has it backwards... how is it backwards... and what does that
mean to you and us? I enjoy the wordgames played by the deconstructionists, ala
Derrida etc. Just wish they'd connect the stuff with themselves and to real life
experience more often. -Scott Hi Scott, The word Gu, I belive, means
darkness, and Ru , light, thus a Guru takes a person from darkness to light. all
the best ex-mug
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
11:03:43 (EST)
Poster: Scott
Email:
To: ex-mug
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more I think
about my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the accounts
of others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru. ex-mug: This
kind of word game is fun and sometimes useful, but it can also be very
disingenuous. Some of the radical deconstructionists hide behind these kinds of
games. My point is that I don't know what you mean by 'Rugu.' If GMJ has it
backwards... how is it backwards... and what does that mean to you and us? I
enjoy the wordgames played by the deconstructionists, ala Derrida etc. Just wish
they'd connect the stuff with themselves and to real life experience more often.
-Scott Hi Scott, The word Gu, I belive, means darkness, and Ru , light, thus a
Guru takes a person from darkness to light. all the best ex-mug
ex-mug: Very clever. It's been a long time, over twenty years, and
that particular translation had slipped my mind. Thanks. -Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
13:20:11 (EST)
Poster: lg
Email:
To: ex-mug
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more I think
about my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the accounts
of others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru. In
my experience while I was a premie, I learned and experienced a lot of profound
stuff with M. Don't throw the baby with the bathwater! M has his faults, like
all of us. Join the human race! If you recognized it was all rubbish from the
start, how come it took you that long (21 years) to leave!
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
13:32:49 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: lg
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more
I think about my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the
accounts of others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru.
In my experience while I was a premie, I learned and experienced a
lot of profound stuff with M. Don't throw the baby with the bathwater! M has his
faults, like all of us. Join the human race! If you recognized it was all
rubbish from the start, how come it took you that long (21 years) to leave!
There's no question that a lot of people say that they experienced
"profound stuff" around Maharaji, and many people say they didn't. I think you
should consider, however, that just because you were around M when you
experienced "profound stuff," that doesn't necessarily mean that M is the source
of the experience you were having. It's like having the flu and getting sick
while at the same time you eat a certain kind of food. Often, people will
associate their illness with that food, and not be able to eat it from then on.
They associate (despite their own knowledge to the contrary) the food as the
source of their illness, when in reality it had nothing to do with it. In my
experience, the profound stuff around M, to the limited extent there was any for
me, was really my experience of my own faith in him. And it can be very
powerful, faith that is. When I lost faith in him, I experienced zippo around
him. It's a very common experience, really. Just look at Christian revivals and
people so blissed out experiencing their own faith, without even a living master
to peg it on.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
14:14:26 (EST)
Poster: lg
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more I think about my
involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the accounts of
others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru. In my
experience while I was a premie, I learned and experienced a lot of profound
stuff with M. Don't throw the baby with the bathwater! M has his faults, like
all of us. Join the human race! If you recognized it was all rubbish from the
start, how come it took you that long (21 years) to leave! There's
no question that a lot of people say that they experienced 'profound stuff'
around Maharaji, and many people say they didn't. I think you should consider,
however, that just because you were around M when you experienced 'profound
stuff,' that doesn't necessarily mean that M is the source of the experience you
were having. It's like having the flu and getting sick while at the same time
you eat a certain kind of food. Often, people will associate their illness with
that food, and not be able to eat it from then on. They associate (despite their
own knowledge to the contrary) the food as the source of their illness, when in
reality it had nothing to do with it. In my experience, the profound stuff
around M, to the limited extent there was any for me, was really my experience
of my own faith in him. And it can be very powerful, faith that is. When I lost
faith in him, I experienced zippo around him. It's a very common experience,
really. Just look at Christian revivals and people so blissed out experiencing
their own faith, without even a living master to peg it on. Hi JW. -
I like your posting! I didn't think for one minute that M was the source of
these experiences but perhaps the cause. Reading your message, however, answered
a question I asked in a e-mail I sent you a few days ago. Thanks
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
14:19:09 (EST)
Poster: ex-mug
Email:
To: lg
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more
I think about my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the
accounts of others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru.
In my experience while I was a premie, I learned and experienced a
lot of profound stuff with M. Don't throw the baby with the bathwater! M has his
faults, like all of us. Join the human race! If you recognized it was all
rubbish from the start, how come it took you that long (21 years) to leave!
I'm glad you learned a lot of profound stuff from M. I actually
didn't get to meet the guy (apart from Darshan lines) and looking back didn't
learn a lot of profound stuff from him at all over the years. At one time I was
Ashram librarian and listened to 80 or so of his 70's lectures in an attempt to
learn something profound, but found his speaches rather mind numbingly boring.
