January 

 

“None of this can mean anything to you.  You couldn’t understand it.  You grew up quite differently.  There was the world of the suburbs, of the railways, of the slums and tenements.  Dirt, hunger, overcrowding, the degradation of the worker as a human being, the degradation of women.  And there was the world of the mother’s darlings, of smart students and rich merchants’ sons; the world of impunity, of brazen, insolent vice; of rich men laughing or shrugging off the tears of the poor, the robbed, the insulted, the seduced; the reign of parasites, whose only distinction was that they never troubled themselves about anything, never gave anything to the world, and left nothing behind them. …

“You can’t think how lovely she was as a child, a schoolgirl.  You have no idea. … I used to go to that house and see her there.  She was still a child, but even then, the alertness, the watchfulness, the restlessness of those days—it was all there, you could read it all in her face, her eyes.  All the themes of the century—all the tears and the insults and the hopes, the whole accumulation of resentment and pride were written in her face and bearing, which expressed both girlish shyness and self-assured grace.  She was a living indictment of the age.  This is something, isn’t it?  It’s predestination.  Something nature endowed her with, something to which she had a birthright.”

 

 

--Boris Pasternak, Doctor Zhivago.

From first U.S. edition © 1958 Pantheon Books,

English translation by Max Hayward

and Manya Harari, pages 459-461.

 

 

 

“And if you think I didn’t have my share of suffering—look here, when I went to give up that flat and saw that damn box of dog biscuits sitting there on the sideboard I sat down and cried like a baby.  By God it was awful—”

            I couldn’t forgive him or like him but I saw that what he had done was, to him, entirely justified.  It was all very careless and confused.  They were careless people, Tom and Daisy—they smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back into their money or their vast carelessness or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made . . .

            … Gatsby believed in the green light, the orgastic future that year by year recedes before us.  It eluded us then, but that’s no matter—tomorrow we will run faster, stretch out our arms further. . . . And one fine morning—

            So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.

 

 

-- F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby (1925)

                                                                        Scribner Paperback Edition 1995, pages 187-189.

 

 

 

February

 

“What will happen to your consciousness?  Your consciousness, yours, not anyone else’s.  Well, what are you?  There’s the point.  Let’s try to find out.  What is it about you that you have always known as yourself? What are you conscious of in yourself?  Your kidneys?  Your liver?  Your blood vessels?  No.  However far back you go in your memory, it is always in some external, active manifestation of yourself that you come across your identity—in the work of your hands, in your family, in other people.  And now listen carefully.  You in others—this is your soul.  This is what you are.  This is what your consciousness has breathed and lived on and enjoyed throughout your life—your soul, your immortality, your life in others.  And what now?  You have always been in others and you will remain in others.  And what does it matter to you if later on that is called your memory?  This will be you—the you that enters the future and becomes a part of it.

“There will be no death, says St. John.  His reasoning is quite simple.  There will be no death because the past is over; that’s almost like saying there will be no death because it is already done with, it’s old and we are bored with it.  What we need is something new, and that new thing is life eternal.”

He was pacing up and down the room as he was talking.  Now he walked up to Anna Ivanovna’s bed and putting his hand on her forehead said, “Go to sleep.”  After a few moments she began to fall asleep.

Yura quietly left the room and told Egorovna to send in the nurse.  “What’s come over me?” he thought.  “I’m becoming a regular quack—muttering incantations, laying on hands . . . .”

Next day Anna Ivanovna was better.

 

 

                                                                        Doctor Zhivago

                                                                        Pages 68-69.

 

 

I believe that we live after death and again and again, not in the memory of our children or as mulch for trees and flowers, however poetic that may be, but looking passionately and egocentrically out of our eyes.

 

 

--Brenda Ueland (1891–1985)

Strength To Your Sword Arm: Selected Writings

                                                            Holy Cow! Press, 1993, page 179.

