Dinosawus Rexes
"MILLIONS of years ago only large reptiles roamed the earth", Dr B Igmouth of Chayngitt University informs us. He goes on further to say, "we now know how they hunted and thought _ as was demonstrated in the movie Dura-Sick Park. We will soon be able to tell you whether they preferred Mac Donald's or Kentucky Fried. Although divorce was uncommon it did occur, and each few-a-hadus had only 3 children. The coppa-sawus was very paranoid, and always running away. The back-a-sawus were very slow moving and couldn't lean over to get their prey, so had to eat monkeys and fruit on trees.
Mr B. Leevinnithin says, "David Rattinburra told me that dinosawuses with teeth definitely ate meat and ones without teeth were definitely vegetarians. I did wonder about things like snakes of course. I know they have fangs but they don't have teeth and are meat eaters not vegetarian. I must be wrong because Rattinburra must be right".
Mr & Mrs Wesea of Canberra say, "we were reading how that a fossil was found containing the footprint of a man and the footprint of a large reptile (dinosaur) on the same piece. If these large reptiles lived in some time before man how could this be"?
Dr Watson of the United Guild for Animal Dental Surgeons said, "yes, the tooth-a-sawus were constantly needing dental work. What is more is that when it came to the crunch, they would afterward have us for lunch _ that's a rhyming joke; you get it"?
Seth (an early earth inhabitant with an alternate opinion) said, "we had some huge animals at first and some largish reptiles. Many with teeth used them for breaking open fruits and coconuts etc. While those without were more to grazing on herbs. Some of these large beasts did eat meat but people killed them off fairly quickly for protection".
Mrs I Reed of Melbourne says, "I went into the museum and saw a huge skull of what was claimed to be a 'tyrannosaurus rex'. I was surprised that they actually did have a real head and it wasn't just a fictitious animal. So I started reading the plaque. It had about 12 lines and on the last one it informed me that they actually only had a TOOTH and the entire rest of the head was assumed. I watched people looking at it and no one read past the first line or so, going away believing that this whole head was really what was found. Now why would the museum create such a deception if they really believed in these proposed creatures"?