Noam Chomsky Controlled Asset Of The
This piece is important
not only due to its value in exposing who No'am Chomsky is, but also because it
is an excellent compendium of the real issues that should be the concern of
every Leftist, and would be, were it not for the untiring disinfo efforts of Chomsky.
Don't let the fact that this was first published at Rense put you off. Important information often appears on Rense's site because D'Powers
Dat Be know that Rense is kooky when it comes to UFOs and such and they
know that any information that appears on his site will be taken as untenable
as a result.
Interspersing difficult-to-internalize, world
view-shifting truths with the far-out is a common technique used to
put rational people off to considering information the elites don't want
considered and analyzed in depth.
Usually, where there's a reptilian or a grey on a site, there's a
tidbit of fact you need to know. The Wheat and chaff principle is generally in
order.
The following is wheat and I present it to you because enough
damage has been done by this weasel, about which I have been writing for years.
His father, the illustrious Wm. Chomsky, true
Anarchist, friend of the working person, Wobblie,
scholar and gentleman, must be crying in Heaven for this disgrace of a son
of his.
Here's the article:
"Noam Chomsky:
Controlled Asset Of The
Daniel L. Abrahamson / PREVIOUSLY CARRIED AT RENSE.COM |
April 6 2006
Noam Chomsky is often
hailed as America’s premier dissident intellectual, a fearless purveyor of
truth battling against media propaganda, murderous U.S. foreign policy, and the
crimes of profit-hungry transnational corporations.
He enjoys a slavish cult-like following from millions leftist
students, journalists, and activists worldwide who fawn over his dense books as
if they were scripture. To them, Chomsky is the supreme deity, a priestly
master whose logic is beyond question.
However as one begins to examine the
interviews and writings of Chomsky, a different picture emerges. His books, so
vociferously lauded in leftist circles, appear to be calculated disinformation
designed to distract and confuse honest activists. In fact,
since the 1960's Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper, using his
elevated status to cover up the major crimes of the global elite.
His formula over the years has stayed consistent: blame “
In his book “The Conspirator’s Hierarchy,” Dr. John Coleman named Chomsky as a
deep cover CIA agent working to undermine social protest groups. Certainly Dr.
Coleman’s claims appear validated by an honest review of Chomsky’s role as a
Left gatekeeper.
Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of
government complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore he claims that the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg
Committee, and Trilateral Commission are “nothing organizations.” When
critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal Reserve and their role in
manipulating the cycle of debt.
Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization and is
an innocent scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald;
that the obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur; and that peak oil is real
and good for humanity.
What he does advocate is population control, gun control, support
for U.N.E.S.C.O., and the end of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world
government under the UN. In other words, the major goals of
the
Chomsky’s role in propaganda paradigm is much like that of Karl
Marx: to present a false liberation ideology which actually supports the
desired solutions of the elite. Marx pointed out the inequalities and brutality
of capitalism and then advocated a one world bank, army, and government with
the abolition of private property and religion; in other words, the major goals
known of the New World Order.
Tens of millions of activists worldwide still remain trapped by
this scam, failing to recognize the inherent autocratic and elitist structures
of Marxism-Leninism or the newer incarnation under Chomsky.
The Globalist elites and their army of
social scientists at the Tavistock Institute
understand that people are going to question the inequities of the current
economic system. For example, why is wealth distributed so unevenly between
classes and countries? Why are those living in third world nations allowed to
die from preventable diseases and starvation? Why does the
In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence? Who
is behind all this suffering? And most importantly, what solutions would
relieve the poverty and destruction plaguing the worldwide population?
Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role of
re-direct agent. He discusses a mere fraction of the real elite manipulation
and then quickly pushes his followers into dead-end solutions and alienating
rhetoric. Chomsky’s hero status is further amplified by Left gatekeeper
publications like Z Magazine, DemocracyNow!, The Progressive, and The Nation.
Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major
funding from Globalist front-groups like the
Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur Foundation? Chomsky may be the head gatekeeper,
but he works alongside a network of fellow Globalist
assets like Amy Goodman who do their best to appear radical while avoiding all
the hardcore issues and deliberately leading the Left into oblivion.
The following analysis will show that Noam
Chomsky is a deep cover agent for the
911:
Noam Chomsky has acted as the premier Left gatekeeper
in the aftermath of the 9-11 crimes, lashing out at the 9-11 truth movement and
claiming any suggestions of government complicity are fabrications. The
“radical” Chomsky takes a position so deeply rooted in denial that it makes the
staged 9-11 whitewash commission look like an honest study. He belligerently
refuses to discuss any of the massive evidence proving government foreknowledge
and participation in the crimes, claiming it would destroy the activist
movements worldwide:
“If the left spends its time on this, that's the end of the left,
in my
opinion: the mainstream would be utterly delighted. It is highly
likely that nothing significant will be found. And if -- which I very
greatly doubt -- something is found that would quickly send everyone
in
triumphant.”
In other words, Chomsky is telling his followers to ignore the evidence
because according to him, none exists. However even if there
is massive evidence, responsible activists should ignore it because it would be
“the end of the Left.” Chomsky’s role as a 9-11 gatekeeper goes even
further as he denies each piece of evidence individually. The following
examples should suffice:
A) As most honest 9-11 researchers know, 7 of the accused 19
hijackers are alive, proving the official story is a fabrication. Many of the
remaining 12 were trained as
Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an
undercover CIA drug runner: a man trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent in
many languages, able to evade INS regulations, working with drug dealers, and
receiving wired bank funds from CIA-linked Pakistani intelligence. There
remains no photographic evidence of these supposed hijackers ever getting on
the planes (walking through airport security does not count). Furthermore, the
autopsy list of Flight 77 which supposedly hit the Pentagon listed none of the
accused hijackers.
