Is unstar starred a star?
YES?
Following the same logic as before, we might say
that anything starred is automatically a star. Unless
this starring process is actually a superficial form.
Maybe the star was meant to exist beforehand, and
it is inadequate to append the suggestion of a star,
especially to something that is obviously resisting it.
It seems the inevitable conclusion is that it depends
on what this "starring" process is. We don't normally
think of being able to "star" celestial bodies into
being, it seems ridiculous. But it also seems
ridiculous to believe that our notion of what an
"unstar" is is adequate.
My solution is that its ambiguous.
NEXT QUESTION