Let me lay a little ground work in some remote areas 
and finally tie them together with other ideas. This is all
going to seem strange to you in the beginning, so bare with 
me. Scientists already today have realized that there is much 
information preprogrammed in our brains for assimilating and
shaping outside information, social information. 

	Take for example sexual preference, just recently they 
discovered that a very small clump of cells in our brains which 
determines our sexual orientation. All brains are born female, 
but usually for normal male brains, in the first 24 hours a 
hormone is released  making a certain clump of cells grow. If 
the cells do grow the brain will be male oriented, making it 
seek out the female form. Vice-versa is also true. 
	But all this also means that the visual clues in our brains
for female/male traits  also are preprogrammed in us. Unlike most 
lower animals, we rely much more on visual clues than smell. So 
there must be information already hardwired in our brains just
to read the visual clues of the opposite sex. This also is
supported by the obvious fact that we don't have to be told as
to what the visual clues of a person’s physical appearance means.
I like women, but never attended a class to learn how.
	There are visual clues for youth, meaning health and
others telling us of old age, weakness and unsuitability for
child bearing any more. None of which we have to go to school
to learn. I even think that there is a good chance who we like
to look at, who we find attractive, might depend a lot on our
own gene makeup. If we have good genes and sense just as good
and of the same type in the opposite sex, we might be driven to
want to have sex with them. Like craving like. And since we all
have our share of weak genes as well, we might sense our gene 
opposites which can improve on our offspring. So a type of liking
your opposite is another flavor of craving. 
	There is other information preprogrammed in us for
listening to languages, learning impossibly fast and well as 
a child , when we clearly outstrip most adults in the assimilation
of language. Later when we just use logic to learn languages,  
rather than some mysterious preprogrammed ability for it, we slow down.
And later when this ability gets turned off with age, we 
become the slow adults who can move to a new country and learn
the native language there more slowly in fifty years than
a child in two years. In this way we become dumber not smarter
with age. And all of it has to do with what nature hardwired in
our brains.

	Other indications are the studies in Israeli where
psychologists discovered that if children are closely exposed
to children of the opposite sex when they are young they will
develop the incest taboo and not marry those people. Even when
they weren't biologically related. Strongly proving that there
is instinct behavior in us, which is preprogrammed from birth
which  is  conducive not for the individual member of the group,
but for the group as a whole.
	We are as programmed for certain social behaviors as 
insects are in their domain. But we have the luxury of free
thought processing over these instinctive conceptual behaviors 
and thought patterns.
	Now I'm  almost at my point. There is another theory by a 
behaviorist at Harvard that much of our altruistic behavior is 
really deep down instinctually selfish behavior. He demonstrated
with social insects with almost mathematical precision that the
amount of willingness and effort one insect will sacrifice for
another is in proportion to the amount of shared genetic 
material they share. If the other insect is not DNA related 
at all, no sacrificing is involved. You just don't, evolution 
in reverse it would be. For siblings with a quarter gene overlap,  
so much sacrifice,  with fifty percent twice.
	Programmed altruistic behavior on the surface, but lying 
underneath, the instinctive consideration that your genes in you,
are also in them, and they are just as important in them as they 
are in you. Individually we might have trouble relating to each 
other, but beneath our surface, we might be always registering 
similarities and differences between ourselves and acting accordingly. 
But always struggling with higher principles to govern and shape
our behavior in accordance to higher considerations, usually abstract
values.  But always, a struggle between instinct and mind. And as 
in so many cases with war, with the alarming probability of complete
gene destruction with impending physical death, instinct wins.

	When soliders rape the women of the people they are fighting
with what are they really doing on an instinctive level to the enemy camp?
They are infusing what they are into what they are trying to wipe out.
What better way to defeat an enemy than to make them become you after
a few generations? Losing what they were to biological history. 
	