Regarding the evidence of government complicity in training the
hijackers, Chomsky wrote the following:
Nothing empirical is impossible. Thus, it is conceivable that
everyone
in the White House is totally insane. And in my opinion, that's what
they would have had to be to try something that would have been very
likely to turn into an utter fiasco, and if by some miracle had succeeded,
would almost certainly have leaked, so that they would all be facing the
death sentence. Possible, but not likely.
B) What about the unprecedented NORAD
stand down on 9-11 which broke standard operation procedure? Over 67 times in
2001, NORAD had dispatched jets when they deviated from their flight path. In
1999, when golfer Payne Stewart’s single engine Lear in depressurized, NORAD
planes were flying around the vessel in 20 minutes.
But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first
day on the job as hijacking coordinator for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD.
Meanwhile NORAD ran at least 7 hijacking drills that morning like Operation
Vigilant Guardian where commercial jets crashed into government buildings in
Manhattan, Washington DC, and Virginia. These “mock” drills, designed to give
live on 9-11, helped to distract the honest people within NORAD and the FAA,
and to evade suspicion from patriotic investigators within the CIA, FBI, and NSA’s Echelon network.
Of the subject of the NORAD stand down, Chomsky wrote the
following:
“Whether NORAD followed SOP, I have no idea, not having
investigated the matter. I think the case is very weak, and diverts people from
the really serious issues.”
C) What about the document called “Operation Northwoods”
signed off in 1962 by the Joint Chiefs of Staff like Generals Lemnitzer and Landsdale? These
men, sworn to protect the Constitution, devised a plan to create false-flag
terrorism in order to engineer a war with
-"Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft
could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of
Cuba."
-"Exploding a few plastic bombs in caarefully chosen spots, the arrest of
Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban
involvement also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible
government."
- "We could blow up a U.S. ship in
This document was discovered in the National Archives and has been
the subject of mainstream articles by ABCNEWS and others. It stands as clear
evidence that the
Operation Northwoods example is only one
of many reasons for
being skeptical about this: it doesn't even come close, and it was not
carried out. Furthermore, there is nothing in history that even remotely
resembles what is being proposed. Of course, that does not show that
the thesis is impossible: nothing could show that, by definition. And if
someone can put together some evidence and refute the arguments as to
why it is extraordinarily unlikely, then the matter will be worth pursuing.
Chomsky’s role as the chief 9-11 gatekeeper proves he is
distracting his leftist followers from the truth. Instead of facing the clear
facts, he claims that 19 hijackers did it and that al-Qaeda
is a real terrorist enemy. When presented with documented evidence, from living
hijacker patsies to the NORAD stand down, he simply claims it doesn’t exist. He
resorts to emotional “they would never do it” appeals in order to deny the
obvious.
Chomsky is exhibiting far more than logical skepticism, but instead is actively
engaging in disinformation.
9-11 Prior Knowledge:
Chomsky denial of government complicity in the crimes of September
11 is one thing, but he goes further, claiming the government had no prior
knowledge of the attacks. Mind you, this is a position even weaker than Michael
Moore’s tepid Fahrenheit 9-11, which at least tacitly suggested a degree of
prior knowledge.
Chomsky’s position is untenable. For a man who prides himself on
science and logic, his steadfast refusal to acknowledge mainstream media
reports finds him using arguments similar to Holocaust deniers; one can show
them photographs, videos, testimony, and physical evidence but the burden of
proof is impossible. Such is the case with Chomsky who ignores the many
government admissions of prior knowledge widely available even in the 9-11
whitewash commission report. Here is Noam Chomsky
writing on government prior knowledge:
That tells us even less. Every intelligence agency is flooded,
daily,
with information of very low credibility. In retrospect, one can
sometimes pick out pieces that mean something. At the time, that's
a virtual impossibility. By arguments like this we can prove that
someone blew up the White House yesterday.
If they did not have prior knowledge, why were Cheney and NORAD
running drills that morning where hijacked jets flew into buildings in
Of course, Chomsky does not even admit the Echelon network exists.
This despite the NSA’s openly acknowledged ability to
monitor all phone calls, emails and satellite communication with keyword
software which can identify phrases and immediately begin tracking the
communication. This despite their admitted bases at
Students of the intelligence world know full well that the NSA’s
Echelon network picked up the chatter for weeks before the attacks. In fact,
the NSA admitted it, saying that on September 10 agents intercepted calls from
hijackers but, *ahem*, did not translate them until after the attacks. Such
admissions are red herrings, clearly designed to excuse massive prior knowledge
at tops levels of the intelligence circles.
What about the President Daily Briefing given to Bush in late
August which discussed the threat of hijacked jets? What about intelligence
groups like Able Danger and FBI agents like Robert Wright who warned of the
flight school trainees? What about FBI agent John O’Neill’s investigation into
Al-Qaeda financing which was quashed by Bush? What
about attorney David Schippers who desperately tried
to warn Ashcroft about the impending attacks? Why was the CIA admittedly
tracking the accused hijackers since 2000? Why was FEMA running drills in
Those are just a smattering of the mountain of evidence proving
beyond any reasonable doubt that the
CFR/Bilderberg/Trilateral Commission:
Before and after 9-11, the key role for the Left Gatekeepers like
Chomsky has been denying the existence of the overclass
which prints the money, funds and manages the wars, ships the drugs, controls
entire industries, and creates the scientific propaganda which plagues society.
Instead they critique mid-level minions & front corporations while speaking
in glittering generalities.
