EDUC 5322

I E – Summary

 

Without a doubt, my lows would involve trying to wrap my brain around your wandering session notes.  I guess my learning style does not fit your writing style…. but….

 

Wow! I just found myself rereading an article in Language Arts 79:1 about the National Reading Panel report that I had skimmed at the beginning of the semester for another course.  The article focuses on the fact that qualitative research was eliminated from consideration in the study, and the impact of this decision on the study’s conclusions.  When I first came across this article in September, I did not read it in detail because it contained lots of “boring research words” which involved hair splitting I didn’t quite appreciate.  It just seemed like professional nitpicking without much real communication.  I didn’t want to take the time to wade through it.  Now the whole article is fascinating to me … I read with greater understanding.  I can understand much more nuance in the rebuttal dialog.  I can see that I really have gained a lot of understanding about what it means to do research and to think like a researcher.  Now the hairsplitting is not just semantic games, but trying to be precise about what you can and cannot say based on the kind(s) of information one has collected.  And it is more clear to me where bias may be clouding the details.  With what I’ve learned from this course I’m much better equipped to critically read research based articles and to consider their appropriate application.

 

BTW – from reading this article, I’m getting some appreciation of the debate that surrounds the use of qualitative research.  This aspect of the topic was not really considered in our course … at least it was not obvious to me.  My perception is that, our course has presented both types of research (quantitative and qualitative) as equally acceptable … with different applications and purposes.  Perhaps they are equally acceptable under appropriate conditions, but it is important to note the resistance to qualitative research reporting and the sources for that resistance.  It is part of the story.

 

My long term plans include adding certification as an Educational Diagnostician to my repertoire.  No doubt, that will largely take me further into quantitative data collection and evaluation … but I know the value of qualitative data as well.  Both will aid me with consulting with families in the meantime.

 

 

 UTTC COURSES  > EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND EVALUATION (FA04... > COMMUNICATIONS > DISCUSSION BOARDS > LESSON 9

 

 

Current Forum: Lesson 9

Date: Mon Nov 1, 2004 11:49 am

Author: Johnson, Ernest <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Lesson 9-Summary

 


 

great discussion and reflection - sorry for the digressions - glad you are able to read research articles and evaluate critically!!!!!!

yes, educational diagnosticians get very involved into quantiative test measuring - but, there are also always qualitative factors involved in each and every student.

best wishes.

 

Post response


 

Current Forum: Lesson 9

Date: Tue Nov 2, 2004 9:46 pm

Author: Gentry, Pamela <[email protected]>

Subject: Re: Lesson 9-Summary

Modify Forum


 

interestingly - just today I was talking with an educational diagnostician about some issues in a school and the effort she was making to evaluate a particular student...she was trying to explain to me what she was after and looking for words to explain how to get there. I said, "oh, you are talking about the value of qualitative description to illuminate the restrictions of the qualitative data you get from testing." She says, "YES!" with a light in her eyes and we went on. We were speaking the same language. I definitely have a new tool in my belt.

 

Post response


Ok


 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1