About Disintre

My letter of apology to Dr. Southwood as one of the 4 authors generating the 10 predictions (1974) tested against Adams River sockeye data related that despite agreement of data to theory being imperfect, as any theory will have flaws when tested against data when based on a sample of 43.282+ million fry attaining adulthood over the 23 years of data analyzed, agreement was unequivocal. Cohort intrinsic rate of increase (r) is relevant more in minimizing both starvation mortality and overshoot of habitat carrying capacity (K) than maximizing population growth, the latter being a particularly human perspective from the standpoint of salmon consumers. Offspring survival is the objective, not boom and bust population growth while running risks of extinction. Fry overshooting K requiring an additional year to smolt compete not only within their own cohort (intra-cohort competition), but compete and have a negative impact on the cohort following their own in time (not unlike professors promising "training" and "a living wage" ascending on the creative intelligence of starving students producing the intellectual property profs hitchhiked upon while the producers witnessed their own careers reach a dead-end). Given the freshwater rearing habitat has a finite K, overshoot results in a domino effect on successive cohorts and with K being intrinsically variable from one year to the next, the Red Queen (an unpredictable habitat owing to abiotic factors) isn't all that overshoot impacts with food abundance another biotic influence related to inter- and intra-cohort competition (hare-lynx cycles were once believed attributable to predators controlling prey abundance, but browse-hare cycles are more parsimonious, lynx simply harvest surplus hare and like any predator, reach handling-time saturation and satiation at low prey densities). Theory was thus sufficient to explain not only phenotypic variation produced during the freshwater phase of Adams River sockeye life histories, but highlighted key concepts in evolutionary theory, particularly overshoot of K relating to Malthus' "...Principle of Population" and the related problem of human progress. Malthus (1766-1834) whose name has been associated with intrinsic rate of increase (r) sometimes referred to as "the Malthusian parameter", predicted famine and pestiilence would arrive when exponential population growth outstripped linear increases in resource abundance, but the industrial revolution, development of internal combustion engines and the digital revolution have staved off the Armageddon he predicted despite human greed having the potential to quash future revolutions.

Had the author bent to committee pressure, lost academic freedom, foregone 5 years salary and a government-funded 2-year PDF and only missed guiding 2 infants to adulthood by resubmitting his thesis framed in terms of "reaction norm" (RN) theory by following recommendations of "experts in the field like Derek Roff" as Fred ordered, perhaps more than a symbolic honorary doctorate granted by a past President of the British Ecological Society and Vice-Chancellor of Oxford University would've been obtained for 17 years of postsecondary investment to accompany the self-respect lost by "Right!" bending to the edicts of liars and thieves (providing the profs at Mac did something completely out of character by fulfilling the promise a doctorate would be awarded for continued cooperation with their aims, a longshot given their previous demonstrations of non-veracity). McGill had apparently awarded Dr. Southwood one of his many honorary doctorates (t), but that didn't taint the vindication I felt by having taken my concerns to a higher place (Southwood will neither be MSc'd or Miss'd). I'd familiarized myself with "RN theory" after meeting Roff, and like Fred's fish monger poster, was swayed more by the Truth of the Albert Einstein poster and quote on Roff's office wall than anything Roff had written or said. When I'd asked him what predictions RN theory made he replied: "That's the beauty of it. None, you just make them up". Any theory failing to make predictions isn't falsifiable and fails to qualify as a theory, with anyone claiming to be a scientist serving on committees awarding research funding not sprouting mammary glands to compensate for squandering public resources on untestable hypotheses failing to demonstrate some think (sic). No one views squandering a shared resource a crime against humanity requiring payback at some future date, where RN is of course an acronym for "registered nurse". The author had no inclination to create the ad hoc explanations Roff wanted RN theory to obtain credit for generating when a perfectly good theory already existed making specific predictions on the characteristics phenotypes will exhibit when raised under conditions of either low (r-selected) or high levels of intraspecific competition (K-selected) owing to cohort density with faculty at Mac and McGill demonstrating only what Titman had already indicated. Fred and others too numerous to mention in their and similar hell holes "were human 2", with a seemingly inexhaustible supply of similar vermin employed by the public sector protecting their supposedly inalienable right to use and abuse others' children following the swearing of oaths promising to do precisely the opposite. Regarding "just make them up", COPs having similar veracity to professors of duplicity at Mac and McGill have value to no one unless developing methods for dealing with liars and thieves is an avocation (Prevarication 101?). Despite having reservations regarding Loff (sic), like Mr. Loss, they aren't rewads (sic) likely to be viewed as turnabout and fourplay (sic), but status as an "x-pelt (sic) in the field", not unlike a cow or ewe, is something no one can guarantee.

On a less pragmatic note, the author views r- and K-selection theory as the optimal explanation for cyclic dominance among not only Adams River sockeye, several other upper Fraser River sockeye populations and likely human populations as well. Cyclic dominance exists when a single cohort exhibits numerical dominance compared to other cohorts (age groups born or hatched at the same time or in a narrowly defined period) within the same population and is similar to the "evolutionary strategy" of a single population (comprised of 4 cohorts in the Adams River example or the baby boomers among humans corresponding to the numerically dominant line 1 cohort of the Adams River population) to "put most eggs in one basket". Following equlibrium being reached after the slide at Hell's Gate blocked upstream passage of much (all?) of the formerly numerically dominant line 4 cohort of 1913, the line 1 cohort (1914, 1918, 1922...) has produced nearly 3 times as many offspring as the sum of the other 3 Adams River cohorts combined in every 4-year cycle, with the previously dominant line 4 cohort maintained at low population levels (approximately 1/40 of the total population) with jack males from line 1 in the overwhelming majority when the line 4 cohort returns to spawn resulting in frequency-dependent selection (with the majority of eggs produced by line 4 spawners likely to be fertilized by jack males migrating from line 1 by exhibiting precocious maturation despite intense competition for freshwater resources being a genetic bottleneck). Empirical studies of r- and K-selection previously undertaken had yielded only equivocal agreement of data to theory, but when a single population subdivided into 4 cohorts raised under different density regimes was examined, theory (and theorists) received vindication. The line 1 cohort subjected to intense competition for freshwater plankton resources as fry is followed in time by the line 2 cohort raised under conditions of intermediate density with the decomposing carcasses of line 1 spawners providing a nutrient boost to plankton at the base of their trophic pyramid despite size-selective predation on larger zooplankton species by the line 1 cohort (requiring less-selective feeding strategies by line 2), with two cohorts following line 2 raised under conditions of low density and minimal intraspecific competition allowing the habitat to lie fallow and larger zooplankton species to make a comeback before the line 1 cohort again saturated the carrying capacity of Shuswap Lake, the rearing habitat of all Adams River sockeye for 1-2 summers prior to going to sea for 2-4 additional years of ocean growth before returning to Adams River to spawn. Were all lines to produce equal numbers of offspring, the habitat would not be cropped as effectively and larger zooplankton species would be driven to extinction reducing the size of the sockeye fry population that could be supported. Study of a single population eliminated genetic differences between study groups with the approximately 1% gene flow occuring between cohorts provided exclusively by jack males, 5 year-olds of both genders and 6 year-olds in their single occurrence outside the range of data analyzed (data on the Adams River population has been collected for well over 100 years). Study of a single population permitted examination of density isolated from genetic differences in a nearly panmictic population (nearly because reproductive isolation exists between line 1 and line 3 sockeye and line 2 and 4 without the production of 6 year old spawners).

Having no background to base their recommendations upon owing to the paucity of their own interests and experience, my PhD examining committee made cosmetic suggestions to improve my thesis which could have been addressed by the author making minor revisions and giving Fred undue credit without the work being failed outright (given all but the final chapter of the thesis had been published with Fred and the U already accepting credit for their "contributions" to the published chapters), but that wouldn't have lost the author a 2 year PDF and insured his future former-wife returned to Mac providing the U continued access to research grants she held for "administrative costs" and rental of laboratory space, stroked Roff's ego and perhaps given Fred an increased operating grant (providing Roff had both a greater sense of obligation and veracity than Fred, also a longshot). For the author losing 34 years of concurrent investment in marriage, academia and access to two infant children owing to those displaying their "balls", the assurance interference competition employed by prof's at McGill, Mac and other institutions crippled individual lives and destroyed the author's subsequent willingness to contribute any less than reciprocal derision to similar miscreants in perpetuity. Hell is too good for bullies, liars thieves and violent men, but it's all we have. Dan is welcome to "men" at Mac and McGill and they her as "sisters" possessing similar ethics, priorities and expectations of rewad (sic) for the "living wage" and respect provided benefactors advancing their c-arrears (sic). As the author conveyed in his letter to MacKenzie when further connections to the "men" at Mac and McGill were severed, those not in alignment with "Right!" stood in opposition upolding "wrong" by definition. Individuals possessing similar ethics to profs at Mac expressing no surprise when "victims" having expectations of benefitting from governmental largesse and "a living wage" were assaulted and defrauded of financial investments, intellectual properties and time might be surprised to learn of the planning required by the author to insure compliance with identities of both no one and nobody were achieved in letters to Catholic "girls" who "start much", when sworn in a court of law (see Dole and Ruse) and in a letter written to the then current Prime Minister of Canada Bran Mudhoney (sic*2). The latter aped "doctors" at "my old school" by similarly failing to acknowledge or reply to a letter relating assault, 5¢/hr wages and loss of children with he and similar letter recipients inadvertently proving the identities claimed. Any letter received making reference to either no one or nobody as the writer requires no reply as Dr. Southwood revealed in his somewhat cryptic reply to my letter expressing my decision to forego further opportunities to "measure-up" to liars, thieves and violent rat-bastards, and instead, sever all "connections" to "men" claiming a 50% share in anything possessed by the author, with all they'd previously laid claim to (49%) identified as theft given both wages and the degree promised were withheld past the point where the credential and those failing to grant it had any value beyond serving as object lessons. Anyone curious can surmise other reasons why those identities were claimed, but having an inability to extrapolate further (v) if livelihoods were obtained by claiming an authority based upon having successfully parroted an oath in the distant past ultimately vilified by providing permanent handicaps to "citizens" means expectations of being any more than object(s) less sons (sic) as their rewad if "the game of life" was consistently played using tactics ranging from morally or ethically suspect, to thoroughly reprehensible and repugnant when measured against "Right!" should be adjusted. Individual failures blamed on a "free enterprise" or greed-based system don't stand up to scrutiny when fault lies not with "the system" itself, but individuals manning posts within failing to perform as promised, and indeed, who couldn't possibly fulfill oaths sworn as a condition of employment (perfection eh? Compared to WAD or Who?). Those thinking themselves so clever no one could uncover their duplicity discover a self-fulfilling prophesy. Whether their parents failed to provide an ethical foundation for offspring to build upon or the latter unilaterally concluded "beating" others at all costs was justifiable despite those whose lives contacting their own knowing losses for having encountered parasites, predators and their ilk, brothers proving themselves only "bothers" believing themselves "members" of "special" groups capable of transcending 20 centuries of "live and let live" philosophy, lose "membership" rather than "progress" establishing precedents where lack of regard for Love, "Right!" and Truth were embraced as their legacies. Parasites and predators generally choose the injured, young, old and others they believe can be subdued without incurring risk of injury or mortal wounds themselves, but The Bible warns of not one death, but two (where orgasm has been described as "the little death"). Given no one's demonstration of sufficient cur eh? to stand for "Right!", individuals standing against light, Love and wrong by definition pay consequences in lost "membership". "Doctor" claimants like Blown (sic) proving themselves indistinguishable from monsters following support of institutions delivering assault, killing wages and incarceration when the value of "training" has been conclusively repudiated by their graduation from an institution where human dignity was sold to the highest bidder join the world's oldest profession. Hippocratic oaths didn't have their etymology (t) in hypocrisy and a return ticket to the male genome for Blown and others whose oaths were similarly worthless is guaranteed only when no one becomes willing to trade children for worthless paper garnered by liars, thieves and vermin proving violence and disrespect their credo (Johnathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" is relevant). Expecting recipients of similar "incite" hadn't employed their collective creativity to prevent the ressurection of gene complexes facilitating individual "success" at others' expense is only (T)reasonable with maintaining self-respect in a millieu where ethically objectionable behavior either fails to receive scrutiny, or when scrutinized, lack of censure or downright approval for disreputable methods employed is provided by those possessing similar values, status and professional desigations explains why social aggregations of individuals in related livelihoods form within society (and COPs drink with COPs). Many pursuing self-interest appeared too ignorant to form a collective having the best-interests of victims as its goal, but others took pursuing self-interest to its illogical conclusion by swearing oaths to God (=Love) that selflessness and perfection was the course they'd adopt while "pursuing" livelihoods parasitizing and handicapping "fellow citizens" having the misfortune to be placed under the "protection" of verified liars following the swearing of oaths as a condition of employment, something Benita was sufficiently naive to engineer for herself and attempt to engineer for the author because those willing to put the fear of God and worthless gametes into her "knew better" (v). "Right!"

At one time promises of "a living wage" may've been fulfilled by profs in Canadian universities "taking" postgrad students for their time, ideas, salaries and whatever else could be obtained for non-negotiable promises, but given the demographics of baby boomers, a later start in university and protracted passage through grad school, my PhD thesis was submitted at a time when a surplus of "student bodies" existed, not unlike the author following a K-selected cohort reducing opportunities to nil with institutional and governmental accountability regarding the use transfer payments, methodologies employed to "train" under- and postgrads and distribution of research funding ranging from barely-accountable to thoroughly corrupt as a cohort raised under low density or r-selection would exhibit with resource squandering one characteristic predicted of such populations under theory. As an example, I attended a Provincial Aquaculture conference in Quebec where a University of Laval professor was introduced by a provincial politician after a $1KK grant renewal was announced so his "important research" on algal "biomass production" could continue, something anyone with a lightsource and aquarium could achieve with a single replicate and $20 budget. Were algal biomass production worthwhile, tons of algae could be harvested from any shallow eutrophic lake in Quebec during the summer months. Like the researcher himself, biomass is useful only as a resource sink, but I wondered whether the politician who'd introduced and was "in bed" with the researcher was taking adequate precautions? Then again, maybe only the Quebec taxpayer was bearing all risks of social decease (sic) while getting fucked by government and those responsible for misappropriation of taxpayer-funded research. As long as Quebec taxpayers believed their tax dollars funded important research, they'd continue supporting provincial politicians whose additional pleas for "Nationalism" took them deeper into lies and corruption. Many great accomplishments in the history of mankind have been made by solitary individuals having a collective voice, while collectives having a single voice stood in opposition. Any promotion of the state results in the individual receiving greater disregard. Mac's affiliation with an English university meant less provincial funding was available to english-speaking researchers so corners were cut by an institution feeling the economic pinch where it made perfect sense that faculty and adminitrators themselves shouldn't know serious austerity. Grad students advancing the reputation of the U, faculty publication records and scientific knowledge were elected to absorb any budgetary shortfalls. Any prof paying their grad students "a living wage" was handicapped by producing fewer publications owing to their inability to "take" as many students for their ideas, time and support salaries as academic "peers" making promises they ultimately reneged upon. Profs leading students astray with promises that went unfulfilled of "a living wage" advanced more rapidly than their peers given publication quantity (not quality) is the criterion determining both funding and promotion within universities (even administrators can count). Having sufficient ethics to truly provide postgrad students "a living wage" was an handicap most faculty at Mac had chosen to forego, not unlike most employers in the private sector whose "arrangement" with government that personal income tax be deducted from employee paycheques prior to employee receipt of earnings providing employers numerous government-sponsored tax breaks, with large corporations paying no corporate tax whatsoever. Furthermore, if large corporations fall on "hard times", eligiblity for government bailouts permit overpaid executives to deny accountability for the dire financial straits of "the corporation", similar to those in elected government disavowing themselves of responsibility for economic downturns (where banks have traditionally profited by foreclosures). Danielle providing each of her graduate students a $7K per year salary in 1991 (the equivalent of social welfare in BC) was paying only approximately 50% of minimum wage to postgrad students barely able to stay alive when $18,841 marked the poverty line for Canadian singles living in cities having populations of more than half a million people (in 2001). In Canada the brain drain has been facilitated by producing conditions for the best and brightest to overcome making them economically indistinguishable from the "dregs of society" while governmental and university infrastructures insure individuals sans ethics get ahead more rapidly than peers honoring promises they've made. The only equalizer is that males "getting ahead" are likely "getting" sufficient "tail" to compensate for any ascension given tendencies of "the weaker sex" to target the well-heeled as sources of bred (sic) and circ(le) uses (sic).