 

 

 

March

 

“A lot you’ve explained.”  He was shouted down.  “A lot you’ve said when you’ve told him he’s got stamps for the special coach!  You should look at a man first, before you start explaining.  How can anyone with such a face go in the special coach?  The special coach is full of sailors.  A sailor has a trained eye and a gun.  He takes a look at him and what does he see?  A member of the propertied classes—worse than that: a doctor, former quality.  He pulls out his gun—and goodbye.”

 

                                         Doctor Zhivago, pages 215-216.

 

 

“But that wasn’t what we were talking about.  I don’t think I could love you so much if you had nothing to complain of and nothing to regret.  I don’t like people who have never fallen or stumbled.  Their virtue is lifeless and of little value.  Life hasn’t revealed its beauty to them.”

                “It’s this beauty I’m thinking of.  I think that to see it your imagination has to be intact, your vision has to be childlike.  That is what I was deprived of.  I might have developed my own view of life if I hadn’t, right from the beginning, seen it stamped in someone else’s vulgar distortion. …”

 

“I know how much you loved her.  But forgive me, have you any idea of her love for you?”

“Sorry.  What was that you said?”

“I asked you, had you any idea of how much she loved you—more than anyone in the world?”

“What makes you say that?”

                “Because she told me so herself.”

“She said that?  To you?”

                “Yes.”

               

“Forgive me, but if it isn’t intruding on something too intimate, can you remember the circumstances in which she said this?”

                “She had been doing this room and she went outside to shake the carpet.”

                “Sorry, which carpet? There are two.”

                “That one, the larger one.”

                “It would have been too heavy for her.  Did you help her?”

                “Yes.”

“Each of you held one end, and she leaned far back throwing up her arms high as on a swing and turning away her face from the blowing dust and squinted her eyes and laughed?  Isn’t that how it was?  How well I know her ways!  And then you walked toward each other folding up the heavy carpet first in two and then in four, and she joked and made faces, didn’t she?  Didn’t she?”

 

                                                                                                Doctor Zhivago, page 399 and pages 462-463.

 

 

April

 

 

In an unjust world, the roles of Deliverer and Destroyer become ambiguous.  "Think not that I am come to send peace on earth," said Jesus.  "I come not to send peace, but a sword."

 

--Freeman Dyson
Disturbing the Universe (1979)
page 4.

 

 

Matthew in 10:34 quotes Jesus uncharacteristically
telling his apostles: "Think not that I am come to
send peace on earth: I came  not to send peace, but a
sword." You don't see that on Christmas cards and it's
not in this film, but those words can be reinterpreted—

read today to mean that inner peace comes only after
moral struggle.

The richness of Scripture is in its openness to
interpretation answering humanity's current spiritual
needs. That's where Gibson's medieval version of the
suffering of Jesus, reveling in savagery to provoke
outrage and cast blame, fails Christian and Jew today.

 

 

--William Safire,
Neither Christian nor Jew served well by 'Passion'
from March 1st op/ed page in Austin American-Statesman.  The article was also on the New York Times op/ed page that day.

 

 

 

 

"... people are to march around the church, to commemorate the event, Palm Sunday, when Jesus rode into Jerusalem and was greeted with applause and with palms.  People thought he'd come to overthrow the Romans, but no, he'd come to change them, and that led to things turning bad." 

 

 

--Garrison Keillor, in the News from Lake Wobegon of April 3, 2004 on A Prairie Home Companion.  Thanks to David Matthews for calling me so I could hear it.

