High School English Teachers’ Voice in Competency Standard and
Professional Development:
Grounded Research
Ashadi
Our
national education in general and English education in particular, has got
various criticisms in many aspects such as, the content of the curriculum,
teaching-learning process, materials, teacher competency as well as their
professionalism. This article is based on a preliminary study on teachers'
competency in relation to their professional development. It is very essential
because the role of the English teacher is believed to be very significant to
influence the success of students' English mastery especially at the high
school level. Therefore, high school English teachers need to really understand
what competency is required from their profession. Issues in this area is getting
hotter as the government enacted National Education System laws followed by
relevant government regulations on education standardization and teacher
certification.
The study
attempts to generate the grounded theory of teachers' competency and their own
perspectives of professional development among active MGMP members and non-MGMP
teachers which will be useful for curriculum designers, material developers,
policy makers and the whole education stakeholders. It is necessary to
scrutinize their factual problems to have a deep understanding on their
criticized performance. The underlying belief is that they work in an intercorrelated system where their competency and
professionalism are in questions.
It is in
progressive qualitative approach and it employs observations, interviews and
focus group discussions as the main data collection instruments. Participants
of this study, few high school English teachers and students around
Initial
conclusion shows a pattern of English teacher competency and professional
development subcategories significant for policy makers and the participants'
own development and English education in general. Through this pattern we can
see that when competency is in demand, teachers should improve themselves
through professional development programs. However, it is also found at this
initial stage that there should be coercive power and external motivation in
forms of punishments and rewards. It is difficult to expect a full internal
motivation from every teacher in competency improvement and professional
development as not all of them are intrinsically driven to become teachers. Other
issues such as the ineffectiveness of the current teacher assessment (DP 3) and
the need for regular evaluation also emerge during this stage.
Ashadi. (2006,
December). High school English teachers’ voice in competency standard
and professional development: Grounded research. Paper presented at the 54th TEFLIN International conference,
Website:
www.geocities.com/eltindonesia
Email: eltindonesia@yahoo.com