In the world of Left gatekeepers, the
Thus in the world of Chomsky, puppetmaster
families like the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and Morgans do not control the financial, oil, pharmaceutical,
and narcotics trade; the Oppenheimers maintain no
influence over diamond, gold, iron ore, copper, uranium, titanium, and platinum
markets; and we can certainly forget about investigating the European Black
Nobility like the Vun Thurn
und Taxis, Alba, and Saxe-Coburg dynasties.
Chomsky also vehemently denies the role of the Council on Foreign
Relations, Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral
Commission in the creation and management of the wars and poverty he claims to
condemn. When speaking on such “conspiracies,” he said the following:
It's the same with the Trilateral Commission, the Council on
Foreign Relations, all these other things the people are racing around
searching for conspiracy theories about-they're "nothing"
organizations. Of course they're there, obviously rich
people get together and talk to each other, and play golf with one another, and
plan together-that's not a big surprise.
But these conspiracy theories people are putting their energies
into have virtually nothing to
do with the way the institutions actually function.
(Understanding Power, 348)
Chomsky’s comments would be laughable if they weren’t polluting so
many good minds. He is clearly trying to misdirect his readers
way from discovering the
Let us examine these so-called “nothing organizations” in more
depth:
The CFR, funded by Wall Street and the Rockefellers after WW II,
is an organization openly sworn to destroying American national sovereignty in
favor of world government. They have acted as the de-facto “secret team” in
managing
The CFR has acted as the dominant roundtable group pushing for a Panamerican Union by 2010 which would dissolve national
borders and unite
Chomsky’s stonewalling on the Bilderberg
raises even more suspicions. Since 1954 the Bilderberg
has served as the central brain of the
Major members of the media, such as editors from the Economist, NY
Times,
Nevertheless in recent years, the truth has emerged. Major media
outlets like the BBC admit the Bilderberg is planning
for a one-world currency, bank, and army. Articles in Reuters and the Financial Times of
their grooming of politicians, and their secret plans for world governance. If
these mainstream media reporters can admit the major role of the Bilderberg in shaping world affairs, why can’t Chomsky? Why
is he holding back?
Simlarly, how can Chomsky
seriously ignore the role of the Trilateral Commission, the brainchild of Globalist masters David Rockefeller and Zbigniew
Brzezinski? This is the same Brzezinski
who helped direct the first CIA funds to bin Laden, and in his book Between Two
Ages called for a technotronic society with a microchipped population.
The Trilateral Commission openly admits they are trying to control the economy
through closer European-Japanese-American cooperation.
They operate much like the CFR, counting the worlds
top elites, politicians, corporate executives, and media barons as members.
They have been instrumental in creating the destructive “free trade” agreements
that are destroying
Journalist Jim Tucker, a Spotlight reporter with impeccable
credentials, also links the Trilateral Commission to the international
narcotics trade, the $500 billion-plus racket from heroin and cocaine alone
which helps fund the Globalist’s house of cards.
What would motivate Chomsky to call the Trilateral Commission a
“nothing organization?” Is it because they echo his goal of a world government?
Or are there darker forces at work?
When balanced against over 50 years of documented evidence,
Chomsky’s claims are exposed as nothing more than spurious lies and denial.
Federal Reserve:
Similarly, while Chomsky bemoans the widespread poverty in America
and the Third World, he has never spoken publicly on the role of the Federal
Reserve, nor their European master, the Bank of England. Therefore
most Leftist activists are unaware of the roles played by these privately owned
bank cartels which print worthless fiat currency out of thin air.
Since its secret formation at
Furthermore every dollar printed is merely debt charged to the
federal government. Thus while it only costs 10 cents to
print a $100 bill, the
The creation of the Federal Reserve, owned largely by the
Rockefeller, Morgan, and Rothschild interests has eluded the “radical” Chomsky.
Furthermore he does not discuss the proven role of the Fed in creating
recessions and depressions in order to purchase assets at a fraction of their
value.
Chomsky systematically ignores the role of the fiat currency system
which drives down wages, inflates prices, and puts the American economy under
the iron claw of a few elite families. Since the dollar is the base currency
for worldwide trade and the current economic house of cards, shouldn’t these
topics be discussed?
Perhaps Chomsky stays mute because a central bank fits into his
ideology. After all, one of the key planks in the Marxist and Fabian socialist
agenda is a managed central bank in order to control the economy. Or perhaps he
fears discussion of the Fed would expose the real hidden hand that secretly
manages the world economy. For him it is easier to blast the front corporations
and low-level grocery boys.
CIA:
If he denies even basic government foreknowledge of 9-11, should
it be any surprise that Chomsky avoids criticism of the CIA? When asked about
the links between the CIA and bin Laden, and the CIA’s overt support of the
Taliban, Chomsky wrote the following:
“CIA support for bin Laden (which is not quite accurate) or the
Taliban (also
not quite accurate) doesn't seem to me remotely relevant.”
How can Chomsky write this with a straight face? He is simply
ignoring the documented evidence of CIA funding for the “freedom fighters”
known as al-Qaeda, totaling over $6 billion. The cozy
CIA/al-Qaeda relationship continued through the
Bosnian conflict via training of the drug-peddling Kosovo Liberation Army.
Chomsky also denies the mainstream reports from
But Chomsky goes further than that. While claiming to critique the
CIA, he absolves the agency of any responsibility for its actions, from Nazi
origins via Project Paperclip to heinous mind control experiments like MK
ULTRA. This horrific period in CIA history, a true Rosetta stone in
understanding the New World Order, is scientifically ignored by Chomsky, who
sees the CIA as an innocent victim of White House orders:.