 

 

 

 

 

May

 

They did not even know the simple things:  a sense of victory, or satisfaction, or necessary sacrifice.  They did not know the feeling of taking a place and keeping it, securing a village and then raising the flag and calling it victory.  No sense of order or momentum.  No front, no rear, no trenches laid out in neat parallels.  No Patton rushing for the Rhine, no beachheads to storm and win and hold for the duration. …  They did not know strategies.  They did not know the terms of the war, its architecture, the rules of fair play.  When they took prisoners, which was rare, they did not know the questions to ask, whether to release a suspect or beat on him.  They did not know how to feel.  Whether, when seeing a dead Vietnamese, to be happy or sad or relieved; whether, in times of quiet, to be apprehensive or content; whether to engage the enemy or elude him.  They did not know how to feel when they saw villages burning.  Revenge?  Loss? Peace of mind or anguish?  They did not know. … Magic, mystery, ghosts and incense, whispers in the dark, strange tongues and strange smells, uncertainties never articulated in war stories, emotion squandered on ignorance.  They did not know good from evil.

 

                                --Tim O’Brien

                                Going After Cacciato (1978)

                                Pages 320-321

 

 

June

 

He caught his breath, looked around and said, “I’m your new officer.”  I grinned, held out my hand, and said, “Hi, Tubby.”  That was stupid of me. He glared and kept his own hand on his trouser seam.  Standing cockily like a bantam rooster—the wall was just high enough to let him stand—he crisply asked, “Sergeant, are these your men?”  The Raggedy Asses grinned at one another.  The very thought of belonging to anyone amused them.  I felt cold.  This wasn’t the good-natured Tubby I had known.  This was trouble.  I said, “Tubby—” and he cut me off:  “Slim, I am an officer and I expect to be treated with proper military courtesy.”  That broke the men up.  He heard their stifled chuckles and looked around furiously. …  He said, “… I’m going to lead these men over the top, and I want you with me.”

                … I said, “Look, Tubby—Lieutenant—I think—”  He snapped, “You’re not paid to think.  You’re paid to take orders.”  I considered saying the hell with it.  But this was literally a matter of life and imminent death.  I tried again, earnestly:  “Going up there would be suicide.  The First Bat’s down there,” I said, pointing. …  “We’re pinned down, so the action is on the flanks.” …

                He stared at me for a long time, as though waiting for me to blink first.  I blinked and blinked again.  Letting his voice rise, he said, “You’re scared shitless aren’t you?”  I nodded emphatically.  His voice rose higher.  All the guys could hear him now.  … There was just a tremor in his voice, and it dawned on me that he himself was petrified—he was masking his fear with his rudeness to me.  But what he said next smothered my compassion.  He sneered, and keeping his voice in the same register, he said, “I know your kind, Bub.  You think we couldn’t hear you back there in the squad bay, masturbating every night?  Did you think they’d give a Marine Corps commission to a masturbator?  Only thing I couldn’t make out was how you dried the come.  I figured you had a handkerchief.”  I heard a titter from Bubba.  I’m sure Bubba never masturbated.  His father, the Alabama preacher in whose steps he hoped to follow, had shown him the way to what he called “Nigra poontang” when he reached adolescence.  But I wasn’t interested in Bubba’s good opinion.  What Tubby had done, and it was unforgivable, was make me look ridiculous in the eyes of all my men.  He knew that was wrong.  They had taught that at Quantico. …

 

… He turned, pointed to Bubba, and said, “You, over here.”  Bubba came over and linked his hands.  Tubby put in a foot, as if into a stirrup, swung up, rolled atop the wall, and rose till he stood sideways.  Both his hands were pointing.  His left forefinger was pointing down at us, his right forefinger at the Japs.  It was a Frederic Remington painting.  He breathed deeply and yelled, “Follow me!”

                The men’s faces still were turned up, expressionless.  Nobody moved.  I stood beneath the wall, my arms outstretched, waiting to catch what would be left.  At that moment the slugs hit him.  It was a Nambu; it stitched him vertically, from forehead to crotch.  One moment he was looming above us in that heroic pose; in the next moment red pits blossomed down him, four on his face alone, and a dozen others down his uniform.  One was off center; it slammed into the Marine Corps emblem over his heart; the gunner knew his job.  Blood had just begun to stream from there, from his face, from his belly, and from his groin, when he collapsed, tottering on the edge and falling and whumping in my arms face up.  His features were disappearing beneath a spreading stain, and he was trying to blink the blood out of his eyes.  But he could see.  He saw me.  He choked faintly:  “You . . . you . . . you . . .”  Then he gagged and he was gone.