Rather than tenure providing professors academic freedom from dismissal owing to adoption of extreme or unpopular viewpoints as was originally intended, many tenured faculty escaped dismissal that would occur in any other profession for doing little more than incompetently performing routine lecture delivery using material not revised in years following their research programs reaching dead or unproductive ends. Postgrads having a spark of creativity had been elected to do both publishing and perishing given supervisor non-participation in research they'd subsequently claim senior authorship for having made substantive contributions to after doing little more than editing student manuscripts prior to their publication. Given the existence of spelling- and grammar-checking options associated with word-processing software, professors and the university claiming either 50% or 100% credit for providing an environment where ground-breaking research was achieved were similarly useful to 5¢/hr wages in amassing retirement savings. When formerly tenured faculty themselves retired, tenured positions have more recently been replaced by sessional lecturers (instructors) assigned larger teaching-loads than tenured faculty. Sessional lecturers have little to no promise of obtaining financial or job security with the prospects of establishing a productive research program almost negligible owing to non-support garnered by funding agencies with members such as Loff (sic) in conrol of public pursestrings (where controlling hiss (sic) own "purse" will be more than sufficient responsibility for Loff to assume). Lack of funding to sessionals insures researchers having political connections receive the bulk of taxpayer dollars earmarked for R&D that may ultimately be simply pissed-away without demanding accountability to taxpayers. In the 17 years I'd been a university student, I'd seen escalating costs of tuition accompanied by deteriorating scholarship and ethics of faculty with a positive correlation apparent between those lacking both. The "mean" financial support Renewable Resource postgrads at Mac received while I obtained my $150/yr "living wage" as a PhD candidate was less than $2K/yr while postgrads in the biology department at downtown McGill received minimum financial support of $12K/year. Why a cow college PhD candidate should receive $10K/yr less in support and only 25% of the teaching assistant wages for teaching the same course that an MSc candidate obtained in a biology department at the downtown campus of the same institution (a similar sum as I'd obtained at SFU during my own MSc for a prior teaching assistantship of the same undergraduate ethology course I TA'd) at Mac) may only be explicable to administrators believing student complaints of assault by faculty members will disappear forever if letters protesting the incident are ignored. The tacit assumption persistent writers protesting tuition fees purchasing assault and non-negotiable promises of a support salary will back down if incarcerated and threatened with lifelong reprisals (v) appearing a good backup plan when plan "A" proved a dismal failure implies the author's ownership of both "alpha" and "omega" will result in those preferring "N OT" fitting "Sin" vacating the alpha "house" in "The End" (making space for trustworthy soles in the beta house to obtain "membership"). Hence, adopting the "backup plan" insured acquisition of not only enemies for life, but "a friend" extending well into the great herafter (sic). Following the author obtaining discharge from hospital after Danielle's betrayal of her vows, the BC social assistance "safety net" revealed welfare recipients had been receiving over three times the average yearly support provided to postgraduate students in Renewable Resources, and over 40 times what the author received yearly as his "living wage" for putting in 60 hour workweeks (Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron" is relevant). Holders of "undergraduate" degrees observed collecting garbage by the waterfront in Sainte Anne de Bellevue while taking Frankie on 6 AM walks near the end of my PhD revealed profs benefitted optimally from the "living wage" postgrads obtained (although similarly-named "family restaurants" certainly benefitted too). Titman and David Bird, another Wildlife prof, staffed their "wildlife specialty store" using labor obtained from the ranks of Mac postgrads, with Bird also having postgrads working at his Raptor Research Centre (now Avian Science and Conservation Centre or ASCC) cleaning bird shit, with PhD candidates perhaps shoveling Bird's shit better than Master's candidates given the acronym "Piled higher and Deeper". Roger Bider, one of the 3 "y's men?" on my PhD supervisory committee, "employed" postgrads to staff what workers there referred to as "The Ego Museum". The first lesson postgrads at Mac would learn in their search for objective truth was promises made by thieves stealing their time, creativity and self-esteem weren't worth the breath used to utter them. In the author's opinion, precious few of the "wise men" I'd met at Mac or McGill deserved status as more than professors of duplicity (prequalifying them for "cunt role"). Promises humans make are all they ultimately have control over, and while they don't have ultimate control, intent determines the difference between "Right!" and wrong. If a man's word cannot be banked upon, he's placed his Y in jeopardy (v) and forfeiture should be expected when persistence in the belief creating insurmountable problems for others to overcome defines "right" (for him alone). Despite her husband losing his "best friend" owing to her claim she'd "changed" while the author was still the same, having met Danielle after a recent miscarriage and providing her financial support for the remainder of the summer we'd met followed by nursing her through various emotional and professional crises' over 18 years, she has a long way to go before reaching the Hell (=Her) provided the author when dispensing with both him and her vows. By retaining her job for life at Mac with continued "membership" in their lit dull (sic) mutual admiration society, Frankie and Cleopatra will both be eligible for and may take advantage of staff-dependent bursaries to attend the U providing their father assault, lies and unfulfilled promises of a "living wage" followed by tranquilizers and incarceration after writing letters designed to protect future postgrads from receiving similar "training". Both parents and grandparents in addition to those lacking progeny contributing tax dollars earmarked for higher education were unwittingly setting up youth who'd proven their fitness for academia by graduating with sufficient grades from their bachelors and obtaining acceptance into a graduate degree program with opportunities for parasitism (or predation defined as death of the prey or its inability to reproduce its genes) so "doctors" misrepresenting institutions like Mac obtained ascension climbing atop a mound of human carnage they'd repeatedly demonstrated no reservations about producing. During her own PhD studies, I'd witnessed Danielle writing letters for Amnesty International (AI) so prisoners of conscience might be freed. Prior to taking her combined sabbatic, adoption and pregnancy leaves, Dan had been chief undergraduate recruitment officer at Mac after demonstrating her willingness to turn a blind eye to a fellow faculty member's assault of her tuition-paying husband promised a "living wage" after $150/yr had been provided to indicate the veracity of her coworkers. When representatives of the institution paying her salary accused her spouse of failing to "measure up" to their "standards" after a single spelling error was detected in a 180 page PhD thesis (coupled with what should have been interpreted as refusal to provide Fred or the U credit for anything more than fuck-all), Danielle ultimately agreed with their assessment by choosing a job for life over honoring wedding vows, Love and loyalty. One of the disadvantages of affirmative action programs permitting women to obtain similar salaries and job opportunities as have been traditionally held by men is that "the weaker sex" may be so gratified they've been provided similar career opportunities as their male counterparts, they appear unaware their elevation of status has been purchased at the expense of males belonging to their cohort failing to obtain egalitarian (or humane) treatment. By choosing a job for life over honour, Danielle had indavertently struck a blow for human lefts (sic). The message of a greeting card Benita received from the author (v) appearing as Exhibit 3 in the court case Jenny mounted (sic) was a legitimate byproduct of my experience at 19 insuring additional betrayals by anyone choosing similar methods to obtain ascension wouldn't occur without reprisals. The courts, police, and of coarse (sic) the government facilitating support of similar "special interest" factions without demanding accountability of the met thugs (sic) employed might worry about the reception "Right!" prepared for facilitators of similar travesties if they knew of its existence. They do (C) now. In retrospect, Dan's stint with AI was indistinguishable from her coworkers hypocrisy. Those betraying trusts so profits, security and/or cheap thrills are obtained with others left bearing the costs of their aquisitiveness need to expand their view of the "house" where their ancestors originated to include every living being on the planet aboard a vehicle with the "animals" brought 2x2 being chromosome pairs sailing upon a single river, time itself. The responsibility for giving birth to and teaching children values for living in a world where cooperation will become increasingly important as human population density increases shouldn't be taken as lightly as unfulfilled promises to provide adequate support and "training" differing significantly from "railroading". Similar promises to provide citizens sound leadership, justice or protection after oaths were sworn may have provided a good income for years and numerous opportunities to lose gametes in exchange for bearing false-witmess under oath, but unless losing an opportunity to ever return to "the milky way" and end in a class having only rudimentary parental care similar to what alligators provide offspring by burying eggs under piles of rotting vegetation is desired (crocodiles are much better parents being unfraid to open their mouths to provide protection for their young during times of danger), swearing oaths or vows should either become less- or obeying them when sworn, more-fashionable. It follows with no barriers to interbreeding between races of humans, a single family exists (v) with the majority of genes in the human genome also ultimately shared with other mammals. Those sharing their creativity while wages permitting sustenance are withheld and assault provided for seeking Truth possess a perk many males take for granted that will be withheld for ethically corrupt and/or selfish behavior. Everyone wants "the best" for their children, but employers and government using the "gun to the head" incentive of: "We may let you continue to live providing you give us complete control" have no children to want "the best" for. Children are too precious for their creation or protection to be entrusted to liars and thieves gladly sacrificing other's children to provide them "e(asy) street". No one should get too comfortable. The 50:50 sex ratio has a single shared Y chromosome at its foundation that won't be paying for others' stupidity, betrayals or squandering of resources without imposing "rewads" (sic). Complete "cunt role" doesn't appear as desireable when seen for WAD (sic) it is (not).

Sexual reproduction coupled with parental care has the potential to produce either an Adolf Hitler drawing on an example before my birth, or humanitarians such as Bob Geldof and Midge Ure as contemporary examples (v) with the alternatives contingent on well-trained offpring following ethical guidelines set out by reputed wise men or objective "Right!" My parents instructing me to "treat everyone as you'd like to be treated" provided an handicap for living in a world of competitive cutthroats whose promises almost invariably proved non-negotiable (t), something I learned to bank on. My father's advice to "treat every girl as if she's your sister" (something I never had) linked in part to my sentiments underlying America's "Sister Golden Hair" regarding Benita. Centuries of parental investment into offspring can be sacrificed while a few poorly-raised bastards "get ahead" riding on the backs of others' progeny expected to content themselves with being used and abused while the police, courts and government provide protection and/or funding to those similarly disposed (and ultimately destined to be disposal units of male-produced gametes for swearing oaths as a condition of employment that were impossible to fulfill and hence, identified as lies from the outset). My 17 year investment in postsecondary education, 17+ years of marriage, 15+ years of access to my children and $150K in real and potential income were sacrificed so Freddie the free load ER (sic) could steal $30K of intellectual property that might further his "career". Might is underscored because the methods Fred used to "get" a head (sic) involved the use of force with both Titman and Fred demanding an obligatory section be included in my revised and resubmitted thesis giving Fred credit for providing more than an obstacle for the author to overcome. Resubmission was ultimately foregone owing to the greater responsibility the author discovered to insure the lyrics of popular songs were more than a waste of breath for those who'd written and recorded them after similar elements were discovered in his own life to key nouns in songs and the recognition my Gnosis obtained at 19 was a shared commodity (verifiable by statistical inference). Thus, someone previously tolerant to abuse may do the math and take a leap of faith after Fred highlighted his recent promotion from assistant to associate prof for who (sic) he'd done in the 6 years I'd been his PhD student (I'd taken off two semesters from my PhD to do a BEd as a bet-hedging tactic). His promotion after my thesis was failed and marriage went down the tubes indicated the Deaprtment of Renewable Resources (now Department of Natural Resource Sciences) approved, or at least failed to disapprove of the methods Fred used to "achieve" publications and obtain "ascension". I view the "renewable resource" being managed a previously inexhaustible supply of postgrad students willing to do almost anything for the "dangling carrot" of another degree and better job and career prospects somewhere down the "long, lonely road" Fred had not only described, but done his utmost to create, with the stick the mythical carrot was reputedly attached to used for poking, prodding and beating slaves deemed eminently disposable, (at least until the "men" misrepresenting the U were informed anticipation of a 99% share in similar (d)ark to what they'd produced for others to content with was their reward for their "contributions"). An inability to recognize anyone capable of creating intellectual properties worth stealing could also create deterrents insuring whatever was stolen appeared negligible compared to penalties levied for theft, assault and endless lies was their oversight. Fred's promotion revealed in the heading of a letter he wrote the author contained a sermon on "many firm and inflexible deadlines" academics are obliged to comply with following Titman's exemplar of taking 3 times longer than the prescribed interval to provide a report on my thesis, with cheap Wh(or)iskey following that hypocricy with the statement he'd found my "accusatory tone" inadequate financial compensation for the intellectual properties I'd already provided him credit for making a contribution to as senior author "offensive" (instead of identifying him an unwelcome hitchhiker ultimately losing passenger status), concluding in the same letter the author was "completely blind to the world around you" (v) making Fred's previous lies and denials a mountain resulting in the author's meltdown as actor and transformation into reactor as revealed by letters reprinted in cc Writer of 6 is 9 (v). After having been called deaf and blind (stupid=dumb would presently follow with Lose i.e.) 66.6% of the criterion required to comply with The Who's description of "a pinball wizard" had been obtained given "my moT" <Fr at 19. I figured if Fred hadn't already obtained tenure, it wouldn't be long before it too was awarded to accompany his newly-awarded Associate status. Furthermore, if I was second in the succession of "trainees" Fred's boundless ambition, minimalist ethics and numerous disabilities had produced with Roger Smith already canned by Fred after his refusal to continue working without the financial support Fred had initially promised, I'd be last (v) with Fred a less-son (sic) learned. I sent MacKenzie an appropriate cartoon I'd found by serendipity in an "Hustler" magazine included with the 29 page letter and 6 page pome (sic) that Brown had the author incarcerated for sending him. The black and white cartoon showed two "men" with one having a stain on the crotch of his trousers attributable to self-mutilation owing to hooks where hands had been (a Moslem tradition) who appeared to be leaving puddles of blood in his wake. The caption had his companion say: "Ya know Fred, I'd have a doctor take a look at that jock itch if I were you". I reminded Fred of "Pinball wizard" by scrawling "Sup all wrists" ("eat all hands") and the song's title next to the cartoon after having congratulated him on his promotion to Associate from Assistant prof in a previous letter where I'd also remarked his parents must be proud to have "Another doctor in the family. Another healer". Fred had done no MSc going directly from BSc to PhD, but whether he detected my sarcasm was moot given the acumen he'd repeatedly failed to demonstrate. Furthermore, he'd revealed a vasectomy to me before we'd left for Vancouver, with neutering a Moslem penalty for causing divorce. Had the author received a "living wage" as Fred had initially promised, the author's marriage would likely still be together with Danielle erroneously considered a Tammy Wynette clone instead of the clash of our ideologies surmountable only because on my trip to the interior, I failed to reject her as she'd done me with my reward apparently being retention of a less-than faithful wife as a daughter. Less-than-faithful wives are easy to put a negligible price upon, headstrong daughters may still be worthy of continued investment at a much, much later date. As Fred's curriculum vitae (CV) reveals, despite being caught red-handed (in actuality, both Fred's hands and his "manhood" were "in the red"), Fred continues to claim credit for publications obtained from my PhD research and the publication Roger Smith produced during his MSc research some 15+ years later, yet neither Roger nor I received the degrees nor the financial compensation promised for our ideas and work. Yours truly was shorted $29,250 if each publication I'd produced with Fred's name appended as senior author was truly worth $10K to his career salary expectations, which at the "living wage" I received, left Fred owing 195 years (money will not compensate me for lost time with my children, so I'll "take the time"). McGill received $30K in Federal transfer payments for "training" Roger and $45K for my own, so taxpayers can surmise the effectiveness of their tax dollars in providing hire education (sic) and infer the accountability government demands of academic institutions in exchange for taxpayer-funded transfer payments (why would those beliving themselves accountable to no one demand accountability of those they're "in bed" with?). The former analysis also fails to consider the equal or greater sum spent by "met!care" (sic) to retain the author in hospital after protests of assault and a 5¢/hr "living wage" were received in exchange for tuition fees paid and production of intellectual properties liars and thieves would've claimed 50% credit for had the author not rejected them first. Were Valery Fabrikant's actions justified or simply a barometer of how corrupt conditions in the public sector had become? A few months after my refusal to resubmit my thesis, Canada Student Loans (CSL) demanded repayment of a $10K loan taken during my BSc that only paved the way for additional theft of my time and intellectual properties. Given no job forthcoming in my field (I currently work as a dog-handler for a pest control company receiving $1/hour for each additional year of postsecondary education obtained beyond what the owner himself obtained, with the 6 years of postsecondary education we share in common apparently worth nothing. The owner, like Fraud, claims to be "a fair man", however, if man is "the measure", any adjective describing "man" is as bogus as my current salary for being a PhD (Poop handler for Dogs), hence, the value of the loan shouldn't be questioned. I found the CSL demand similarly absurd to the ambulance company Danielle employed to have me taken to hospital against my will demand I pay the bill for the involuntary trip she instigated or my "credit rating" would be damaged. Knowing what "real "credit" imparts is something many will never no (sic). Lacking shame, "doctors" at McGill and Mac were unanimous on sham with derivitive liars and thieves accusing others of failure to measure up to their "standards" after yours truly having worked 5 years for the equivalent of 5 days pay with assault provided when refusal to accept additional lies without questioning the lie dispenser's "right" was provided (Chubby Checker's "Limbo Rock" begs the rhetorical question "How low can you go?" Limp O is a state no one heartily approves of, despite numerous exemplars going directly to Hell).