Or take the CIA, which is considered the source of a
lot of these conspiracies; we have a ton of
information about it, and as I read the information,
the C.I.A. is basically just an obedient branch of the
White House. I mean sure, the C.I.A. has done things
around the world- but as far as we know, it hasn't
done anything on its own.
There's very little evidence-in fact, I don't know of any-that
the C.I.A. is some kind of rogue elephant, you know, off on its
own doing things. What the record shows is that the
C.I.A. is just an agency of the White House, which
sometimes carries out operations for which the
Executive branch wants what's called "plausible
deniability"; in other words, if something goes wrong,
we don't want it to look like we did, those guys in
the C.I.A. did it, and we can throw some of them to
the wolves if we need to. That's basically the role
of the C.I.A., along with mostly just a collection of
information. (Chomsky, “Understanding Power”)
Like all of Chomsky’s claims, this one is based on emotion,
conjecture, and opinion. He does not cite any specifics, knowing full well that
his fawning minions will accept his word as gospel.
Chomsky sees the CIA as a pathetic collection of scapegoat
bureaucrats, acting as grocery boys for their master President. According to
him, the CIA does not carry out secret projects on their own, and if accused of
such, are innocent.
JFK Assassination/CIA role:
Therefore is it any surprise the Chomsky endorses the lone
assassin and magic bullet theory in the assassination of JFK? From his
emergence as a guru of the Left in the late 60's, Chomsky has belittled anyone
researching the anomolies stemming from the official
story and
The Kennedy assassination cult is probably the most
striking case. I mean, you have all these people
doing super-scholarly intensive research, and trying
to find out just who talked to whom, and what's the
exact contours were of this supposed high-level
conspiracy-it's all complete
nonsense. As soon as you
look into the various theories, they always collapse,
there's just nothing there. But in many places, the
left has just fallen apart on the basis of these sheer
cults. (Chomsky, Understanding Power)
Chomsky’s position puts him in the less than 15% of Americans who
believe Oswald was the lone shooter. For such a self-proclaimed “anarchist”
radical, Chomsky’s trust in
The facts of course, tell a different story. While far from perfect man,
Kennedy ran afoul by opposing the very forces that took over after his death.
He began withdrawing 5,000 CIA “advisers” from Vietnam; fired CIA chiefs Allen
Dulles and Richard Bissel; disbanded the CIA and
handed over covert operations to the State Department; ordered the creation of
a silver-backed government currency to break the Federal Reserve monopoly;
turned down the Operation Northwoods plan to engineer
false flag terrorism and blame it on Cuba; and refused to invade Cuba and
launch a full scale nuclear war during the Missile Crisis, a plan favored by
hawks like General Curtis LeMay.
Chomsky ignores the true history of the Kennedy presidency because
it would expose te shadow
government takeover after his assassination.
What about Chomsky’s claims that the CIA never acts as a rogue
elephant? Do they hold up?
MK ULTRA/Project Paperclip:
Chomsky has never publicly acknowledged the covert CIA mind
control programs known as MK ULTRA and its many offshoots. This program alone
shows how the CIA was indeed a rogue elephant, as they ran illegal campaign of
propaganda, brainwashing, sex slavery, and poisoning of citizens.
In 1946, Globalist bagman Harry Truman
began a covert plan to smuggle top Nazi SS officers, scientists, and
propagandists into
Then, using his same crew of Gestapo and SS, aided by the Vatican,
and sponsored by the CIA, Gehlen set up “rat lines”
which smuggled 5,000 of the worst Nazi criminals into South and Central America.
Butchers like Klaus Barbie, Mortin Bormann and Josef Mengele among
others owed their freedom to this program.
Those same men would later aid CIA coups in
These men birthed the MK ULTRA program, focusing on mass mind
control, via drugs, hypnosis, subliminals, and pulsed
electromagnetic waves. It was this mad science, spawned in the Nazi labs of Dr.
Josef Mengele, that now obsessed men like Sidney Gottlieb, John Lilly,
Jose Delgado and Ewen Cameron.
Their most famous project was the creation of Manchurian
candidates, used for political assassinations, drug transportation, espionage,
and sabotage. Yet this was not limited to Sirhan Sirhan.
In fact, both Gottlieb and Cameron helped train thousands of
pre-adolescent children for use in child prostitution, sex slavery, blackmail,
satanic rituals and murder. Known as the Monarch Project, children were kidnaped from American streets and foreign nations and then
programmed with trauma based mind control.
Other common victims for experimentation included prisoners, the
homeless, and residents of mental institutions, all cherry-picked because they
were defenseless. Details of this horrific and still operational program are
available in rare and highly suppressed texts of Fritz Springmeier,
which usually fetch over $300 a piece.
Why does Chomsky refuse to discuss MK ULTRA and its sister projects?
Why does he claim the CIA was merely a pawn of the White House, when the record
proves that Eisenhower and Kennedy had little, if any knowledge of MK ULTRA?
Simply put: Why is Noam Chomsky covering for the CIA?
Elite Child Sex Rings:
The Monarch Project of prostituting children deserves further
mention (although Chomsky would disagree). In 1988 Vice President Bush was
caught having 15 year-old call boy prostitutes visiting the White House late at
night. The credit cards records to prove it were splashed across the front page
of the
Unfortunately the star witness, Craig Spence, was suicided in his hotel with piano wire before he could
testify. Book like "The Franklin Coverup"
by John DeCamp have further proven the links between
the CIA and Army intelligence to the elite sex slavery rings. Cases of like the
"The Finders" in Washington DC, where customs agents discovered a CIA
warehouse full of child porn and satanic torture, stand as yet further
evidence.