	Now what I want to suggest that maybe, just maybe we also
read visual clues on other peoples faces as to who they are 
on a genetic level and as to how they overlap with our own genes.
 If there are two preprogrammed conceptual triggers: ONE, to judge 
and take care of ourselves as individuals within a greater society
of animals for ourselves and TWO, another value system for weighting
our importance towards the greater group we are in. A constant
struggling of warring values, usually opposed to each other.
	And if the visual clues in groups with less range of visual
clues for determining gene material is in certain groups because 
they are less varied with surface traits. Then their group behavior 
interest drive will be stronger than their drive for self-interest.
Good for war and sacrificial soldiers, but bad for discovering
the rights of individuals.
	Civil rights would have been a long time coming in most 
Asian countries. And pilots willing to dive their planes into ships
on a suicide run would have been a long time coming in America. 
	In some countries, the natives are able to look around and
sense distant relatives in strangers. So a more natural feeling of
kinship and blending into the whole group is fostered. In other
countries, the natives only see strangers in strangers. Little feeling
of connection, leading to a greater drive to stand out from the crowd
and be to noticed. So in one group, those who stand out too much,
try not to, in the another, those that do, beam with pride.

	Ever notice how sports fans like to dress up when they attend
an important ball game? They brand themselves with what they wear to
identify themselves with their favorite teams and their fans. When
sports fans identify themselves too closely with a team they can
feel real opposition to the rival teams and their fans. Sometimes
when the feelings are taken too far in absurd silliness they start
riots. Just over a game? But if you looked inside their feelings,
the game was elevated to a war. Both being born from the same
instinctive impulses. Sports are fine, beating fans sucks big time.

	These instinct is a double edged sword. Sometimes blindly
going with a group can lead to mass destruction and horrible atrocities.
Selfish ego can make an Amercian CEO feel egotistical about his huge
salary and bonuses. Proud to stand so far above his employees in earnings.
Where in Japan it might foster a sense of shame. Where even baseball teams
play to win, but by not too much.      
 
	We can borrow their good points, them ours. To tell the truth,
These traits are not bad or good. They don't matter, just character
does. Just character.



Side Point
This is why uniforms generally work in bringing out more strongly
group behavior in soldiers, cops, nurses, whoever, all the way to
Bikers with the same dress and beards, and even to priest wear.
To all sort of ways of using uniform visual signals to foster a
sense of group. Ever wonder why kids in gangs like wearing the same
identifying cloths or why Hasidic Jews like to wear black and beards?
It fosters a group identity which brings out group values over
individual valves.  


Break a tough kid down, build him up as a group member.
The Marines do that. Works, doesn't it? 


Clothes to build group identity. Clothes to stand out as an individual.
What is your identity taste? Which group to do you belong to. 

This can be used and studied to discover which types of visual clues
bring out what sense of belonging.

From clothes to blend in, to others to stand out, and ways of designing
visual clues to broadcast certain symbols for certain psychological 
effects.

And when you guys make money from it by using it to design smarter clothes.
by all means. Throw me a few bucks. They rendered my computer science useless.
My punishment, I guess. Or is it, that flood, that I pointed out to them? What 
flood? Can't you figure it out, by now? Question is, a flood of what?

	So in one group the systems for enforcing greater group 
Consciousness and set of values is naturally stronger, but changing 
with time and integration. Where in the other, the triggers for 
individualistic values are stronger,  leading more to a more 
exploratory nature and a natural stressing of individual values.
From political revolutions to even the normal day to day behaviors
manifesting themselves in a million different ways.



	The premise is, if the above is true, some states as they
are now, are almost driven to look out for themselves. Much 
stronger group behavior values in them than us. Both are good,
both can be bad, depending on how they act and where and when.
From Japanese soldiers disposing and not understanding captured
American soldiers in World War Two, sending them off on a death
march because they thought to themselves, 'just look at them, 
how could they not sacrifice themselves to the death for their
group, what low life these Americans must be.'
	In their minds they deserved their horrible deaths and 
may they never shame their family and race in the same way. 
With horrified American soldiers not understanding the seemingly
complete lack of compassion for individual concerns and rights.
	Two systems values played out then and later today, in a 
disguised form  with a new setting. In today's trade negotiations.
 	One looking at the world in general on principle, putting
in the background group concerns, the other with it in the foreground
claiming otherwise,  but always breaking promises to accommodate 
only themselves and only their group.


This is the biggest division which hurts God.
And the one Satan will play against him. The divisions between
groups is something which Satan uses to divide his sub-Kingdoms.