One of the criticisms the illegally-formed PhD examining committee had regarding my thesis was its lack of originality (since when did theft become original? Did I miss something?). My claim to originality may've been challenged because Larry published a paper in 1983 taking credit for the hypothesis juvenile salmon, trout and char use cryptic coloration and appropriate behavior for defense against predators. I'd been Larry's student for 3 years when the paper announcing Larry's "discovery" was published and a few months later, published my ideas and experiments backing his "announcement". I thought it ironic my claims to originality may've been challenged because I'd been "scooped" by a former MSc supervisor whose scientific career already overshadowed my own by several orders of magnitude (and whose scientific reputation is not in question, but whose Word no one will gladly compare to his own or that of anyone currently or previouly living on the planet). Anyone reading my single 1984 publication could've ascertain the work I'd reported couldn't be performed in the few scant months following Larry's "contribution" with my 1985 thesis leaving no doubt whatsoever. I'd built an 8.5 M long 9000 L stream channel over a metre wide and deep holding 9000 L of water used for predation experiments, completed 2 fieldwork seasons, conceived a photographic sampling chamber having a prototype built I'd used during my MSc and PhD fieldwork permitting "sampled" fish to escape death (something Fred "inherited", one of the many perquisites of being a successful thief with his purchase of the Mamiya RB67 camera a month before my field research was canned from my friend Sam who'd built the photographic chamber for 2/7 of what Sam paid for it another plus) and completed genetic crosses to assess parr mark heritibility in addition to the 1984 research results published. I concluded none of my PhD thesis examiners (providing an external examiner did exist who wasn't a fabrication similar to the integrity cheap Whiskey and booby boy claimed to possess) had read the publication my PhD research was based upon, but still assumed themselves in a position to not only provide "guidance", but stand in judgment of the author and his work despite deeming lies, theft and assault demonstrations of "originality" deserving of my emulation. I'd arrived at SFU with the hypothesis intact and Larry had no contribution to my MSc thesis ideation but did provide a lab, equipment and funding for research from a grant he'd applied for and obtained using my hypothesis, ideas and proposal. When 2 years of funding had been secured, the grant provided my summer research budget and summer support funds with TAships funding the other 8 months of my grad student coursework until Larry began editing chapter revisions prior to thesis submission. The hypothesis that parr marks provide crypsis was briefly mentioned as a possibility in a 1958 publication by WS (Bill) Hoar subsequently uncovered by completion of an extensive literature review as the first stage of my MSc research, with Bill being asked to be on my MSc thesis supervisory committee owing to his seminal publication. My actual "marks" as a student had always been only par or better so allegorical interpretations can be substantiated. As for Fred, he came from a Catholic family having 12 children and had previously boasted only one of his sisters had been in trouble with "the police". Given Jenny's example, claiming COPs as allies isn't too different than claiming Idi Amin a role-model. If each child in a family has the wisdom of their parents divided between them, Fred received 1/6 of what my brother and I split. As his CV further reveals, Fred didn't receive the tenure he expected to obtain where his subsequent resignation is relevant. Furthermore, neither Roger Smith nor I appear on Fred's list of grad students despite our publications appearing on his CV, something he might explain by a couple independently wealthy guys having too much time on their hands wanting to "share" their intellectual wealth and hard work with a non-contributing senior author who enjoyed dishing out abuse, providing it was non-reciprocal. Despite Fred having found the tone of my accusations "offensive", he failed to mount much of a "defense" when the author proved the validity of his own somewhat derivitive perceptions built upon a foundation too many had contributed to for the author to be properly grateful (v), but you know who you are and why "the Tinman" would covet the burden (v) of a heart. If decisions made by magistrates on the financial compensation a previously-fucked recipient of "bad information" should receive had validity, $34,500 per day was just compensation for "working" with Fred despite not having received (or wanting) any of Fred's genetic information. Nevertheless, his claims to originality weren't based upon Ecclesiastes 1: 8-10 which states: "There is nothing new under the sun". Hence, even my claim to "Right!" is wholly unoriginal. I am simply one of many whose Word was viewed "good" by the purple strobing presence that man (the measure) either doesn't understand or am forced to conclude came from my production of the blue light several months earlier and was therefore my own entity (v). The idea of Loving something and setting it free comes to mind where it would appear the blue jet I emenated may've returned to its source. For those knowing oneness as I did at 19, it doesn't matter, but for betrayers of oaths and/or vows, the problem is similar to the reader's own of being part of it or NOT. Those believing themselves fit to judge originality or Truth had best be less derivitive and duplicitous than those levelling criticisms at yours truly or they'll be required to measure up to the measure (v) and objective "Right!" (=90). Males failing to do so end up in the (F)red to join those who relinquished decision-making 140K years ago except the earth-shaking matter of who was or wasn't an acceptable depositor of priceless genetic capital in their (B)anks. Like all (B)anchors (sic), collateral is all important with nothing paling in significance to cold-heart cache (v).

Thus, neither the spelling nor grammar of creators of art or science are critiqued by the author, but instead, the hubris of anyone presuming to judge. No one knows whether the inspiration from their logos resulted in the creation of works destined for immortality based upon revelations predicated on a shared Gnosis. Freeloaders hitchhiking on others' creativity while the pilot and vehicle carrying them receives only derision "get" reciprocal dehumanization until mutual respect is reestablished, however those claiming to be "men" making unwelcome cameos in others' lives should hold their breath only to make temper tantrums appear more authentic given their previous inauthenticity, with permanent loss of keys for displaying particularly objectionable behaviour predictable were scripture consulted. For youth and generations to come, however, the free "Right!" has only just begun (v) following decades of repression by oxymoronic "civil servants" whose "big picture" included only themselves and their children's futures with no consideration given to making sacrifices to achieve the greater good unless they were made by others (paving their way to Hell=Her). The author affirms and applauds pop culture's lyrical agreement to Biblical, literary, folk and creative traditions with scriptural consistencies in Lennon's "Nobody Told Me", The Beatles "For No One", "Mean Mr. Mustard" (faith), The Rolling Stones' "Ruby Tuesday" (Proverb 31) and The Byrds "Turn, Turn, Turn" (Ecclesiastes 3) obvious to anyone familiar with The Bible, but examples can't be exhaustive since allusions to no one, nobody and nothing were intended to lead listeners to scripture following recognition of terminology forming a lexicon derived from a shared Gnosis proceeding from illumination (in addition to arcana derived from sacred knowledge (v) given nothing is sacred). With lyricists delivering cryptic arcana, it escapes the author how wordsmith-journalists have avoided lyric interpretation, and despite training in composition required to analyze relationships between the 12 notes of the chromatic scale, journalistic training doesn't permit similar analysis making critics who'd presume to analyze compositions equivalent to priests claiming celibacy advising on marriage- and/or birth-contol. The latter is something priests claim expertise in, just as Jenny claimed psychiatric expertise no one thought to question when he claimed to "perform a psychiatric assessment" of "Right!", rewrote song outcomes and lectured the author, Benita and the BC Courts on the differences between Love and obsession (where losing permanent access to the SRY locus for himself and his allies after subterfuge and perjury served the dual purposes of losing gametes and bearing false witness under oath to cover derilection of duty redefining both Love AND obsession). Most commentators on music appear to embrace the: "It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than open one's mouth and remove all doubt" philosophy by simply pigeonholing artists' genres based upon rhythms or similarities to other artist's work. Individuals pursuing "livelihoods" involving parasitism of other's children would have been prudent to follow journalist's non-commital examples. George Harrison surrendered all royalties from "My Sweet Lord" and half royalties from "All things must P ass" (sic) following the ruling "unintentional copying" of The Chiffons' "He's So Fine" had occurred. The 12 note chromatic scale is a carrier that with appropriate lyrics, serves as a double-edged sword (t) having the capacity to either praise or admonish listeners based on karma they're owed for treating men as brothers and women sisters belonging to a common family or NOT (where opposition to New Testament prescriptions regarding "the golden rule" imparts Old Testament vengeance). The latter was clear from Lennon's message in "Instant Karma" employing video images of "Right of Way" signs with inversion of images whenever the word "Christ" was sung. Thus, using an identical melody line, bridge or chords as employed in a previously-recorded work is secondary to the lyrical message itself given a single message based on a shared lexicon derived from a common Gnosis proceeds from the logos. The Truth of the latter means Harrison was guilty of doing only what everyone had been doing since lyrics and music "married", with Gospel(l) "the church" where the "marriage" was performed. Although the author's interpretation is contrary to Marshall McLuhan's famous (v): "The medium is the message" quotation (making all rap lyrics secondary to the sampled carrier, eh?), McLuhan's conversion to Roman Catholicism for whom the earth remained at the center of the solar system after Copernicus' heliocentric theory championed by Galileo was prohibited is relevant (McLuhan was born a Methodist). Galileo was forced to abjure heliocentrism enduring 40 years of subsequent house-arrest and prohibition from scientific pursuits for attempting to update the RCC regarding the immutability of "truth" Roman conquistadors "appropriated" from Greek civilization in general, and Aristotle in particular. With mankind having common roots in Africa as both Johanson and Leakey have demonstrated despite disagreements regarding the specific location, the continent of mankind's origin is undisputed with mankind a single vine linked to hominid apes and their prosimian relatives. Nothing is sacred about scientific knowledge with Aristotle the first biologist and true scientist (v), but a man nevertheless. God only became an issue when legislated into existence by Constantine after the nature of God (=Love) in Man (with Woman the recipient and receptacle) was either neglected or forgotten (t). McLuhan's viewpoint was consistent with either having water sprinkled on his head or taking a church-sanctioned bath that was linked to "salvation" (t) in the same way most people believe "marriage" is a ceremony performed by a priest or justice of the peace instead of gamete transfer from a male to a female that may or may not result in a 'nancy. Biological marriage results in most women and men being "married" numerous times to different partners, with "successful marriage" defined solely by the production of offspring that are a credit to the race where, unlike publications, quality not quantity is the final arbiter of whether the world has been made a better place by offspring presence. Regarding McLuhan's light bulb analogy, without illumination (i.e. the lamb=lambda), shadows are neither cast nor perceived, with Plato's analogy regarding cave walls taking precedence to McLuhan's ideas, particularly in an age of flat panel monitors, plasma and projection TV's. Illumination represents the lightning strike, music and lyrics the reverberations of thunder heard years prior to the author finding the futile (sic) met the passed (and "lapped" several times: v). Those at a standstill or in reverse regarding both perceptions and ethics "get" more than publications and/or loss or gain of gametes for their "+rouble". Stealing no one's ideas without having the capability of understanding the ideas or logos where they originated while laboring under the belief the originator wouldn't produce others to blow thieves and liars to kingdom come was only wishful thinking. Perceptions and ethics are thus other components of the narrative.

The Chiffons banked revenues from the melody line and lyrics created for "He's so fine". Harrison should've been given the benefit of doubt by the judge(D) ruling on the case having neither knowledge of songwriting nor the methodology songwriters employ with Keith Richards (v) describing the process briefly in the link to 666 in the following paragraph. The Chiffons subsequently profited from the controversy by covering Harrison's "My Sweet Lord" with Harrison recording "This Song" and producing video targeting the courts and "Bright Tunes" as his rebuttal (with Harrison's former manager Allen Klein purchasing Bright Tunes Music Corporation so Harrison would owe Klein the royalties from both songs). With regard to the courts possessing truth, despite insuring everyone swears an oath on The Bible or some other book reputed to be Holy (as judges, COPs and politicians claimed to be when swearing similar oaths) prior to taking the witness stand with "professional oath-swearers" claiming The Bible an aid in seeking and finding Truth, Parmenides whose influence on Plato and the course western civilization has taken would likely claim no one has a monopoly on The Way of Truth (which he likened to Man) and anyone ruling without knowing all the facts reveals only The Way of Opinion (not unlike Woman). Similarly, judges ruling $34,500 for each day a wife spent in wedlock was just compensation for "her time" when a divorce was "settled" (with a faithful PhD candidate husband adequately-compensated when receiving allegations they were actually insane for remaining faithfully married to a wife turfing her "best friend" like a used tampon after 17+ years) reveal the value of wisdom only by demonstrating its dearth. Only a man having lived with a particular woman can place a value on her "friendship", with one being nearly priceless and another nothing but trouble who ultimately costs any man they consort with everything they possess while she continues to "sit pretty" with the blessings of courts willing to provide numerous male "stand-ins" to replace the absentee's function, if not form. The word "judgment" appears 162, wisdom 215 and knowledge 130 times in the NIV version of The Bible. The expectation those swearing oaths ruling on Truth should demonstrate 32% judgment, 42% wisdom and knowledge in 26% of cases they find "a" pawn (sic) demonstrates "a" Lit All knowledge a dangerous thing (v). If the "burden" of both McCartney's genes and Gnosis required financial compensation for the woman who received them, the liability a judge provides his spouse is second only to the handicap they provided themselves for presuming to rule on Love after swearing an oath to serve God (=Love). At puberty, male mammals begin to manufacture the seeds of the next generation by possessing a 50% share in both the Y obtained from their father and a representative X obtained from their mother. Additionally, males recombine those factors and 22 other chromosome pairs in nearly every conceivable way within haploid gametes they're likely to donate to a lesser or greater extent to women diligently "working" to accumulate alleles to compensate for the old-date DNA their parents provided at their own conceptions. Owing to the ability of males to produce gametes having novel allele combinations while donating some percentage to females once they initiate sexual activity, regardless of how many males females "take" for their genes, all gametes flow one-way from males to females (except the approximately 2-13% of homosexual gamete exchanges serving as the control) and define human perfectability. Females never make Love or life, fhey can only take both of the former. Furthermore, while females may never know definitively whether their x came from their father or mother and hence, whether their lineage stretches back to seizing the SRY locus (as man did and does), or was a mere flash in the pan only linked to the paternal root as an also ran (down their thigh). But females can "know" the presence of the "father" (Y), his mother (X) and their relation to her own x following unprotected sexual relations. The ruling a male sharing his gametes with a woman should continue providing financial compensation when the former "wife" (used in the narrowest sense possible given unprotected sex was "marriage" prior to the church creating "communion" to mark their imperfect involvement in sex and "marriage") has moved on to "greener pastures", fails to reveal wisdom. Ruling that men should pay twice, first with their gametes and again with cash and other resources ultimately turns the former wife into a prostitute, not unlike judges having the audacity to rule on such matters after wives having reached the decision future recombinations of a male's genes won't reveal too much they haven't already known. It would be just as reasonable for judges to rule former husbands should continue to receive conjugal rights after divorce has been granted, something Supreme Court Justices would likely view as only reasonable given their desire to fuck everyone, however, those having sworn oaths demonstrating their lie ability (sic) on day one escalating duplicity over careers and bluffing they possess sufficient wisdom to rule on matters they know "nothing" about, find time still stands (against All liars). The ruling wives should receive financial compensation for genes they obtained via genetic parasitism could only be made by those whose genetic and ethical contributions to mankind were similar and thus, a burden all citizens have shared to a lesser or greater extent, not unlike wasted R&D funding. Remove the XY chromosome pair from the human equation (given reproduction via parthenogenesis) and where would the human race be? Living in caves with only hungry crying babies to show for centuries of what passes for civilization. Representatives of the state using their oaths to declare Love illegal while parisitizing and preying upon those they swore to protect will discover llaw-abiding (sic) conduct on the author's part when they at last go to their rewads (sic). Citizens in ancient Greece were exclusively male, something both Danielle's actions and Benita's accusations and testimony proved eminently reasonable.

