Society and Economy under the Old Regime in the 18th Century

 

Major Features of Life in the Old Regime

 

·      Maintenance of Tradition

o       Few considered change or desired innovation outside of those in favor of the Enlightenment, especially in social relationships

o       Nobles and Peasants repeatedly called for the restoration of traditional rights

o       Nobles were against expanding monarchial bureaucracies to keep their ancient rights

o       Peasants called for the maintenance/revival of manorial rights that allowed them access to particular land, courts, or grievance procedures

o     The 18th c. economy was also mostly traditional. Quality/Quantity of the grain harvest was still most important factor for most of the population and the government

·      Hierarchy and Privilege

 

o       Hierarchical structure of society – the medieval system of rank and degree became more rigid

o       Each state/society was considered a community composed of several smaller communities/groups. A person enjoyed such rights/privileges as were guaranteed to the communities/groups of which he or she was part.

o       The community might include the village, municipality, the nobility, the church, the guild, a university or parish. In turn, each of these bodies enjoyed some privileges

The Aristocracy

 Nobility, consisting of 1-5% of the population, were the wealthiest sector, had the widest degree of social, political, and economic power, and set the tone for polite society.  

Most had their own separate house in the parliament, estates, or diet. Land gave them their biggest source of income, but they also had extensive power in social and economic life.  

They often fostered economic innovation and embraced the competitive spirit, which helped to protect the nobility’s wealth.

·      Varieties of Aristocratic Privilege

o       British Nobility

§        The smallest, wealthiest, best-defined, & most socially responsible

§        400 families, w/the eldest male in the House of Lords, and usually in control of the House of Commons by corruption. Owned ¼ of all arable land.

§        Dominated the society and politics of the English counties.

o       French Nobility

§        ~400,000 nobles

§        Nobles of the Sword – those whose nobility was derived from military service

§        Nobles of the Robe – those whose title came by serving in the bureaucracy or by purchasing it.

Aristocratic Resurgence

·        The nobility’s reaction to the threat to their social position and privileges that they felt from the monarchies’ expanding powers.

o       All nobility tried to preserve their exclusiveness by making it difficult to become a noble

o       Pushed to reserve appointments to the officer corps, the bureaucracies, the govt. ministries, and the church for nobles only.

o       Attempted to sue existing autocratically controlled institutions against the power of the monarchy

o     Sought to gain further exemptions from taxation or by collecting higher rents or forgotten feudal dues from the peasantry

The Land and Its Tillers

·        Land was the economic basis of the 18th c. and the foundation of the status and power of the nobility. Except for the landowners, most people who lived on the land were poor.

·        Peasants and Serfs Rural social dependency related directly to the land  

·        Obligations of Peasants

o       The power of the landlords increased as one moved from west to east across Europe

o       Banalités: feudal dues, which included use of the lord’s mill to grind grain and his oven to bake bread.

o       Corvée: The practice of forced labor in which the seigneur could also require a certain number of days each year of the peasant’s labor

o     Robot: the service that serfs must provide to their lord by the laws/customs of the Habsburg lands.

The English Game Laws

·        1671-1831, English landowners had the exclusive legal right to hunt game animals. By law, only persons owning a particular amount of landed property could hunt the animals.

·        Excluded from the right to hunt were all persons renting land, wealthy merchants who did not own land, and poor people in cities, villages, and the countryside.

·        The poor were excluded b/c the elite believed that allowing them to enjoy the sport would undermine their work habits

·        The Game laws represent a prime example of legislation related directly to economic and social status

·        Many poor people living on an estate or in a nearby village would kill game for food, as they believed the game actually belonged to the community. Poaching thus increased during hard times.

·        By the 1820s, both landowners and reformers called for a change in the law.

·        In 1831, Parliament rewrote the game laws, retaining the landowners’ possession of the game, but permitting them to allow other people to hunt it.  

Family Structures and the Family Economy

In pre-industrial Europe, the household was the basic unit of production and consumption.

 

Northwestern Europe

·        Almost invariably consisted of a married couple, their children through the early teenage years, and their servants.

·        Households were small, usually consisting of not more than five or six members, with more than 2 generations of a family rarely living together.

·        High mortality and late marriages prevented the forming of 3+ generations. The structure was thus nuclear rather than extended.

·        Children usually left home in their early teens to enter the work force of young servants who lived and worked in another household. A child of a skilled artisan might remain w/his parents to learn a valuable skills, but only rarely would more than one child do so.

o       Neolocalism – those young men & women who had moved away would eventually marry and form an independent household of their own.

o       They usually had kids right away, if the woman was not already pregnant at marriage. Premarital sex was common, though illegitimate births were rare.

·       Servants – a person who was hired to work for the head of a household in exchange for room, board, and wages. They were young and in no way socially inferior to their employer. This allowed people to acquire the productive skills and savings necessary to begin their own household. These years working are the reasons for the later marriage age in NW Europe.  

Eastern Europe

·        Men & women usually married by age 20. Often, esp. w/Russian serfs, women were older than their husbands.

·        Households were generally larger, frequently consisting of more than 9, and possibly more than 20, members, with 3-4 generations living together.

·        Marrying did not involve starting a new household, but rather moving in and expanding one already established.

·        Why?

o       The Landholding structures accounted in part. The lords of the manor wanted to be assured that it would be cultivated (to get rents). Some might forbid marriage between their own serfs and those from another estate. They might require widows and widowers to remarry to assure adequate labor. They discouraged single-generation families b/c death or serious illness might mean a lack of cultivation to the land.

The Family Economy

·        Most people worked w/in the family economy (w/in the household). Depending on their age and skills, everyone in the household worked. All goods and income produced went to the benefit of the household rather than an individual. This was for farmers as well as artisans.

o       In Western Europe, the death of a father often brought disaster to the economy of the household that depended on his skills or land.

§        The high mortality rate meant that many households included second-family groups such as stepchildren.

·        In Eastern Europe, the family economy functioned in the context of serfdom and landlord domination. Peasants thought in terms of their families and expanding the land available for cultivation. There were fewer artisans and merchant households, and far less geographical mobility than in Western Europe.

Women and the Family Economy

·        A woman’s life experience was largely the function of her capacity to establish and maintain a household. Marriage was an economic necessity. A woman devoted much of her life to first maintaining her parents’ household and then devising some means of getting her own household to live in as an adult. Bearing and raising children were usually subordinate to these goals.

·        On a farm, a girl would usually leave home between 12-14 years. She might take up residence on a nearby farm, but more likely she would move to a nearby city or town. She would rarely travel more than 30 miles from her parent’s household.

·        Having migrated, her main goal is to accumulate enough capital for a dowry, which might mean working for 10 or more years, which means marriage might be postponed until the mid- to late twenties.

·       Women found many occupations & professions closed to them because of their sex. They had less education than men, as they found fewer education opportunities than men. They often received lower wages than men for the same work.

 

 

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1