The lived with a lot of incredible people in and out of the ashrams - this is
why I stayed around for so long, not because of GMJ. Since having said byebye to
big M, I have rejoined the human race! I would have left the cult earlier had I
not been so young and gullible. GM was being promoted as God in human form. When
I signed-up as a premie I didn't think of God as having any faults. I was led to
believe that GM was fully enlightened. When the penny finally dropped and it was
apparent that he is most certainly not, then I left like a shot. I am most
grateful for this newsgroup, thanks everyone. love, ex-mug
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
14:44:39 (EST)
Poster: lg
Email:
To: ex-mug
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more I think about my
involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the accounts of
others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru. In my
experience while I was a premie, I learned and experienced a lot of profound
stuff with M. Don't throw the baby with the bathwater! M has his faults, like
all of us. Join the human race! If you recognized it was all rubbish from the
start, how come it took you that long (21 years) to leave! I'm glad
you learned a lot of profound stuff from M. I actually didn't get to meet the
guy (apart from Darshan lines) and looking back didn't learn a lot of profound
stuff from him at all over the years. At one time I was Ashram librarian and
listened to 80 or so of his 70's lectures in an attempt to learn something
profound, but found his speaches rather mind numbingly boring. The lived with a
lot of incredible people in and out of the ashrams - this is why I stayed around
for so long, not because of GMJ. Since having said byebye to big M, I have
rejoined the human race! I would have left the cult earlier had I not been so
young and gullible. GM was being promoted as God in human form. When I signed-up
as a premie I didn't think of God as having any faults. I was led to believe
that GM was fully enlightened. When the penny finally dropped and it was
apparent that he is most certainly not, then I left like a shot. I am most
grateful for this newsgroup, thanks everyone. love, ex-mug Thanks
for sharing your experience with me - ex-mug, I appreciate it. I didn't get to
meet him either... He never visited our ashram, it was too far away or too cold
perhaps! I was around from 1979 - 1987 myself. We all learned from that
experience. Don't we. Love lg
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
15:09:06 (EST)
Poster: ex-mug
Email:
To: lg
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more I think
about my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the accounts
of others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru. In
my experience while I was a premie, I learned and experienced a lot of profound
stuff with M. Don't throw the baby with the bathwater! M has his faults, like
all of us. Join the human race! If you recognized it was all rubbish from the
start, how come it took you that long (21 years) to leave! I'm glad
you learned a lot of profound stuff from M. I actually didn't get to meet the
guy (apart from Darshan lines) and looking back didn't learn a lot of profound
stuff from him at all over the years. At one time I was Ashram librarian and
listened to 80 or so of his 70's lectures in an attempt to learn something
profound, but found his speaches rather mind numbingly boring. The lived with a
lot of incredible people in and out of the ashrams - this is why I stayed around
for so long, not because of GMJ. Since having said byebye to big M, I have
rejoined the human race! I would have left the cult earlier had I not been so
young and gullible. GM was being promoted as God in human form. When I signed-up
as a premie I didn't think of God as having any faults. I was led to believe
that GM was fully enlightened. When the penny finally dropped and it was
apparent that he is most certainly not, then I left like a shot. I am most
grateful for this newsgroup, thanks everyone. love, ex-mug Thanks
for sharing your experience with me - ex-mug, I appreciate it. I didn't get to
meet him either... He never visited our ashram, it was too far away or too cold
perhaps! I was around from 1979 - 1987 myself. We all learned from that
experience. Don't we. Love lg lg When I think of the incredible
people with whome I shared so many good times with in the ashram and out (in
spite of a very remote GM)I wonder how many of them are still involved with GM's
cult. Some I know are no longer involved. Anyhow, I have found this newsgroup
with another gathering of incredible people who have the courage to share in the
way that they do. I now take the opportunity to formally tell GM to get stuffed,
to get off his high horse and own-up to the fact that he is , and has been
leaching off of his followers for many years, simply to maintain an incredibly
expensive life-style. How bloody obnoxious! And he is still at it. I'm sure the
IRS will catch him out one day (they got Al Capone!) all the best ex-mug
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
16:14:08 (EST)
Poster: lg
Email:
To: ex-mug
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The
more I think about my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read
the accounts of others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru.
In my experience while I was a premie, I learned and experienced a
lot of profound stuff with M. Don't throw the baby with the bathwater! M has his
faults, like all of us. Join the human race! If you recognized it was all
rubbish from the start, how come it took you that long (21 years) to leave!