Both music and scripture impart similar information with new wrinkles added so a single story of peace and provisionially brother- and sister-hood is revealed, with responsible stewardship of the planet the underlying theme provided by the shared Gnosis. Males in opposition to those precepts risked foregoing an opportunity to return in the same gender role with females demonstrating lack of regard for Love never gaining freedom from card-stealing "membership" as "the fairer sex". Furthermore, the logos (Word="Right!") is no longer hidden in song lyrics with illumination obvious in videos produced per The X Files: "The Truth is out there". The author views song lyrics (and melody lines) committed to memory a better way of providing those unfamiliar with Gnosis also possessing underactive or lacking any conscience whatsoever with a superego similar to what The Bible and other parables once provided given the latter is no longer being widely-read nor its precepts followed by the majority of individuals claiming to be Christians. Likely 99.9% of readers were incapable of understanding scripture even were it studied intensively, with no one following its precepts anyway so it should be little wonder why the author views artists as extended family with both living and dead having revealed a share in Gnosis as sons of God, although interpretation as either a theological or sexist message would be incorrect. Love requires no "supreme being" to exist with women also instrumental in producing art and insuring continuity of the species by giving birth to and raising children with values where Love is elevated as the highest good to demonstrate their share in Gnosis, while others have been doing their utmost to target, identify and reap the gametes of males willing to violate oaths, vows and/or provide disrespect to other members of the family of Man. Perhaps lyrical verification should be identified as "Love SonGs" given a fine-enough edge for them to be interpreted in a less-benevolent manner by those having malignant credos, with males proving themselves throughly rotten bastards obtaining the surety of retribution staining the crotches of panties given an overall equal sex ratio must be complied with. Love is divine, but its flipside is devilish (v) when the lives, future and happiness of children and fate of the human race is at stake. Most male musicians reported by the media having drug- and/or alcohol-related problems (exaggerated for the sake of publicity) are now family-men having children and grandchildren, just as Divas currently exist with similar "problems". Providing they don't kill themselves (or someone else), the songs they've recorded will influence millions with no one having to sacrifice years of investment for them to make a living. God (=Love) helps those whose sadist faction includes liars, thieves and violent bastards. When Hippocratic oaths fall like tenpins, those swearing them should've expected they'd follow. Furthermore, rock icons aren't likely to feel too differently about their children than the reader does about their own, and might feel more strongly having spent months at a time separated from families and loved-ones to pursue a calling spreading The Word, also referred to as The News by Huey Lewis and The Beatles (v). I missed seeing my children grow to adulthood thanks to "Dan the man's" unilateral decision her faithful husband had no "Right!". Court personnel supporting Danielle's position that man (responsible for manufacturing both X's and Y's) has fewer rights to children than women (whose x's were products of man) can join Danielle as betrayers of "Right!" so they too are "right" (to be wrong). Furthermore, no matter what humans believe, if all are unable to agree to the proposition children are the future, they'll give birth to ancient his story (sic). Dan and her deceased father's Blown "friend" whose marriage is similarly over will have no further effects on others' lives as he and she did mine without knowing reciprocity following Danielle being awarded the role of daughter as related in Interior. On my return from Merritt, Benita asked me where I'd been. As all that had transpired there was too bizzare to relate to her, I asked her if she could keep a secret. When she replied in the affirmative, I told her "So can I" relating nothing to her of my trip (she likely suspected me of debauchery with a woman of ill-repute, totally unncessary if one knows where women originate and their primary role in targeting and identifying disreputable males). Benita later proved her efficacy as a three lock box by attempting to make the author recant the identity "truly no one in particular" obtained at enlightenment. Recant the Truth and join liars? Enough liars and cowards exist already. Hasty decisions made regarding the dispensibility of True Love have eternal consequences and despite Danielle obtaining approval for her actions from Blown whose Hippocratic oath was no less sacred to him than her marriage vows to her, a job for life is still only a job for life (v). If Danielle was similarly faithful to her vows until she revealed her priorities upon returning from PiG (sic), she can determine "how great things are" by discovering a more masculine perspective on the joys of dealing with a man whose Word means nothing (nothing lasts forever). If genetic "donations" from anyone were accepted following our initial meeting until betraying her vows, she can continue engineering betrayals until her maternal lineage composed of "social list Jews" are entirely eliminated from the genome (v) with The Who's "Won't get fooled again" sounding similar to "Won't get food again", a misinterpretation my dealings with Fred instilled. "Happiness is a warm gun" by The EatlesS relates: "She's not a girl who misses Mitch". Prior to our marriage, Mitchell Clark accompanied Danielle and I on our migration to Vancouver, but our differential began to fail near Kamloops and my friend Sam put us up for the night, but I made a detour with him to visit Adams River. A sign there read: "The richest 100 acres on earth". The population demographics of Adams River sockeye that became the final chapter of my PhD thesis nearly 20 years later was a similar obsession as my Gnosis (satori=zen, nirvana=Buddhism and Jainism, Truth=Parmenides) for the final two years of my PhD before meeting Benita. Sam and I left Dan and Mitch behind in Kamloops for several hours. It's good Danielle was only playing a temporal game. Like most women, she wouldn't have survived in an eternal arena without "Help". Since the day she had Blown end our marriage by proxy, she's done little to indicate her x lineage worth perpetuation as far as "Right!" is concerned. I hope my children had an easier time with Danielle's priorities because she's had effects on my life I wouldn't perpetrate on a lower species. Having similar effects on the lives of my children will reward her maternal lineage with reciprocity, if 6 million weren't enough. On a cheerier note, given vowels are freely interchangable, Benita had the lyrics related to her as: "She's not a girl who misses Much" (v), although she may now wish I'd either recorded fewer videos for her to watch (provided she did watch and consider anything I'd recorded), seen less, or even provided no one the benefit of doubt. Don't sell something (no one's reputation) you can't value because if your own fate is connected, your worth may be determined by the negligible or inestimable value you place on their lives, hopes and dreams, all which Robert(a) chose to exclude herself from. Maybe next time? No "next time" is required for anyone incapable of remorse following unequivocal demonstrations of malicious intent so cheap thrills or profits are obtained at the expense of anyone's years of investment or dignity (v).

Ethologists once believed the intent of actors in intraspecific conflicts could be predicted by observing prior escalations, but current views hold bluff and disinformation have been selected with conveyance of "True" intentions the exception to the rule. In intraspecific conflicts between non-human species, ritualized methods exist for determining the outcome of conflicts with red deer (v) locking antlers and pushing against their opponent rather than goring one another. Rattlesnakes of the same species wrestle without deploying poison fangs, which in either case, could impair fitness if injuries occurred and/or prove fatal to one or both opponents. In contests where one opponent is larger than another, correlated asymmetries are often used to settle the outcome of disputes without escalation being required. For example, large body size is often correlated with fighting ability so a smaller opponent generally retreats when facing one that is larger. If only the same were true of human behaviour, but fighting to the death is common in the human species largely because nearly everyone believes themselves to possess perfect information, and despite no one making that claim, persisting in the belief alliances formed are sufficient to compensate for information deficiencies ("Right!" is by definition: "the light at the end of the tunnel") have eternal consequences. Rather than viewing an individual standing in the way of "Right!" an exceptional case, humans are social animals sorted into two genders having common ideologies, but employing very different methodologies. A queen bee founding a hive in a location interfering with human habitation may sentence her entire family to the fate of extermination despite a single individual responsible for the decision to sting a child or family pet. Every female worker in the hive has the ability to sting with all being programmed to believe the queen can't be wrong. In human terms, those who've convinced themselves Her Majesty can't be wrong is analogous given her appointment of the Archbishop of Canterbury responsible for maintaining religious tradition and continuity goes with the belief no one can stand up to the information possessed by the union of church and state in courtrooms, but given disinformation and misinformation, what appears more consistent than any traditions church and state perpetuate is a Tower of Babel analogy regarding discrepancies between the spoken and written word in cultural communiques. Indeed, small European countries developed different languages so communication could be achieved between extended kin-groups, with individuals outside the kin group being excluded. Hence, the function of language is not communication at all, but selective communication so large numbers of individuals can hear with their ears remaining dumb, with nonverbal communication similarly allowing others to see with eyes remaining blind. For example, The Sweet's song "Ballroom Blitz" has the title lyrics occasionally pronounced "Barroom Blitz" making it apparent wordrobes (sic) were selected consistent with both post- (the title) and pre-illumination states (the "misheard" lyrics) indicating The Sweet employed a logos-based lexicon with the "misheard lyrics" not misheard at all, but serving as an auditory identification signal indicating the band's inspiration was obtained via shared Gnosis. Similarly, light flashes or hand signals in Estelle's "American Boy" video imply enlightenment when the word "Broadway" is sung, with an OK symbol employed in Lady Gaga's "Just Dance" video indicating similar Gnostic arcana implying Love and continuity. The 23 chromosome pairs humans have in common can be represented by a raised index and middle finger (v) with a raised index finger and pinky (reputed to be a devil worship signal) indicating 25=Y.

