Who's Paying for the Isolated US- Soldiers' abuse Case in Iraqi Prison? (May-04)
M.E. REALITY CHECK

 
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/jeff/jacoby_2004_05_07.php3

Abandoning Gaza will not end terrorism
Jeff Jacoby

May 7, 2004

 Meirav, the 2-year-old, had been strapped into a car seat for safety.  But car seats are no protection against bullets, and by the time rescue workers reached the Citroen station wagon, Meirav was dead of multiple gunshot wounds to the head.  So was her 7-year-old sister, Roni.  And Hadar, the 9-year-old.  And Hila, 11.  One by one, each had been shot at point-blank range.
 
    In the driver's seat, their mother was dead too.  Tali Hatuel, 34, was a social worker who was often called upon to comfort and assist victims of terrorism.  Eight months pregnant with her first boy, she had been driving to Ashkelon on Sunday for an ultrasound exam.  Then she and the girls had planned to join her husband David at an election precinct to urge voters to oppose the controversial Israeli referendum on unilaterally "disengaging" from the Gaza Strip.
 
    But David never saw his wife and daughters alive again.  He buried them Sunday evening, sobbing with grief and surrounded by thousands of mourners in Ashkelon's new cemetery.  "You were my flowers," he wept. "I am all alone and there is no one left."
 
    Not long after the slaughter of the Hatuel family, two terror groups -- Islamic Jihad and the Popular Resistance Committee -- proudly claimed responsibility in a call to the Associated Press.  The official Voice of Palestine radio praised the quintuple murder as a "heroic" operation against "five settlers," not bothering to mention that the victims were an unarmed pregnant woman and four children.
 
    The savagery of the attack was similarly downplayed by National Public Radio in its broadcast the next morning.  Actually, reporter Julie McCarthy did more than minimize the horror of the massacre. She blamed the victims for "provoking" their own murder -- not by anything they did, but by their mere "presence" in the disputed territory.
 
    "The settlers rallied support [against the referendum], saying Israel was withdrawing under fire," McCarthy reported, "but there was ample evidence yesterday to show that their continued presence in Gaza is provoking bloodshed. Israeli troops shot dead two Palestinian gunmen after the men ambushed a mother and her four small daughters outside the Gaza settlement of Gush Katif.  The family was shot and killed on their way to the Israeli city of Ashkelon."
 
    In NPR's warped moral calculus, Tali Hatuel and her children are in early graves not because Palestinian culture celebrates the mass-murder of Jews, but because Jews have no business living among Arabs.  If McCarthy had been reporting from Birmingham in September 1963, would she have blamed the bombing of the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church on the provocative "presence" of the four black girls who died in the explosion?
 
    The Hatuels opposed Ariel Sharon's proposed Gaza pullout because they understood that unilaterally surrendering land to Hamas and the PLO could only result in more terror and bloodshed, not less.  If the past decade -- the era of the "land for peace" delusion -- has made anything clear, it is that the more Israel concedes to the Palestinians, the worse Palestinian terror becomes.  Abandoning Gaza will not make the Arabs more peaceful.  It will simply strengthen their conviction that Israelis can be defeated through terrorism, and make Gaza a more effective staging-area for violent attacks on Jews.
 
    Notwithstanding the defeat of Sunday's referendum, Sharon says he still intends to go forward with his "disengagement" from Gaza.  That presumably will mean the uprooting of some 8,000 Gazan Jews from the homes, farms, and schools they have built over the past quarter-century.  The State Department and the United Nations will cheer the sight of Gaza being ethnically cleansed of its Jewish population -- being rendered Judenrein, as the Nazis used to say.  But having approved Sharon's expulsion of Jews from territory largely occupied by Arabs, what will they say if he then proposes to expel Arabs from places whose majority is Jewish?
 