I'm glad you learned a lot of profound stuff from M. I actually
didn't get to meet the guy (apart from Darshan lines) and looking back didn't
learn a lot of profound stuff from him at all over the years. At one time I was
Ashram librarian and listened to 80 or so of his 70's lectures in an attempt to
learn something profound, but found his speaches rather mind numbingly boring.
The lived with a lot of incredible people in and out of the ashrams - this is
why I stayed around for so long, not because of GMJ. Since having said byebye to
big M, I have rejoined the human race! I would have left the cult earlier had I
not been so young and gullible. GM was being promoted as God in human form. When
I signed-up as a premie I didn't think of God as having any faults. I was led to
believe that GM was fully enlightened. When the penny finally dropped and it was
apparent that he is most certainly not, then I left like a shot. I am most
grateful for this newsgroup, thanks everyone. love, ex-mug Thanks
for sharing your experience with me - ex-mug, I appreciate it. I didn't get to
meet him either... He never visited our ashram, it was too far away or too cold
perhaps! I was around from 1979 - 1987 myself. We all learned from that
experience. Don't we. Love lg lg When I think of the incredible
people with whome I shared so many good times with in the ashram and out (in
spite of a very remote GM)I wonder how many of them are still involved with GM's
cult. Some I know are no longer involved. Anyhow, I have found this newsgroup
with another gathering of incredible people who have the courage to share in the
way that they do. I now take the opportunity to formally tell GM to get stuffed,
to get off his high horse and own-up to the fact that he is , and has been
leaching off of his followers for many years, simply to maintain an incredibly
expensive life-style. How bloody obnoxious! And he is still at it. I'm sure the
IRS will catch him out one day (they got Al Capone!) all the best ex-mug
I agree with you 100%. And the sad part (eventhough he introduced me
to my inner self) is that he is deceiving people along the way. I feel angry,
frustrated and sad about that. Later, I have found some "spiritual" books giving
the same or better teachings, but much more comprehensive. (Excuse my english -
it is not my mother tong) lg
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
17:35:51 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: lg
Subject: Re: Rugu
Message:
The more I think
about my involvement with M from 1973 to 1994, and the more I read the accounts
of others, I am convinced that M was always a Rugu, not a Guru. In
my experience while I was a premie, I learned and experienced a lot of profound
stuff with M. Don't throw the baby with the bathwater! M has his faults, like
all of us. Join the human race! If you recognized it was all rubbish from the
start, how come it took you that long (21 years) to leave! There's
no question that a lot of people say that they experienced 'profound stuff'
around Maharaji, and many people say they didn't. I think you should consider,
however, that just because you were around M when you experienced 'profound
stuff,' that doesn't necessarily mean that M is the source of the experience you
were having. It's like having the flu and getting sick while at the same time
you eat a certain kind of food. Often, people will associate their illness with
that food, and not be able to eat it from then on. They associate (despite their
own knowledge to the contrary) the food as the source of their illness, when in
reality it had nothing to do with it. In my experience, the profound stuff
around M, to the limited extent there was any for me, was really my experience
of my own faith in him. And it can be very powerful, faith that is. When I lost
faith in him, I experienced zippo around him. It's a very common experience,
really. Just look at Christian revivals and people so blissed out experiencing
their own faith, without even a living master to peg it on. Hi JW. -
I like your posting! I didn't think for one minute that M was the source of
these experiences but perhaps the cause. Reading your message, however, answered
a question I asked in a e-mail I sent you a few days ago. Thanks
Sorry, can you explain how you see "source" and "cause" as different
things? Frankly, I don't think he's either the "source" or the "cause." In my
experience I was both the source and the cause of my experience, M was just
someone I had faith in, mostly because I wanted so much for it to be true that
he was god incarnate.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 23:13:40
(EST)
Poster: Steve A
Email:
To: Everyone
Subject: Who are the real Premies
Message:
We were
always told that Premies were so called because they were "lovers of truth". Is
it not ironic that we are designated in this forum to be ex-premies or ex lovers
of truth. Are we not by our very actions and discussions here in pursuit of the
real truth?. Have not our experiences made us even more passionate about finding
the true purpose of existence. Whether or not we are aware of it I feel that our
communications here help countless people examine their feelings about GMJ and
EV. If we cannot help people examine their own hearts and heads we have done
nothing to stop them from going through the same pain we had to endure. If there
are any so called Premie's reading this I would simply ask, search your own
feelings and question, "does what I am doing feel right?", "does what I believe
in feel in any way wrong or contradict what I know to be true", and at the end
of it if you find you don't know who or what to believe in, trust that your
conscience and intuition will always remain true to you. Please forgive me, I
didn't want to sound like a preacher it just came out that way.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
01:07:12 (EST)
Poster: Diver Dan
Email:
[email protected]
To: Steve A
Subject: Re: Who are the
real Premies
Message:
Keep the name "EX"PREMIE forum it seems very
apprapo or how about "The DARK Zone" or even the X-files , sorry that one has
already been used. Are you all ex lovers I think not! Ex-Devotees Yes!