Deception in "human affairs" more often than not results in security, wealth and/or power obtained following the parroting of promises, oaths and/or vows with harbingers of deception expecting victims to bear both costs and disappointments for having been sufficiently naive to expect congruence between promises made and deeds performed by those who reneged as Danielle on her vows, Fred regarding the "living wage" promised and Jenny regarding his oath and "serve and protect" credo he'd sworn to uphold. They all might've wondered WAD could be in store for doing "Right!". The author's expectation of betrayal when dealing with the courts insured finding the transparent ruse of an upper case "Revolver" tape I'd given Benita and instructions that she "put it to your ear and blow your brains out" or listen to it at loud volume had been altered in the "Execitive Summary" (sic) Jenny provided his superiors wasn't the one-way ticket to disappointment Jenny expected the author to content with after having transformed the tape into a lower case "gun" and rewording my interogative to ask whether the recipient had used it to "kill yourself yet", and wasn't unlike dealing with the veracity of doctor of philosophy claimants at Mac and McGill (v). Liars are liars and as a former wolf cub, I'd come prepared to defend myself against allegations of wrongdoing, but defending myself from fabrications so a COP having a surname synonymous with a female ass could justify spending his self-described "valuable patrol time" wasting the salary taxpayer's provided him by visiting Benita "just about every day" and pursuing a porn star calling with the recipient of my letters and gifts he subsequently justified by perjury and bearing false-witness against "no one in particular" was not and will never be welcome(D) by anyone in The Word (t). Jenny had the unmitigated gall to ask me why he didn't "fair too well in my book" the last time I saw him after delivering Benita a paperback version of 6 is 9 following my detection of his perjured testimony in the previous case and I told him "Walk a mile in my shoes". Jenny said "I wouldn't want to be in your shoes", I replied "You'll never be" (v), where the reader will recall my feet were bare when Danielle placed me on the path she'd chosen for "Right!" to walk. After being jailed 3 times in 2 years at Jenny's add vice (sic) for giving Benita gifts including 250+ pages of Love letters with the final salvo arriving near Christmas where I'd written to her: "Believe me, I'm motivated only by Love. I would not do anything to harm you, and indeed am willing to risk my own freedom to get this to you. Decide where I should spend Christmas", she decided jail was where "no one" belonged. One of the interesting byproducts of placing your life in the hands of someone assuming they or their allies "know better", is their tacit assumption they do. Willingness to place a negligible value on allies and methods no one might have at their command is a surefire recipe for disaster. The surety Benita played "hide the salami" with Jenny while yours truly was in jail at Christmas after having told Benita that since 19, Christmas had been a sacred time for me with Benita revealing she was simply "glad to make it through another year" resulted in the author becoming more than simply an unwilling victim of grade school kiddie's playing fast and loose with Truth at the expense of nobody's reputation (but their own), but the decision to dismantle "the system" miscreants similar to Jenny swore their allegiance to. Those choosing to profane Love and light shouldn't entertain expectations of access to either with its antithesis their re:wad. Spending 10 years in graduate school studying prey defense and following the policy of Truth since "Right!" on December 31st 1973 meant allegations of wrongdoing by anyone who'd sworn an oath on The Bible promising to seek Truth and serve God (=Love) who subsequently proved themselves liars or demonstrated a willingness to obscure Truth and label it "opinion" had gone well beyond familiar to verge on ridiculous. Any stand that "valuable patrol time" can be measured by gamete loss is only vindicated when access to a Y chromosome is similarly lost (at least till the age of legal consent when hot meat injections become popular among those whose only legacy from this life is lingere). Court cases where judges found what defendants said in their own defense "not relevant" while every word a lying COP uttered was deemed not only admissable, but unquestionable as "the truth, the hole truth and nothing butt (sic) the truth" is Truth only within the limits the author prescribes. I'd even written to and warned Benita: "I can be very wrathful as well, and my wrath is not pretty. If someone harms me they're actually inflicting that harm on themselves", a supposition my experiences at "the ivory tower" had already verified when instigators of trouble for "Right" had what they'd sown return to them in accurate, but far from flattering reflections borne out not only by coincidental nouns discovered in song lyrics targeting individuals at Mac and McIll (sic), but accurate recounting of circumstances. Jenny accused me of writing "My wrath is not pity", but Jenny quoted from his "notes" (=fabrications) while my lawyer read statements Benita had compiled from the letters I'd written (the author verifies his legal aid lawyer was capable of reading despite having 9 fewer years of postsecondary education than the author, if I was a highschool grad, my "mouthpiece" would have begun grade 4 while Jenny was just beginning kindergarden relatively speaking with Benita similarly well-educated as Jenny). Were I feeling charitable towards someone proving themselves a lying piece of crap, I'd attribute the difference between Jenny's account and the account read by my lawyer on either a transcription error Jenny made or only recently getting out of diapers, but after him convincing Benita the "Revolver" tape I'd given her was actually a gun with Jenny thinking himself clever enough to turn Woman against no one when Truth would ultimately be revealed, seeing Jenny and his oath-swearing allies burn in Her (sic) for eternity was a lesser evil to developing a sudden tolerance for liars and what they dispensed as truth (sic) under oath (v). Contrary to Jenny's distortion, Benita did illicit pity. Anyone unable to see my generosity and kindness towards her and Brenda was undeserving of accusations and trouble for the author to content with after throwing their lot in with liars would ascertain what profs at Mac and McGill had, and that wouldn't be pretty. Dis-appointment takes many forms, but represents a single chromosome (x) given all males share a common Y after receiving the SRY locus at conception. Jenny revealing his lie ability (sic) identified his female ancestry a problem requiring solution. After preying upon the treasure (the woman I'd chosen and Loved) and bearing false-witness against the measure ("Right!") when sworn to Truth, Jenny had no allies remaining on the SRY or X except Benita, Brenda and similar "brother constables" as hissself (sic). Furthermore, Benita swore under oath I'd said I had: "a revolver and asked if I'd used it to shoot myself yet" so had either been "fooled" by Jenny or decided she'd make additional trouble for the author to content with by playing the femme fatale indicating no sense of "Right!" with either her mother's x or father's X equally defective as her willingness to instigate a fight with no one outclassing her and the allies she'd chosen to take "her part" (cunt role). Benita's expectation the skirmish she'd begun would end with she and her allies victorious because "men" of the courts, police, psychiatric profession and "doctors" at McGill were dealing with someone who'd lost their mind, should've worried more about who'd found WAD was lost and what was made of it given coincidences from the life all found fault with an underlying theme in movies, book plots and lyrics of popular songs, with the identity "no one" also appearing several times in The Bible (427 in the New International Version). When an employer is considered not only sane but "just" when paying an employee promised a "living wage" 5¢/hr with assault the incentive to not question lies provided and still provide an equal share in what was discovered, I'd prefer being labelled crazy to accepting an opportunity to share anything further that I possessed with similar vermin (individuals demonstrating minimalist verbs). As for Benita, she testified: "He understood that -- I think -- well, he said that he understood that we could only be friends. And then in the end of August he gave me a card that said, 'It's your move, my friend,' which I took to mean choosing him as a lover or -- or whatever, so I made --", where to finish her incomplete thought "an enemy instead" by "soliciting" the testimony and gametes of a lying COP. "Friends" don't send "friends" to jail, keep lines of commuication open without jumping to conclusions based on speculations not confirmed with their "friend", and stand up for those they care about through thick and thin without providing sexual rewards to COPs who desecrated their oaths years earlier, and now find bearing false-witness against their "friend" as routine as women staining the crotches of panties every 28.3 days (a routine Jenny and his A1 lies can anticipate falling into). Women like Danielle and Benita having the audacity to refer to themselves as "friends" need to ask why their own families are so important to them (and small!). Furthermore, women not having sufficient respect for their "sisters" to eschew opportunities to take other women's husbands for gametes lead not only men into temptation and make themselves an enemy of the husband's wife, but become an enemy of faithful women everywhere (no one employs methods to determine men and women whose vows are worthless). With regard to temptation, the Lord's Prayer is relevant to "the week her sex" having one who Loves and accepts them unconditionally (v) given the tendency of most women to have little or no respect for other women, precious little for themselves and no regard whatsoever for the gender creating all the trappings of the material world (including themselves). As for "choosing him as a lover", were Benita male, Jenny's "just about every day" visits would've been an unfiled police report with Benjamin wondering where just ass (sic) could be found. The ass could be found in deriliction of duty with someone else he was "very concerned" about, also in "cunt role" who had similarly convinced herself how fortunate she was to be getting appease (sic) of ass to rescue her from the Truth nobody Loved her (v). Having known eternity at 19 (=90), my concerns have been living in a manner meeting the approval of those knowing "Right!" so my "children" aren't disappointed by the choices no one has made. Whether I had an audience of millions or only a few songwriters Iike John Lennon, the knowledge I was always being "watched" resulted in the author exhibiting qualitatively different behaviour than those believing "It's his word against mine" or "no one will know if I'm lying" tactics. Comparing any "version" of "the truth" to The Word isn't a viable tactic to adopt if your strategy as a male is retention of "membership" rather than seizing "cunt role". Given my experiences, Love for my and all children and their protection were placed as the highest (and only) good. Why no one had to "sober up" was based upon conclusions that COPs proving themselves liars, perjurers and bearing false-witness in their "Execitive Summary" (sic) and when sworn to Truth with the collusion of other oath-swearers after an arena had been revealed to the author where a single word spelled in an unconventional manner (and unwillingness to compromise Truth for lies and profits) were sufficient to lose two concurrent 17 year investments. The effect of returning Jenny to high-school despite 13 years on the Farse (sic) and the disadvantage a 4 year BA confers its recipient swearing an oath promising perfection returned Jenny to kindhergarden (sic). Jenny from the block was transformed to Jenny on the (chopping) block, to finally arrive at Jenny playing with blocks to reveal the wisdom of Benita's "choice". Life is simple when your choices are made for you by liars you've blindly trusted to provide Truth they've never known (v) and won't have a shot at again. Trying no one after choosing professions where oaths were sworn following gametes and genetic identities being captured by Xx units considered nobodies and easy prey (not unlike the author), lose what they freely gave away (also not unlike the author), but choosing careers where practitioners view parasitism or predation of children in the "brotherhood of man" "fine" providing their appetites for materialism are sated shouldn't anticipate a return invitation from the SRY. Presiding judges permitting lies and factual inaccuracies sworn as Truth to go unchallenged while deferring to the leadership of COPs bearing false witness under oath ultimately share Jenny's expectations of rewad (sic). Males provided the SRY locus and a Y chromosome at conception ending up on "easy-street" owing to oaths sworn or promises made that were subsequently desecrated are exempt from repeat performances in similar gender roles as humans in their next go round, and perhaps excluded from roles as mammals when additional evidence has been obtained (i.e. all cash in the Y they've perverted given Love=+O@90=Y). Furthermore, song lyrics about "guns" bombarding all within earshot of radios and televisions with Truth regarding the "servicing" daughters of taxpayers receive and "projection" their sons should anticipate when lies are sworn as truth by similar base miscreants to Jenny won't make many in law enfarcement (sic) feel too grateful about the "rap(e)" oath-swearing pubic savants (sic*2) will ultimately foot the bull (sic) for. Given my possession of both an X chromosome and Y (in addition to "Right!"), a very dim view is taken of lying to double x units by Jenny and others employing a y having no respect for Truth believing their own y invincible owing to an oath sworn to Queen and cunt t(h)ree (sic*2). Neither Jenny nor his oath-swearing allies should consider themselves eligible for renewed "membership" in the "heir club for men" with a new appetite to satisfy obtained for their +rouble (sic). Attempting to stand on a foundation of Love (=God) while making Love letters "dangerous" and illegal after gametes were exchanged between an accuser and employee of the courts subsequently bearing false-witness was not a particularly viable strategy to facilitate retention of a Y chromosome. My useless tit lawyer's reading what Benita had received with Jenny testifying I'd written: "I can be very wrathful as well, and my wrath is not pity." (see Dole) was an inter resting (sic) tactic. In Quebec many graduates of law school obtain employment as public notaries where one of their tasks involves comparing two documents, the original and a copy. Their job is to certify a copied document is a "True copy" that has gone unaltered with the content identical to the original. If satisfied the two documents are identical, (apart from the form they take), they affix a seal and their signature certifying Truth has been upheld. Judge(d) Smith failed to mention the discrepancy between what my lawyer read from the letter I'd written that Benita copied and was introduced as evidence by the Clown (sic), and what Jenny read from his "notes" and testifed to be Truth, yet Jenny had committed a subtle act of perjury Smith either failed to notice, or upheld (either way indicating the only bench Smith had any Right! to be sitting upon was one where he's permanently sidelined from "the game"). "Pretty" and "pity" are not synonymous with a positive "spin" pertaining to the former and a negative connotation attached to "pity" which Wikipedia also describes as a "weasel word", perhaps owing to the character or more accurately, lack thereof normally associated with its users. Since a synonym for "pretty" is "beautiful" with Bonita meaning "beautiful" in the romance languages, it implied Benita was not viewed by the author as a recipient of his wrath, but merely a pawn as Danielle herself had been in the eternal "power game" played by those believing themselves "men" when man is both X and Y factors in balance (such that da Vinci's Mona Lisa was reputed to be a self-portrait). Jenny and his confederates shouldn't wonder who elected themselves for roles as recipients (and future receptacles) with Jenny's "brother constable" Winson-Jones a former recipient. Wasting 15 years of happiness Benita and yours truly might have enjoyed so Jenny could wet his wick only to reveal the value of his oath (worthless to all but the One it was sworn to) with similar oaths sworn by his allies having equal (and negligible) value resulted in the author taking his own gametes out of circulation. No big deal? It is if you know most males have continued losing X and Y gametes to women for 15 years while the woman you Love continues to play "hide the salami" with similar miscreants to Jenny who, unless they Love her as I do, may similarly lose permanent access to the SRY. During that time I've lost none of my gametes to members of "the weaker sex". That would mean "Right!" settling for less than Love owing to the intervention of a state elevating a lying ASS in a (con)stable above God (=Love). The OX is something only fathers having daughters can understand, however, my adopted son is no less precious to me since we share a common Y. Too bad few in law enforcement will make that claim any longer with anyone having sworn an oath being more than suspected of duplicity, but convicted beyond doubt. No one can measure up to "Right!" with those having sworn oaths as a condition of employment no more than liars and pretenders to "Right!" who can kiss "wood" goodbye.

Those swearing oaths as a condition of employment could formerly escape recrimination only by successfully deceiving those knowing of their claims to selflessness and veracity those attributes (v) had been pursued from the outset of careers until they were finally observed inaction (sic) explaining why court transcripts have been included for reader's perusal, although the author doesn't give a good goddamn what anyone thinks if they disagree with his assessment that panty wastes require anatomical correctness to adequately measure down to the veracity Jenny and his A1 lies demonstrated. Opportunities are also provided for readers to judge the author using similar criteria, however, Rene Descartes most famous quote, cogito ergo sum is relevant (v) to the author's identification as no one (v) with relativity transforming the perception to "on one". I'd written to Benita that I put Descartes before de whores (v). Benita like most women put herself first, a characterstic she appeared to share with Jenny. Very common despite my having initially told Benita she was special. Special status was conferred only because nobody Loved her. She wanted to prove herself worthy of "bed her", something Jenny was only too happy to co(m)plie (sic) with where The Be Dulls lyrics to "Hey Jewed" of: "Take ass, add song and make it bed her" fit a bit too well. Almost anyone can uphold an oath during a court case lasting a few hours. Having sworn an initial oath a decade or more years previously that's reaffirmed several times a month appears to create only more blatant liars of COPs believing additional opportunities to lose gametes on "valuable patrol time" (and the ability to ever produce them again) would be useful if a frame of one who'd learned nothing from a previous frame for an hash pipe not his own was engineered. It was also apparent that two judges, a similar number of prosecutors, Benita and Brenda all deferred to a COP taking directions from his dick while taxpayers picked up the tab. Amateurs at obfuscation who were neither paragons of virtue nor fountains of wisdom before swearing oaths as COPs, judges or alternatively, taking a "bar exam" (how low?) can call Jenny to get them to light at the end of lives after judging Love illicit, but sex between consenting adults fine as long as no one was framed and taxpayers picked up the tab for everything except the author's, Benita's and Brenda's "wages". So another component of the narrative deals with factual inaccuracies and unaddressed motives revealing the competence, morality and veracity individuals on the pubic (sic) Dole bring to "jobs" as "professional" liars, thieves and protectors of "human lights" (sic). "Helpless" prey posing no risk, eh? Dream on (v).

Christianity curently (2009) has an estimated 2.1 billion followers with fully 1/3 of the world's population subscribing to the notion JC is the one way, but with most adherents born in their faith, few know more than the dogma: "Jesus died on the cross for my sins". How could Christianity's followers know anything about a man purported to have been born, crucified and resurrected nearly 2100 years ago? Subscribers are only repeating what they've been told and/or what they think The Bible says despite illumination and enlightenment explicit between its covers with the word "shine" often employed as a synonym. The letters J and C didn't exist prior to creation of the Latin alphabet with the name Julius Caesar an early example of letters corresponding numerically to 10 and 3 respectively (with "103" Gematria for JC). The class mammalia should be viewed as a single group divided into both male and female "tribes" with unprotected sexual relations between males and females the true one way. Heterosexual carnal knowledge is provided to females by an unprotected male penis' ejaculation of gametes into a vagina, and if an egg is fertilized, offspring may be born owing to one (or more) sperm out of millions fertilizing the ripened follicle the female obtained as an embryo from either her mother or father. Nearly all female mammals are "top predators" given the millions of sperm that ultimately die for each egg fertilized, but if you're reading this, consider yourself a survivor of the previous selection process. In mammals and birds (Aves), both classes exhibit some degree of sexual dimorphism, but role reversal exists in birds where males are the homogametic gender possessing more showy secondary sexual characteristics and being more likely to conduct displays to attract females compared to mammals and particularly humans, where females attract males to obtain genetic factors they have no access to without obtaining gametes from males. In mammals, males are more likely to exhibit polygyny mating with multiple females while among birds, females are more likely to be polyandrous choosing from numerous males conducting displays vying to father their clutch. While it is generally accepted that short of rape, human males can do little more than express an interest in a particular female with the latter choosing from the available pool of males expresing an interest in her, that is not the author's or Bible's perception. Having chosen Benita owing to the cessation of loneliness I knew in her presence indicated to me our meeting was predestined despite Jenny and the courts interference in "matters of the heart". Jenny claiming expertise in areas where he had no training (psychiatric assessments, song rewriting with interpretation of song lyrics and threats facilitated with only a BA in psychology?) present a danger to everyone they come into contact with, but women possessing suitable equipment to take males for gametes require no training whatsoever. With a few lies told under oath that a sexual opportunist like Benita would interpret as Jenny protecting her "reputation" (those lying under oath protect only themselves, unsuccessfully when dealing with The Word), maybe Jenny should have stuck with what he was qualified to do (then again, perhaps he did). Regarding female choice, attached males should consider themselves "out of the running" when presented with sexual opportunities or their link to the SRY is jeopardized (and forfeited). Females thus provide temptation attached males are expected to resist given the master X possesses perfect information, can't be cheated, and like the master Y, isn't keen on perpetuating the genes of liars and/or thieves despite whatever job title or function they claim, oath they've sworn or other "cleaver" (sic) methods they've employed to increase their stature at other's expense. The standards for Truth are higher in science than the (F)arts where it appears any ass can produce sounds the courts find pleasing, particularly if his lies provide yet another day's wages. "Men" whose vows or oaths fail to measure up to "Right!" failed man and won't retain the SRY locus or obtain access to a Y chromosome until playing with Barbies is replaced by bigger and better "thinks" (sic). The Bible passage "male and female created he them" describes the reproductive capacity of male mammals. At puberty the testes of human males are totipotent producing both male (Y) and female (X) gametes that belie the male "wrapper" of their producer. Male mammals have had sole responsiblity for manufacturing both kinds of gametes since the Y chromosome "hijacked" the SRY locus approximately 300 million years ago, although the ancestral human Adam (Y chromosome) is hypothesized to have been conserved in its current state for only 60K years, with the ancestral "Eve" (X chromosome) estimated to have been "fixed" 140K years ago. While the expression "sex cells" exists in the lexicon of nearly all North Americans, only males actually manufacture the latter where it follows by logic alone that all Xx's ever produced originated within the testes of males with female mammal populations growing by X's produced by males donated to haploid x gametes females received from either their mothers or fathers to form all Xx diploid females since the SRY locus came into existence. Furthermore, with only 5% crossover between X and Y chromosomes following fertilization of an oocyte, the two sex chromosomes are nearly separate "houses" with the father's (SRY) "house" (X) having many rooms (X's and Y's) also Truth. Female mammals obtain both their mother's and father's X at their own conception, but only one of the x's obtained is active. The other X is inactivated as a Barr body at approximately the 1000 cell stage of embryological development, but women likely obtain the X and 22 haploid autosomes of every male they have sexual relations with in addition to male diploid epidermal cells sloughed off during "relations" to permit comparisons of germ to somatic cell "libraries". Females are thus potential "collectors" and librarians of X and autosomal information, however, a virgin female having no previous exposure to Y or X gametes is unlikely to know what a Y "does", going so far as being ignorant of whether her active X (or x) came from her father or mother, something every male knows with certainty after having obtained their father's surname. Funnily enough, the X chromosome and 22 singlet autosomes a female mammal provides to any male offspring might just as easily have "come" from her father as mother, except in marsupials such as kangaroos where the "master" or controlling x always belongs to the mother (with the father's X invariably inactivated as a Barr body). Hence, every fertile eutherian male is capable of autonomously producing both X and Y gametes requiring little assistance from a female to achieve reproductive success except the donation of a ripened follicle from one of the embryos her mother or father endowed her at her own conception, with her sole task eating enough in a month (often at male expense) to ripen and provision the follicle so when she gets "lucky", she gets pregnant as well to provide her father's or mother's lineage genetic continuity. The active X (or x) donated to females thus comes from one parent or the other with the Barr body bearing "witness" to the choices the X in control has made and can be thought of as "spirit" given there is no body. Since only a single X is active in mammalian females, human females may have relatively little contribution to reproduction and be more important in identifying and eliminating "cheaters" and thus, the genetic information of males who at one time would get a woman pregnant and leave her with no support, not unlike Nathanial Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Letter" which appears to describe Benita's "choice" of Jenny as her "Champignon" (v).