 

                                                                                --William Manchester  (April 1, 1922 – June 1, 2004)

                                                                                Goodbye Darkness: A Memoir of the Pacific War (1980)

                                                                                Pages 274 – 278 in Dell paperback edition, 1987. 

 

 

(See also the quotes of the month for April 2003.  The incident described here occurred on the Monday after Manchester left the hospital to return to his men.  Manchester doesn’t give the date, but with a little research I learned it was June 4, 1945.  The place was Okinawa, on one of the beaches of the Oroku Peninsula.  Manchester kept a journal that managed to survive the war along with him.)

 

 

 

 

July

 

Below lies dense L.A., threaded by freeways.  Then we glide down the bleak concrete and cinderblock sleeve of Watts and out past Cabrillo Beach.  Below, the tide restlessly gnaws at the shore; up here, in the pristine cleanliness, I am cosseted with pillows, steak, champagne, a movie if I want it (I don’t), and a pretty, young, boisterous, outrageously outspoken stewardess who has my number.  Serving me dinner, she drops a fork and mutters, “Shit.”  The Sergeant in me says, “Nice girls don’t talk dirty.”  Her eyes lick at me merrily.  She grins and says, “I’m a woman, not a girl.  Anyway, you should talk.  I saw you giving me the once-over, you dirty old man.”  I say,  “I’m not a dirty old man, I’m a sexy senior citizen.”  She:  “Where’d you get that?”  I:  “Some bumper sticker at the Old Folks’ Home.”  But the game stops there.  She passes on, a member of the Pepsi generation who has deduced that I am on the wrong side of fifty-five, a senescent old-timer, laden with medication for hypertension, antibiotics for rotting teeth, and tricyclics for endogenous depression—a walking drugstore in no condition for any strenuous activity.  Which is as it should be.  At my age I ought to feel calm, untroubled, unchallenged by any female, or for that matter, anybody.  Yet I am uneasy.  A few Japanese soldiers, I have read, still lurk in the bush on the islands; every now and then one emerges.  It would be just my luck to be the victim of the last bonzai charge.  That is ridiculous, of course; still, I am nervous.  The fact is that I have no idea of what I shall find Out There.

 

                                                                                                --William Manchester, Goodbye Darkness,

 pages 56-57 of Dell 1987 paperback edition.

                       

 

 

My mother used to say that life begins at forty.  That was her age when she had her first baby.  I say, on the contrary, that life begins at fifty-five, the age at which I published my first book.  So long as you have courage and a sense of humor, it’s never to late to start life afresh.  A book is in many ways like a baby.  While you are writing, it is curled up in your belly.  You cannot get a clear view of it.  As soon as it is born, it goes out into the world and develops a character of its own.  Like a daughter coming home from school, it surprises you with unexpected flashes of wisdom.  The same thing happens with scientific theories.

 

--Freeman Dyson, from the preface to his collection of essays, From Eros to Gaia (1992).

 

 

 

 

 August

 

...I had only told Josif of my problem because I thought I would get sympathy from a man I deeply respected and who I thought would be on my side.  I expected him to...say, “R.T., you are right to feel so angry!  Tell me all about it.  Get it out of your system.”

            But no!  He compassionately but soberly rebuked me and would not let me off the hook.

            Those words came to me during the greatest trial I had ever had until that time.  I couldn’t discuss it with my friends or family members, but because Josif was from Romania and was far removed from the situation, I was able to tell him everything. ...

            And then came those remarkable words—spoken in his Romanian accent:  “You must totally forgive them.”

            “I can’t,” I replied.

            “You can, and you must,” he insisted.

            Unsatisfied with his response, I tried to continue.  “I just remembered.  There is more.  What I didn’t tell you . . .”