    No: Arab-Israeli peace will not be won by dragging people, kicking and screaming, from their homes.  Nor will it be won by giving land and statehood to the gangsters who run Hamas and Fatah.  Abandoning the field to the terrorists will not make the terrorism stop.
 
    The only workable recipe for lasting Middle East peace is the enormously difficult one of remaking Palestinian society from the bottom up.  Of destroying its poisonous culture of violence, death-worship, and Jew-hatred.  Of educating its people for democracy and tolerance.  Of replacing its cruel and corrupt rulers with leaders genuinely committed to moderation.
 
    Only when -- only if -- such a transformation takes place will the Palestinians be ready for statehood.  To confer sovereignty on them now would be disastrous, a guarantee of violence for years to come.  If there is one thing a regime that can call the execution of a mother and her four daughters "heroic" doesn't need, it is a reward.

 

THE HIGH PRICE


In a message dated 5/9/2004 1:33:26 AM Eastern Standard Time, Discocapper writes:
Saw that earlier today. Of course he is exactly right! But to appease the Arabs the US is going to force Israel to give up something, but at least right now we are leaning on Arafat's latest stooge PM to make a gesture. Bush and Rice HAVE TO SEE throught the charade that the PA will settle for anything less than ALL OF ISRAEL. It is damaging, though, when Sharon comes here, gets an endorsement from Bush, and then Israel cracks an egg on Bush's forehead. It is also interesting that the US is using the same WRONG (?) tactic in fighting scum in Fallujeh that Israel uses in Gaza. Haven't we learned ANYTHING! Fallujeh should have been incinerated! Instead now we have this war prisoner scandal, and guess which country is going to pay a price for that?
________________________
 
Bush now siding with Jordan and backing off support for Sharon is deplorable.
The sick soldiers' abuse in Iraqi prison, is INDIRECTLY hurting us, as Arab pressure is mounting gaining momentum when Graphic Photos tarnish Bush and WEAKEN him.

Thus, Weakening even more the already weak-hero 'David' Vs Arabian 'Goliath' that grows ever STRONGER demanding and Monsterous.
 
__________________________
 
RE: 'ABUSE' CASE

Regarding the abuse case itself:
 
Man Bites Dog...

(May 2004, Re: Allegation of Abuse in Iraq.)

Do you ever wonder why it is so difficult for the needle of truth to pop the balloon of an empty content crusade?

Let's put it this way:

Why is there a commotion when US/UK, etc., are 'caught' with a SOME RARE abuse case?

Or rather:

Why is it at all such a big deal on this case for so long all over the world, such screaming headlines, such a TV and Internet mega noise?

This, at a time that (to pick some examples:) 'Moderate' Muslim World, is apologizing for Al Qaeda atrocities around the globe.

At a time that even the Bias UN is admitting that the Sudanese 'crisis' GENOCIDE, involving Islamo Fascism on Christians, and Arab-Muslim Racism on Black Muslims, that has already claimed 2,000,000 innocent lives, is to be considered the greatest human catastrophe since WW2.

What's the big sensation -- there for -- with some isolated youngsters abusing Iraqi Arab Criminals in a prison?

You guessed the answer right, because of it's rareness, because of it's unusualness, because of the outside of US/UK norms, rules, and nature.

We/them all are used to THEM torturing en masse with 'celebration' and sick 'pride,' no one is used to US/UK behaving like them, no one can accept a rare case by US that reminds even a shadow of their daily routine.

In their evil bloody 'Routine' it would be extremely boring, and no 'story' whatsoever.

[It reminds us how the 75% Polled backers of Genocide Bombing, the ones that love posing as victims, the Arab "palestinians,"  DARE to "criticize" Beautiful Upper Moral Israel in the UN... False 'victims' ].

Only on a special beautifully garment, any little stain, even the tiniest, is conspicuous...

They, the media and all of us are accustomed so 'conveniently' to 'Dog Biting Man,' we can't let go, and it won't fly that 'A Man Bites a Dog'...
 

Home

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1