The Pythagoreans were a Greek magico-mystery cult existing prior to the Roman takeover of Greece with its central tenet the transmigration of souls (not unlike X and Y gametes). They also concerned themselves with mathematics, particularly involving music and geometry by developing both scales and tonal modes in music, with 6 trigonometric identities described with all the latter having 3 letter abbreviations except Sine consisting of 4 letters and defined as Opposite over Hypotenuse, with a "Right!" triangle having a single 90° angle with sides of lengths 3, 4 and 5 units the Pythagorean paradigm. If you're male, females are the side Opposite given the Adjacent is self, but that fails to take into consideration X gametes produced by males every 74 hours and the fact that females produce none whatsover, but have instead been entrusted with embryos by their parents containing an x and 22 other autosomes, of which perhaps 400 ripened haploid follicles will be ovulated during a lifetime, less if the woman has been on the pill. Any sexually-active heterosexual female may accept gamete "donations" from numerous males in her lifetime, however, if she doesn't become pregnant, she may never know the benefits or lie ability (sic) of the males she received them from, although in the long run that information can be inferred by whether she finds someone willing to spend a protracted interval of time with her. In a "perfect" Pythagorean triangle, the Adjacent squared is 9=I, the Opposite squared is 16=P (with the princess being relevant) with G (=7) the difference between Opposite and Adjacent squared (v) making what "G says" relevant as the difference between P and adjacent (the perspective of the male's X) where most males remain blissfully unaware of their X chromosome and permanent attachment to the maternal root. The Hypotenuse squared is 25=Y, the letter traditionally used to signify the male gender (with the difference between Y and P being 9 letters) which can be thought of as the traditional male perspective. Any offspring produced by a successful mating is the "Christ child" if "Christ" is defined simply as "a gene product" based upon the Greek letter Chi (Latin X), and in humans having parental care for two or more decades, a product of Love given the parental investment required to produce a young adult ready to take their place being sacrificed on the altar institutions erect to their own mediocrity and lack of regard for all but their own "members". Alternatively, offspring may choose to swear an oath to conspire with other oath-swearers so cashing-in on the investments others have made in their children, grandchildren (and so on), not to mention investments individuals made in themselves (with attempts to cash-in on nearly everyone excluding their own diminutive circle of sacrosanct family members identifying uniformly selfish motives and intent, characteristics females perfected thousands of years before the Y chromosome reached fixation 60K years ago). God the father is synonymous with vengeance in The Bible with little attention paid to Love's protective function in dealing with vermin no one can subdue, but most Christians put Christ and God into the same trinity, an erroneous assumption because there's only a single SRY locus and it alone determines gender (only begotten son (=Y) is relevant when a complement of daughters (X's) are also produced by male testes), with the "precious blood of Christ" a metaphor for menses. Only females shed the latter and then for only a few days per month and usually for less than 1/2 their lives. Regarding the adaptive significance of sex, for any heterosexual pair in flagrante delicto, a trinity is apparent in the number of X's present with the controlling Y the rationale accepted for why sexual union was achieved (v), or in the case of a man and woman only holding hands, NOT! Both parties should be in agreement and Truth cannot be hidden by either party otherwise a male can lose all he has (good luck on that, eh Jenny? Jen? J?...). For males, 3x chromosomes exist, the x their mother provided them at their own conception which may be their mother's active X, the x she didn't provide where the alternate proviso exists, and the X their father failed to provide since males obtain only their father's Y, but if they have a biological sister, she may have obtained the father's X as her own active X (providing her mother's x was inactivated as a Barr body). The symbol XXX is thus a valid representation for both heterosexual congress and reproduction which explains the 3 crosses of Christian myth and the lyrics "crooked crosses in God's country'" of U2's similarly-titled song. As Danielle revealed, however, double-crossers (xx) exist as well, but unlike females, male mammals obtain no "carnal knowledge" from sexual congress with "the week her sex" (one of Dan's favorite expressions was: "Once a week is enough for any man") with a single betrayal of vows sufficient to transform "the chosen people" into little more than a grudgingly-borne burden, with the only haploid X heterosexual males "know" with certainty being the x and 22 singlet autosomes their mother provided when their father donated her his Y and 22 haploid autosomes. The latter makes Jesus (or G says where the Masonic symbol is relevant) the "one way" given genetic and relational information males provide is all females can know of other X's (or Y). Benita failed to obtain access to my gametes, but did obtain gifts of the heart, none which she viewed equally valuable to showing "Right!" how wrong she could be by "soliciting" the assistance of those accustomed to finding everyone they encountered in a professional capacity wrong to the extent that fabrications offered by a COP as Truth in a court of law were blindly accepted without questioning the motives, intent, acumen or veracity of the information source or the evidence provided by no one. "Employees" of the court and their colleagues alone were "right" owing to "positions" obtained following a sacred oath being sworn despite whatever sordid deeds they'd previously performed "in God's name". Funnily enough, Nietzsche declared "God is dead" and the "sue poor man to be the meaning of the univers(itY)". When oath-swearers go to join Love, I'm sure they'll be handsomely (perhaps "handsome" isn't an ideal word for wearers of lingere employing seduction to maintain attachment to the Y) compensated for all they've done to uphold "Right!". Given wages of $300+ per hour, a value was placed on an hour of "their time" (as lawyers) worth 2 years of my own. I hope for the sake of their soles (Y) they're "Right!" (despite my cheering section revealing at 19 no one was) and productivity approaching 6000 times the author's own has been achieved in their past and will continue to be maintained in the future. The author producing 3 books of 500 pages apiece in his "spare time" is surely something any lawyer can match by writing 18,000 books of similar length, with judges likely capable of greater productivity given higher hourly salaries and God behind them (maybe theys should start looking over their shoulders?). The Tragically Hip's 2002 album titled: "In Violet Light" obtains the intended meaning only when written as: "Inviolate Light" (v) with The Word decrypting the title to "Inviolate Right". As the source of "Right!" knowing repeated violations while observing the rights of others similarly trampled upon by those swearing oaths insure all costs of interference will be charged back to their sources. (B)ankruptcy occurs in locations other than bank accounts.

Jenny who assured Benita Love presented a danger while sex with him and accusing and bearing false witness against The Word represented "the safe road" could result in a female's reproductive tract not only rejecting the genetic information obtained from similar miscreants rather than incorporating it into the 22 autosomes she might provide her sons or daughters (where any x a mother provides her daughter has at least a 50% chance of being inactivated anyway) by mounting an immunological response against any male possessing gametes having a similar genetic configuration, but Paul Simon's "Myth of Fingerprints" got me thinking about there being only a single Y (actually, multiple Y's exist, but there's only a single SRY locus and its possession results in male physiognomy) and methods to employ for testing the hypothesis, an experiment both Benita and Fred inadvertently facilitated. Given the one-way information exchange is accomplished by females taking males for gametes, females may simply be intermediaries so their father's X can link to either the Y or X of her sexual partner if offspring are produced. Thus, the author's "take" on homosexual marriage is that it already occurs if a son obtains an X from his mother that originally belonged to his maternal grandfather. Hence, male mammals producing both X and Y gametes are sex. Females of the species are sex receptors and "librarians" of X and autosomal information with mitochondrial libraries likely being their forte' given the energy reserves available on the tails of sperm, not to mention female association with other flora such as Candita albicans (v). Owing to the evolutionary arms race, vaginas are likely to be scavengers and conservators of sexual products much like spermathecae in social insects as evidenced by differential mortality of X and Y gametes with female reproductive organs serving as a potential battleground. Y gametes expire more rapidly in female reproductive tracts than X gametes with sperm competition turning the reproductive tract of any promiscuous female into a war zone to fertilize a single egg every cycle. If you're male and think you "got lucky" owing to a tryst between the sheets, think again. Females get lucky, male mammals pay the shot to a greater or lesser extent as they've been doing for 300 million years. ATP on the tails of sperm facilitating propulsion towards the largely stationary follicle result in females getting tail(s), males lose tail(s) where ATP propelling the flagella of sperm is the ultimate energy currency of all cells. Females are thus energy and gene parasites of males, and unlike selection occuring at the daughter-cell stage in females, male gametes undergo no similar selection process until their gametes are donated to females who themselves act as agents of selection. If the Pope is God's representative on earth (similar to the "Revolver" I gave Benita being life-threatening to anyone who listened to the 14 songs on the UK version), women are death's representatives by facilitating the demise of nearly all gametes they're provided except in rare cases of pregnancy. The one (sperm) who "dies" on the "cross" (animal and plant breeders are familiar with "crossing" of different phenotypes) is not dead at all but reunited with the "other house" whether it is harbored in an X(x) or Y(x) body making the genome the vehicle of eternal life.

Western civilization is based upon information Roman armies "appropriated" (an euphemism preferable to "stole" in the same way "senior author" sounds less threatening than "parasitic and predatory information freeloaders" and "making love" is preferred to "parasitizing males for genes and energy currency") largely from Ancient Greek and Ptolemaic civilizations. Ptolemy I was one of Alexander the Great's (v) 7 bodyguards appointed Satrap of Egypt in 323 BC and subsequently awarded the title of Soter or saviour, but the cultural information obtained by Roman conquest was secondary to "true" History given the latter is written in DNA, not history books. Similarly, the True Book of Love and life is written in our DNA (v), and contrary to popular opinion, is not a collection of pages smeared with ink, although is certainly symbolized there as well since the precepts found within The Bible reveal a code of conduct designed to make the reader acceptable to God (=Love) as taking music and song lyrics to heart currently does. The written representation in The Bible is a model that has been previously and is currently being used in an inappropriate manner by those presuming to lead while actually serving as little more than parasites or predators of gene products and/or their producers (parasites don't kill their hosts, predators have death or consumption of prey as their intent). Furthermore, human cultural history is based not on numerous creative individuals doing their "own think", but on the logos as the creative "programme" which explains why Leibnitz and Newton simultaneously developed calculus and Thomas Mann wrote "The Magic Mountain" when James Joyce wrote "Finnegan's Wake". The Bible's prohibition against Sin(e) identifies a trigonometric identity the Pythagoreans defined as Opposite over Hypotenuse, and in the human equation where self is the adjacent (3*3=I), is not unlike putting one's spouse or boyfriend/girlfriend (whom you have only a weak genetic relationship to) over the welfare of your own children (with whom you share half your genes), or in my case, putting Fred's and McGill's welfare over that of my children (and children everywhere) by resubmitting my thesis to those who'd already eliminated "I" (and Y=5*5=Truth) from the payoff matrix. The author's compliance to their edicts would have given known parasites a 50% share in my ideas, which proceeding from my 19 experience, was more valuable than anything they could offer, and was light years beyond anything they'd actually delivered in addition to continued access to a 1/2 share in Y (and the SRY locus, where no further access will be permitted to anyone who failed or fucked others in the way I'd been failed or Benita fucked). Tan (+1) resembles Tao or "the way" of Taoism (obtained by simply reversing the "correction for continuity") with the golden rule of placing Opposite over Adjacent where the welfare of others, and women if you're male, is placed over self-interest. Perhaps the founding fathers of the Roman Catholic Church failed to ascertain the importance of trigonometry in understanding human relations to the Greek civilization they appropriated, or perhaps pursuing the Cos function seemed a more lucrative prospect (v). Cos is at the root of "cosT" and is simply the Adjacent or short side placed over the Hypotenuse or longest side which in a triangle having a "Right!" (90Â°) angle, is the sum of squares of Adjacent and Opposite. So defined, the Hypotenuse is what offspring currently represent in the human equation where children (which should be the Y of both parents and the state) support parasites having sworn oaths promising a lack of self-interest will be pursued while placing themselves atop the trophic pyramid with the welfare of All placed beneath their own. The rights of children (and their parents) to know Truth are subservient to the interests of Church, State, or the union of both as represented by the Courts. In Canada an accused individual faces both Queen (v) and the head of the Protestant Church in the "person" of the Archbishop of Canterbury, so ostensibly, nobody can "win" opposing Church and State. As McGill representatives failed to convince the author, the survival of institutions and furtherance of the careers of predators and parasites is more important than the survival of the individual on whom western civilization was based ("man is the measure of all things" is relevant: v) and finding Truth, even if it harms liars, thieves and violent individuals choosing similar duplicitous methods, defines Freedom. Those failing to pay support salaries after promising to do so, obtain signatures from candidates expressing satisfaction with prospective external examiners to comply with their own regulations, observe deadlines set by their own institutional protocol, reply to letters expressing dissatisfaction with vendors of goods and services or deliver anything more than derision following acts of attempted parasitism were what my "examiners" highlighted while implying the author failed to measure "up" to their "standards". Myopia that the author hadn't already been measuring "down" well beyond measurement being possible, desireable or required to situate those apparently incapable of self-examination or correction of the suicidal payoff matrix they'd constructed if proven wrong was the choice every recipient of letters from no one had made by their refusal to reply, with MacKenzie's reply similarly unacceptable as Blown revealed. In addition to the spelling error in my 180 page thesis, Fred also accused the author of "dangling prepositions" in his 10 page report. The "pre-position" was Fred's "3 piece suit" where the cartoon sent revealed Fred would have no "thing" dangling ever again. In his report Fred had consistently misspelled "salmoin" (sic), "sentance" (sic) and even misspelled mispelled (sic), whereas the author's single spelling "error" in 180 pages was "populuation" (sic), where there's only a single "u" in "population" (all other occurences of the word were correct, a deliberate error and "spelling test" designed to identify not only hypocrites, but how low they'd sink) with U rotated 180Â° for those identifying their true crullers (sic). Anyone invalidating a 2 year PDF and providing a woman with a reason to turf her loyal and faithful husband of 17+ years by highlighting a single spelling error when the sentance (sic) and accusation is itself mispelled (sic) and pointing out dangling prepositions (sic) as unacceptable (participles dangle) shouldn't seriously entertain expectations of having any "thing" dangle again. Ever.