Definitley! But try and remember Maharaji brought love into all of our hearts or
none of you would be here today(in more ways than one).The JSCA equation ......
there is a profound absence of bliss around here! What? Did you all fall off
your barrogons one to many times.Lighten up find the peace and stop crying over
the pieces Why did you all start on the journey was it to come to an end or to
enjoy the journey ! You've forgotten the word don"t forget the purpose and why
we ARE! Love life Live life and don't regret be Thankful !
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
02:26:29 (EST)
Poster: Steve A
Email:
To: Diver
Dan
Subject: Re: Who are the real Premies
Message:
Dear
Diver Dan Ex-Devotees definately, but I beg to differ, it was not Maharaji that
brought love into my heart, love springs from within and for me I have never
been happier in my life than I am now. If EV is giving you that love and bliss
unconditionally then I am happy for you. Yes there are many people here who have
had bitter and in some cases trajic experiences with Maharji and EV, I pray that
you will not, but if you do we will be here for you.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
14:49:59 (EST)
Poster: ex-mug
Email:
To: Diver
Dan
Subject: Re: Who are the real Premies
Message:
Keep the name 'EX'PREMIE forum it seems very
apprapo or how about 'The DARK Zone' or even the X-files , sorry that one has
already been used. Are you all ex lovers I think not! Ex-Devotees Yes!
Definitley! But try and remember Maharaji brought love into all of our hearts or
none of you would be here today(in more ways than one).The JSCA equation ......
there is a profound absence of bliss around here! What? Did you all fall off
your barrogons one to many times.Lighten up find the peace and stop crying over
the pieces Why did you all start on the journey was it to come to an end or to
enjoy the journey ! You've forgotten the word don't forget the purpose and why
we ARE! Love life Live life and don't regret be Thankful ! Diver
Dan, Only God bought love to my heart. GM had nothing to do with it. all the
best ex-mug
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 23:56:57
(EST)
Poster: A premie
Email:
To: Steve A
Subject: Re: Who are the real Premies
Message:
We were always told that Premies were so called
because they were 'lovers of truth'. Is it not ironic that we are designated in
this forum to be ex-premies or ex lovers of truth. Are we not by our very
actions and discussions here in pursuit of the real truth?. Have not our
experiences made us even more passionate about finding the true purpose of
existence. Whether or not we are aware of it I feel that our communications here
help countless people examine their feelings about GMJ and EV. If we cannot help
people examine their own hearts and heads we have done nothing to stop them from
going through the same pain we had to endure. If there are any so called
Premie's reading this I would simply ask, search your own feelings and question,
'does what I am doing feel right?', 'does what I believe in feel in any way
wrong or contradict what I know to be true', and at the end of it if you find
you don't know who or what to believe in, trust that your conscience and
intuition will always remain true to you. Please forgive me, I didn't want to
sound like a preacher it just came out that way. You did sound like
a preacher but that's OK. If you are truely a seeker of truth you must be open
to the possibility that when one does "search (their) own feelings and
question...", one may just find that it feels great. You see Steve, you have to
be open to that possibility without bringing out from your hip pocket doubt
about one's ability to trust their own process because they are a "premie"
(which is the argument many of you use when the response is a positive one).
Hey, keep trying Steve. You may actually convince somebody if they're the kind
that takes to being preached at.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 20:48:24
(EST)
Poster: Sir David
Email: [email protected]
To: Bill & everyone
Subject: A Father & His
children
Message:
I've put this up here Bill so you won't miss it.
I guess I'm aware that He knows what I'm thinking and doing all the time so I
just talk to Him in my head. Like well thanks for showing me that or I feel a
lot better about things now or why oh why did this happen God? I am always
asking Him for help and I sought the most help from Him when I finally realised
that He wasn't Maharaji. I had a sense of real freedom then, after the initial
pain. So I don't have to do all of THAT then God, wow, thanks for showing me and
thanks for loving me. One of the most remarkable things he has shown me is that
the whole of the Hindu religion and it's teachings are totally false. They are
so far off the mark and I've thanked Him over and over for showing me that. Now
I can meditate without any fear or hassle. If I don't meditate, it's not a
problem either. He doesn't judge me at all. Maharaji talks a load of crap.
