The Final Pages of Stanley Coren’s How
Dogs Think:
An Interesting Example of Causal Reasoning:
As I was working on the latest
section of this book I heard some excited whimpering. My beagle, Darby, was
excitedly running back and forth between my office and the kitchen. Curious
about what was wrong, I left my computer and went to
investigate. Darby has a fascination with my wife’s cat Loki, and seems puzzled
about how the cat can get himself up onto table and counter that are far too
high for Darby to reach with his short beagle legs. Like all of my dogs, he
also has a fondness for cat food if any can be stolen from the cat’s bowl. For this
reason, we have taken to putting Loki’s food dish on the kitchen counter, where
it cannot be emptied by dogs looking for an extra meal. In fact, I had fed Loki
only twenty minutes or so earlier. Since the counter is high, we sometimes
leave a little plastic stepstool near so that a lazy cat doesn’t have to exert
himself so much in leaping to the counter. The stool is low,
however, so it doesn’t help greedy, short dogs reach the counter. As usual, Darby
had been interested in the feeding process, watching carefully as I kished that
cat’s kibble into his bowl, and as usual he had made excited hopeful sounds. Now
as we entered the kitchen the cat had just jumped off of the counter. Darby
glanced up, then at the cat, then at me, and next he did something very strange.
He looked down and began to dig at the base of the counter. I looked down but saw
nothing.
“What are you trying to say, Darby?”
I asked him, as if I expected an answer.
Again he looked at me and then frantically
began to dig at the base of the counter. I looked down more closely and still
could see nothing. Darby paused and once more started to scratch at the base of
he counter with even more determination. Finally, in order to examine what he
was pawing at, I got down on my hands and knees to examine the area better. Suddenly
I felt something on my back and when I look up Darby was standing on the counter
and scooping up some of the stray bits of kibble that the cat had left behind.
There are many ways that one can
interpret this sequence of events. One of the most generous is to suggest that
Darby had observed the cat using the stepstool but recognized that he needed a
larger step to reach the counter. He also new that I often
came over to investigate what he was doing or places that he was paying
attention to. Therefore, if he had engaged in conscious planning, his
scheme was simple—namely to get me to bend down near the counter and to use me
as a larger, more functional stepstool. That is a long chain of speculations on
my part, and it credits the little dog with a high degree of consciousness and
reasoning. As a scientist I know that I have no evidence that this is what went
on his mind, but then again, I have no evidence that this was not what went on
in his mind. Since it is clear that in this instant a dog apparently outsmarted
someone who has a Ph.D. in psychology, it is more comforting for me suggest
that this is evidence of a dog’s thinking and intelligence.