Ex-DCF worker allegedly lied skillfully
Angela Edgerton, a former child protective investigator,
went into great detail in the reports in question.
By Gabriel Margasak
staff writer
August 17, 2005
The devil was in the details
in the case of a Stuart social worker fired by the Department of Children and
Families and arrested this week for allegedly filing false investigative
reports.
Child protective
investigator Angela Christine Edgerton, 30, got away with falsifications in at
least 13 cases because of the elaborate detail she included in the reports she
filed while investigating child abuse allegations, Stuart police said Tuesday.
Edgerton described nuances
down to which posters children had in their rooms.
"Anybody reading these
reports would believe an actual investigation had taken place," Stuart
police Sgt. Kim Major said. "They were very detailed, right down to the
types of services she offered."
Edgerton, who told police
she was now working at a day care center, could not be reached for comment.
A months-long Stuart police
investigation found discrepancies in at least six of Edgerton's cases. A DCF
official acknowledged that a review of 102 of her case files, going back one
year, had uncovered 13 cases with "some type of falsification."
"Whenever anything like
this happens, we go back and review and see what we can do differently,"
DCF spokeswoman Christine W. Demetriades said.
"Obviously you need to just keep getting better at these things, given
what happened here."
She added that only two of
the 13 cases contained falsified accounts of interviews with children. In the
other cases, adults claimed they'd never met Edgerton, even though she reported
interviewing them.
Despite the single felony
charge of filing false reports, police and DCF officials said no harm came to
any children involved.
Edgerton was hired by the
DCF on July 7, 2003, and was fired May 19 after the irregularities came to
light on May 5, Demetriades reported.
Demetriades explained that DCF workers, who
generally handle 10 to 12 cases a month, are required to make face-to-face
contact with alleged victims within 24 hours of a complaint. The observations
are then typed into a computer as an initial risk assessment report.
All cases are reviewed by a
supervisor at least twice, and police frequently accompany case workers on
their calls, officials said. The DCF has used random follow-up phone calls to
families as an extra check, Demetriades said.
The DCF "may need to
increase these types of calls," she said.
In one case, Edgerton filed
a report indicating she'd conducted a home inspection to check on a child after
an allegation of mistreatment against a guardian. She even noted who let her
into the home, according to a Stuart police report.
But the guardian later told
a DCF supervisor she'd never met Edgerton and didn't even know about the
complaint until the child told her a DCF worker had talked to her at school,
the report states.
Although Edgerton was able
to falsify reports for some time, Demetriades said
DCF safeguards worked in the end.
"I really feel that we
did everything we could have in this," she said. "We feel strongly
that the vast majority of our staff would not even contemplate such
behavior."
- [email protected]
http://www.tcpalm.com/tcp/local_news/article/0,2545,TCP_16736_4007705,00.html