| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:34:15 PM | Hi Justin |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 8:34:22 PM | Hey, How you doing ? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:34:37 PM | I am fine. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:34:43 PM | How abou t yourself? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 8:35:16 PM | Very good. So what time is our meeting tonight ? I thought it was at 8 |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:35:41 PM | 9 |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:35:50 PM | about half an hour later |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:36:08 PM | didnt you get the email? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 8:36:24 PM | No. I haven't received any email in a while. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:38:09 PM | Do you check your students email? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:38:24 PM | There is a distrimon alias which Rahul has created. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 8:38:36 PM | No. Perhaps I should. I haven't logged in this semester. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 8:38:57 PM | The web site has my hotmail address as a main contact. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:40:53 PM | I see. |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 8:40:57 PM | hi Naveed && Justin |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:41:01 PM | You should ask Rahul to change it. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:41:04 PM | Hi Sadaf. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 8:41:13 PM | Hello |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 8:41:14 PM | We are waiting for people to join in . |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 8:41:37 PM | ok |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 8:59:30 PM | what machine to we log into to check our uiuc mail ? |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 9:01:34 PM | u can use webmail.uiuc.edu |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:03:07 PM | thanks. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:04:52 PM | Hi Chandra. |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:05:08 PM | Hi Naveed. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:05:11 PM | We will wait for a few minutes and start discussing how to proceed with the project. |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:05:33 PM | Sounds good. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:06:18 PM | hey guys |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:06:23 PM | Do you think we can talk over the net. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:06:51 PM | i think that will be difficult. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:07:09 PM | also we cant save the stuff we speak |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:07:32 PM | so are you all happy with the roles you have? |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 9:08:21 PM | I am not happy with my role |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:08:27 PM | hay Rahul were you able to meet the TA this Sunday? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:08:32 PM | sadaf i chaged yours |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:08:37 PM | changed i mean |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:08:43 PM | yes naveed |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:08:45 PM | I am happy with mine. |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 9:08:58 PM | oh great ! so wat do I have now |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:09:17 PM | system analyst / use case designer |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:09:25 PM | more design oriented role |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 9:09:47 PM | thanks |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:09:52 PM | so our aims for the project are twofold |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:10:01 PM | I would like to know what you guys except from the Architecture role? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:10:11 PM | first we have to decide architecture |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:10:25 PM | chandra as the architect you are the technical lead on the project |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:10:37 PM | which means you do the high level design |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:11:32 PM | once we decide the architecture we have code the basic infrastructure, finish the critical/high risk use cases |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:12:26 PM | chandra does that sound reasonable? |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:12:52 PM | sound reasonable. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:12:59 PM | hi justin |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:13:07 PM | Hello, I must have got disconnected |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:13:13 PM | Did you guys see the use case diagram & high level infrastucture diagrams? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:13:29 PM | i will post the chat i had with chris (our TA) later tonight |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:13:42 PM | chandra saw the use case diagram |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:14:00 PM | did u put up an infrastructure diagram as well? |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:14:21 PM | Yes, very very high level. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:14:50 PM | ok just saw it |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:14 PM | Hay Rahul what was the feedback from the TA |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:16 PM | I saw it as well |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:16 PM | It's under Elaboration, Usecase diagram is with all use cases. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:17 PM | Ar we on track |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:19 PM | what we need is a clear translation between the conceptual diagram we had before and this infrastructure document |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:26 PM | behind schedule? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:37 PM | naveed yes. he said that we should e-mail him once a week just top keep in touch |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:41 PM | not really |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:15:54 PM | Yes I am working on the conceptual diagram. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:16:08 PM | as i said before we need an architecture and some basic framework code |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:16:14 PM | thats it for this semester |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:16:26 PM | all the associated artifacts of course |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:16:43 PM | did you guys get my e-mail from this afternoon about the use cases? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:16:56 PM | I didn't |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:17:12 PM | sorry justin i sent it 5-ish so u may not have gotten it |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:17:15 PM | can you please clarify about the arifacts. And got the mail. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:17:50 PM | I've had a huge mix up with all mail the past month, I should recieve any new incoming email. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:18:00 PM | ok basically we will have to produce some artifacts for each phase. if you look at the link on our website it gives some examples |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:18:18 PM | i will put up a list tonight as part of the project plan |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:18:38 PM | justin go to our Yahoo Groups website all opur e-mail is archived there |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:20:11 PM | so as i said in the e-mail the use cases look good in general. we will have to formalize the actors a bit and polish the use cases up. |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:20:13 PM | In my understanding conceptual diagram could be a high level class or a component diagram. Do you guys agree? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:20:27 PM | i agree |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:21:00 PM | chandra u should take a look at the use cases and figure out how each of them would fit into your proposed architecture |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:21:19 PM | establishing that link is the key for the current phase |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:21:28 PM | what does the architecture include? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:21:39 PM | somethings like platform |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:21:50 PM | technologies invovled etc? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:21:52 PM | architecture has a copuple of different levels |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:22:05 PM | first a conceptual idea of what modules will make up the system |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:22:25 PM | then we can decide on specific technologies to implement that conceptual design |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:22:49 PM | the next iteration we can actually do some coding and implement some parts of the system |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:22:57 PM | I will try to take a cut at it by Friday and send you a note. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:23:16 PM | sounds good chandra |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:23:24 PM | What should I work on ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:24:15 PM | justin (and all others who submitted use cases), you guys will have to both clean them up a bit and then elaborate on them |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:24:31 PM | in inception, we just have a very vague idea of what each action performed is |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:24:33 PM | Suggestion on use cases: Can we refine use cases so that login in not repeated in all the uses cases, instead mentioned under precondition. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:24:38 PM | Once we do this, will they be considered finished ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:24:57 PM | yes |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:25:28 PM | once the use cases are detailed enough that each action roughly corresponds to a particular software function, we are done |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:25:40 PM | So should we keep the existing ones, and created new versions of them, so we can show progress ? Or just updated the existing ones and retain one copy of each ? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:25:59 PM | What are the things to be done in the elaboration fase? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:26:06 PM | we now have a directory for inception |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:26:21 PM | any new work will go ina new directory called elaboration I |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:26:31 PM | Use case elaboration, architecture, Object model ? |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:26:34 PM | High Architecture model |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:26:48 PM | naveed the first two at least |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:26:58 PM | onbject model can wait until the next phase |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:27:06 PM | next iteration i mean |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:27:10 PM | I see. |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:27:22 PM | And elaboration on use cases using the architecture. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:27:32 PM | this iteration ends on next friday according to the schedule |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:27:40 PM | ok |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:27:56 PM | we then have three weeks for the next iteration (elaboration II) |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:28:03 PM | Can you give a rough idea what the architecture document mifght have. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:28:07 PM | i left one week at the end for clean up |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:28:12 PM | I am a little vague about it. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:28:29 PM | we start wuth the vision diagram |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:28:48 PM | then we try to map each part of the diagram to specific software modules |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:29:06 PM | at this point they are still conceptual |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:29:09 PM | i.e. database. web server, browser etc ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:29:15 PM | we then decide how to implement them |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:29:20 PM | Architecture model will have high level components partioned across different layers with appopriate technology/platform picked. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:29:39 PM | vision -> coneptual -> implementation -> technology |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:29:58 PM | implmentation means database, web server, etc |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:30:26 PM | does that make sense? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:30:37 PM | then what are high level compnents? |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:30:43 PM | Question is are we following the UML style modeling? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:30:58 PM | chandra YES. its a requirement for this course |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 9:31:31 PM | I think component diagram should be part of Architecture document |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:31:41 PM | naveed high-level components are a "logical" breakup into modules of the system |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:31:45 PM | High level components can one or more classes. