EVENT SCHEDULE
December 8-10 Savannah, GA Ft.
McAllister Winter Muster
January 12-14 Baxley, GA Indigo Rocks
Tactical
March 3-4 Savannah, GA Ft. Pulaski
Muster
March 9-11 Averasboro, NC
May 2-4 Marching Through Georgia
May 5-6 McDowell, GA
June 1-3 Pickett's Mill, GA
Members need to contact Jerry
Gouge regarding their desire to participate
in the above listed events. We need to
begin registering now. Some of the events
require a registration fee. Let's register as
a group for each of these events rather
than have individuals sending in their
monies. Contact Jerry Gouge at 800-824-
8083 days, 843-757-3689 evenings or at
PROPOSED CANDIDATES
If anyone has a man they feel would
fit into what we are trying to accomplish,
feel free to mention his name to Jerry
Gouge who will publish his candidacy in the
next newsletter.
Proposed Candidates
Omar Alkalouti
Wayne Dobson
Alan Forrester
If you feel that these men do not fit with
our group call me. If I do not receive 2
negative votes for any of them then they
will be mailed invitations around the end
of December.
Outstanding Invitations
Jeff Jue
Jeff Kirkland
Brian Mead
Ft. McAllister Garrison
According to William Scaife's The
March to the Sea, Ft. McAllister was
defended by the following during the Dec.
13, 1864 assault.
Maj. George W. Anderson, Commanding
Capt. Thomas A. White, Engineer-in-charge
The Emmett Rifles (25 men) Capt. George
A. Nicoll
Clinch's Ga. Light Artillery Battery (50
men) Capt. Nicholas B. Clinch (wounded)
Co. D, 1st Regt. Ga. Reserves (28 men)
Capt. George N. Hendry
Co. E, 1st Regt. Ga. Reserves (47 men)
Capt. ? Morrison (wounded)
Major Anderson reported that he
had "150 men for duty," yet Federals noted
the capture of 230 Confederates, including
killed and wounded. These Confederate
forces were for the most part untested
troops; few had any combat experience.
As Hazen's men approached the fort
they captured a Confederate picket by the
name of Thomas Mills who served with
Clinch's Ga. Light Artillery Battery.
Unfortunately for the garrison, Pvt. Mills
spilled the beans revealing both the
strength of the garrison as well as the
defenses, including the torpedoes. By 4:45
PM Hazen's men were in position to begin
their assault, forming a semi-circle around
the fort. Their lines were formed roughly
600 yards from the fort.
A signal was received from
Sherman's headquarters at Dr. Cheve's Rice
Mill and Hazen's assault began. The fort
was well armed for another river incursion
but inadequate for a land attack. Many of
the guns on the land side were mounted en
barbette along the earth palisade and thus
made easy targets of the artillerymen
manning them. Several were simply picked
off by Federal sharpshooters hidden in the
tall grass. As the main Federal line gained
the last few yards before the moat several
Federals were killed by buried torpedoes.
". . . Just outside the works a line of
torpedoes had been placed, many of which
were exploded by the tread of the troops,
blowing many men to atoms; but the line
moved on without checking, over, under,
and through abatis, ditches, palisading, and
parapet, fighting the garrison through the
fort to their bombproofs, from which they
still fought, and only succumbed as each
man was individually overpowered." (Brig.
Gen William B. Hazen)
Although overcome by a tidal wave
of Yanks, several Confederates refused to
surrender. In a report, garrison
commander, Maj. George W. Anderson
wrote: "I would therefore most respectfully
call the attention of the general
commanding to the gallant conduct of
Captain Clinch, who, when summoned to
surrender by a Federal captain, responded
by dealing him a severe blow on the head
with his sabre. (Captain Clinch had
previously received two gun shot wounds to
the arm). Immediately a hand to hand
fight ensued. Federal privates came to the
assistance of their officer, but the fearless
Clinch continued the unequal contest until
he fell bleeding from eleven wounds (three
saber wounds, six bayonet wounds, and two
gun shot wounds), from which, after severe
and protracted suffering, he has barely
recovered. His conduct was so
conspicuous, and his cool bravery so much
admired, as to elicit the praise of the
enemy and even of General Sherman
himself."