In the forrmer Yugloslavia,
CIA front company Dyncorp has been convicted of
operating in the human slave trade and using their C-130's to ship many of the
200,000 women and children smuggled out every year. Furthermore, mainstream
news outlets have shown evidence of UN Peacekeepers assisting the sex trade in
the Democratic
Despite the voluminous amount of grotesque evidence, Chomsky has
never discussed the elite sex trade. This is an issue so shocking, so paradigm-altering, that his Leftist followers would no longer trust
their loving mother government, and that is the last thing Chomsky wants. After
all, if the Leftists knew that top level politicians are actually pedophiles
practicing satanic ritual abuse, they would no longer trust the savior world
government. The absence of Chomsky and the Left on the suffering of these
children speaks volumes about their true moral character and motives.
MK ARTICHOKE/ MK NAOMI:
Other MK ULTRA side projects included pushing LSD to the youth
culture and attaching electrodes into prisoners heads, the latter perfected by
Dr. Delgado. Adjunct programs like MK NAOMI and MK ARTICHOKE focused on
genetically engineered viruses, biological agents, and radiation effects on
American citizens. Common experiments included testing biological agents and
atomic weapons radiation on soldiers, the mentally handicapped, people in
subways, and even whole towns; putting cancer viruses into polio vaccines; and
exposing pregnant women to radiation to test the effects on the fetus. These
experiments have been documented as continuing into the 1980's and likely still
continue today.
Chomsky does not discuss these horrendous programs, because it
would awaken his readers to the cruelest fact: that the U.S. government will
murder its own citizens and soldiers, killing hundreds of thousands of
unwitting subjects simply for political gain. After all, if they would feed
radiated breakfast cereal to thousands of retarded children, would these same
parasitic elites not also kill more than 2,800 Americans on September 11?
Fluoride:
Of course MK ULTRA lives on today in our drinking water. It was
around the time of its inception, in the 1950's, that the
Chomsky has never discusses the effects of sodium fluoride, nor
the lead and arsenic used in water as silent weapons of pacification. As a
scientist, he is apparently uninterested in sodium fluoride's proven link to
cancer, leukemia, osteoporosis, Alzheimer disease, and brain damage.
So should we be surprised that he never writes about the deadly
poison aspartame found in thousands of products? Or genetically modified foods
and growth hormones which destroy immune systems while causing blood disorders
and swelling of the organs? Or cell phones which emit deadly
microwave radiation leading to cancer, vision loss, and (according to published
BBC reports) altering human DNA? Or the GWEN towers which pulse deadly
ELF radiation across
Rockefeller Pharma Cartel:
The Nazi doctors who didn’t end up in American intelligence found cushy jobs in
the pharmaceutical cartel firms like Merck and Eli-Lilly. Chomsky never
discusses the history of these firms; nor the Rockefeller control over the
American Medical Association; nor the link between mercury-tainted vaccines and
brain damage; nor the deadly mind control drugs like SSRI’s
(Prozac, Zoloft, etc.) and amphetamine-based Adderall/Ritalin
pills pimped out to helpless children.
These drugs cause bone degeneration, memory loss, suicidal
tendencies and added depression to the poor kids gobbling them like
Flintstone’s chewables, all at the advice of their
pill-pusher death merchant doctors. Meanwhile Chomsky stays true to form,
ignoring these matters and instead calling for socialized, Federally-controlled
healthcare which would further subsidize the pharma
cartel. This is just another example of his bait and switch tactics, a sloppy
mess of disinfo and elite sponsored solutions.
Psychiatry/ New Freedom Initiative:
Chomsky and his Left Gatekeepers also ignore the assault from
psychiatric community, largely controlled by the Rockefellers and Tavistock Institute, which seek to define every neurosis as
a mental illness in order to push more drugs. Bush has signed the New Freedom
Initiative to forcibly psychologically test all K-12 students in public
schools, screen them for “mental illnesses,” and force the children to take the
recommended drugs.
This brainwashing agenda was pushed by the pharma
cartel, with GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Merck and
others investing millions in buy-offs and lobbying. But news of this
extraordinary Stalinist plan never graced the pages of Chomsky's editorials,
nor Z Magazine, The Nation, the Progressive, and DemocracyNow. Perhaps this is because the New Freedom
Initiative fits into their goal of government-controlled socialized health
care.
The New Freedom Initiative, bolder than Stalin’s wildest dreams,
is just a small part of the eugenics agenda; a dominant Globalist
goal which Chomsky and his Left Gatekeeper bagmen aid and abet. Chomsky has
never written about the sinister American Psychiatric Association, nor the role
of it's former chief, Dr. Ewen Cameron, the
aforementioned MK ULTRA villain and CIA child programmer.
Key aspects of the scientific eugenics movement such as population
control, abortion legalization, poisonous vaccinations, and stem cell research
find their most vocal advocates on the far Left of the managed political
debate. Leftist college majors like sociology advocate programs like parental
licensing by the state, state-controlled child care, and Chinese style
childbirth laws with forced sterilization as a penalty.
