|
You will need this as the very minimum hardware:
However BNC 10-base2 networking is kinda crappy, so why not go a little further and try 10-baseT? It's benefits are more expandable, much more reliable, and if you shop around it doesn't cost that much more. You will need this as the suggested hardware:
|
Remember, at time of writing no 100Mb/sec cards are available for RISC OS, and as a split-speed
network will sync down to the lowest common denominator...
I would advise you to buy multi-speed hardware if your budget allows it. If you have a 10/100
card in the PC and a 10/100 hub, then when you get a 100 card for your RISC OS machine (assuming
somebody bothers to make one?), then the network will take a 10 times speed increase and you did
very little to effect that.
Failing that, stick with a cheap and plentiful 10Mb parts. It isn't breakneck, but for a small
home installation it will be plenty. The 80486DX/4-66MHz machine running Windows for Workgroups
3.11 (with a generic NE2000 driver) served a 1Mb test file to my RiscPC (ARM7 40MHz) via
OmniClient's LanManFS (NetBEUI) in a shade over two seconds. My harddisc is only just half that
speed. However a benchmark showed a much poorer picture. My harddisc managed 1.26Mb/sec average
and the Ethernet managed 430Kb/sec average. The reason? Transferring big chunks of data is a nice
fast operation. But transferring lots of little blocks (as the benchmark program did) is tedious
and slow and has many overheads. The speed of the network, though, is more likely to be 430Kb/sec
instead of >1Mb/sec as application file handling is more likely to do a number of small transfers
instead of large ones.
That said, I could probably double that speed by using a faster computer at the other end of the
link!
Click here for a pictoral guide of how easy it is to fit a NIC into a RiscPC.