During the assault, the Federals lost
24 killed and 110 wounded. Confederates
losses included 17 killed and 31 wounded.
In his memoirs, Sherman described the
scene: "Inside the fort lay the dead as they
had fallen, and they could hardly be
distinguished from their living comrades,
sleeping soundly side by side in the pale
moonlight."
By that night communications had
been made between Sherman and the
Atlantic blockading fleet via the now open
Ogeechee River. Remarkably, on Dec. 16,
the Federals had erected a wharf and
warehouse where the unlimited supplies
from the fleet would soon flow.
Savannah's fate was sealed and Gen.
Hardee evacuated his forces, including the
State Line, from the city on December 21,
1864.
Indigo Rocks Tactical
The Indigo Rocks Tactical is January 12-14
in Appling County, GA just outside Baxley.
The tactical is located just off of HWY 144,
12 miles east of Baxley and is being hosted
by George and Harvey Eason of the 1st
Georgia State Line. There are hundreds of
acres of wilderness to fight in with no
modern distractions. There will be
campaign camping areas in the woods for
both sides and there will be plenty of room
for tent camping in a large pasture. Plenty
of parking space is available. There will
be water available and some hay.
Firewood available for gathering and port-
o-lets. Chris Collins will be the CS
Commander and Jerry Gouge will be the
US Commander. Registration fee is $3 per
person. For more information call George
Eason at 912-367-4810 or Harvey Eason at
912-986-9688.
Editorial by George Eason
I would like to begin here by saying
that this little tirade of mine mainly
concerns Confederate reenactors, but it can
apply to either side. I guess I'm being
pessimistic but I can see the lines being
formed up in reenacting between the
progressive and or hardcore reenactors and
the basic farby or marginal reenactors.
Now mind you, I am NOT saying
that one is farby just because they are not
hardcore or progressive or whatever.
However, I do feel like there is right way
and a wrong way of doing things and when
the two get mixed there is bound to be
friction and some division. Perhaps this is
inevitable, who knows. I realize that this is
a hobby (lifestyle for some) and it's
suppose to be fun, but there are too many
folks out there that don't give a rip about
history or authenticity. Many of these folks
just want to camp out, drink a beer, burn
powder and glory in being a danged ole
rebel.
They love to run around giving the
Rebel yell, swearing their undying devotion
to Jeff Davis and proclaiming that the
South was right and we're gonna rise again!
YEE-HAW! Well fellows, I love the South
also and I hold dear to my heart all of it's
history and heritage. I had six ancestors
that served in the Army Of Tennessee and
I love honoring their memory by trying to
accurately portray a loyal Southern soldier.
It's in my blood and spirit to do so.
It's exactly for that very reason that I hate
to see their memory stained by folks that
apparently don't have a clue.
I often wonder how many of these
good ole boys can really tell anyone about
how the common foot soldier ate, slept,
cooked and fought while he's out on the
march. How many of them can go a
weekend without a cooler full of food,
cokes or beer? How many can get by
without their big wall tent and comforts of
home?
Can they really educate the public in
any way about the life of the common
soldier? Sad to say, probably not. I'm pretty
sure many of them would freak out at the
prospect of packing their gear on their
back for the weekend and living off the
contents of their haversacks. To a lot of
these fellows the word authentic or
campaigner is a dirty word. Many don't
even really understand who they are trying
to portray. Here's a good example of what
I'm talking about. A friend and I were
talking to a reenactor one evening and my
friend made the statement that he
portrayed a soldier of The Army of
Tennessee. The fellow we were talking to
replied, "Well ,you'll have to go to
Tennessee to do that won't you". This
reenactor was a first sergeant in his unit
and commander of a S.C.V. camp! The bad
thing about this is that it's not all that
uncommon. Perhaps I sound like a know it
all but how can you portray someone that
you know almost nothing about? You
certainly can't honor them.