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:32:16 PM | each component might performa single function, e.g. security |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:32:38 PM | another example would be "communication with employer application/website" |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:32:53 PM | which might be an interface |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:33:35 PM | At a high level we could have UI, Business logic, and Data components, including security. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:33:43 PM | exactly |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:34:13 PM | once we have the components identified, we can discuss how to "make" them |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:34:41 PM | the finished architecture/design document is essentially a recipe for building the system |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:34:58 PM | the use cases link that recipe to the initial requirements |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:35:31 PM | I am planning to use microsoft technolgies like XML, ASP, IIS, SQL . Does this sound good? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:36:01 PM | sounds good to me |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:36:08 PM | i won't be doing much development |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:36:12 PM | you guys decide |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:36:40 PM | naveed look at the rational example for a sample architecture diocument |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:36:54 PM | Platform assumption: work stations targeted NT/95, Broser assumptions: IE 5.x or above? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:37:38 PM | i am looking at that |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:37:47 PM | i think we should keep things simple, and not depend on IE exclusive stuff |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:37:57 PM | in the beginning its all the high level stuff |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:37:58 PM | agreed. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:38:21 PM | but when you go down it goes into discussing some detailed stuff |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:38:31 PM | by the way, i would be very careful about taking a completely microsoft centric approach |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:38:55 PM | naveed, thats because that is the finished document at the end of all elaboartion |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:39:14 PM | as i was saying, we are doing this for an academic audience |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:39:30 PM | generally not very microsoft-friendly |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:39:43 PM | I know it is high level stuff, however, if we know need to make some assumption what platforms and browser are we targetting at some point. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:40:07 PM | they are talking about some design patterns etc. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:40:23 PM | we can use MS technology, but our software should be generally cross-playform, and certainly cross-browser |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:40:27 PM | We could put in stuff about MVC in our web architecture. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:41:02 PM | chandra, people from all over the world will use the system (or so we hope). we cannot target IE/Windows alone |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:41:35 PM | I agree that the design shoud be language/technology neutral. However, implementation would be specific. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:42:32 PM | chandra, i actually meant implementation. all the code we write should be viewable in netscape. you would be surprised how many large corporations still use netscape 4.7x |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:42:44 PM | at least i was |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:43:23 PM | but we can get naveed to decide that since he is the customer :) |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:43:25 PM | hay guys, if we are to implement this for next semester, at least i want to, we should target it for java |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:43:45 PM | so we might have some hosting service avaible at a chepa price. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:43:46 PM | The back end will be specific, but the front end will have to work with ie/netscape. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:44:02 PM | justin thats what i meant |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:44:20 PM | naveed, hoiw much java? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:44:34 PM | meaning? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:44:36 PM | J2EE or just JSP/servlets? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:44:42 PM | jsp/servlets. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:44:48 PM | ok sounds good |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:45:10 PM | Then part of the requirements we have specify what are the targetted platforms ( IE & Netscape ). |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:45:57 PM | anyway, i don't think we need to worry about that just yet guys. get the high level design first, we may have requirements that limit us to a certain technology |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:46:17 PM | chandra i think that is a given |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:46:54 PM | as far as possible, we should use straight up HTML, which may be dynamically generated by ASP/JSP or whatever else |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:47:29 PM | i kind of have a different view to this |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:47:46 PM | yes naveed? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:47:47 PM | because deciding on platform might well be in the earlier stages. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:47:54 PM | in risk analysis etc. |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:48:31 PM | FYI, I am not a pro-microsoft, just coming from the microsoft PDC, XML is really getting a big boost. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:48:34 PM | well we can identify technological risks early |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:48:58 PM | but decisions are best left till after high level design |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:49:16 PM | chandra i hope to use XML, just not with .NET :) |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:49:38 PM | I agree with rahul. we can look at this later. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:49:48 PM | What I understand from elaboration is that after this we are ready for development. |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:50:03 PM | These issues need to be ready before the construction phase. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:50:08 PM | naveed correct. after the second iteration. |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:50:09 PM | Given the time frame we really need to decide how many usecases we could fully elaborate?. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:50:17 PM | Can we confirm our assignments before the deadline so everyone is clear on what they are supposed to work on ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:50:31 PM | chandra we have to elaborate all the use cases, even if we do not code anything |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:50:51 PM | the Nov 10th deadline that is |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:51:22 PM | justin i think chandra will work on architecture, while the rest of us clean up our use cases |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:51:49 PM | can you guys wait until tomorrow, i'll update the web page with specific assignments? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:51:52 PM | Ok. Rahul, I did not see a link on our site for archived email. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:52:14 PM | justin, go to http://groups.yahoo.com/distrimon/ |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:52:51 PM | Rahul, I meant architecture, components, class/object diagram, as part of elaboration phase. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:52:57 PM | sorry that is http://groups.yahoo.com/groups/distrimon/ |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:53:12 PM | one more try http://groups.yahoo.com/group/distrimon/ |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:53:23 PM | chandra that is correct |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:53:46 PM | architecture and components in this iteration, class diagram and technological decisions in the next one |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:53:52 PM | Thanks. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:54:06 PM | the next iteration is 3 weeks and the longest one |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:54:49 PM | chandra is that okay with you? |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:55:11 PM | Sounds ok. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:55:13 PM | u have 5 weeks for the whole architecture dosument, and i expect that you will be discussing design with the use case designers |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:55:37 PM | that would be sadaf and rob, if i remember correctly |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:56:34 PM | okay guys anything else? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:56:55 PM | Does anyone still need a partner for HW 5 ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:57:00 PM | please check the website tomorrow, i will update the management stream documents |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:57:22 PM | chandra u still want to work together on homeworks? |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:57:22 PM | sounds good guys |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:57:28 PM | got to go know |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:57:34 PM | bye naveed |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:57:42 PM | Yes I do need a partner, Rahul |
| Naveed Ahmad | 10/31/2001 | 9:57:44 PM | by |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:57:54 PM | ok chandra, we can do this one together |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:58:10 PM | Sounds good. Bye guys. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:58:20 PM | naveed u still there? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:58:32 PM | could you save the chat for us? thanks! |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:58:33 PM | Rahul, can we do the 3 of us in hw ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:59:21 PM | justin can u confirm with the TA? i think they allow it if we have an odd number of people |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 9:59:30 PM | We do have 7 correct ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:59:50 PM | yes i just checked the page. one group of 3 is allowed |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 9:59:55 PM | Sound good to me guys. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 9:59:55 PM | chandra u ok with that? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:00 PM | cool |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:09 PM | when can we meet to talk about homework |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:21 PM | is the weekend too late? |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:34 PM | got to go now |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:35 PM | let's try Sunday night at 8CST? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:36 PM | How about saturday moring/early afternoon ? |
| sadaf mumtaz | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:44 PM | bye |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:47 PM | Sunday night is fine here. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:49 PM | bye sadaf |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:52 PM | bye sadaf |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:00:56 PM | sunday night it is |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:00 PM | 9 EST |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:10 PM | "affirmative" :) |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:19 PM | Sounds good. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:22 PM | Where will we connect if Naveeds machine is not up ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:23 PM | c u guys then |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:32 PM | do you guys have ICQ/AIM? |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:41 PM | I don't |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:42 PM | or yahoo or MSN? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:48 PM | MSN and ICQ here |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:01:55 PM | can also get AIM easily |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:02:09 PM | Can we do 3-way call instead. |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:02:45 PM | are you there chandra ? |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:02:52 PM | Unless we have a way to connect. |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:03:16 PM | yes! |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:03:21 PM | Do have the option of using any of the apps that rahul mentioned ? |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:03:29 PM | ok i'm back |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:03:36 PM | chandra? |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:03:47 PM | I am here! |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:03:51 PM | MSN is ok? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:03:57 PM | Fine here. |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:04:19 PM | MSN is ok with me aswell. |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:04:31 PM | ok i'll e-mail you guys my nickname or whateva later this week |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:04:38 PM | see you guys then? |
| Justin Circelli | 10/31/2001 | 10:04:44 PM | same here, Bye |
| Chandra Shekara | 10/31/2001 | 10:04:50 PM | Bye ! |
| Rahul Karnik | 10/31/2001 | 10:04:50 PM | bye |