Leftists call for more vaccinations in the
Population Control:
Population control by any means necessary is a major,
some would say the major goal of the
Chomsky, the self-proclaimed radical, also advocates such
depopulation methods. In Chomsky’s book “Understanding Power,” a collection of
his talks with activists, a crowd member asks about population control, to
which Chomsky responds:
If we continue to produce energy by combustion, the human race
isn’t going to survive much longer...Yeah, population control is another
issue where it doesn’t matter if you do it, everybody
has to do it. It’s like
traffic: I mean you can’t make driving a car survivable by driving well
yourself; there has to be kind of a social contract involved, otherwise it
won’t work. (61)
Chomsky and other gatekeepers claim to maintain the moral high
ground, but then advocate the eugenics agenda pushed by elite
roundtable groups like the Bilderberg and Club
of
Gun Control:
Another one of the great successes of the Left gatekeeper has been
pushing for unconstitutional gun control agenda through their publications like
The Nation, Z Magazine, The Progressive, and their
internet kin at DemocracyNow! &
Indymedia. It is a great achievement of
propaganda when the supposed radicals “opposing Bush” call for a completely
disarmed American populace and inflated budget for BATF thugs in ski masks.
Chomsky mock s those who support the Constitutionally
endowed right to bear arms. In fact, he says it doesn’t exist:
It’s pretty clear that, taken literally, the Second Amendment
doesn't
permit people to have guns. But laws are never taken literally, including
amendments to the Constitution or constitutional rights. Laws permit what
the tenor of the times interprets them as permitting.” (Secrets, Lies, and
Democracy)
Then later in the interview, Chomsky is asked if guns are a proper
way to respond to government tyranny. He responds as follows:
As for guns being the way to respond to this, that's outlandish.
First
of all, this is not a weak
the government has tanks. If people get tanks, the government has atomic
weapons. There's no way to deal with these issues by violent force, even
if you think that that's morally legitimate.
Guns in the hands of American citizens are not going to make the
country more benign. They're going to make it more brutal, ruthless
and destructive. So while one can recognize the motivation that lies
behind some of the opposition to gun control, I think it's sadly
misguided. (Secrets, Lies and Democracy)
It would be one thing to hear such rhetoric out of the Fabian
socialists in the Democratic party. But to have the
supposed “fringe radicals” saying there is no second amendment and advocating
gun seizures is remarkable. And because of globalist
infiltration of the left, this policy once favored by Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and
other mass murderers has found a comfortable home. Hence it has become common
to hear activists protesting the
Environmental Front Groups:
As masters of propaganda, the Globalists
have uses their Left Gatekeepers to push eugenics and population control as
necessary for the environment. This has been accomplished through the phony
environmental movement and Peak Oil fabrications.
The Club of
Other fronts like the World Wildlife Fund, managed by the
aforementioned Prince Philip, vocally push for population control while seizing
large swaths of land for “Mother Earth.” Other pet projects such as the
Past WWF board members have included Bilderberg
founder Prince Bernhard, Hollinger media gopher and Bilderberg
member Conrad Black, Shell chairman John Loudon, King Juan Carlos of Spain,
Prince Henrik of Denmark, and accused drug dealer
Henry Keswick.
Chomsky is one of the many re-direct agents who use the real
environmental pollution problems to push for a fascist takeover by a world
government. Much like the ideas discussed in the Report From
Suppose it was discovered tomorrow that the greenhouse effects has
been way understimated, and that the catastrophic
effects are actually
going to set in 10 years from now, and not 100 years from now or something.
Well, given the state of the popular movements we have today, we’d probably
have a fascist takeover-with everybody agreeing to it, because that would be
the only method for survival that anyone could think of.
I’d even agree to it,
because there’s just no other alternatives right now.
(Understanding Power, 388)
Here is Noam Chomsky, openly advocating
a fascist takeover because the ends justify the means. This is classic
problem-reaction-solution programming, as he points to the real threat of
pollution and then offers the solution of tyranny
Peak Oil:
As previously stated, the environmental movement was funded and
amplified by Globalist oil, banking, and drug
cartels, with specific help from the Rockefeller Foundation. The WWF, along
with other phony NGO’s like the Sierra Club and Greenpeace consistently call
for population reduction. Additionally these groups push the flat earth thesis
of “Peak Oil,” predicting that oil supplies will soon run out and of
course...require massive worldwide population reductions.
Chomsky posted an entry called “Peak Oil” on his blog in June, 2004, writing the following: “The basic
theory is incontrovertible. The only questions have to do with timing and
cost.”
Then in a radio interview with Steve Scherr,
Chomsky said the following of Peak Oil:
There's another side to this, there's a sense in which it's
advantageous if the oil peak is earlier. The reason why is it
will
compel the world, primarily the
like sustainable energy.
If there's unbounded amounts of hydrocarbons, we're just going to destroy the
environment for human life or most biological life, so the
earlier the peak is, in some respects - yes, it could be catastrophic,
it could also be beneficial.
The “beneficial” aspects Chomsky discusses are likely the
resulting population control and starvation that would ensue from such a
shortage.
But in reality oil is abiotic and
constantly regenerating. This, while huge wells go untapped in Russia,
Equatorial Guinea, Nigeria, Sudan, Cuba, Indonesia, Iraq, Alaska, Venezuela,
Bolivia, Norway, and the Gulf of Mexico. Additionally, refinery capacity has
been deliberately shut down by the oil oligopoly in order to create artificial
supply shortages. Market prices are controlled by the Anglo-American cartel and
they intend to use this as a vehicle for engineered crises. At this years Bilderberg meeting
Henry Kissinger reportedly predicted $100 a barrel oil within a year. The only
possible result is a complete worldwide depression.
It is within the “radical” Left that horror stories of diminishing
oil find their home. Even within the 9-11 truth movement, authors like Mike Ruppert and Nafeez Ahmed have
attempted to attach Peak Oil as the reason for government engineering of 9-11
and the wars in the
Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
Another triumph of Chomsky’s disinfo
campaign has been the active denial of the The
Project for the New American Century (PNAC), a neocon
group that published radical statements calling for world war, population
control, and a worldwide police state back in 2000. The signatures on the
documents included Dick Cheney and cabinet members like Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, Dov Zakheim, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, and
Eliot Abrams.