I like to get along with everyone but
it's hard to sit back and watch some of
these folks as they make a mockery of
history and their ancestors. I'm sure that
some could say I'm being too critical, but I
have noticed that there's quite a bit of
criticism coming at us from some of the
mainstreamers. I've heard them sitting
around and blasting folks for being
hardcore fanatics and stitch counters and
so on. Not everyone has to be hardcore, but
don't knock someone because they are
trying to do something right. I've heard
stories that hardcores and campaigners are
hostile, but I've seen plenty of hostility
coming from those who could care less
about doing it the right way. I personally
know of two fine reenactors that were
forced out of a unit because they were
considered to be too dirty! For land's sake!
Confederate soldiers didn't get dirty! Yeah,
and I'll sell you the Brooklyn Bridge too!
To sum things up, I think we all
need to strive to do things right, do our
homework and keep on growing in our
knowledge. We will never know it all but
we need to keep working at it regardless.
We also need to be always willing to share
what we know with others and always be
respectful of their feelings. I also feel,
however, that if someone is ruining my
experience because of their lack of concern
for historical accuracy or by just being a
flat out farb, then I am not going to
hesitate to speak my mind. It's like my
father told me one day many years ago, he
said: " Son, there are only two ways to do
something, you can do it right, or you can
do it half-assed!"
FAMILIAR HINTS TO
INDIANA SOLDIERS
TAKING THE FIELD
BY HENRY B. CARRINGTON
I. YOUR ENEMIES - UNCLEANLINESS,
PROFANITY, INTEMPERANCE,
LEWDNESS.
Keep the Body Clean - After marching, if
feet are sore, bathe in salt and water. Keep
the hair close; air your blankets well. You
never take cold, no matter how wet, if in
motion. When retiring wet, rub the body
until reaction comes on. If possible, never
retire in a state of perspiration, until the
body is clean and dry. Be regular in the
calls of nature; constipation results in half
the diseases of the camp.
Swearing profanes the name of the god of
battles. Remove Him if you wish His
blessing. Keep your own self-respect, and
you cannot become a coward. The habit is
unmanly, useless and degrading.
Drinking - unless under medical advice, is
your greatest curse. A well man was made
with nerves to sustain him under labor; he
can depend upon them. - Liquor excites,
but brings reaction and ruin. Coffee is a
stimulus and is nutritious. Quit strong
drink.
Lewdness makes beasts of men - never risk
it. Be as pure as when at home. In a word,
be as good citizens in the field as if at
home, where mothers, wives and maidens
look to you for support and favor.
II. DIET AND COOKING
You will cook for yourselves. Your
rations are super-abundant; save them' you
can. In cooking, remember that half cooked
food is ruinous. Better use uncooked pork
or bacon, hard bread and coffee, than eat
victuals half cooked that need perfect
cooking. Beans require thorough cooking;
soak them over night; don't smoke them,
you ruin them; boil them over a slow fire
for three hours at least - the same with
hominy. Skim your soups often, it will pay
you. Start with clean cold water, in clean
kettles. If your kettles are foul, your
victuals will be foul also. Pepper and salt
your soup half an hour before it comes off
the fire. Onions in your soup are good.
They are anti-scorbutic, and if you can get
them, they are good against scurvy. If you
fry bacon, get your fat hot before you put
the bacon in a mess pan. The pores of the
flesh close up at once, and prevent its
becoming greasy and indigestible. Stale
bread crumbled and put over it will help it.
Start potatoes in cold water with salt; if the
water boils sharply throw in cold water and
chock it. When nearly done pour off the
water, and leave the kettle on till the
steam evaporates. You can have mealy
potatoes if they are good for anything. To
fry potatoes, put them first in cold water
half an hour; then into hot fat till brown,
cutting them into thin slices; if you don't
they only accumulate fat.
Boil rice gently, stirring constantly
until it is soft. Turn it into a kettle or
coarse towel, and pour over it fresh cold
water, then put it into a clean kettle until
dry; serve hot or cold, as convenient, with
molasses.
