Mr R Eeson of the Group of News Watchers states, "I remember in the 50's and 60's how we used to talk about if it were possible to have test-tube babies: The question of whether life could be created in a test tube and have a baby without parents. This discussion of test-tube babies went on for a long time until scientists claimed they had made a test-tube baby. But this was false because all they did was take an egg, which a woman had produced, and put in sperm, which a man had produced. It then has to be transferred back to the woman for normal growth to occur: Hardly what was in debate"!

Prof Twidl Thumz responds, "yes, well, it sold newspapers that day and sounded good. Besides, it took the pressure off us to come up with a real test-tube baby and made it seem like we were gods even though we hadn't. It also gave our followers greater faith in us".

Mrs Wee Seeorl of Perth states, "I remember in the 70's there were claims that homosexuality was because some men had more female hormones than male hormones. Research showed this to be false; and that if a person had more female hormones they would be a female. However then some scientists were hired by a homosexual group who 'discovered' it to be true".

Mr I. Think of the small Group of Thinking Psychologists says, "everyone goes through a physical change some time around 12 years old. This includes a change in hormones. There will be small periods of there being more than usual amounts of hormones of the opposite sex. This can cause a moment where there can be a sudden attraction to the same sex. With current confusion in society on this issue a person may then think they are somehow homosexual or lesbian because of this. This can also occasionally occur at any stage of life. However this will pass as males are males and females are females. Homosexual or lesbian activity is chosen not hormonal".

Mr Itz Hogwash of Canberra asks, "if homosexuality is natural (as some scientists claim) then why is it that animals don't accept it? If a suddenly randy male dog tries to mount another one (and such even will do so with a lamppost, so that doesn't suggest homosexuality) the dog underneath NEVER accepts the penis being placed in his backside. Surely we would have many dogs that would accept it. Yet having been brought up in a suburb with dogs everywhere I never saw it once. Any claims of some animal that does; I would have to see and study the facts personally to believe _ I mention dogs because they live among us and we KNOW the facts. And if it were natural surely we should be seeing it all over the place".

Ms A. Dill (Psychologist) of the Qld Department of Deceptive Services stated, "facts are merely what we believe to be fact. If we believe something it will become fact to us. We just guide people's facts, you see"?

I questioned Ms Dill, "if I walked off a cliff and believed I'd be alright would it be fact then that I wouldn't die"? To this question she stated, "you aren't supposed to really think about what many Psychologists and scientists say too deeply, but just blindly accept because it sounds good".

Miss S. Vandenberg (LDS) of Brisbane states, "Jesus Christ said that we can change ourselves. But modern psychology claims that is impossible: We can only learn to control our appetites. Jesus Christ said that if we want to have real happiness we need to change our thinking and actions. But modern psychology teaches that our problems are caused by what someone else did to us and that them suffering will make us feel better. Jesus Christ taught not to get divorced unless the partner has committed adultery. But modern psychologists teach it's good to get a divorce if you aren't entirely satisfied. And now we have all these unmarried women, who blame their ex-husband for everything wrong, all over the place; and no man will marry them. Jesus Christ taught that if you are angry you are in hell fire. But modern psychology teaches that it is good to be angry and this will help you to be happy. I don't see angry people thinking very sensibly about what they are doing. Anger is used as an excuse for crime. So should I believe modern psychology in these things or the ancient psychology of Jesus Christ"?