It was Zakheim who previously ran
Systems Planning Inc., which made remote-control software for commercial
airliners. Also as comptroller of the Pentagon, he lost over $3 trillion of
taxpayer money without explanation. Yet his corruption was not singular; after
Bush took his figurehead position in the stolen election of 2000, all of the
PNAC radicals became the architects of 9-11 and purveyors of pre-war lies about
Their infamous “Rebuilding
They also openly called for killer viruses to wipe out large
sectors of the human population. The document states: "[A]dvanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target'
specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to
a politically useful tool."
How can Chomsky and his kin ignore the statements of the PNAC
cabal, whose mad plans for world domination read like the lost chapters of Mein Kampf?
If the Left Gatekeepers won’t discuss these published documents,
how can we expect them to research the true history of AIDS and the potential
emerging avian flu? Should we be surprised when they fail to mention the 60
plus dead microbiologists after 9-11, many of them leading researchers in
emerging viruses? Should we look to Chomsky to find an expose of the heavy
metals and biological agents in chemtrails?
Isreal/Zionists:
Many authors of the PNAC documents were radical Zionists linked to
the Likud party in Israel, who presented similar
plans to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996 (“Policy for a Clean
Break”).
Chomsky, the supposed critic of Israel, has been praised by
followers for his books like “The Fateful Triangle” which detail many Israeli
war crimes. Furthermore he often criticizes the Isreali-linked
network dominating
For example, he remains mute on the “Office of Special Plans,” the
ad-hoc nerve center of pre-war
Those same gophers, many of them assets of the Israeli Likud party and intelligence syndicate Mossad,
operated a two-way spy network; just as manufactured propaganda flowed from Mossad to the OSP moles, U.S. secrets on Iran secretly
floated into Sharon’s war cabinet.
In the middle of all the traitorous espionage was the mafia don of
all lobbying cartels, the Israeli-controlled AIPAC. Top level AIPAC officers
like Steve Rosen often acted as a go–between, then using that same fake
intelligence to strong-arm the Congress where they control both sides..
All parties mentioned, from Rosen to
Vote Fraud:
When he isn’t busy covering up the facts surrounding 9-11 or the crimes of the
CIA, Chomsky spends time actively denying the vote fraud of 2004, which ushered
in another term for the neocon dictatorship. Chomsky
often brags that he does not vote in presidential elections, noting that both
sides are owned by corporations. But he has openly denied the role of
electronic voting fraud in 2000 and the more prominent example of 2004. In
2004, exit polls in
The room for vote fraud was immense. The Secretary of State in
The Diebold code is private and has been
exposed as being easily hacked by Bev Harris at
BlackBoxVoting.org. In
I don't find the evidence compelling. An inaccurate count in
itself is a
random effect. As for collusion, yes, there are concerns, but concerns are
not evidence. The problem that concerns you may or may not be real, but in
my view, even if we take the worst case scenario, it is still marginal --
just as the
reason to suppose that electronic voting will have more than a random effect.
Chomsky and the gatekeepers cannot discuss the fraud of electronic
voting because it would awaken too many people to the total bankruptcy of the
system. It is important that college activists at
World Government:
Chomsky plays the Left gatekeeper role perfectly, presenting a
false dialectic of the evil American imperialist as the antagonist aggressor,
contrasted by the savior UN world government as the benevolent deux ex machina.
This false propaganda model, pitting the imperialist
The Globalists have long been masters of
such a paradigm. In the early part of the 20th century, the same Wall Street
bankers crafted the doctrines of Communism. While posing as a workers’
liberation theology, it pushed for a central bank, world army, world court, world
government, and the abolition of religion, private property, and the nation
state.
Like other “anarchist” agent provacatuers
such as John Zerzan (who helped train violent mobs to
ruin the
In fact, Chomsky goes further, pushing for the elimination of the
nation-state and national sovereignty to be replaced by a one world government:
“Well in my view what would be ultimately necessary would be a
breakdown of the nation-state system- because I think that’s not a viable
system. It’s not necessarily the natural form of human organization.” (314)
Chomsky, echoing rhetoric from the phony Marxist doctrines, is
essentially endorsing the major goal of the world elite: the breakdown of
national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government.
Noam Chomsky is a
shameless world government pimp, and has heaped lavish praise on men like
Bertrand Russell who helped design the
UNESCO:
Since Chomsky is an avowed global government cheerleader, is it any surprise he
supports some of the worst UN programs? U.N.E.S.C.O, the nightmare UN vehicle
posing as an “aid” organization, finds a strong advocate with Chomsky.
Long a pet project of the Malthusian-obsessed Rockefeller clan,
U.N.E.S.C.O projects include filtering pro-UN propaganda into American schools
and with the goal of eventually merging the curriculum with
"The general philosophy of UNESCO should be a scientific world humanism, global in extent... It can
stress… the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world
political organization… Political unification in some sort of world government
will be required…to help the emergence of a single world culture."
But Noam Chomsky, ever the advocate of
the UN, endorses the goals of U.N.E.S.C.O wholeheartedly and lambastes the evil
conservatives who question its motives:
U.N.E.S.C.O-because it’s working for the
put them out of business. The United States launched a huge propaganda
campaign against U.N.E.S.C.O. in the 1970's and Eighties- it was full of
outrageous lies, totally fabricated, but nevertheless it sufficed to eliminate
the Third World orientation of U.N.E.S.C.O. and make it stop doing things
it was doing around the Third World, like improving literacy and
health care and so on. (86)
PROPAGANDA:
Many credit Chomsky’s “Manufacturing Consent” with being the
premier study of government propaganda. In Leftist circles it is hailed as a
Bible, a rite of passage for any true activist to understand the system. But
again, Chomsky’s work, while appearing radical, is actually gatekeeper disinfo.
