| Investigations Is a question--unquestionably--a question? YES? Here again we are concerned with absolutes, or the question of absolutes. Is a question something with the quality of questioning, in which case it is absolutely questionable--even as to whether it is a question--or is a question a dead term used to describe something that isn't exactly real--a tool that only points at the moon? The question then becomes, are all things true? or what is that thing at which the finger points? The one uses qualities but is lacking in literal truth, the second uses literal truth and is distinctly lacking in qualities! Are we talking about questions of ultimate meaning? In that case unless its meaning consists of its puzzlement, there ought to be a way in which it is questionably a question, a way in which it can be understood so that meaning can be derived. Are we talking about doubt itself? Practically, doubt doesn't do much good except to prevent--sometimes just temporarily--harmful actions. So doubt shouldn't be considered as an unquestionable question, unless it is a tool to preventing something that we must not allow to happen to ourselves. Doubt should be reasonable. So a question is only unquestionably a question when it has meaning (be it profound meaning or no). The trick is finding a question that still has meaning when it has been solved. NEXT QUESTION |
||