The Cowardice and Hypocrisy of the "British"

 

Of all peoples who criticize Israel, the most reprehensible of them are the Germanic peoples who settled Europe unspeakably violently, massacring all of the indigenous peoples of Europe that would not be subjugated.

 

These are the same people whose descendants launched the Crusades.

 

These are the same people whose descendants founded America. The belligerence and brutality of their history and present speaks for itself.

 

These are the same people whose criminal descendants founded Australia and massacred the Aboriginals there. The same may be said about New Zealand.

 

These are the same people who descendants founded English Canada and massacred Natives there. Is Canada not a commonwealth of Britain to this day? Do they not pay homage to the "House of Windsor" (formerly Wettin, Germanic "nobility (?"

 

In fact, was South Africa under apartheid not a British commonwealth?

 

These are the same people who founded Switzerland and the Scandinavian countries, which, while peaceful within their own borders, were Nazi-sympathetic to a horrific extent and which evince a good deal of xenophobia to this day.

 

These are the same people whose descendants perpetrated the Holocaust.

 

Did the British not collude with the Nazis against the Anarchists in the Spanish Revolution?

 

Their humanitarianism track record is the world's worst.

 

To their credit, people in Germany today are making a "fearless moral inventory" and taking another direction.

 

Holland, to its credit, has become a very accepting society. Of course, in addition to being accepting of foreigners; it is accepting of dope addiction and prostitution. They seem incapable of knowing what to and not to accept.

 

Yet some of them, including the modern day British, rather than doing that inventory, are blaming others for barbarism. What could be more ridiculous?

 

Would the State of Israel need to exist at all if not for European barbarism?

 

Is there a nation, other than the daughter of Britain, the US, which undertook so extensive and violent a programme of imperialism than Britain?

 

As in every state in which there are conquered peoples, the vanquished who are too weak and spineless to revolt find some illusory sense of dignity identifying with their conquerors who see them as little more than cannon fire. Scotland is premier among those fools. They are so stupid,  insipid, unwilling to take responsibility for their destinies (and let's face it, drunk) that they are actually proud of their legions that England sends to the front line ahead of them. They take great pride in being used as cannon fire for the British. But the same might be said of the other "British Isles" as well, of course. They swagger and they rant and they rail against Israel. This provides them with the delusion of being strong. In fact, they are peons who have no identity of their own, other than the one that England allows them. George Galloway is, undoubtedly, the top dog of this vociferous, vile and vilifying litter.

 

The article on the link below demonstrates that the Anglo-Saxons (who really have no right to call themselves British at all. They vanquished the Britons) have a very long and ugly history of apartheid.

 

Before they presume to point a finger at us, Britain has a lot of history and still more present to set aright.

 

Though recently the Church has admitted some of its cultural atrocities and the Germans have undertaken true soul-searching and monetary recompense of those they plundered; most Germanics go unrepentant for that which they have perpetrated – taking the morally squalid stand of pointing their fingers dripping with blood at their former and current victims in accusation.

 

http://www.world-science.net/othernews/060719_apartheid.htm

 

The appellation British in the title is in quotation marks. The government of Britain today are not British at all. They are Germanics who brutally vanquished the indigenous Britons, as I wrote. Having done so, they appropriated their name in order to claim legitimacy over the region and to subsume any trace of memory of the Britons under their own "culture" and language.

 

And it is such as these who criticize Israel!

 

A state of utter denial on the scale of an empire. Astounding!

 

The following is an excerpt from my essay "An Anarchist Explains Why Israel Is Not An Imperialist State". The entire essay can be found on the following URL:

 

http://www.geocities.com/dordot2001/IsraelIsNotAnImperialistState.htm

 

The following excerpt demonstrates that the British played a determining role, and very deliberately so, in creating the conflict that exists in Israel.

 

The readers' attention is requested to be turned to the period of "Illegal" Immigration from 1933 to 1948. This is the period called Aliyah Beit. During that time, when Jews were in the greatest peril since the time of the Inquisition, the British authorities in Israel limited Jewish immigration to Palestine (See: The White Paper 1939 – 1947 http://tinyurl.com/hm7e4). This, and more damning still, it was British policy that, in large measure, created the Palestinian problem.  Not only did the British set Jewish immigration quotas starting in 1920, they attempted to create an artificial Arab majority in Israel by requesting France to stop curbing illegal Arab immigration to Israel and by bringing Arabs in illegally themselves during the years 1920 – 1948 (See: http://tinyurl.com/dkpsu). It was not for naught that Ben Gurion, who would become the first Prime Minister of Israel, said:  "The Zionists should fight the war as if there were no White Paper and fight the White Paper as if there were no war."

 

Incidentally, the Mossad, much-maligned by Israel's detractors, was organized during the period of Aliyah Beit as an organization to smuggle Jews into the Land of Israel from Europe [See: 1938 January 12, POSEIDON (Eretz Israel) http://tinyurl.com/zp5pb]. 

 

Doreen Ellen Bell-Dotan, Tzfat, Israel\

[email protected]