            “R.T.,” he interrupted, “you must totally forgive them.  Release them, and you will be set free.”

 

                                                                        --R.T. Kendall, Total Forgiveness,

                                                                        Charisma House, 2001, pages xxv-xxvi.

                                                                        Thanks to JKW for loaning me the book.

 

 

The 2nd quote for August is in audio form, from a speech given by Marian Wright Edelman, president and founder of the Children’s Defense Fund. (I have part of this speech on a cassette.)  This particular speech is from the early 1990s, but she has given similar ones since then.       www.geocities.com/dwtrulock/marian.mp3

 

 

 

 

 

 

September

 

 

            Paul said that love “keeps no record of wrongs” (I Cor. 13-5).  But he did not mean that you must be blind to those wrongs…the fact that there is something wrong, especially if it is staring you in the face, is not to be denied.  In fact, …sometimes the people we admire the most can do the most hurtful things to us.  And it is of no value to pretend we didn’t see it happen. …  Love doesn’t erase our memories.  And it is actually a demonstration of greater grace when we are fully aware of what occurred—and we still choose to forgive. … We cannot truly forgive until we see clearly the offense we are forgiving and understand its seriousness.

           

Love is a choice.  Total forgiveness is a choice.  It is not a feeling—at least at first—but is rather an act of the will. … When we do this all the time—as a lifestyle—we not only avoid bitterness, but we also eventually experience total forgiveness as a feeling—and it is a good feeling.

           

Graciousness is not the way presidential elections are won.  A former presidential campaign manager claimed two facts:

 

·         Candidates with high negative ratings in the opinion polls—above 35%—lose.

·         Negative ratings are far easier to create than positive ones.

 

In other words, to win it is not enough to look good; you must also make your opponent look bad.  And unfortunately, it works.

  Graciousness is shown by what you don’t say, even if what you could say would be true.  Self-righteous people find it almost impossible to be gracious; they claim always to be after “the truth,” no matter the cost.  Total forgiveness sometimes means overlooking what you perceive to be the truth and not letting on about anything that could damage another person.

… It is my experience that most people we must forgive do not believe they have done anything wrong at all, or if they know that they did something wrong, they believe it was justified.

… Total forgiveness, therefore, must take place in the heart.  If I have a genuine heart-experience, I will not be devastated if there is no reconciliation. … This is also why a person can achieve inner peace even when forgiving someone who has died.

 

 

--R.T. Kendall, Total Forgiveness,

Pages 17, 18, 21, 27, 28, and 29.

 

 

 

 

 

Then he too stood and wept, tears ran down his cheeks, like those that had smarted the skin of the English officer of marines:  those clear drops flowing in such bitter abundance every hour of our day all over our world, till in sheer poetic justice we have named the earth we live in after them; that alkaline, salty gland-secretion which is pressed from our system by the nervous stress of acute pain, whether physical or mental.  It contained, as Hans Castorp knew, a certain amount of mucin and albumin as well.

 

 

--Thomas Mann, The Magic Mountain,

originally published in German as

Der Zauberberg (S. Fischer Verlag, Berlin, 1924).

Translation by Helen T. Lowe-Porter (Alfred A. Knopf, 1927).

Excerpt from First Vintage International Edition, March 1992, p.538.

 

 

 

October

 

…I saw my own feelings reflected in Herbert’s face, and, not least among them, my repugnance towards the man who had done so much for me.

 

Heaven knows that we need never be ashamed of our tears, for they are rain upon the blinding dust of earth, overlying our hard hearts.  I was better after I had cried than before—more sorry, more aware of my own ingratitude, more gentle.  If I had cried before, I should have had Joe with me then.

 

In the little world in which children have their existence, whosoever brings them up, there is nothing so finely perceived and so finely felt as injustice.

 

…I was not only odd-boy about the forge, but if any neighbor happened to want an extra boy to frighten birds, or pick up stones, or do any such job, I was favoured with the employment.