Because Hinduism is crap. We are growing eternally as God's children and He is
also growing eternally as our Father. He loves us more than we realise. He holds
us closer than we realise. He knows we love the people in our lives and it's
supposed to be that way. He is all love. Where love is, He is there. We don't
have to do this Hindu merging trip because we are already merged with Him and
always will be. As He grows so will we. He will always be our loving Father and
will always hold us deep within His love. He has got us to love and that will
last forever. We will grow in love with Him and He with us. It is an eternal
love story. My six year old daughter, Jasmine, told me at Christmas that Jesus,
Mary and Joseph were special. I told her that we're all special because God
loves us all and made us so He could love us. Like she's special to me because
her mummy and I made her so we could love her. She understands this. That is the
essence of it all.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 19:31:22
(EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To: Everyone
Subject: Homer Simpson and Realization
Message:
I
caught the Simpsons last night. Homer joins a religious cult. Too many
coinciences. Or, as they say, there ARE no coincidences. Anybody see it? How
about the hanger, with the mother ship that isn't really a ship? and the best,
the Rolls Royce drive bys' whilstthe meek toil in the fields? Too Good!! They
must know.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 22:40:26
(EST)
Poster: Scott Talkington
Email:
[email protected]
To: Selena
Subject: Re: Homer
Simpson and Realization
Message:
Selena: Saw part of the Simpson
episode. There's a point in the Mishler interview where he expreses the opinion
that American society is in no real danger from people like Mamaraj Ji.
Sometimes Americans get defensive and a little ugly about this stuff, but the
Simpson episode reprents the best of the American irreverence. We have a culture
that is anti-authoritarian and puritanical at the same time. The downside of
that tension is expressed very well in Miller's "The Crucible." We are in turns
fanatical believers and fanatical disbelievers. There's got to be humor in that.
-Scott
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 23:12:17
(EST)
Poster: Mickey the Pharisee
Email:
[email protected]
To: Selena
Subject: Re: Homer Simpson
and Realization
Message:
I enjoyed last night's episode,
especially the sudden attacks of devotion: "I love the Leader!!" which seemed to
hit everyone when approached by the movement's thugs. I felt that it was quite
accurate in its portrayal of the cult mindset.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
13:33:11 (EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To:
everyone
Subject: Re: Homer Simpson and Realization
Message:
You'd think you'd hear the brain fart thing on a cartoon
instead of a public program. Then again, the writers for the simpsons are much
classier than that. Not only did M say it in public at the LB event but I am
pretty sure he did last year as well. It's all so funny in some ways. All this
religiosity and then he spills something like that. The premies found it quite
amusing when he said it. He went on and on about it too.... I'd elaboraate but,
well.... only if people insist. :)
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
17:02:47 (EST)
Poster: Marge and
Email: **
To:
Selena
Subject: Homer Simpson and Realization (Re: Homer Simpson and
Realization)
Message:
we insist! If you want to.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
17:19:45 (EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To: Marge
and
Subject: Re: Homer Simpson and Realization
Message:
we insist! If you want to. You mean
"only if I want to, by the grace" ? well,er, it's more like South Park than the
Simpsons, but he said something about at least with a real one you can tell
right away by the smell what it is, but with a mind one sometimes it takes a
while of listening Then there was some other witty comment about at least with a
real one you can open a window.. Shucks, guys I just ain't as funny as he was. I
guess you had to be here, no no I take it back - be glad you weren't!! Guess
mass hysteria has it's place, it makes even the lamest witticisms seem funny at
the time.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 17:46:23
(EST)
Poster: JW
Email: [email protected]
To:
Everyone
Subject: Devotion Quotes
Message:
The thread
below about devotion got me thinking about how often Guru Maharaj Ji used to
talk about it. In fact, he talked about it (devotion to him) as being much more
important than knowledge or practicing knowledge. I just saw a copy of a Divine
Times from 1979. In it is a satsang Maharaji gave on Christmas Day in 1979.
There is a picture in the issue, and I can see myself sitting in the hall. It
was in Miami at DECA, that place where the premies were converting a Boeing 707
for his personal, luxurious use. There are probably about 100 people in the
hall. Before coming to speak, we were told by PAM how pleased M was that we had
stayed with our "real" family, and didn't go visit our "other" families for the
holidays. Anyway, here are a few quotes from that satsang entitled "Be A
Devotee" dated 12/25/79: [Sorry about the repitition, but, as we know, that's
the way the guy speaks.] "And the only reason of existence then is to be a
devotee. And the only thing that ever happens is devotion. If we just surrender
ourselves to Guru Maharaj Ji, if we surrender ourselves to that experience, if
we just become a devotee and have devotion, that's all that's needed. And it
becomes the same thing for us. We'll be driven completely insane, we'll be
driven completely mad, by this world. And only if we focus completely on one
thing and that's devotion, because that's the only thing a devotee can
accomplish in this world. There is nothing else a person can accomplish. There
is nothing else a a human being can in fact accomplish. There is nothing else a
human being can in fact accomplish in this world. He cannot become a professor.