Don't burn your coffee [when
roasting.] Use a little fat or sugar, stirring
constantly over a slow fire. When browned,
cover with a damp cloth to cool' then grind
it passing the mill twice. Use clean kettles.
When the water boils briskly, throw in the
coffee, having first wet it, and let it boil
for two minutes; then dash in a cup of cold
water, and take it off the fire, let it stand
five minutes, pour it through a flannel
strainer, into another kettle, to be served.
In measuring the water by rations, allow
five per cent, --lee-way. -Poor coffee is
secured by excessive boiling. Good coffee
can be made in a few minutes, as directed.
Soup can be made of most anything;
save your beef bones for the purpose -
skim faithfully. After the first boil, and the
scum begins to rise, chock your fire and
only let the water simmer. If you boil too
hard, the pores of the flesh close, the
essence of the meat is retained with all
impurities, no scum rises, the meat is hard
and tough, the soup is thin and watery.
Otherwise the juices are extracted, the
meat is rich and tender, the soup is rich
and nutritious. The fat skimmed off, keep
if you can, for other cooking. Cook two
hours. Don't put in too much salt or
pepper; there is no remedy but thinning the
soup, which spoils it. Better add more if
necessary. In pork and bean soup boil
briskly for an hour with the beans alone;
then take the kettles off for fifteen
minutes, pour off the water, and put in
clean water, add your port without rind,
and boil and hour and a half or two
continuously.
Elbow grease and ashes applied to
your kettles will not hurt what is to be
cooked in them. Grease upon coffee,
because of dirty kettles, is an abomination.
Keep your kettles clean.
III. ARMS AND EQUIPMENT
These are as a wife and family to
the solider. Pet them. Keep your musket
dry and bright. It may save your life. Don't
use sand or brick dust. A little flour of
emery will last long and be of service.
Don't use oil to excess, a little carefully
applied, and well rubbed, is better; deep
flannel for the purpose; see that the cone is
clear, the lock action, free and regular;
your ball-screws and screw driver always
on hand. After cleaning your piece, leave it
perfectly dry. A little more time taken will
pay the pains. After guard duty, at night,
wipe off the dew; however weary, never
sleep until this is done. Better lie down wet
yourself, than leave your musket wet, if
both cannot be attended to. See that there
is no water in your bayonet scabbard.
Use common blacking for your belts
and leather equipment. They will then last.
It will pay. When oil or lard is used, use it
sparingly and rub well. It is seldom needed.
Don't use strong fat for the purpose. Keep
your ammunition dry and your boxes full.
Soldiers need neither bowie-knives
or revolvers. They are a secret weapon, too
ready in case of brawl, and useless against
a foe. Trust your musket and bayonet. If
you have six shots, and are hard pressed,
you will throw away your musket. You then
cease to be a solider. Remember, here, that
"crossing bayonets" is never done by any
considerable force. Few well authenticated
cases are found in history. Push on
steadily, coolly and persistently, and you
will win.
IV. OBEDIENCE TO ORDERS AND
COOLNESS OF TEMPER
These are indispensable to make the
good or successful soldier. A thousand
Colonels to a regiment is not provided for
by the regulation. Obey the one you are
allowed. Better obey an officer of less
experience, who is cool and courageous,
than try to dictate to those who are
responsible for the regiment.
Your safety is in your courage. The
shock of battle is soon over. The cowards
who bread and run, suffer most. If abused,
or maltreated, remember these is a just and
proper remedy. Don't try to execute the
law yourselves. It don't pay. Manfully ask
your rights, but obey orders. But soldiers
who do their duty, seldom complain.
Grumblers exist; always have; always will.
But don't you grumble. Bear toil and labor
patiently. You will be rewarded.
