Single layer coil:

L = N*N * a*a/4 / (9*a/2 + 10*l)

N = 162

a = 1 in

l = 888 in

L = 0.74

From: Anthony Meiers
Sent: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 04:04:51 -0700
To: [email protected]
Subject: Dr. Jay Garrett

While Dr. Jay Garrett gave some of the best information on what ZPE 
was, his prototypes never made it with any reproducibility. The primary 
reason for that is that none of his devices were actually being powered 
by ZPE.
 
The Pons & Fleishman experiments were very interesting. They were doing 
things with voltage switching, modulations, and oscillations that 
haven't been fully explored. If you read the details of the experiments, you 
find out that the amount of energy production was actually greater than 
fusion byproducts were detected. That means the trace amount of fusion 
byproducts were actually a side effect of a more fundamental energy 
system.
 
If you look on my web page, http://www.geocities.com/dr_a_meiers/, I 
think you will see a pattern. In the MEG experiment by Tom Bierden, they 
are using magnetic coils and a switch array. Again, they're playing 
with voltage switching, oscillations, and manipulations.
 
My theory, which has supporting experimental evidence which is yet 
unconclusive, is that all of these free energy devices made to this date 
are inadvertantly creating a partially bidirectional electrical current 
using voltage switching, oscillators, and other manipulations.
 
However, I have created a coil which will create a bidirectional 
electrical current if electricity is generated with it. I have recharged a 
half dead 9v battery using this coil in 10 seconds. Here's the amazing 
part. I simply plugged the coil onto the half dead battery, AND NOTHING 
ELSE. The half dead battery powered the coil enough to get electrical 
reinforcement and thus charge the battery. I have had 4 people 
independently recreate and test the coil. Now I am using the coil for power 
generation.
 
I tell you this because what I need is to get people used to the idea 
that free electricity is easy. My first prototype cost less than $30 to 
build. The second will cost less than $50.
 
If it turns out that it becomes impossible to patent this technology 
because of pressure from the oil companies, then I will need a network of 
free energy minded people who are ready to learn to build these devices 
and give them to their friends. If they are bold enough to sell it, let 
them. If it gets to that point, I release the coil design to public 
domain. But at this point, I hope to get a patent.
 
Let me know if you can help. Thanks.
 
Dr. Anthony Meiers



Dear Dr. Meiers,

It was wonderful to see Dr. Garrett's new web site pop up on my web 
sites.  I am your friendly MAD WEB TV SCIENTIST and it was also great to 
see your name on Dr. Garrett's site.

I would like to have more specific information on your coil system like 
wire gage/diameter number of coils, etc.  I had "classic electronic 
training" in the Air Force and passed courses on black and white and color 
television.  I also did a little work with the electronics of r/c model 
aircraft.  I mention this to give you hope that I might be able to 
"comprehend" the unfamiliar concepts you and Dr. Garrett are talking about.

I need a lot of help with "bidirectional electrical current" ???  Its 
easy to understand why people think we are really mad.  A diagram of 
your battery charging experiment with enough detail so that reproduction 
of your results can be demonstrated would be very helpful, as well as 
theoretical explanations of what is actually happening.

Yes, I am a slow learner but I try really hard.

Thank you for your good work.

Sincerely,

Richard Porter



Keep in mind, the first coil was a product of a Eureka moment.
 
I ran down to Radio Shack, got a 3 pack of coil wire. I used 75 feet of 26-gauge,
from this right here... 
 
http://www.radioshack.com/product.asp?catalog%5Fname=CTLG&category%5Fname=CTLG%5F0
11%5F010%5F004%5F000&product%5Fid=278%2D1345
 
I then had my associate grab one end of the coil wire... and unwind it. All 75 feet.
I then had him come over to me and grab both ends. I then went and found the middle by
pulling the wire taught from the middle, with my associate keeping the ends even.
 
At this point, I grabbed the coil wire from the middle, bent it to make an inverted V
shape, and started winding it from the middle out to the sides.
 
This is a lot of work.
 
I didn't actually keep track of the number of turns. This was just a proof of concept.
I did it at home, away from my lab, on a weekend. I wound the coil around an empty tube
of toilet paper. How low tech can you get?
 
When the winding of the coil was finished, I duct taped the coil on to the paper tube.
I then connected a half dead 9V. in 10 seconds it was on the verge of overcharging.
 
I have yet to generate electricity using this coil design. That project is next.
 