That's fake. And you cannot become a doctor. That's fake. It's like, experience,
experience, experience, experience, and it's a very well used word sometimes. To
experience this, to experience that. But truly the word experience--there's only
one thing we CAN experience. And that's devotion for Guru Maharaj Ji. But truly
what makes the difference for that devotee is that flowing devotion. A devotee
will follow their Guru Maharaj Ji wherever Guru Maharaj Ji goes and not be
involved in anything else. But when we become just that humble devotee, whose
reason to live, whose reason for existence is because he is a devotee of Guru
Maharaj Ji, because he is devoted; he experiences devotion. That's his reason to
live. That's his purpose to live. And keep on having that experience, and to be
completely surrendered to Guru Maharaj Ji -- and as long as Guru Maharaj Ji will
give him that experience he's accepting it. And when we become a devotee, only
then are we even capable or receiving that Grace. And the ones who deserve it
get it. When those devotees, those beings who have recognized their Guru Maharaj
Ji, those beings. And once I was just reading that statement of Kabirdas. And he
says, "People who consider Guru Maharaj Ji something else are definitely bound
to hell." There's no and's, if's an and but's about it. [Sorry, can't go on. I'm
getting nauseous. He goes on to say that Christmas misses the point that Christ
revealed the same knowledge that that Christ came into the world for "this
Knowledge, that love, that devotion -- that's all that happened."] So, fellow
ex's, since we consider Maharaji "something else", are we "definitely bound to
hell, "no if's, and's or but's about it?"
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 18:35:01
(EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To: everyone
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts (Re: Devotion Quotes)
Message:
I can't believe I forgot the other gem from my visit to
Long Beach. It seems M is fond of calling people's thoughts from the evil mind
"brain farts" these days. Reading your quotes from Divine Times made me think of
it, not in the way he'd like I am sure, but it sort of shows the absoluteness.
God, how wonderful , everytime someone does something you find uncomfortable or
against the great devotional philosoply, oh well, they just had a brain fart.
Scary isn't it?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 19:29:05
(EST)
Poster: Katie
Email:
To: Selena
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts (Re: Devotion Quotes)
Message:
I can't believe I forgot the other gem from my
visit to Long Beach. It seems M is fond of calling people's thoughts from the
evil mind 'brain farts' these days. Reading your quotes from Divine Times made
me think of it, not in the way he'd like I am sure, but it sort of shows the
absoluteness. God, how wonderful , everytime someone does something you find
uncomfortable or against the great devotional philosoply, oh well, they just had
a brain fart. Scary isn't it? I can't believe Maharaji is saying
things like "brain farts" at programs! It would be extremely funny if people
weren't into it. The guy is 40 years old, after all. When you wrote "it sort of
shows the absoluteness", I mistook the word "absoluteness" for "adolescence"
(really!). Wonder what TV show he got that phrase from?
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 22:04:03
(EST)
Poster: John K.
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes
Message:
Warning - the
following material is rated N for negative so be forewarned!! Wow! Say it aint
so, Joe. Tell me I didn't really believe in this guy for so many years! One
reaction I have is that these quotes are really depressing to me. It's scary how
absolutely nonsensical they are. 'The only thing we can experience is devotion
to Guru Maharaj Ji" Huh? Come again? Yet, I can't tell you how happy I am about
it, that is, that I simply cannot relate to this kind of talk, at the same time
it is very sobering to me to read this stuff because I clearly remember that I
used to be the devotee sitting there lapping it up. In fact I think I remember
listening in wash. d.c. via phone feed to that satsang. The whole feeling comes
back to me. The whole goal of sitting in satsang is to become mindless. To not
judge, to not evaluate. To not think. To simply soak it in. Now, deep in my
consciousness I simply reject that whole notion now. I don't enjoy just sitting
there and being a sponge. I am a human being. I have a mind. I have capability
to evaluate. I think. I think about what is said. I understand. I don't
understand. That's what I do. To deny myself my thoughts is to deny who I am.
Don't tell me I cannot judge or evaluate what I am hearing. I question, I
filter, I approve, I disapprove. That's what we are supposed to do as humans.
The whole premise of satsang is so bogus! That we cannot trust what we ourselves
think about things. Did he really say we are bound to hell? Gee, I'm really
scared!
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 22:28:32
(EST)
Poster: de
Email: bb
To: JW
Subject: ca (Re: Devotion Quotes)
Message:
Hi JW I am
in that photo too. close to the stage center. I considered that speech his
culmination of the devotional era speeches. Because he didn't stray to far from
the topic during the whole talk. Usually he would just hit the subject of
devotion a few times a speech. Talks like that made people like OP and me stuck
for life. Tough to overcome the programming if you really ate it at one point.