V. TRANSPORTATION AND
RAILROAD CAR DEFENSE
By Cars. - Load and unload by platoons,
one to the car. A train can load in ten
minutes. If in a hostile country, unite the
knapsacks of comrades on a set, hang them
between the windows, covering the vital
parts. The man by the window can have a
ready fire, having butt of musket against
leg of seat, leaning to window. Comrade
carries his piece erect, between his feet. He
can load while the other fires, exchanging
pieces. The men by the windows are
number one - their comrades in the seat
are number two. If train stops, number
twos pass out opposite side from attack -
falling upon the ground, firing beneath the
car, until the whole command can form. If
attack be made upon both sides, the men
should remain firm until the commanding
officer selects his place of formation, and
then steadily, by files, march to their
position. - Haste will only disorganize.
Meanwhile a fire may be maintained by a
squad from each car to divert attack from
forming parties. Coolness in such
circumstances is indispensable to safety;
and a prompt formation will defeat the
enemy.
Remember no train will be urged
into the face of a large force. Such attacks
are by guerillas, or small detachments.
Your self-possession will save you, and a
brisk attack will ruin your assailants.
On Steamboats. - Don't spread over the
boat at first. Twice as many men as you
suppose may be quartered on a steamer. If
formed in a single rank, in any space seven
feet deep - face to the partition - unsling
knapsacks; deposit them six inches apart -
number your men by companies in whole
numbers - unsling and spread blankets -
four double - and you have room and every
man has his place.
Remember that loud talking is
unbecoming a solider. Never be so situated
that the call of your officer cannot at once
be heard and responded to. You are minute
men in this war. A minute lost, is lost
forever. Save the minutes, and your toils
and labors will soon be at an end.
VI. THE SICK AND WOUNDED
Be brothers to those who suffer.
Your turn may come next. Be unselfish, for
you are comrades. Stint yourselves for
those who languish. Don't fret because one
breaks down. The best men may give out.
Share your canteen of cold coffee or water
with the weary. You'll not repent it. Better
that you suffer in part, than have your
regiment strewed for miles by the wayside.
Remember a bandage, even a handkerchief,
tightly bound above an artery, or both
above and below, if there be much effusion
of blood, may check the flow until relief
comes. In the hot sun, a sponge, or green
leaves, in the hat, slightly wet, may prevent
sunstroke. If threatened with frosted feet,
or fingers, promptly apply cold water until
reaction comes on. If very cold and drowsy,
don't give way to sleep until your
extremities are warm again. If gruel cannot
be procured for the sick, on the march,
crush corn, extemporize corn meal, and you
can, with salt and crackers make a very
respectable substitute. Stale bread, toasted
hard, soaked and seasoned, will give
nutriment, refresh the sick, and will require
but a few minutes stop.
In all things, cherish the unity of
feeling, which makes men one in sympathy,
as they must be one in danger and
adventure.
VII. LAST BUT NOT LEAST
Remember this is not a mercenary
war - a war for pay or plunder. Our true
condition is that of peace. Armies are but
an expansion of police authority, when civil
process is inadequate to maintain order in
the States. You fight to maintain civil
authority; that our country whole and
complete again, may know peace. You are
soldiers now - you are again to become
citizens. Let all your acts, therefore,
however earnest and aggressive upon the
enemies of the State, prepare you to
become better citizens, inasmuch, as by
your toil and sacrifice, you have learned
how precious our institutions are, and can
realize the value of a well ordered,
peaceful Republic.
Dare, do and endure, and you will
be blessed. Your fellow soldier,
HENRY B. CARRINGTON Col. 18th Inf.
U.S.A., Com'd'g at Indianapolis. And
Mustering officer for Indiana.
An Attempt at Defining the
Terms:
Authentic, Hardcore, Progressive,
Mainstreamer, Farb and Campaigner
By Paul Calloway
There is so much confusion about a
certain set of terms that I think it would be
useful to attempt to set some definitions to
these terms. It may confuse the matter
more, it may cause still more infighting -
but these are not my goals when writing
this article. Rather, I purpose to create a
forum for the discussion of these terms
alone. I also believe eliminating some of
the ambiguity in how we define ourselves
may lead to a more healthy reenacting
experience for all.