Now for the theory. You spin a magnet inside a coil to generate electricity. The coil is
wound from one end to the other. The flow of electrons from the EM field follow the path
of the coil. Electrons move in one direction.
 
You spin a magnet inside of this coil to generate electricity. The coil is wound from the
middle out. The flow of electrons from the EM field follow the path of the coil. Electrons
move in both directions at once.
 
This bidirectional current is then reinforced by the Earth's magnetic field.
 
Again, I'm very early in my experimental stages. But if you want to try to build my EM
battery charger, feel free. Just keep in mind that all of the intellectual property stuff
mentioned on the site still holds. But scientific reproduction of my experiment is always welcomed.
 
Let me know if I can get any more specific. Thanks.
 
Dr. Anthony Meiers



It is an honor and a pleasure to duplicate your work and to be as 
supportive as possible to your historic efforts.
Thank you very much for your immediate response!

Okay, I assume it is okay to overlap the winds of wire as I wrap from 
the center toward the ends of my paper tube as per your descriptions.  
When I connect to the battery I need to know what points on the coil are 
connected to the battery.   I assume the connection points are from 
either end and the center, right?  

"Sprites" associated with lightning would seem to be fit the 
"bidirectional electrical current" concept. 

Thanks again for your good work.

Rich



From: Anthony Meiers
Sent: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:19:35 -0700
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Dr. Jay Garrett

Yes, I wind from the center to the outside... when I reach the end of 
the tube I wind my coil on, I take the wire and line it straight back to 
the center where the "V" is, then wind again for another layer.
 
Yes, when you are done, you should have two ends, one on either side of 
the tube. Use either for positive or negative.
 
You do not connect to the center. You should have the ends coming out 
both sides. Do it just like in the "V" coil picture on my website.
 
Thank you much.
 
Dr. Anthony Meiers



This is great!  Thank you very much Dr. Meiers!   I love your very 
practical (low tech) educational technology.  I have one theoretical 
question, however.  If current is flowing in opposite directions from the "V" 
then the two ends "should" (?) have the same polarity.  Can you 
enlighten me about this seeming contradiction?  

There is obviously something really exciting going on here and I simply 
must try to get my mind around it!

Thank you for being so patient with me.  I have all I need now to do 
some serous experimenting, maybe I can come up with some theories based 
on what you and Dr. Garrett have already written.

Thanks again,

Rich



From: Anthony Meiers
Sent: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 08:03:27 -0700
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Dr. Jay Garrett

Our email conversations are very educational. Do you mind if I post 
them to my web site? I can include or exclude your contact info if you 
want.
 
Thanks.
 
Dr. Anthony Meiers



It would be a great honor to be included on your web site.  I have 
total confidence in the integrity of both you and Dr. Garrett.  It would 
really be great to get a note from him.  Since I have literally been 
trying to communicate with him for years.  All I ever got was bounced back 
e-mail.  The emotion would be greater than if Einstein were to have 
communicated with me back before we found out about him!    

Please correct my blundering typo before you put my stuff on your site 
first though.  When I get overly excited I always manage to do 
something dumb like this.  The offending typo is:  "Sprites" associated with 
lightning would seem to be fit the "bidirectional electrical current" 
concept. 

Lets say something like:  '"Sprites" associated with lightning would 
seem to  be harmonious with the "bidirectional electrical current" 
concept phenomena. '

History is being made before our very eyes!

Rich



It was a very good conclusion. Matter of fact, I believe lightening itself is a
bidirectional electric circuit reinforced by the EM field of the earth. Do you
know how many amps are in a bolt of lightning?
 
A lightning strike may contain more than 1,000,000 volts and over 200,000 amperes.
Average Lightning Stroke is 6 miles long. Lightning moves about 30,000 times as fast
as a bullet. The temperature of lightning's return stroke can reach 50,000 degrees
Fahrenheit. The surface of the sun is not even that hot! (around 11,000 degrees Fahrenheit).
 
Where does that energy come from? Static Electricity? No, the collision of storm
fronts create static electricity. Static electricity that is bidirectional arcing
current. The friction of the colliding fronts creates "magnetization" of the air
particles in the cloud. Then, the circuit is broken... the circuit becomes "open",
and the reinforced bidirectional circuit dumps enough energy from the Earth's EM
field to close the circuit. Arc to the ground. To the dynamo that is the core of the Earth.
 
That's how you get a million volts and 200,000 amps. That's how this project is
going to work.