Deutsch I
Objective: Students will analyze and present information collected via the
worldwide web about geography, population and geographical features, comparing
Germany to Missouri, USA.
I. Gather information
from the following websites:
for Missouri
information:
http://www.ecodev.state.mo.us/
http://www.50states.com/missouri.htm
for German information:
http://www.serve.com/shea.htm - go to
left side of screen and find culture.
http://userpage.chemie.fu-berlin.de/adressen/brd.html
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/cshome.html
http://www.travelsthroughgermany.com/website2/quikfacts.htm
II. Analyze your
information.
This means comparing like qualities of the two palces, finding the differences,
why are certain features important to each area and how do certain features
affect the people.
III. Present your
findings:
You will present your findings
through a 3-5 minute presentation in English. You can use one of the following presentation ideas:
-
posters
-
power point
-
venn diagram
-
video
-
other presentation modes approved by the teacher
You must also give credit to the sources from
which you received your information and turn in any copied and pasted
information that you have. Please
highlight the web address.
IV. This project will be scored as follows:
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
|
Content
(25 points) |
Meets
few or none of the requirements |
Does
not meet minimum requirements, contains information that is questionable
and/or inaccurate, contains information that reflects little/no
comprehension, lacks insight |
Gives
the desired information, but no more, contains information that is basic and
accurate, but shows little evidence of supporting details, contains
information that reflects comprehension of basic facts, draws familiar
conclusions |
Exceeds
the amount of information requested, contains information that is accurate
and partially supported, contains information that reflects a great deal of
comprehension of material, draws familiar conclusions |
Has
an overall effect that is fresh, original, unique and exceeds the amount of
information requested, contains information that is accurate and supported,
info reflects total comprehension of material, demonstrates insightfulness
through connections |
|
Language
during presentation (20 points) |
Language
is incomprehensible |
Does
not reflect the level of study, is inaccurate, incomprehensible or irrelevant. |
Reflects
level of study, is generally accurate, but is limited and/or repetitious |
Reflects
level of study, is accurate and varied |
Reflects
level of study, and is precise, varied, and extensive |
|
Delivery
(20 points |
Totally
unprepared and incomprehensible |
Not
prepared, reads from notes, rate, volume, pitch are distracting/inaudible |
Prepared
but makes frequent references to notes, rate, volume and pitch are
appropriate and audible |
Well-prepared,
little reference to notes, rate, volume, and pitch are appropriate and easy
to hear |
Well-prepared,
no reference to notes, volume, pitch, and rate enhance presentation |
|
Visual
aide (20 points) |
Careless,
sloppy, visually that distracts from the presentation |
Many
errors, does not help in presentation |
Helps
the presentation somewhat with many errors. Some organization |
Helps
the presentation with few errors. Very organized |
Enhances
the presentation with virtually no errors. Very organized |
|
Use
of Class Time (10 points) |
Wasted
time. Rarely on task |
Wasted
much of class time |
Wasted
some class time but spent some time on task |
Wasted
very little class time. |
On
task during all class time. |
|
Length
of presentation (5 points) |
Less
than :30 |
:30-1
min in length |
1-2
minutes of length |
2-3
minutes in length |
3-5
minutes in length |