Chomsky spends the entire book attempting to prove that newspapers
diminish American war crimes while exaggerating those of foreign governments.
Such a point is easy to prove, and he does so in his own droll and methodical
method.
Yet he stops there. Chomsky does not discuss the real elephant in
the room: direct CIA collaboration with media outlets and journalists beginning
in the 1950's under Operation Mockingbird.
Chomsky avoids writing about Mockingbird, the CIA program which
covertly put major publishing, newspaper, and media outlets, as well as
thousands of individual reporters under direct agency control. Agents included
Ben Bradlee at Newsweek, Henry Luce of Time and Life,
and Arthur Sulzberger of The New York Times, Alfred Friendly of the Washington
Post, and Joseph Harrison Christian Science Monitor.
Shouldn’t this a significant development for a historian authoring
an honest study of propaganda? After all who is to say that this program
doesn’t still continue? The Bush administration has admitted spending hundreds
of millions on fake newscasts and paying individual reporters like Armstrong
Williams to push talking points in newspapers. What about the times they
haven’t been caught? Exactly how many mainstream commentary and news outlets
work with the CIA and White House?
Perhaps this is the reason why the scripts of the nightly news on
ABC, CBS, and NBC are almost exactly the same, while Newsweek, Time, and the
New York Times push the elitist agenda on cue (as seen most prominently in the
run up to the war in Iraq).
Furthermore Chomsky does not discuss collaboration between the Bilderberg Committee and the major media outlets. Shouldn’t
this concern the so-called radical anarchist, when media editors attend secret
meetings calling for eugenics, world government, and a cashless society control
grid?
Owners, editors and writers from Time, Newsweek,
Economist,
York Times, CBS, NBC, ABC and every news outlet in
between have attended the world government meetings.
Furthermore, what about the influence of the CFR, which openly
calls for a Panamerican Union and the end of American
national sovereignty? The CFR counts amongst its members
major editors, owners, and journalists in media outlets from PBS to CBS, CNN to
News Corp.,
Aren’t these the reasons that journalists push the propaganda
Chomsky identifies? In “Manufacturing Consent,” Chomsky takes limited aim at an
easy target. But he fails to dig deeper and examine the actual reasons why the
propaganda permeates the mainstream media opinion. Clearly the influence of the
CIA, CFR, Bilderberg Committee, and White House have
turned major media outlets into little more than docile commissars.
Additionally, the interlocking interests of media owners with the military
industrial complex have served to sway content even further.
Chomsky’s “classic” study is little more than a limited hangout
project. He is merely shooting the messengers, blaming journalistic “bias”
while failing to follow the trail of money, power, corruption, and black
propaganda. Instead, he identifies some passive propaganda and is hailed as a
brilliant analyst and purveyor of truth by the Leftist minions. But his true
achievement is ignoring the reasons behind the lies, as he executes a masterful
bait and switch tactic. Is it a coincidence that Chomsky’s co-author for
“Manufacturing Consent,” Edward Herman, has also denied any government
complicity in 9-11?
While claiming to expose propaganda, Chomsky has perfected the
art.
CONCLUSIONS:
Chomsky and his gatekeeper contemporaries are perfect devises for
the Globalists because they help define the limits of
the false left-right paradigm. Much like David Horowitz, a former Leftist,
currently does for the radical Right. Is it a surprise that he edited a book
called “The Anti-Chomsky Reader?” It should only be natural since they both
serve the same role of gatekeeper.
Puppets like Horowitz, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity,
Michele Malkin, William Kristol,
William F. Buckley and their kin serve as Right Gatekeepers. They criticize the
failures of liberals and Democrats and then call for Bush worshipping, illegal
wars, fascist government, and giving up all of our Constitutional rights for
“security.” In doing so they pollute the movement and help marginalize true conservatives voices like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and groups
like Gun Owners of
Chomsky and his gatekeepers do the same thing. They write about
the crimes of American imperialism and then call for population control, gun
control, global government under the UN, and a totally socialized Brave New
World society.
The Left gatekeepers must manage the delicate tight rope act of
appearing radical while in actuality calling for worldwide enslavement and
murder. In all likelihood they get a little help from the propaganda scientists
at the venerable Tavistock institute in London and
adjuncts of the CIA’s Mockingbird program; clearly the Left’s denial of 9-11
truths has been too coordinated too have simply been a freak occurrence.
In the mainstream it is the same with the staged battles between
pawns like Democratic operative Al Franken and Republican Ann Coulter.
All of this is designed to create a tight spectrum, a masterfully
crafted false paradigm to enslave the mind and give the people false choices.
Thus at either extreme of the spectrum and all points in between, from Chomsky
to Horowitz, one finds they are endorsing total enslavement and global
government. This is the genius of the
Noam Chomsky and his Left
Gatekeeper associates must be actively exposed for their role in the propaganda
system. For nearly 40 years since they infiltrated the
activist movement, these Left gatekeepers have made the activist movements
impotent, territorial, confused, and ineffective. Thus instead of
understanding their enslavement, many activists end up calling for tighter
chains by echoing Chomsky’s calls for gun control, population control, and a
world government under the UN. They end up critiquing the
Noam Chomsky and his clique of re-direct agents mercilessly push real
activists into dead-end solutions. Until they are vocally exposed, the Left
will continue to remain a managed asset of the
Source: http://prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/060406Chomsky.htm
Doreen
Ellen Bell-Dotan,