First and foremost, I believe that
there is room in the hobby for all. I think
Joe Farb has every right to go to a wide-
open reenactment and drink his swill and
go to the dance. At a wide-open
reenactment, Joe Farb shouldn't have to
put up with jeers and dirty looks from the
hardcore crowd. The hardcores should
expect Joe Farb to be there and it was
their choice to attend that wide-open
reenactment so they all should deal
maturely with the result. I also think Henry
Hardcore has every right to go to a
reenactment where authenticity
requirements are set to prevent Joe Farb
from showing up. If the event clearly says,
invitation-only, they mean it... Joe Farb
should get his invitation before he goes. If
he's turned down, Joe Farb should deal
with it and not go there seeking a
confrontation.
We all get a certain degree of
enjoyment out of this hobby or we wouldn't
be spending our dollars and time on it.
What tickles Joe Farb's fancy is likely to
be different from what might give Henry
Hardcore a rush. Let them both get what
they want out of the hobby and everybody
will be happy. We've all got guns... let's all
do our part in preventing anyone from
going postal.
To both Joe and Henry, and to all
those in between, I suggest you do your
homework ahead of time and attend events
that are likely to meet your expectations.
Henry Hardcore, don't go to the battle of
"Ya'll Come" where invitations are open to
all and expect everyone in the ranks to be
dressed in Child's kits or Wedeward sacks...
it's ridiculous but sometimes that's what we
expect. Joe Farb, don't show up at an
expressly campaign-style event with your
A-Tent and plop down in the middle of the
campaign camp and not expect some dirty
looks.
Now, back to the subject at hand. In
this document, I will attempt to provide
detailed definitions to the proceeding set of
terms. It has been my observation that
friction comes when any three of these
stages or levels are combined in the same
proximity (whether it be a battalion
formation or just in camp) and thus one of
my reasons for creating these definitions.
An example would be a battalion of
mainstreamers, progressives and hardcores
or another would farbs, mainstreamers and
progressives... combining any three has
been in my experience a major
disappointment to somebody.
Farb, Mainstreamer, Progressive, Hardcore,
Authentic and Campaigner
I look at these terms on a sliding scale:
< Farb >< Mainstreamer >< Progressive ><
Hardcore >< Authentic>
Reenactors normally slide from one level
to the next (normally left to right) and on
a on few occasions, certain reenactors have
been known to skip several stages on the
authenticity sliding scale. This can happen
when a hardcore or progressive group takes
a fresh fish under his wing and thus
intercedes in what some might consider the
"natural progression" or even "evolution" of
the Civil War Reenactor.
You'll note that I did not even
mention the word Campaigner which many
consider to be a level of authenticity in and
of itself. I do not ascribe to this belief.
Please read on as I discuss this in great
detail later.
Defining the Term FARB: Most
reenactors come into the hobby as a
FARB. Some of them stay right there
indefinitely, others begin moving toward
the right. When we talk about a FARB, I
think of wristwatches, modern eyeglasses,
coolers in camp, MRE's for rations, etc.
The term FARB is much like the word
"hoosier" which no-one really knows for
sure where it comes from. One of the more
believable explanations was explained by
Ross M. Kimmel in "Confessions of a
Blackhat: Recollections as a Skirmisher
During the Civil War Centennial; Part Six
in a Series: Friction and Film" which
appeared in the Winter 2000 issue of the
Camp Chase Gazette (Vol. XXVII - No. 3)
pp. 55-56.
"I have mentioned the F-word -
"farby" which survives in the reenactment
subculture today as "farb," meaning a
person who is not authentic." "Believe it or
not, it was invented in Gerry Rolph's
kitchen in the early 1960's, I think by the
time of the First Manassas reenactment."
"It originated as an adjective, farby, to
describe that which did not come up to
Blackhat authenticity standards." ".... farben
in German... means colorful, which
certainly describes many farbs."
Defining the Term MAINSTREAMER:
MAINSTREAMERS use general-line
equipment from sutler-row and usually
exhibit a "this is only a hobby" mentality.
