Moral
Giftedness
A quick review of the Seven Types of
Intelligence as defined by Harvard Guru Howard Gardner as background can be
found on the following URL:
http://tinyurl.com/axvkn
Note that none of those categories of intelligence
pose any particular challenge (to be read 'threat') to society, and so there
was no reason for the scientific and mental health mafias to reject them.
They're eminently useful categories for defining what the ideal person in
non-anarchic societies, structured variously as they are at this point in
history, should be.
I posit that there is another type of
intelligence: Moral Intelligence. I further posit that there are and always
have been people who are gifted in Moral Intelligence to the point of being
preternaturally so gifted.
It is dismaying to me that despite the
fact that there are, and always have been, gifted and hyper-gifted geniuses of
morality throughout history, this type of intelligence is not so much as
recognized in the list as existing. It is subsumed under the more manageable
and affable Interpersonal and Intrapersonal categories of ability. We know,
however, that the morally gifted usually don't, and didn't historically, get
along well either with others, or themselves.
It is the people who are exquisitely aware
of distortions of morality and ethics and who are fearless about speaking out
about the injustice and describing it articulately who are the most likely to
be the ones who are given the medicines that artificially induce
"desirable" traits like complacency, malleability, indifference in
the face of suffering, the inability to pinpoint who the perpetrators of moral
wrongs are, etc. In fact, psychotropic drugs have been formulated to do just
this; these are not the side effects of the drugs, these are the target
effects. Psychotropic drugs are not considered to having taken effect, or be
administered in sufficient doses, until the recipient of them evinces these
traits (i.e, becomes a zombie like your average
workday citizen). This demonstrates that despite the fact that moral giftedness
is ignored by the scientific and mental health communities, i.e., they do not
want the public-at-large to be aware that it exists or to validate it in any
way, they themselves are very much aware of the fact that it exists and that it
has the potential to bring about change in the status quo. Vast sums of money
and effort have been invested in keeping moral intelligence under control.
Thus, we can be certain that those whose hands are on the money levers know
they have a great deal to lose if moral intelligence were to express itself
freely. The research goes on.
The severely morally gifted are those most
likely to be institutionalized and/or to die an early and often brutal death as
a direct result of their gift. Their suffering is generally in direct
proportion to the greatness of their gift.
In addition to the traditional societal
methods of suppressing the expression of the morally gifted and inhibiting
their courage to express themselves, a new method has been devised for the
world-wide internet community. The
moniker "rant" (as in what the mad do) is applied to impassioned
posts on subjects of morality and ethics. A person who has posted on a moral or
ethical topic is expected to partake in a sin offering ceremony. She or he must
keep the post as short as possible, apologize for having written the post and
end with the mealy-mouthed cliché "getting off the soapbox
now."
The state does not generally have to intervene when one of its citizens
hyper-moralizes and becomes obstreperous, not anymore, not since the late 1960s
or early 1970s. Most people have been programmed by the media so well (TV
and radio shows are called 'programs', after all) that they themselves
will attack the miscreant on the ground and they usually succeed in
beating him or her emotionally into submission sooner or later.
Geschwind's Syndrome, considered to be the interictal
behavior of those sufferers of temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who demonstrate the
"Epileptic Personality", is now believed to be the reason why some
individuals demonstrate behaviors such as:
Emotionality
Mania
Depression
Guilt
Humorlessness
Altered
sexual interest
Aggression
Anger
and hostility
Hypergraphia
(excessive writing)
Religiosity
Philosophical
interest
Sense of
personal destiny
Hyper-moralism
Dependency
Paranoia
Obsessionalism
Circumstantiality
Viscosity (the quality of being socially "sticky")
Hyper-philosophical
Emotionally
volatile
Obsessively detail-oriented
As we can see from the list above, the
traits of the hyper-morally gifted are described not only in uncomplimentary
terms, but in pathological terms, as the effects of brain damage.
We must ask very basic questions in order
not to be drawn in by the assumptions inherent in some of the terms describing
the "symptoms" of Geschwind's
Syndrome. What is "hyper-moralism"? At
what point does a person become too moral for comfort in non-anarchic
society? The same might be asked about
being philosophical. At what point is someone considered pathologically
philosophical in non-anarchic society? We must assume that to be moral and/or
philosophical is considered desirable only up to a limited degree in
non-anarchic society. We do not hear
about individuals being hyper-beautiful or hyper-handsome. Even if adjectives like these were to be
coined and applied to individuals, they would not signify and sort of
aberration or symptom of disease. Quite the contrary, they would be considered
supreme compliments.
Professor Eric Altschuler,
a neuroscientist at the
Other famous figures in history that have
been retrospectively "diagnosed" as having suffered from Geschwind's Syndrome or TLE-related hypergraphia
include Van Gogh, Dostoevsky, Virginia Woolfe, Samuel
Taylor Coleridge, Franz Kafka, Lord Tennyson, Edgar Allan Poe, Lord Byron and Petrarch. One can only imagine how much poorer the world
would have been had psychotropic drugs been in existence in their time and had
they been administered to them.
Hyper-morality, then, is the result of encephalopathy
and thus can, and should, be "treated" in the opinion of
neuroscientists like the good Professor Altschuler. The severely moral should be relieved of
their suffering. Likewise, society-at-large should be relieved of their viscous
aggressiveness and incessant harping on that annoying subject.
People who
go mad in the face of injustice and steadfastly, persistently and undauntedly
voice their moral outrage, particularly those who do so in the form of writing
treatises and books on the subject, are doing nothing more than exhibiting the
symptoms of the neurological illness from which they suffer.
By grouping being hyper-moral with
symptoms that are accepted as being symptomatic of various anti-social personality
and psychological disorders, as they are defined in non-anarchic societies, the
mega-message is clear to the public-at-large:
Only those who concern themselves overmuch with morality are demented,
suffering as they are from a pitiful disease of the brain.
Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan,
Tzfat, Yisra'el