Expessialy since he won't let up. He can't. His ego. his money source. His whole
world is built on it. He knows he isn't anywhere but he can get the sheep
bleating easy enough so why change? got to go.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 23:41:51
(EST)
Poster: Jw
Email:
To: de
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes
Message:
Hi JW I
am in that photo too. close to the stage center. I considered that speech his
culmination of the devotional era speeches. Because he didn't stray to far from
the topic during the whole talk. Usually he would just hit the subject of
devotion a few times a speech. Talks like that made people like OP and me stuck
for life. Tough to overcome the programming if you really ate it at one point.
Expessialy since he won't let up. He can't. His ego. his money source. His whole
world is built on it. He knows he isn't anywhere but he can get the sheep
bleating easy enough so why change? got to go. Hi, Burke: In the
photo, I'm sitting right in the center as well. Maybe I was sitting next to you.
I don't recall your name, but it was a long time ago. You know, Burke. I'm
impressed at how you actually LISTENED to what M said. I think I was more like
John and just tried to suspend my thought processes and soak in the boring crap
he said. It was the only way I could do it. I do recall certain lines the were
especially awful, or scary, or stupid, but mostly I never analyzed what he
actually said, until now. In fact, I remember sitting in that satsang on
Christmas day, but if you asked me now, I wouldn't have remembered anything he
said, except I remember the "stay with you real family" comment. I think this
satsang is interesting, because he dispells that revisionist notion, now
espoused by premies, that all M was ever about was an internal experience and
the practice of meditation. This satsang proves that wasn't true. I also have
quotes from Hans Jayanti 1979, but they are even worse. Maybe I'll get the
stomach to post some of that later. JW
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Mon, Feb 9, 1998 at 23:53:36
(EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: John K.
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes
Message:
Warning
- the following material is rated N for negative so be forewarned!! Wow! Say it
aint so, Joe. Tell me I didn't really believe in this guy for so many years! One
reaction I have is that these quotes are really depressing to me. It's scary how
absolutely nonsensical they are. 'The only thing we can experience is devotion
to Guru Maharaj Ji' Huh? Come again? Yet, I can't tell you how happy I am about
it, that is, that I simply cannot relate to this kind of talk, at the same time
it is very sobering to me to read this stuff because I clearly remember that I
used to be the devotee sitting there lapping it up. In fact I think I remember
listening in wash. d.c. via phone feed to that satsang. The whole feeling comes
back to me. The whole goal of sitting in satsang is to become mindless. To not
judge, to not evaluate. To not think. To simply soak it in. Now, deep in my
consciousness I simply reject that whole notion now. I don't enjoy just sitting
there and being a sponge. I am a human being. I have a mind. I have capability
to evaluate. I think. I think about what is said. I understand. I don't
understand. That's what I do. To deny myself my thoughts is to deny who I am.
Don't tell me I cannot judge or evaluate what I am hearing. I question, I
filter, I approve, I disapprove. That's what we are supposed to do as humans.
The whole premise of satsang is so bogus! That we cannot trust what we ourselves
think about things. Did he really say we are bound to hell? Gee, I'm really
scared! Amazing, isn't it? As I said to Burke, I don't recall him
saying any of that and I was sitting in the room at the time he said it. But I
think I just suspended my thinking and let it waft over me, just like I did most
of the time he was speaking, because it never made much sense. Nevertheless,
this is a period when Maharaji hardly even spoke about meditation or even
knowledge. It was all devotion, devotion, surrender, surrender. In light of
this, how can premies be so revisionist and say that all he ever talked about
was just an "experience inside?"
