Neuromodulation techniques in the treatment of the
overactive bladder
J. CROEN and J.L.H.R. BOSCH
Department af Uralagy, Erasmus MedicalCenter Rotterdam, RotterdClln, The Netherlcmds
Introduction
Symptoms of an overactive bladder often remain a
therapeutic problem despite optimal use of conservative
treatment methods induding drug therapy, behavioural
therapy, pelvic fioor exercises and biofeedback. In the lapt
decade, sacral nerve neuromodulation has been con-
firmed as a valuable addition to the therapeutic arsenal.
The success of sacral neuromodulation has renewed
interest in other neuromodulation techniques. The
current techniques of neuromodulation for treating the
overactive bladder are:
. anogenital electrical stimulation;
. transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS);
. sacral nerve neuromodulation;
. percutaneous posterior tibia! nerve stimulation (Stoller
afIerent nerve stimulation, SANS);
. magnetic stimulation.
Mechanism of action
It is unknown how neuromodulation works; indeed, it is
even unknown whether neuromodulation only works at
the spinal levei or whether supraspinal pathways are
involved [1]. The most important spinal inhibitory
mechanisms of the micturition refiex are [2]:
. The guarding refiex: increased activity of the striated
urethral sphincter in response to bladder filling,
refiexively inducing detrusor relaxation;
. Edvardsen's refiex: increased activity of the sympa-
thetic nervous system in response to bladder filling;
. Anal dilatation (afIerent pathway: anorectal branches
ofthe pelvic nerve; prevents voiding during defecation);
. Gentle. mechanical stimulation of the genital
region (afIerent pathway: dorsal 'ditora! or penile
branches of the pudendal nerve; prevents voiding
during intercourse);
Accepted for publication 1 March 2001
. Physical activity; alferent pathway: musde afIerents
from the ümbs (but not from the pelvic fioor!; prevents
voiding during fighting or fleeing);
Most oE the afIerent fibres involved in the above
inhibitory mechanisms reach the spinal cord via the
dorsal roots of the sacral nerves. Edvardsen's refiex can
also be activated by stimulation of afferent anorecta!
branches ofthe pelvic nerve and afferent dorsal clitoral or
penile branches of the pudenda! nerve, at least in cats. Its
role in humans is probably limited [3].
At least two potential mechanisms are possible: (i)
activation of elferent fibres to the striated urethra!
sphincter refiexively cause detrusor relaxation; and (ü)
activation of afferent fibres causes inhibition at a spinal or
a supraspinal leveI. Based on experiments in dogs and
observations in humans, Tanagho and Schmidt [4], who
introduced sacral neuromodulation into the field of
urology, adhered to the first theory. However, measure-
ments of the urethral pressure profile and af urethral
resistance during voiding do not indicate that the striated
sphincter is activated with the stimulation parameters
currently used [5]. Interesting studies supporting the
second theory are those in which the dorsal clitoral or
dorsal penile nerve, purely afferent branches of the
pudendal nerve, were electrically stimulated. This
induced a ~tr~ng inhibition of the mi~turition reflex
and detrusor hyper-refiexia in healthy volunteers and
patients with a hyper-refiexive bladder [6-8]. Fowler et a!.
[9] measured the latency of the anal sphincter contrac-
tion during a peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) test in
women who were candidates for sacral neuromodula-
tion, and conduded that this response was mediated by a
polysynaptic reflex rather than the result of efferent
stimulation. Experimental work in spinalized rats showed
that neuromodulation reduced the degree of hyper-
reflexia as well as the expression of c-Jas after bladder
instillation with acetic acid [lQi(C-fos protein is
expressed in the spinal cord after frri1ation of the lower
urinary tract; this expression is mainly mediated by
afIerent C fibres). This resuIt shows that inhibition of
afferent C fibre activity may be one of the underIying
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1