 

                                                --Charles Dickens, Great Expectations, first published

serially in 1860-61.  I wrote down these quotes when I read the

book (thanks to prompting from DPS) in September and October

of 1999.  The quotes come from pages 366, 172, 66, and 45

of the Bobbs-Merrill 1964 edition.

 

 

 

 

MACBETH

   Canst thou not minister  to a mind diseased,

   Pluck from the memory a rooted sorrow,

   Raze out the written troubles of the brain,

   And with some sweet, oblivious antidote

   Cleanse the stuff’d bosom of that perilous stuff

   Which weighs upon the heart? 

 

DOCTOR                                                  Therein the patient

   Must minister to himself.

 

MACBETH    Throw physic to the dogs!  I’ll none of it.

      

--William Shakespeare, Macbeth,

Act 5, Scene 3.

 

 

 

 

Like Charles Dickens, who experienced the same lurching fall of family fortune in adolescence, Shakespeare seems to have sworn to do anything in life that he could to get himself and his family well out of the flood of fear, and safe somehow in a big bourgeois house.

 

                                                                --Adam Gopnik, in “Will Power,” a review of the book

Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare.

                                                                 The New Yorker, September 13, 2004, page 91.

  


November


When it went off, in the New Mexico dawn, that first atomic bomb, we thought of Alfred Nobel, and his hope, his vain hope, that dynamite would put an end to wars.  We thought of the legend of Prometheus, of that deep sense of guilt in man's new powers, that reflects his recognition of evil, and his long knowledge of it.  We knew that it was a new world, but even more we knew that novelty itself was a very old thing in human life, that all our ways are rooted in it.

  --J. Robert Oppenheimer, The atom bomb and college education, in The General Magazine and Historical Chronicle, University of Pennsylvania General Alumni Society, 1946.  (From a
commencement speech Oppenheimer gave that year.)



        
I have attempted, in my own life and in this book, to reconcile a love of nature with an affection for machines.  In the game of life and evolution there are three players at the table:  human beings, nature, and machines.  I am firmly on the side of nature.  But nature, I suspect, is on the side of the machines.
              In November of 1972, at the age of nineteen, I built a small tree house on the shore of Burrard Inlet in British Columbia, and settled in.  In winter I consumed books and firewood; in summer I explored the British Columbian and Alaskan coasts.  The tree house, ninety-five feet up in a Douglas fir, was paneled with cedar I found drifting in Georgia Strait, split into boards whose grain spanned as many as seven hundred years.
             ...
            I spent the summers working on a variety of boats.  When running at night I preferred to take the midnight-to-daybreak watch.  By three or four in the morning, I was alone with the trace of unseen landforms on the radar screen and the last hour or two of night.  I sometimes left the helm and paced the decks.  The world receded in a phosphorescent wake, while birds appeared as red or green phantoms in the glow of the running lights, depending on whether they took wing on the port or starboard side .  I also found myself slipping down into the engine room for more than the obligatory check.
            When you live within a boat its engine leaves an imprint, deeper than mind, on neural circuits first trained to identify the acoustic signal of a human heart.  As I had sometimes drifted off to sleep in the forest canopy, boats passing in the distance, and wondered whether trees might think, so I sat in the engine-room companionway in the small hours of the morning, with the dark, forested islands passing by, and wondered whether engines might have souls.  This question threads its way through the chapters of this book.
             ...
            This book is not about the future.  Where we are at present is puzzling enough.  I prefer to look into the past, exercising the historian's privilege of selecting predictions that turned out to be right. The past is where we find answers to our questions:  Who are we, and why?  The future is where we see questions to which the answers are up to us.

             Do we remain one species, or diverge into many?

             Do we remain of many minds, or merge into one
?

                 

                                      -
-George B. Dyson, from the preface to Darwin Among the Machines, 1997.