Some folks start at this level, believing that
wearing wrist-watches and sunglasses are
obvious anachronisms that need be avoided.
They'll usually keep their coolers hidden in
their tents and often times are very
focused on the battles. It has been my
observation that they usually hold
hardcores in contempt even though they
most have never met or talked with one.
This was the case with me in the early days
of my reenacting experience. I frequented
terms such as "button-pissers, stitch-nazis
and stitch-counters" without really knowing
who or what I was describing. I only knew
what I had been told by other
mainstreamers and farbs. However, it was
at this stage of my impression that I could
easily have been described a campaigner! I
was using mainstream gear but sleeping
under the stars, eating out of my haversack
and shying away from status quo
reenacting. I don't think the term
Progressive could have been ascribed to me
as I had no interest in obtaining more
correct gear.
Personal Note Aside: Mainstreamers and
Farbs aren't all bad, and whatever you
might have heard, hardcores don't hate
them...
Defining the Term PROGRESSIVE:
Reenactors reach the PROGRESSIVE
stage when they begin making an all out
effort (within the limits of their finances)
to get things as right as possible. They'll
usually have an increased interest in doing
Living History and may have started to feel
that pitched battles are losing their luster.
When the event calls for garrison-style
camping, they will bring A-Tents and
limited camp furniture. If it's a campaign-
style event, they'll usually put up shelter
halves or sleep under the stars. They'll be
consciously looking for the best gear they
can buy and can be noticed as having a
more soldierly outlook and approach to the
hobby. Their views on hardcores are
noticeably changing and are now becoming
for appreciative of the research many other
hardcores and progressives have done
which they now realize is of great benefit
to them, the progressive reenactor.
Defining the Term HARDCORE:
This is perhaps the least understood of all
the levels / stages and thus I intend to
spend a fair amount of time on it. In the
grand scheme of Civil War Reenacting, few
have made it to the HARDCORE stage.
Although, arguably, more and more have
made it to the Hardcore level of late. Still
more think they've made it here but
probably haven't. Scott Cross of the
Mudsills has dutifully described in the
following manner in a recent web posting
and I've taken the liberty to quote him:
"After 20 years of Civl War living History
with the Mudsills, I have some definite
ideas [about the definition of hardcore.] A
hardcore bases every article of his
impression on documented sources, i.e.:
actual items in museums or private
collections. He doesn't have to do the
primary research all by himself, because he
networks with other trusted hardcores that
do primary research on artifacts. He
doesn't have to make all of his impression
parts, but knows who is out there that can
do it in the same manner as the 19th
century manufacturers. First-Person is
another part of being a Hardcore. Either
individual biographical research or unit
research is important to him. The first-
person stories of the common soldier are
an integral part of his study. Campaigning
is another factor. Re-enactments are not
important, because one can never
authentically recreate a battle. Marching
with minimal gear, camping and cooking as
they did, and experiencing every possible
hardship, from winter cabins to burning
and bending railroad iron, helps the
Hardcore to connect with those men from
the past. I would also have to include a
military mindset is also essential. Some
may disagree with this, but you can't
understand the day to day life of the
soldier without running a military style
camp, with competent officers and NCO's.
I suppose that we are looking for total
immersion type experiences in what we do.
The closer the experience, the more we
identify with the historical people, the
closer we identify, the better we can share
that knowledge with each other and the
public. I'm sure I've forgotten a few things,
but I'm also sure my comrades will fill the
gaps."
This is the big leagues where
complete immersion is the goal. Finances
be d***ed, there are no excuses to be made
at this level. Do it right or don't do it.
Some call this the BIRD principal,
ie."because it's right darn-it!" On a side
note, please don't assume someone is a
hardcore because they use the term BIRD.
Rather many hardcores shy away from the
term as it seems to trivialize and humarize
the effort of authenticity. Not everything in
life need be demoted to a catch-phrase.
