![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| 1. The New Jeep Cherokee. |
Not only does it look stupid, rolls over every time you go round a corner and have the rear legroom of a bicycle but it has useless rear bumpers. Hence if someone crashes into your rear at 5mph the spare wheel takes the brunt killing the entire rear bodywork and your no claims bonus. Nice. |
| 2. The Saab Viggen |
If you want to pay extra for the previous model, albeit with less room fine, but for me it makes no sense. Buy an S60. An 850 chassis and 250bhp dont equal fun anymore. The looks are a generation behind the rest of the range. And it costs more, or have I already said that. |
| 3. The Volvo C70 T5 |
![]() |
| Who's bright idea was it to put 250bhp through a cavalier chasssis and charge �30k for it? Apart from the fact that the standard car was probably faster as you didnt have to wrestle with torque steer and chronic wheel spin, if you wanted to go fast then you bought a 328i.The sad thing was people bought these cars without driving them. " would sir like a standard saab, or one which costs �5k more". You can guess their reply. And oh look, Saabs plan for a performance sub brand have quitely dissapeared. |
| Buy a fiesta. Get the bus. Anything but a Nova. |
| 4. All Novas |
| 5. All saloon versions of hatchbacks |
![]() |
| Why? They are more expensive, more difficult to park, depreciate more, and are ugly. VW have the excuse that the sell more Boras or Vento as they are know there, than Golfs in America, but everyone else, why?. Renault megane classics, pointless. Ford Focus saloon, lets make one of the best designs of modern time ugly. Nissan Almera, like they don't depreciate enough already. They are all jokes. And the manufacturors wonder why the don't sell. |
![]() |