Abstract:
It is known that reality is subjective in nature and there is no one true reality. Each individual�s reality is unique in its own manor in respect to how that individual interprets/perceives an event or thought. This would seem to indicate that there is great number of multiple realities and I believe that there are so many variables in interpretation that there is a potential for an infinite amount of reality and thought. So as we as humans perceive things, usually in the physical sense of sensory impute, we define that as our reality. Physical perception however is only a portion of our thought and there is thought that is more abstract in nature that is not bound to �physical� laws nor just to sensory impute. I believe that because the non-physical thoughts exist, that these perceptions/objects of the non-physical also exist in their own reality; this is of course because as reality is defined as interpretation of thought. This seems to be similar to the quote �I think therefore I am� as a definition of ones perceived reality; there also should be �I think therefore all thought exists� as that would imply that perception validates a reality. Also just because a thought is based on the foundation of non-physical reality does not necessarily detract from its validity or overall value. I believe that humans are more in tune to what their mind can easily perceive, this being the physical realm. The reasoning would obviously be because of the sensory organs that we possess are geared to picking up these certain frequencies giving a noticeable distinction between the two types of perception. This gives way to the misconception of one acceptable physical reality and another that is simply disregarded as imagination or thought with no potential of being a measure of actuality. I think the physical or tangible realities overshadow many of abstract nature that could have a potential of governing properties, characteristics and a foundation in terms of a reality.