·         Leicester's lesson in racial harmony

Following a recent report by the BBC “Leicester's lesson in racial harmony” and how it is now a role model for places like Oldham and in deed the whole of the England what exactly what sort of role model is it?

 Manzoor Moghal, chairman of the Federation of Muslim Organisations in Leicester and a member of the Labour Party, attributes the turn-around in attitude to the setting up of Definable Structures and Organisations such creation of race relations council committee and Long sustained effort in public education. In other words, the indigenous population, have been brain washed in to excepting a different future for them selves from the one they wished for their children. In the process of this re education they have been left hating themselves, their people and their own culture as in some way as inadequate and in need of enrichment.

 These so called benefits, which these Definable Structures and Organisations have brought about have been nothing but detrimental to the original population, there has been a massive increase the number of migrants in the last 30 years. Manzoor Moghal arrived there as an asylum seeker in 1972, It is by know means a coincidence that the Asylum seekers of the past actively work and encourage further immigration in to Leicester. Don’t be mistaken this is not out of concern for asylum seekers but an attempt to strengthen the immigrants own hold on the city. The Bishop of Leicester, Timothy Stevens, regularly meets with other religious leaders to discuss the asylum issue also Leicester is now claimed as a welcoming city for everyone, no one mentions how often it has to say’s good bye to it’s original citizens as they fee the city.

These Definable Structures and Organisations have also “allowed the immigrants to flourish in their host community”. It is forecasted that that by 2011 Leicester will become the first UK city where 50% of the population will hail from a non-white background. Many Leicester's schools are like Rushey Mead School which has a school population of 95% Asia students. (has this school ceased to be Diverse?)

 These achievements appear to be exactly the very things the indigenous population where protesting about in 1970. Where they Right to be concerned? It is a strange sort of diversity the that can, within the space of 30 years reduce the original population from 99% of the total to just 50%, and in some areas 100% of the population is Asian. It is a fact that Leicester is far from being diverse it is segregated deeply along racial lines.

Another example promoted as diversity in action is cultural festivals such as Diwali which attracts more than 25,000 people to the city." The thing is that all 25000 people exclusively Asian’s. Not exactly a diverse Cultural event is it? Another example is  “it was a case of trying to teach people that building a mosque next to a church was not a threat”, combined with the demographic change in the city it is exactly that. Many areas next to established mosque, have populations where 100% - 95% are Asian.  It is interesting to note, that it is now actually an asset, to the city seeing people in their national dress as it brings diversity rather than adversity. Just what nation do these people belong to?  Leicester is now more like a city from the Asian Subcontinent than an English Midlands Town.

 So what sort of role model is it for the England. If this level of diversification continues along its current rate Leicester will cease to be a Diverse City AT ALL, but in a further 40 years it will return to a mono cultural city, one where Asian are the dominant population and Islam the dominant Religion. What  then? Will we start forcibly re introducing white people back into the city to maintain its diversity and do you think this will be welcomed by the Asian Muslims. No in fact it will be resisted by force. Once land has been claimed for Islam is always to be Islamic and Muslims the world over have a duty unto death to keep it Islamic. We are already under the call of Jihad.

 It is Quite clear that benefits of diversity all way comes at the expense of some one and that some one is a way’s people of European descent. Racial and cultural diversity, which only whites promote--and always at their own expense--is nothing more than unilateral disarmament in a dangerous world. If current population movements continue, and if the thinking of whites remains unchanged, there will be little doubt as to which group's fate will be the "disaster and oblivion".