As Jesus said, "Satan's Kingdom is divided against itself."


By this I don't mean Japanese. This was just an irritable example.
This applies to all groups. It's in the countries with the greatest
gene variety do races mix the best. Not in India, not in Japan, 
and not in China. The people there are basically good, but try 
living among them if you're an outsider. Not so easy.  

In these countries the group instinct is more likely to
override consideration for individual concern in other people
because of less genetic variety. But I believe this must become
triggered in children to work strongly. When Asians are raised
with a variety of people around them, I suspect that instinct
fails to kick in fully. Or at least strongly. Time will tell.

But in whites this instinct can also be tapped into. In Italy a
long time ago, black shirts. In Germany, brown shirts. USA, 
more stylish, white hoods. Or gangs with colors in the streets.

The real question is if these premises are true then....
How will other clannish groups behave once whites fall into
a minority? Will the willingness for mixing continue or go
the other way? I never judge how someone treats me when they are
in an inferior position, but how I think they would treat me
when they feel they are in a secure superior postion. That is
when the buried poisons in some hearts surface.


I'm not saying they are bad people by comparison because I AM NOT
saying it, just that these groups might be more naturally clannish.
And which group is least likely to walk in groups? You know the answer,
but ever wonder why?

Just think of their cultural values as being more of a reflection
of family values extended beyond the nuclear family over the entire
race. This ability is an organizational strength, what lone 
individuals can't do, groups often can. A thousand people can be
stronger than a hundred thousand in that hundred thousand if 
they work together as a group[by whatever means]. And smaller 
groups sense this instinctively. Many clamor for the rights of
the minorities to be loyal to their heritage, fine and good. 
But not for the majority, they are supposed to forget theirs.
Not exactly a fair break. Unless your intent is to disrupt the
majority, then the cultural battle plan makes sense.

I suspect as individuals, we're more or less the same[somewhat].
As groups, we have a long way to go. But it is today's problem,
isn't it? Tomorrow, we'll either be mixed one day, when it won't
matter. Or God loses, and it just came down to the very best
surviving. The same mind set which made Hitler kill those he
thought which were bad for the German gene pool.  

I think most people are good for the most part, no matter what race.
I'm using an example of how I think Satan divides us from others.
Its across these instinctive group dividers which he casts his hook
of hatred.

If Peter can fish so can Satan.

How did some men who married Jews in Germany turn in their wives
for prison? What happened in their minds? Why did their hearts turn
so cold? What DIVISIONS did Satan erect in their hearts? Group divisions?
German husbands waking up one day to only think of their wives as Jews?
How strong can a group division become, if it even can break up the love
of married couples? Plenty strong! When did God ever hint Satan was weak?

NO race is bad, no people. So never condemn one, but best to remember,
Sometimes they can go bad.

As we all know, Hitler and Satan had some usual ideas about race mixing. But 
then again, don't most groups who want to preserve themselves and secretly wish 
others don't. Can you feel that little itch deep inside your heart? All hearts
carry it. Not so easy to get rid of that secret longing for group advantages 
over others. It is too natural.

I guess it’s a good thing police have uniforms, isn't it? Keeps them together. 
It is that 'together' bond, forged with uniforms and training, which enables
a cop or fireman to risk his life for a civilian. A marine or ranger uses the
same group instinct for finding the drive to fight a group enemy. When you bond
so strongly with a larger group you lose your lone self. How many Marines ever
charged an enemy position, thinking only of himself? Any? When they face death,
they're thinking much more of the group needs, not their own. That is the heart
of a true soldier. 

When you watch West Point cadets celebrate graduation together, soldiers
fight together, sport teams play together, bees and ants work together,
fish swim together, birds fly together, wolves hunt together, cattle graze
together, dolphins and killer whales swim together, deep down inside, behind
it all, is the same instinct. We just have a lot more sophisticated thinking 
overlaying that instinct. But underneath it all, is that all important feeling, 
of belonging to a group. When you belong so much inside yourself, your identity 
has become, IS the group identity. 

Once I believed caring about clothes was stupid. I was so smart I was stupid. 
So, what do your clothes say about you?