 

 

 

 

 

      
December


        My attempts to wrestle with particular sexual situations will come in the next four chapters.  But before turning to these particular and diverse contexts for sexual decision, I shall propose three broad principles which I believe to be appropriate Christian norms for sexual expression.  By themselves principles are never sufficient, of course.  Yet, together with everything else the person brings to moments of decision, principles can be useful and even, I believe, necessary.
        First, love requires a single standard and not a double standard for sexual morality. All of love's elements which we have considered imply that love must always be expressed as justice.  Without justice, it becomes individualistic and shallowly sentimental.  And without love, justice becomes simply a struggle for power.  Love expressed as justice becomes the lively concern for the empowerment of all persons, so that everyone has rightful access to the means for human fullfillment.  This implies that there cannot be one sexual ethic for males and another for females, nor one for the unmarried and another for the married, nor one for those heterosexually oriented and another for those oriented to their same sex, nor one for the young and another for the old, nor one for the able-bodied and another for those with physical or mental infirmity.  The same basic considerations of love ought to apply to all.
        Second, the physical expression of one's sexuality with another person ought to be appropriate to the level of loving commitment present in the relationship. ...
        Third, ... sexual expression should be evaluated in regard to motivations, intentions, the nature of the act itself, and the consequences of the act, each of these informed and shaped by love. ...
         ...
       
While the argument for the intrinsic unity of the two functions of intercourse, the unitive and the procreative, is not a typically Protestant argument, some make that case as does Paul Ramsey. Even if we believe in birth control and hope for the completely safe contraceptive, he contends, the procreative dimension ought never be sundered from the inherent meaning of coition.  If such separation is made in the minds and hearts of the parties concerned, no respect is paid and no honor is given to the fact that God has joined these two functions together in our being.  When one person engages in sex with another with whom he or she would not want to have a child (if such were ever to happen), the two engage in a new form of mind-body dualism, denying the sexual body as procreative.
        ...
        ... Some societal sex taboos can be defended as sound wisdom regarding predictable threats to our genuine human becoming.  Many other sex taboos can well be challenged.  We are body-people by God's design, and distinctly human bodies are made for play and exploration--"an adventure of tenderness and an exploration into the potential of pleasure hidden in our need for love."


   --
James B. Nelson, Embodiment: An Approach to Sexuality and Christian Theology (1978),   pages 126-27, 145, and 179.  This was a find of mine at the most recent Austin Presbyterian Seminary library book sale. The phrase in quotation marks comes from a 1976 book by Lewis Smedes, a theologian who died two years ago this month.  



      
But what then was this form, this mask, in which suppressed, unchartered love would reappear?  Dr. Krokowski asked the question, and looked along the listening rows as though in all seriousness expecting an answer.  But he had to say it himself, who had said so much already.  No one knew save him, but it was plain that he did.  Indeed, with his ardent eyes, his black beard setting off the waxen pallor of his face, his monkish sandals and grey woollen socks, he seemed to symbolize in his own person that conflict between passion and chastity which was his theme.  At least so thought Hans Castorp, as with the others he waited in the greatest suspense to hear in what form love driven below the surface would reappear.  The ladies barely breathed.  Lawyer Paravant rattled his ear anew, that the critical moment might find it open and receptive.  And Dr. Krokowski answered his own question, and said:  "In the form of illness.  Symptoms of disease are nothing but a disguised manifestation of the power of love; and all disease is only love transformed."
        So now they knew--though very probably not all of them were capable of an opinion on what they heard. ...
         ...
        Hans Castorp mused, his gaze still bent on Frau Chauchat's arm.  The way women dressed!  They showed their necks and bosoms, they transfigured their arms by veiling them in "illusion"; they did so, the world over, to arouse our desire.  O God, how beautiful life was!


                      
--Thomas Mann, The Magic Mountain (1924), translation by H. T. Lowe-Porter (1927).
                                Excerpt from pages 128-29 in the First Vintage International Edition, March 1992.

 

1

 

 

 

1                                                                      

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1