Sanitsuda Ekachai
Congratulations, Mr Chuan.
On the holy day marking the start of the Buddhist Lent of BE 2543, you went down
in history as a civilian tyrant, a product of money politics in the guise of
democracy. It's your detached haughtiness and
your contempt for the plight of the poor that did it. All the Pak Moon villagers
need is a gesture of political commitment to end their long suffering. It takes
only a smidgeon of compassion to see this. But you think you're too high to meet
dirt. So you feel nothing in seeing the poor who seek justice beaten and locked
behind bars. Listen to your justifications for
the crackdown: the need to protect the rule of law; the conspiracy theory of a
third party instigating things; the need to protect the country's image. Aren't they the very same lame
excuses military dictators used to oppress the people?Many Thais have died to
throw off the yoke of military dictatorship. What we got in exchange is money
politics whereby politicians use the election ritual to continue the rape of
natural resources in collusion with the authoritarian bureaucracy and big
business. The result is a devastation of
nature, the source of villagers' livelihoods. Naturally, they want back the
right to manage their environment. That's what the demand for Egat to open the
Pak Mon dam gates and let the Moon river flow naturally again is all about. Civilian administrations always
claim legitimacy through the election ritual when they deny small people their
voice and their civic movements for direct democracy. It takes a small leap for
old-world politicians to become tyrants. Other civilian governments may have
been equally full of dinosaurs. But in line with Thai political paternalism,
they at least had the decency to make a pretence of listening to the poor.
Tyrants just shrug their shoulders after crushing the people. Mr Chuan, you and
your men fit that bill nicelyAfter decades of destructive development policies,
the storm of civil unrest is brewing over conflicts involving the management of
natural resources across the country. Pak Moon is just one example. We need a government that acts as
a conciliator and has the political will to defuse conflicts. We need mechanisms
for conflicting groups to resolve their differences peacefully and justly. Instead, Mr Chuan takes the side
of the bureaucracy, the protesters' nemesis. By siding with Egat, he effectively
killed the dialogue process by reneging on all the promises made to the
grass-roots movement by the Chavalit government. His administration has used the
state media to discredit the Pak Moon struggle through lies and distortion. And
it went back on its own word when the recommendations made by the Pak Moon
committee did not serve Egat. This drove the villagers to desperation. The Pak Moon protesters were
accused of breaking the law. But isn't the law a tool in the service of social
justice? What to do when the government demeans justice and uses draconian laws
to persecute dissidents?The charge of law-breaking rings hollow when the
government continually breaks the higher values of truth and justice. And if our
legal and bureaucratic systems stand in the way of justice, they must be
changed. The Democrats' crackdown on the
Pak Moon villagers opens a new round in the struggle of popular movements for
participatory democracy. We face a new challenge-to make
the aloof Bangkok middle-class realise that the problems of the rural poor with
state accountability are their problems as well. And that their involvement will
speed up political reform. But with or without middle-class
support, for the poor, with their backs against the wall, there is no turning
back.pf
Sanitsuda
Ekachai is AssistantEditor,
Bangkok Post, July 20, 2000