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
05:19:17 (EST)
Poster: JW
Email:
To: Selena
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts (Re: Devotion Quotes)
Message:
I can't believe I forgot the other gem from my
visit to Long Beach. It seems M is fond of calling people's thoughts from the
evil mind 'brain farts' these days. Reading your quotes from Divine Times made
me think of it, not in the way he'd like I am sure, but it sort of shows the
absoluteness. God, how wonderful , everytime someone does something you find
uncomfortable or against the great devotional philosoply, oh well, they just had
a brain fart. Scary isn't it? Did Maharaji use the term "brain
farts" right in the Long Beach program, or did you just hear that he was saying
that? Typical of him. I don't suppose he wants to use the word "mind" anymore as
equivalent to the devil like he always used to. I suppose nowadays he says you
should "follow your heart" instead. But I think he's missing that if you are
going to get that inane, there is such a thing as a "heart fart" as well. And as
you say, just labeling independent, critical thought something negative, like
"mind" or "brain farts" is the method he uses and always used to try to deflect
any judgment or analysis of how, greedy, stupid, inane, destructive,
egotistical, uncarring, fake and fear-ridden, he and his cult really are.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
06:14:17 (EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts (Re: Devotion Quotes)
Message:
As far as I know, the first time m used to speak about
brain farts was during meetings with EV organizers. Those people who are
supposed to help him to the best of their capabilities, using their
intelligence. And what does he say when you serve him wholeheartedly, as well as
you can? That you have brain farts, and that it’s polluting the universe. So
much for your devotion. I finally decided that I wasn’t an idiot and that nobody
has any right to treat me like this. Specially a so-called loving guru. One of
the reasons I left. Maybe I’m not the best person Maybe I’ve done mistakes But
Nobody has any right to treat me like this. The hell with him, and I mean it.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
07:13:38 (EST)
Poster: Brian
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes
Message:
I was just
reading that same issue yesterday at work and was fascinated by his words. I'm
off to become a devotee now... Seriously, there was also a great account of his
first trip to the West. Holding First Class airline tickets, he wandered to the
back of the plane on every flight because in India there is was no First Class
section. Everyone sat wherever they wanted in the "slums" - as he put it.
Curious how his viewpoint changed to the point that he couldn't even share First
Class with other passengers later. The mission would buy up the whole section.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
09:33:40 (EST)
Poster: Mr Ex
Email:
To: Brian
Subject: Recent quotes? (Re: Devotion Quotes)
Message:
Hi Joe, I could transcript exactly the same kind of BS
from a very recent satsang (1997). Are you interested (Brian?) to have it on the
web-site? Just to show that nothing has changed since the 70s : only some
cosmetic changes, like - DLM’s name changed to EV - devotion as what’s still
required - darshan to ‘pay respect’ (no pranam anymore) - no Krishna sitting on
a throne, but rather a simple human being sitting on a crazy stage (picture of
Long Beach stage) Maybe we could list the items we’d like to illustrate with
very recent quotes. Otherwise I won’t lose an hour to do that. Maybe we’ll get
some explanations from Ros Sutton, how EV is only a meditation school and how we
misunderstand Maharaji’s word altogether.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
10:38:59 (EST)
Poster: Selena
Email:
To:
everyone
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes vs. Brain Farts (Re: Devotion
Quotes)
Message:
Yes, all, I am afraid it is true, he used the
term right up there in public on his throne, whoops scuse me, chair.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
15:38:56 (EST)
Poster: VP
Email:
To: Everyone
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes
Message:
Also rated N:
Better bound to hell than bound to a lifeless life. It sounds like GMJ only
wants you to sit around and devote and vegetate. (When you aren't guarding
cheese). You may as well be dead. Well, no thanks! There's too much to do and to
enjoy in this life.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
16:18:33 (EST)
Poster: John Cavad
Email:
To: JW
Subject: Re: Devotion Quotes
Message:
GMJ claims to
love unconditionally; but unless one surrenders to him totally obeying all his
rules, he loses interest. It;s one thing to put aside self-interest as a natural
expression of care within a living context; it's another to be expected to do so
as proof of love.
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Tues, Feb 10, 1998 at
23:00:22 (EST)
Poster: Mickey the Pharisee
Email:
[email protected]
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Re: Recent quotes?
(Re: Devotion Quotes)
Message:
Mr. Ex wrote: "Maybe we’ll get some
explanations from Ros Sutton, how EV is only a meditation school and how we
misunderstand Maharaji’s word altogether." I remember that I use to refer to DLM
as a "meditation society" after I left because I just didn't want to admit to
anyone that I had spent five years in a cult!
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index
Date: Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 22:09:16
(EST)
Poster: Brian
Email: [email protected]
To: Mr Ex
Subject: Re: Recent quotes? (Re: Devotion
Quotes)
Message:
I could transcript exactly the same kind of BS
from a very recent satsang (1997). Are you interested (Brian?) to have it on the
web-site? Just to show that nothing has changed since the 70s : only some
cosmetic changes, like - DLM’s name changed to EV - devotion as what’s still
required - darshan to ‘pay respect’ (no pranam anymore) - no Krishna sitting on
a throne, but rather a simple human being sitting on a crazy stage (picture of
Long Beach stage) Absolutely I'm interested. BTW, whenever you see me not
resonding to something in a post here that is directed at me, it's because I
didn't read that one. My online time available to read has dropped drastically
since taking over the site. I pick and choose according to the topic now and
miss a lot. I always respond to email though (one of the reasons that I don't
get to read as much here). I can be reached at [email protected] anytime :)
Back
To Index -:- Top of
Index