Although, if you are a frequenter of the
term BIRD, don't let hardcores push you
around about it while saying other catch-
phrases FARB out the other side of their
head. Come on reader, smile, that was a
good point.
An excellent treatise on the
Hardcore movement can be found in both
the March 2000 issue of the CCG as well as
being posted on the internet. It's called the
Campaigner's Manifesto, written by Col.
Nicky Hughes of the Breckinridge
Battalion. (A similar treatise exists for
Civilian reenactors.) Although I don't agree
with how he has couched the term
Campaigner in his writing, I think the
manifesto clearly applies to the hardcore
movement. I'll spend more time discussing
the term Campaigner but suffice it to say
that using my definitions, a more apt term
might be, "The Hardcore's Manifesto".
Although the name Hardcore is a term of
derision by many mainstreamers, it is also
a badge of honor that most real hardcores
are happy to have ascribed to them. The
term campaigner however is adopted by
groups with clearly mainstream impressions
and thus my belief that in the context of
the manifesto, the term hardcore would be
more appropriate. This is not to denigrate
Mr. Hughes' work here though as it is
outstanding and should be the gold-
standard for serious reenactors in their
pursuit of authenticity.
Defining the Term AUTHENTIC:
Yes, finally there is the level of
AUTHENTIC which all reenactors should
strive for yet none of us will ever obtain.
The model authentic was the true Civil War
Soldier and we can know him through his
photographs, diaries, letters and other
primary resources. This is where we set our
sights and when the world of reenacting
politics begins to muddy the landscape, this
is the guiding light.
Defining the Term CAMPAIGNER:
With regard to the term CAMPAIGNER, I
view this as a particular aspect of a
soldier's life. At times the real soldiers
were on campaign, other times they were
garrisoned. In the world of reenacting, it is
possible to have a Mainstream Campaigner
(Chickamauga) or a Hardcore Garrisoner
(Ft. Pulaski.) I do not see the term
campaigner as an independent description
of ones commitment to authenticity except
as it relates to the scenario at hand. As I
mentioned previously
CONCLUSION:
To summarize, these are my humble
opinions having been in all these separate
movements at one time or another. I have
also had a great deal of exposure to all of
these stages of authenticity as a result of
the creation and maintaining of my
website, the Authentic Campaigner. I
expect there will be some disagreement
and perhaps even heated debate. You're
welcome to have your own opinions... as
someone has said they are said to be like
armpits - everyone has them and they
usually stink, including my own. A certain
amount of nastiness is generally expected.
Please, just keep the name-calling away
from using my mother's name... I get
touchy on that point. She's a good woman.
;-) Have your own thoughts on the matter?
Go to the Authentic Campaigner Forums
and Discuss it!
I respectfully close and wish you all the
best, regardless of what category I may
have inadvertently lumped you in. I am
fortunate to have dear, lifelong friends at
all stages - I hope that never changes.
MAHAN'S OUTPOST
For those of you who missed
Mahan's you missed probably one of the
best events ever. For some strange reason,
call it the luck of the draw or whatever
most of the Federal Regulars were in one
company that being the one led by Duke
Culberson. He was a fantastic commander
and from what I have heard ours was the
only company that met with success and
survive intact after Sunday morning's
"battle".
This was the first time for me that
I have been involved in a first person only
style event. It was not that difficult and
everyone in our company did a great job
staying in first person. One thing you have
to watch out for is modern day slang. I
found that the best way to talk was to be
slow and deliberate and to think out
everything in advance before opening your
mouth. I caught myself saying "cool" and
used the term "blow torch" to describe
Dutch blowing on a fire and "bathroom" to
describe a Reb relieving himself.
It pays to go prepared and the
Regulars were the only people that brought
some food and as a result our company had
a fine dinner late Saturday night. Though
spooning would have kept us a bit warmer,
it seems it will have to get even colder
before all of our modern inhibitions will
see us spooning.
I noticed that if a person does not
have access to all of the modern day
conveniences they are not missed. I came
to the conclusion that if we put our minds
to it we can be a lot more authentic then
we realize. Keep the faith boys!