PRESS RELEASE

 

I filed a criminal federal complaint that could eradicate abortion.  The U.S. Department of Justice refuses to handle it for justice.  The complaint is two-fold. 

 

It is first against the Arlington police for not handling for justice a criminal matter of a disability insurance company that blackballs and otherwise treats with me criminally. The suspect came off the record at the police although the criminal issues had not at all been resolved, and so are ongoing.  I’m not the only one who would complain about that company and my employer did terminate the contract.

 

It is second against the Falls Church police for misconduct, and Arlington diocese for discrimination and violations of freedom of speech including with violence. I sidewalk counseled and protested at an abortion clinic that was next door to a Catholic church, and both diocese and church gave me more trouble than the clinic, making the filing of a complaint unavoidable.

 

Both matters were referred to Disability Rights Section, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, and I was told there was no record at all after confirming receipt of the complaint plus many addenda.  Disability Rights was not permitted to refer it to Criminal Section, where the complaint was said to belong.  Everywhere this matter has traveled, the records disappear or are misrepresented, or I am discredited somehow.  I am slandered by both the subjects of the complaint and law enforcement, whose handling seems to be all-or-nothing. 

 

The Office of Inspector General -- the agency to which one complains about such handling -- not only resists releasing the record (that is, complaint, allegations and exhibits that I sent them and their work product and criminal information) but releases information that blatantly misrepresents the complaint and me instead.  I just filed a second FOIA Appeal because the Office of Information and Privacy already told the OIG to release all that I sent and OIG still hasn’t.  Expedite handling was previously granted but at the appeal level it was denied, and so I would have to go to judicial review about that. Plus, I have to correct misrepresentations in the record.

 

The matter as a whole met the criteria for OIG jurisdiction AND an extension of whatever statute of limitations that could apply, according to what I learned about such criteria from the OIG investigative specialist with whose guidance I re-filed a complaint.  He gave me his e-mail address to send the complaint and allegations so that he could insure the right party received them.  But the result was similar or worse than at the other agencies, including that I was told that this investigative specialist was only a clerk when he is an investigator and, in fact, the one to whom I, the complainant, should have directed my questions. 

 

And so, how would this complaint eradicate and overturn abortion? The enforcement of the law. Why was Terri Schiavo murdered? Because of favor toward Mr. Schiavo from the law. This complaint would expose such corruption and make examples of corrupt law enforcers. It would bring life and death issues to the fore, giving justice and the unborn child press to re-emphasize the child’s right to his own life without having to apologize or explain for considering the unborn child equal to the mother and the rest of us who are “already here.” It would expose the progressive agenda and its origin and backing for the corruption that it is, thus causing all just initiatives (including pro-life) to be effective. Because it would eradicate corruption, it would make a firm foundation and catalyst for the eradication of abortion.

 

Contact Information:  Anna Maria Agolli [email protected] March 29, 2007

CLICK HERE TO GO TO PETITION TEXT

CLICK HERE TO SIGN PETITION

CLICK HERE TO GO TO WEBSITE

 

http://kennedy.senate.gov/senator/contact.cfm.