The genome and its perpetuation is Truth in an objective sense. Institutions have no part in gene perpetuation where they and their "champignons" like Jenny are little more than a cancer feeding off gene products, not unlike the message conveyed by The Matrix (v). Unlike understanding Pythagoreanism, no instruction manual is required to understand gene products, although insuring they get what they require is a guessing game when they're crying and preverbal. When your own X chromosome is under attack because you have a masking Y and you observe English majors like Benita confuse "Service and Project" with what COPs swore to provide, even readers might get sufficiently disenchanted to dismantle institutions making rules those believing themselves in control had no intentions of following themselves. Any institution making rules and subsequently breaking them so increased opportunities for predation, parasitism or derision can be delivered to others discover "membership" of their person Hell (=Her) secure. Genesis' "Jesus, He Knows Me" appears to convey a duplicitous message, but its video showing Freemasonry logo indicates trigonometry key to understanding the message. Every male has a girl "friend" (his own X originally belonging to either his maternal grandfather or grandmother) provided to him by his mother at his own conception, and Y. The Y was obtained by receiving the SRY locus and 18 other distinct genes not residing on the X or any of 22 other haploid autosomal chromosomes obtained from his mother, with the Y previously belonging to his father, grandfather, great grandfather and so it goes. There is thus a single shared Y, and in a biological sense, the Y represents All because its possession facilitates production of both X and Y gametes so when an x follicle is fertilized, construction of either the alpha and Yx "house" or beta and Xx "house" is facilitated, with the maternal x represented as the "little house" (whereas the father's "house" is the origin of all X's, and Y's, can and should be represented as upper case). Furthermore, the ability of the Y to self-repair makes it wholly autonomous and indivisible making the "50% credit" the U wanted to obtain credit for the 180 pages the author produced, something else instead (Î©=Omega, where mega (<Gk=KK) indicates resistance to providing similar violent rat-bastards any share in Y whatsoever). Genesis' video also reveals a new verse, Genesis 3:25. The last verse of Chapter 3 in The Bible was Genesis 3:24 (3x chromosomes) where the allegorical flaming sword (19+Word) of enlightenment blocking access to the tree of eternal life would appear to be an impediment no longer. Maybe Sting (Gordon Sumner) was responsible for gaining access? Then again, maybe no one valued at 5¢/hr receiving assault as "training" and a steady diet of lies while seeking objective Truth was responsible for the logos a generation's Gnosis is based upon was the "culprit"? If acquaintance with both X and Y "houses" are available to males by sharing the attributes of a father's Y and mother's x (in addition to 22 autosomal chromosome pairs), "Christ" or "cosmic consicousness" represents a mutation event since prior to illumination, the same genotype existed. Following illumination, the SRY locus becomes "active" joining Y to X and potentially, the Y of other males and x's of females, although I prefer children and youth for whom Love is All that matters, gender identification and ego either fail to exist or are not as rigidly defined as with most adults, and given Benita's and Danielle's demonstrations of wisdom, gender and sex is unknown or not employed as a bargaining chip to gain the cooperation of liars proving themselves deficient in moral fibre and any sense of "Right!". The latter may explain Michael Jackson's "preference" for children where anyone accusing Michael of impure motives failing to measure up to "Right!" given Michael was provided similar condemnation as no one received (for having sexual designs). If the reader wants to believe the worst of the author or Michael for preferring children to greedy and unprincipled "adults" stealing time and resources while uniformly providing abuse to all they encounter except their sacrosanct family members (when only a single family exists), or alternatively obtain cheap thrills or ascension at other's expense while stealing gametes, measuring up to 90° involves receiving assault, 5¢/hr wages for 5 years and walking away from two concurrent 17 year investments without regrets so liars and thieves can be properly dressed down (to day-of-the-weak under where?) and children protected from similar abuse at the hands of miscreants. Take a chance if you're sure you've got "no thing" to lose, and like Jenny, Fred, Titman and Brown, you want to perpetuate "A" die nasty (sic). Arthur C. Clarke's "Childhood's End" is relevant (v). Only Love is important. That is Wisdom and all else is vanity. Hence the Y can be thought of as the "bridegroom" every x is ultimately "married" to (given there's only one SRY and a single family) and for whom every Y has the potential to be a brother (or bother) given X and Y were "joined" in the "flash" of illumination. The Bible suggests becoming "knew" in Jesus Christ is actually a mutation of sorts and represents "salvation". But what is actually "saved" is the internal dialogue of the logos with the Gnosis present in music, art and literature corresponding to a synoptic "story" so music critics, like judges, can receive exorbitant salaries (compared to "a living wage" of $150 per year) to provide "priceless opinions" upon "really crappy songs with really crappy lyrics" (earning their posessors the "right" to "buy those products everybody has to buy neWay" given a 50:50 sex ratio must be complied with despite 50% of the population sharing only a single Y). Besides geometry and mathematics (where the Greek alphabet was based upon 24 letters correspondng to the letter X or Chi of the Latin alphabet, with "prisoners" of Jesus Christ relevant given both males and females possess a single active "x" chromosome), the Pythagoreans developed music with 12 notes currently existing in the chromatic scale. There were 12 apostles. The 13th note "betrays" the root and is a doubling of root frequency. Coincidence or design? Thus, another part of the narrative examines how and why Judass (sic) betrayed The Way, Truth and Life and the penalty incurred for bearing false witness against the measure while lies and subterfuge were used to "trick" the treasure (v), providing Benita was actually "tricked" and simply not bereft of any sense of "Right!" as Jenny revealed of his own x (where B, her family and friends may have to rely on Jenny's truth and "right" to get them into their next "string"). I'd obtained a roommate named Jason and when I'd asked him what he thought about Love, thinking about my feelings for Benita prior to being arrested for breach of the probabation order for writing and delivering her a copy of "6 is 9" he replied: "I like women with big boobs". It was something I felt any woman Jason was romantically involved with could bank on. Jason had been "bonking" the wife of a blind guy in the apartment complex where we lived when I was arrested by Constable Upton of the VPD for delivering Benita my keyboard sequenced to play "Piano Man" (given the 88th and 88th site of my enlightenment), a softcover version of 6 is 9 (given the discovery of 333 in Rocky Raccoon, hence 666 was actually 999), a loaf of fruitbread I'd baked (v) where the expression "nutty as a fruitcake" is relevant, the fruitbread contained no nuts, a deck of St. Jacques playing cards having the jack of diamonds and clubs as the one-eyed jacks (v) instead of hearts and spades (where Benita's "choice" was a well-heeled COP who couldn't avoid fucking-up and thus, diamonds and clubs), and 2 joints, only 1 of which was presented as evidence in the case described in Ruse of 911. Besides going to jail 3 times based on Jenny's incite (sic) with Benita's support, somebody obtained a 50% "share" in what the author's generosity provided, but had no qualms about seeing the donor prosecuted. NORML but far from humane behaviour from where I stand (and 999=III do, 27="å" in a 26 letter alphabet). If Upton supported Jenny's right to bear false witness or was cognizant of Jenny's sexual involvement with Benita, he'll join Jenny in the (P)ark (v). As for Jason, losing gametes to a woman having behavior more deviant than his own wasn't likely, but as neither appeared to have any conception of "Right!", situating them both at their appropriate levels won't be difficult.

The author also examines how the Church using baptismal sacraments as a placebo for de facto illumination and Holy communion (or Eucharist, note elimination of "a" yields Euchrist, Eu < Latin=true) as a metaphor for sex has perpetuated religious wars and Christian intolerance for other belief systems that have evolved on the planet. All religions I studied following my own illumination had the experience of enlightenment at their core except Christianity, where in the latter, the experience of enlightenment is personified in "the man" Jesus Christ, a male born of a virgin. Taken literally, it would mean Christ received no Y chromosome from Joseph or any other male and therefore was either female (Chi=x, XMAS is relevant, hence Same X) or an entity requiring an allegorical or anagogical interpretation. Female mammals can be cloned (v) but lack a Y chromosome to donate to their offspring and if a female does possess the SRY locus (via translocation), development without ovaries is accompanied by "her" inability to become pregnant except by implantation of a fertilized embryo from a donor (requiring in-vitro fertilization, not available 2100 years ago). Evidence for Jesus Christ as an historical figure or biological entity is therefore sketchy, whereas a good deal of evidence exists that other illuminated individuals had lives resulting in religions being founded. I don't think additional religions are required on planet earth given the affiliation of so-called "doctors" at Mac with the RCC and the belief the Pope(ye) permitting Romantic (sic) Catholic "bothers" (sic) to prematurely introduce children to homosexuality without reprimand from the Holy see, would condone their own minor indiscretions of killing wages, assault, lies, theft of intellectual properties and incarceration of anyone sufficiently "crazy" to protest the former perquisites. The Pope is reputedly vicar of Christ and thus, a surrogate till the real think (sic) comes along. Everyone should be free to believe whatever they want, but with that Freedom goes the proviso their beliefs don't have negative consequences for others. If you claim you're right to be wrong (as so many have in their interactions with no one), measuring up to objective "Right!" (90) is required (and impossible to achieve, there's only a single SRY locus and that is the "sole" of man). If you're male the penalty for accusing the SRY of failing to "measure up" to your own "right" is permanent loss of any share whatsoever in the SRY, with all the trappings of the world including women and children also created by the XY pair. The offspring of all species and the process by which they come into being should be viewed as sacred (since they reflect our own origins), but particularly the offspring of human beings and it is for them that "Right!" exists until mankind once again descends into the darkness created by liars, thieves and violent men with no one to stand against them. Nonetheless, I remain hopeful changes affected in the past 50 will last another 2100 years. Until then, Truth is what All require with the certainty that a single family exists irrespective of gender, race, color, class or creed providing "Right!" is done the take-home message. Failure to "get" the message results in a similarly enlightened view as held by women believing males have nothing better to do with their time, money or gametes than go to jail because they'd "still want it" while the gametes of an endless supply of liars are deposited on feminine hygeine products, enter condoms or sewage systems worldwide, a view not departing significantly from the idea that wages of 5¢/hr and assault are learning experiences worth paying tuition or taxes so transfer payments can be made available to institutions of hire (sic) learning accompanied with unbridled faith those at the Hell-M (sic) will distribute those payments equitably and exhibit prudent use of taxpayer resources. Males "wanting" to share their gametes and perspectives with women they Love is an act of selflessness, which is a largely thankless task not worth the investment of 17 seconds of "my time" so Benita could obtain additional sociopath genes to share with her equally clever sisters, much less two concurrent investments of 17 years. It only follows anyone who protests having tuition fees buy assault and lies must be crazy or alternately, oath-swearing police, judges, politicians and doctors demonstrating selfish motives and lack of familiarity with the road no one travelled made them unworthy of any share whatsoever in either Y-based genetic information or Gnosis. As for Christianity, the monarchy of Ferdinand and Isabella financing Columbus' explorations also brought Western Europe the Spanish Inquisition persisting another 356 years after its inception. New converts to Christianity from Judaism and Islam persecuted by The Church under orders from the Spanish aristocracy led indirectly to the Protestant reformation, but primarily so Henry VIII could obtain a divorce from Ferdinand and Isabella's daughter Catherine of Aragon after permission for his divorce was denied by Pope Clement VII. Catherine was unable to produce a male heir so Henry formed the Church of England to obtain his divorce and marry Anne Boleyn who subsequently gave birth to Elizabeth I. Anne Boleyn was executed under Henry's orders on charges of witchcraft 3 years after Elizabeth's birth, although Elizabeth "the virgin queen" whose bedroom conquests were undoubtedly equally successful to the military campaigns she undertook, further refined the Anglican Church. The Bible brought to America on The Mayflower was The Geneva Bible, also the version preferred by Shakespere over The King James Bible on which The Church of England was and continues to be based. The short but illustrious history of the Reformation instituted by the British monarchy is no more ill-lustrous (sic) than the history of the Roman Catholic Church (RCC). Joseph Campbell wrote in The Power of Myth: "You know, it's very interesting to think of the history of Christianity. During the first five centuries, there were lots of Christianities, lots of ways of being Christian. And then, in the period of Theodosius in the fourth century, the only religion allowed in the Roman Empire was the Christian religion, and the only form of Christianity allowed in the Roman Empire was the Christianity of Byzantium's throne" (another early example of Nationalism). The latter drove sects familiar with the logos and enlightenment into hiding owing to Roman persecution once doctrines regarding God, Jesus and the Holy Ghost came under absolute control of the state. While the Protestant Reformation failed to result in greater regard for Truth than the Church Roman Emperor Constantine founded with identical sacraments retained so existing biological processes could be replaced by metaphors devoid of meaning to parishioners, Christian intolerance for other faiths resulted in warfare (the Crusades) following formation of the Roman Church despite mankind being a single species with a common library of DNA shared between different races having a common blood. Unlike birds, mammalian blood cells have no nuclei with human females spilling blood for all mankind after possessing the hubris to deliver their makers into judgment (with all Xx's ultimately coming into existence via the XY pair who sacrifice millions of gametes for a single egg to be fertilized). Mammal populations grow by the addition of new x's, and while "recruiting" xy pairs whose x's require a "refresher" on the "joy" children bring to pushy individuals so they might "enjoy" pushing out something worthwhile, predatory and parasitic bastards deserve (to) know less (sic). To those for whom "justice" is synonymous with protecting the rights of liars to perjure testimony and bear false witness under oath so those accused of Malus are found guilty so Truth remains hidden and is declared "not relevant" is the "sweetest thing", eternal vengeance has obviously been underrated. For those preferring lies and killing to Truth, payment for reaping gametes can be obtained if mercenary intent is taken to its logical extreme but expectations of ever posessing more than an open yoni given no verifiability to recommend COPs or court jesters for "membership" in the "heir club for men" should be permanently cur tailed (sic). Even non-mammalian species exhibit genetic homology in the production of critical enzymes and losing a relationship to the class Mammalia is a distinct possibility for abuse of "Right!" where "children" were involved. (anyone innocent of guile is considered by the author to be an eternal child).

The Christian Church obscuring Truth so profit motives were obtained has promoted the manipulation of parishioners who continue paying for symbols representing biological processes (sex and reproduction) that will continue unabated whether The Church survives or not. Lennon in a 1966 interview with British journalist Maureen Cleave said: "Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue that; I'm right and I will be proved right. We're more popular than G says now." Perhaps I'm an hedonist, but I'd prefer worshipping in the "church" everyone emerges from: the vestibule of a woman's reproductive tract, giving communion the traditional way too: "Here is my body (Y sperm) and here is my blood (X sperm)" amid passionate kisses, but at this stage in my life, only with a single woman given that I believe myself "linked" to a sufficient number of X's who know I Love them as I do Cleopatra given a solopsist perspective on the ultimate function of illumination, the creation of Love and Life. Gamete exchange represents Love and therefore God to most people until they have children following which, protecting gene products from liars, thieves and violent bastards is All they know and all it's necessary to know of God (=Love). Steve Winwood wrote and recorded "Higher Love", but it seems certain Winwood wasn't referring to the "hire love" Benita witnessed Jenny pass off under oath (and elsewhere) with his "I was very concerned" bullshit. Jenny's "concern" was that he perceive a return to occur on the "just about every day" visits Benita boasted of that taxpayers footed the bill for. Perjury is a sure ticket off the SRY and onto the sly (Xx) for those swearing oaths when false-witness is borne against "Right!". The latter would have secured Jenny and his lineage eternal reprisals were Benita not involved. Her involvement raised the stakes well beyond perennial repercussions for Jenny alone, but all swearing oaths as a condition of employment given oaths are like vows and sworn only by choice by functionaries presuming they'd "show me the Way(Ne)". As for Jenny successfully convincing Benita their pelvic affiliation would go undiscovered, Jenny's "brother constable" having no Y chromosome to recommend Winson-Jones for "membership" in my brotherhood (with Jenny's own "membership" like Fred's revoked in perpetuity) will result in Jenny being fortunate to join her sisterhood to escape being "doctored" in a Christian Barnyard (sic). I suspect with the manipulation Benita received by the courts and their loyal affiliates, most women would prefer maintaining a relationship with a loving husband (YX chromosome pair with 22 paired autosomes she obtains full and exclusive access to) than an impersonal Queen as head of state with minions claiming an affiliation with God (=Love) gladly sacrificing anyone's precious gene products (and their oaths) to further the aims of a state doing its thinking with a common head situated in a COP's boxer shorts. While "brief" may describe Benita's vague attraction to Jenny (v), her Majesty's loyal oath-swearing representatives shouldn't entertain expectations of obtaining further access to the SRY locus and a Y chromosome or standing for natural bodily functions except walking (or running from amorous 4-footed suitors). A woman's husband and children should represent Love (=God) when both state and church have demonstrated over 2100 years neither gives a good goddamn about the gene products she and her mate bring into the world except as their own fortunes and perpetuation are affected (selfless thieves whose oaths to Love prove worthless gain access to Y one star at a time). Women are the more malleable gender having no endogenous Y nor apparent sense of "Right!". Simply following whichever way the wind blows to obtain the greatest short-term payoff (with costs of providing sexual access actually being benefits) shouldn't leave males any faith in "mother nature" whatsoever (v). The Y chromosome is itself the question to every answer with the male gender being responsible for production of everything on this planet that women covet, including women themselves. For women, only one important question exists and if it fails to contain the word Love and the name of another person (whether male or female), it was the wrong question.

