I admit that this does nothing toward the proof of the existence of deity; it does fill one with the awe and majesty of the creation. If it, the matter of the universe, is the result of an accident, a chance occurrence; it is a magnificent one. That accident would be worthy of reverence. I do know that intelligence could not produce such a result. I agree with the line of thought from the Rambam: we can only know what God is not. From that premise, one may say that God is not intelligent. What caused and operates the creation is transcendent. The concept intelligence is more aptly used for more mundane beings. One knows from observations of the produce of human intellect that the creator is above intelligence.
One may not know the substance of transcendence; it is too out there. Beyond. One may make the leap of faith and poetic license to say that God does not like anti-life as much as It likes life. Moral principles have been based on less. What more do we need?