ewanage
runotentertained?
site
home>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

mcgregor
<<back
? date ?                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
we're locked in a battle of  the laws of pyshics...read on

Episode 1
Attack of the candle


sumbitted by: TORR (me :D)


It's a spectacular scene. Ah yes the elephant scene in Moulin Rouge is practically a masterpiece in cinema (and NO that is not my opinion!! :D) Yet, when Christian helps Satine out as she trys to mumble the words out to "your song" to the charming (RRRRIGHT) Duke, and knocks the flaming candle off the table, and by the end of the scene the room isn't bursting in flames, that's quite a marvel. Not that i would want the room bursting in flames, no no no, but last time i checked when u tipped over a burning candle onto a tablecloth/carpet, i recall seeing fire. And how Christian tipped it over it's a wonder that he didn't burn himself. But actually, the fact that the scene didn't end with the trio being burnt alive in a flaming elephant, was a good thing. :D
ON SECOND THOUGHT...
got a second thought?
e-mail me
September 26th, 2003                                                                                                                                                                                               
where it'd go?

Now you See it, Now you Don't!


sumbitted by: TORR (me :D)


Looking at the spetacular scene (no pun intended, LOL) after Satine's "ooo i'd buy us a big house, where we both could live" and that nice lil meeting with Christian under the table telling him to leave, in the next frame we see the two rising in unison, with Satine singing the signature line of Christian's song, ultimately swooning the duke (and if you didn't notice, when she sings "now your in the world" she looks away for a second, a firm sign of their no love!! :D) but Christain rises behind the duke at this same time and we see in that shot that the table with the "champaign!" is no longer there!!! POOF! What's up with that? Prolly, cause the table would've been in the way for that shot...but still.....
April 10th, 2004                                                                                                                                                                                               
wig or no???

Could it be real?


sumbitted by: TORR (me :D
)

Nightwatch can sometimes be one of those "hmmm..." movies, plot lines and casting department aside, I have to often question whether or not Patricia Arquette's hair in that movie is...real.  Now, the opening scene where she has it pulled up I can see its authenticty, but other than that it defitenely causes one to question.  First off, the style of it makes such questions arise, such a "banged and straight hair" do seems like a typical fashion in a wig magazine.  The quality of her hair, a majority of the time frazzled, makes one speculate.  I guess we'll never know then, and the question remains, "wig or no?" And if it isn't, then NO props to the makeup/hair department! :/
June 3rd, 2004                                                                                                                                                                                               
romeo, romeo, wherefore art thou romeo?

The scene and its dissapearance

sumbitted by: TORR (me :D
)

Now before I start, this is for all you  "Romeo and Juliet" experts out there:  I'm well aware that in questioning where a particular scene went that using that quote is not actually correct. Because she's not asking where he is.   But it just flows so well!!! LOL *feels geeky*  Anyhoo...I'm getting down to business on the fact that Big Fish suddenly had its big fish in a small pond without one of his triumphs in the winning sequence.  See a grand slam hit in a baseball game, science project winner, basketball game triumph, and...in the previews...standing ovation for a excellent performance of a play (I'll assume Romeo and Juliet).  Here and here are two pics of the Romeo Ewan that were shown in the promotional trailer.  I was suprised to see in watching the movie and then the extras that this scene was not included.  Yet I have a possible theory on the fate of this scene.  I believe that if they had shown that scene where he was recieving a standing ovation for wonderful acting, the audience would be inclined to think he might start a future in acting, while the other accomplished actions were not enough to represent a proabable future.  No offense to sport's buffs, but how often does some small town guy get drafted in to the NBA, etc?  I know that acting for a living is very limited too, but I think the showing of that scene would've put a depth into Edward's character that wouldn't have ever been resolved; creating confusion.  Yet it is sad to see the scene sliced,
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1