The Truth that the logos is connected to Gnosis with the related SRY locus "hijacking" both X and Y chrmosomes explains why two separate "stories" exist in The Bible. One is of the sons of God (=Love) and the other pertains to the daughters of men (where dot here is equivalent to periods), however in the "synoptic" gospels, the genealogies of Matthew and Luke disagree, while genealogies are something Mark doesn't go into at all. Matthew deals with children born of a father's will, Luke with sons born of illumination because no direct genetic relationship is required for the logos to be propogated (where ideological similarities appear more relevant than so-called "blood" kinship). But in the beginning everyone was related anyway which describes Mark's perspective. If you're reading this (or have simply lived on this planet in the past 300 million years), you're connected to the beginning of Life by an unbroken chain of gene products whose X (if you're female) or Y gamete (if you're male) "died" on the "cross" (from the testes to ovum) where it should be obvious how two become one to result in genetic continuity. Similarly, the Old Testament is the testament of the light (Moses=90), with the New Testament the perspective of those who "knew" the light and are carriers of Gnosis. Precious few Church fathers when the Christian Church was founded were likely to have any familiarity with illumination while Gnostics familiar with the logos who did were either killed or driven into exile. Ten Thous and Maniacs (artistic license), Manic Street Preachers, The Jesus And Mary Chain and other artists too numerous to include in 1500 pages of text provide a synoptic story whether classified by critics as rock, heavy met dull (sic), cunt tree (sic) or gospel(l) to provide those who've fulfilled oaths (impossible over a career), promises (in a lifetime?), vows (possibly, I did for 18 years prior to my "run" being preempted by a Jewish wife "knowing" more than her husband despite her only exposure to non-parental X and Y factors "coming" from males believing they'd gotten "lucky" by having their gametes parasitized by Danielle and her maternal lineage) and obeyed The Ten Commandments (virtually impossible, hence The Word) with affirmations "Get A Yawn's Bible" (Rocky Raccoon) wasn't the sleeper critics have dismissed, ignored, or interpreted with literal fanaticism. The Bible's arcana, like the lyrics of rock 'n roll, were both written so an enlightened man might escape judgment by the descendents of Roman boors continuing to pass off lies and/or pervert Truth so profits or other perquisites could be obtained. Never underestimate the capacity of human beings to inflict suffering upon their own kind or find justification for why wrong behavior they've exhibited was actually "right". Making unsubstantiated accusations (v), legitimizing theft, bearing false witness and presuming to judge others guilty of crimes accusers and judges were themselves guilty of are the uses The Bible has been put to in the past 2100 years despite promises of enlightenment and thre promise of objective Truth existing between its covers. Predators and parasites feigning concern who'd presume to rule on Truth (v) claiming a special affiliation with God (=Love) after legitimacy has been provided by an oath sworn on a prop professional oath-swearers were unlikely to have read, weren't intended to understand (Gnosis is experiential and The Bible is only an open book to the illuminated) and something they'd never have sworn upon had they read between the lines to ascertain penalties for failing to execute oaths with perfection is the ultimate irony given judges and politicians were generally lawyers before assuming what they've been foolish enough to believe are elevated stations. Any contract not read by someone who signs, affixes their mark or swears they'll observe its precepts is no less binding than one entered into with full knowledge. Oaths are anathema. Professional oath-swearers convicted themselves of failing to measure up to the "standards" hubris would lead Benita and Jenny to accuse regarding the "danger" no one presented so liars who'd sworn oaths prior to carrying out similar servicing and projection as Jenny demonstrated were brought to judgment themselves ("no one should judge"). Only the logos knows objective Truth (all Life is connected) and that obeying any oath sworn entails measuring up to "Right!" when accusations were made that the logos responsible for Gnosis failed to measure up to "standards" maintained by parasites and predators of taxpayers' children. No one measures down. Satan ("as way") won't serve "men" because women and children require protection from so-called "men" as Benita demonstrated by her headstrong and forthright actions by delivering both herself and no one into the hands of a snake for whom neither my nor Benita's life, happiness, or the investments of our parents, grandparents (and so on) were equally important to Jenny as "getting his rocks off" on the taxpayer's shekel. Jenny's claim he was providing Benita "protection" while bearing false-witness and lying repeatedly under oath to hide his sexual involvement with her before the courts (provided the "men" of the courts were unaware of their mutual involvement and not simply willing to dismiss Jenny's perjury in a "boys will be boys" fashion and conclusively seal their fates) made the caution "Be careful what you wish for" something no one wanting to do "What's Right!" is willing and Abel (sic) to oblige Jenny and his oath-swearing allies (so all get their rocks off permanently). The logos was made a priest forever, not until age 65 or a million dollar severance package is provided, or until death. Those who'd interfere with the dreams of children and youth as my own investments were compromised will be lucky if suckling piglets is in their cards on their return (v). Because life can never end for the SRY locus, it never ends for its products. One of the pleasures no one has obtained since enlightenment at 19 is turning the tables on petty bastards demonstrating a willingness to judge or enjoy judgment by proxy as Benita substantiated with vague accusations, confused recollections and false-witness provided by an Ass so another day's mort gauge (sic*2) payment could be secured by functionaries present (with the "gauge" already well-beyond its limit and "mort" alone remaining to "professional" oath-swearers). The greeting card I'd given Benita prior to Hallowe'en entered as Exhibit 3 in the chapter titled "Dole" of 6 is 9 showed Miss Piggy and Kermit on its cover with the verse: "Just think, once we were perfect strangers and then we met". The inside of the card read: "Now What?". My inscription to whoever read the message was: "Truly no one in particular, the next move is yours my friend (v)." Judge(D) Smith permitted the card to be introduced as Exhibit 3 in Case 59275 with AC information sworn by Jenny having CD's for rebuttal (v). Lawyers referring to one other as "my friend" with yours truly "the outsider" considered unworthy of "membership" in the elite prosecutors sought appointment to as judges with the swearing of an oath promising to "seek Truth" was inter resting (sic*2) given a COP "planting" evidence expecting he wouldn't get "plant ed" himself. Jenny's description of a female COP as "brother constable" in juxtaposition to "my friend" of the greeting card is relevant. She and Benita were likely the only two of their little "family" cognizant of the meaning the author attached to the phrase. Women are not my "brothers" and until I receive genetic information from a woman other than my own mother, never will be. Any male considering women "brothers" was, is and will always be a wasted share in a Y chromosome and until they've had a child, have no verifiability or accountability to recommend them as gamete donors, only recipients. Deep Purple's "Perfect Strangers" was released in 1984. Readers may also recall who 1984 is associated with (v), or perhaps the name of Janis Joplin's band (v).

In the 15 years since the failure of my thesis, it seemed I'd finally relinquished responsibility to my cheering section on the other side by finding an actual physical location named Omega in the city of my enlightenment. Having seemingly reached the end of my road as aleph or alpha I'd adopted at 19, I thought seriously about quitting my job as a mobile aquarium service technician where I'd worked for the past 7 months. Despite earning "a living wage", Christmas left me with only $200 in my "bank account" (removing the equivalent of more than a year of PhD wages per anum for "serve vice" (sic*2) charges) before any presents had been purchased. I was using my own vehicle for work use and some days drove more than 100 km/day while only getting reimbursed for gas and personally bearing all insurance, liability and vehicle repair and maintenance costs. A breakdown or accident on the snowy streets would've put me out of work or worse (although I'd ascertained the owners would loan me money to get my vehicle back on the road as they had for other techs so I could continue to make anywhere from $400-600/day profit for them following payment of my up to $105/day pre-tax salary). Unlike McGill, the company I'd worked for paid 10-15% of what they billed for an hour of my labor, but it really wasn't much different than receiving 1% of $75K for 5 years work given that I'd never get ahead. The company had adopted a triangular logo, the symbol Newton used in calculus to denote change, yet I'd been "told" years previously I had to invert the pyramid at the time I'd produced the blue jet. When it became obvious my schedule the first day back following Christmas and Boxing Day would require me to work 9 hours plus travel time so the company's clients weren't shorted for hours they'd be billed given a minimum of 1 hour was charged regardless of whether a full 60 minutes were spent in maintenence, I had a difficult decision to make. Who'd get shorted, the clients or the owners who'd provided me only sufficient wages so $200 remained prior to Christmas, who'd doubltless provide me a similar Christmas the following year? I liked most of the company's clients more than the owners and manager who'd provided me the grueling schedule that was my dilemma. After writing and delivering my letter of resignation providing what I thought were 8 good reasons for giving the company's other technicians and clients the benefit of doubt (the reputed "Christian" owners and manager weren't as lucky), I figured I'd call Benita on her birthday to celebrate my decision and tell her there wasn't a single day in the past 15 years that I hadn't thought of her. I had the intention of explaining the relevance of the dedication to "nothing" I'd written in the copy of 6 is 9 Benita chose to leave behind for the courts to dispose of along with the deck of playing cards, loaf of fruitbread (>Fr=pain) and 2 joints when the book was delivered while briefly leaving my keyboard sequenced to play "Piano Man", but all I could say when she was on the line was "I'll always Love you". She hung up and when I called back seconds later, she was sobbing and hung up again. A few weeks later I had a rare dream. Normally I go to sleep with the formerly vivid dreams I once had now replaced by blackness with no memory of anything until morning (v), but in this dream Benita was talking at a rapid pace and just as I was waking, I told her I Loved her again. And then as I fully awoke thinking about what my heart spoke, I got angry at myself. Benita had played me for a fool to obtain gametes from a COP who perjured his testimony, bore false witness and claimed Love crazy with Danielle and Blown providing precedents lending his "psychiatric assessment" creedence despite his completion of only a Psych BA. She'd participated in sending me to jail 3 times, and whether Jenny had duped her into believing the "Revolver" tape I'd given her was a "gun" and she'd received a suicide invitation or lied under oath herself, was equally guilty of malice. Through her collusion with Brenda providing "moral support" so sexual involvement with Jenny remained hidden before the courts (provided it did), no one was framed so Love (=God) and giving gifts at Christmas could be declared illicit (so much for the oaths of liars proving themselves equally stupid fucks as the women they "married" sharing their status and gametes). The presiding Provincial Court judge using The Bible to lend creedence to sham proceedings with all involved too cocky to heed the warning no one provided Clown Prosecutor Ruse of the precedent set in AC59275 by "truly no one in particular" claimed on the greeting card that became "Exhibit 3" I'd given Benita prior to Jenny's Hallowe'en "trick or treat" meant nothing to him (someone else who can bemoan never having learned to read). Another useR. After the copy of 6 is 9 had been delivered and no one was returned to court to answer for breaching the probation order, another order was signed with the "aka nobody". When the Justice of the Peace who had me sign the order asked why I used the alias. I replied "Nobody's perfect". She said "I wish it were true". Be careful what you wish for....

I called Benita again on the night of a lunar eclipse a couple months later to clear the air once and for all. I told her answering machine that while I hadn't been "mutually commited" after relinquishing any further relationships (with gamete and energy parasites such as herself or any other women on the planet) since my marriage had dissolved 15 years earlier, no one in court truly cared about her and despite everyone present but the author, she and Brenda making a tidy profit impugning the author's motives and sanity, no one was there because of Love. I mentioned Sara Bareilles owing not only to her reference to a guy at a liquor store in "Fairytale", but the circumstances of "Love Song" including the old piano in the video resembling the one I'd played for her in hospital, telling Beni that she could opt for the latter and the story Jewel had written or stay with "Torn" by Natalie Imbruglia as she had in the past (v). At present everyone (in my cheering section) seemed to prefer a Love Song and Love Story to one of betrayal and eternal reprisals, with my refusal to be judged by her, Jenny or representatives of the courts apparent in the message delivered by no one on the greeting card given to her 15 years previously. When I'd lost contact with her after she'd moved from 3575 Mayfair with the assistance of "arrival mail", it had taken some time for me to see she'd moved to an old apartment on 11th Street across from the house on Louellen Street (actually an alley between 11th and 12th Street running between 4th and 6th Avenue) where I'd played old rock n' roll covers in the basement with Marty (the drummer) and a couple other guys at least once a week for over two years before us moving to a new location a few blocks away. I told her I'd seen her a couple times outside her apartment but hadn't contacted her because "the time wasn't right", but a change of circumstances occurred (discovery that Omega corresponded to an actual physical location in the city of my birth, an office furniture company I did aquarium maintenance for who were unhappy with brown star polyp in their tank, my manager told me to take the live rock from their tank and transfer it to the tank of another client's thereby ordering "Right!" to do wrong so future profits could be obtained) and after 19 and 38 years of carrying the world on my shoulders, I was finally able to discharge my responsibilities to the "other side". I'd told her I'd seen she'd painted the living room of her second story suite the colour red and remarked it was coincidental that after giving my Queen size bed and green paisley bedsheets to Marty prior to leaving Surrey for Edmonton, he'd given me a set of sheets for a double bed that were a similar shade of red. I reminded her that she'd told me after what I'd written to her, she'd never be able to forgive me and remarked that I thought it odd she thought forgiveness was hers to grant given her actions and their impact. It was too much like Lose i.e. who believed other's actions and their repercussions on my life were more benign than the letters, poem and cartoon I'd sent those at McGill and Mac. I told her that forgiveness was something we all had to grant (otherwise those wronging us wouldn't gain opportunities to soil the crotches of panties every month and ask insightful questions like: "Why are similar products advertised if everyone has to buy them neWay" : t). Whether Benita chose to attack no one repeatedly based on the ass sent (sic) of a horny COP she appeared too naive to protect herself from or whether she was similarly malicious was irrelevant given no one was "Right!" by definition making her actions wrong for numerous reasons, not the least of which was my treatment of her (and Brenda) with generosity, kndness and respect they repeatedly failed to reciprocate (v) or demonstrate themselves to deserve. I told her answering machine that she'd proven she couldn't be trusted not owing only to the "anything else" she'd "shared" with Jenny, but because she'd gone before the courts claiming the author "dangerous" after distributing what was written to her in confidence to everyone present in court, something neither she nor they (not unlike my former PhD examining committee) had the acumen or background to consider. Jenny either frightened her sufficiently to obtain sexual access, or had her full cooperation in the Ruse with Clown Protitute or (sic) Dole accusing the author of attempting to accomplish what Jenny himself achieved not sitting too well, where the Clowns representatives will be carrying out at least two functions males have traditionally performed standing by either sitting or squatting if they even suspected Jenny's "success" in losing gametes at taxpayer expense was achieved at the cost of no one's "good name". Similarly, if the "men" of the courts sitting in judgment knew or suspected Jenny's and Benita's accusations and a portion of their paycheques were obtained owing to a pelvic affiliation they'd developed on his self-described "valuable patrol time", they were equally guilty of bilking taxpayers and engineering an attempted frame of yours truly (who at 19 was provided the identity of no one after "nobody" had already been revealed). I told her machine if the courts hadn't probed her and Jenny sufficiently to discover their affiliation, they were neither capble nor interested in discernning Truth and simply covetous of another meal ticket obtained at taxpayer expense and the author's lifetime of investments (with no one present having as much to lose or invested as the author). In either case, they weren't "men" for whom Truth is equally sacred as Love and failed to differ from women obtaining a free "Right! at my expense. I also related I viewed her admission of "affairs with married men" sleasy, recounting my 18+ years of fidelity with Danielle as my standard and relating that any woman I'd consider as a wife would have to be capable of similar exclusivity and trust. If she couldn't meet that standard, she couldn't be with me (or anyone else in my cheering section). Whether all she deserved from life was sharing the gametes and ideologies of a lying piece of crap like Jenny with other women in his "stable" (v) or NOT, she'd demonstrated no difficulties in adopting Jenny's view that assault, 5¢/hr wages and loss of children to an unfaithful wife were what the author deserved in contrast to the loyalty she provided Jenny for his magical transformation of a tape to a rape (providing she was averse to obtaing gametes from someone who'd lied to her given that liars usually lie to everyone and no one obtains "special treatment"). I also told her machine that while there were 3 crosses when JC was crucified, when the stone was rolled from the cave he was laid to rest in, "no one was found" to finally close the subject of the greeting card inscription, but also lay the Christian myth to rest once and for all as an allegorical reference to sex and reproduction. I explained that in any intimate encounter between heterosexuals, there are 3x's and a single Y present. If the reason they're together isn't Love, it's no place for children. I left her an "out" by not blaming her for "that Revolver" being transformed into "that gun" in Jenny's "Execiitive (sic) Summary" and her testimony where the "revolver" became a suicide invitation, then noted the temporal anomalies and "coincidental" nouns similar to those of roCai RaKuhn on the Revolver album. Benita's expectation that "Right!" would back down after encountering opponents barely capable of using point dead styx (sic) to write their names in the dirt they'd dealt others for years providing cash or losing gametes were obtained in exchange for oaths sworn might have been a disappointment to her, but so too are fairytales having endings created by women unequivocally demonstrating malev(i)olence and homocidal ideation. I also related the persistence of 3's in other videos, for example, Alanis Morisette's "Ironic" shows 3 Alanis' driving in a car on a snowy day where each interacted with the other. William Shatner's rendition of "Rocket Man" employed 3 symbology as well where the lyrics of the song fit the circumstances of my illumintion, but again, there's not too much of the current and past lyrical or video lexicon the author is unable to view as reflections of his own thoughts and/or experiences relating all the way back to 19 (=90) and prior. I further related that I wanted to teach her more regarding what she's been Miss sing but all my classes are "101", taken from Alanis' "So(w) Pure" video and I wanted her as a new student and my only pupil. I've always Loved Alanis so related the title of her latest album to my previously alleged heroine habit. I also modified a line from Alanis' "Ironic" that seemed appropriate regarding "10,000 spoons when all you need is a knife" by changing "knife" to "wife", and it was certainy true. There is a nearly inexhaustible supply of women who'd likely assent to providing me "opportunities" to provide their "poon" my genetic capital, and despite still Loving Benita, she'd be acceptable in my eyes only if she was capable of fidelity. If she couldn't meet my standard for myself, I wouldn't be interested in her, or indeed any woman given the tendency of most members of "the weaker sex" to practice "serial monogamy" with the serial aspect defined by themselves alone (all women ultimately control). Few women appear interested in "mating for life". Death is much more interesting with many single women having only one male making "night deposits" in a single 28.3 day cycle, while others prefer fully-blown warfare between the gametes of as many males as can be accomodated, something Benita appeared to lean towards. I also told her if she did decide in the affirmative, I wasn't interested in some disposable plastic knife, but one that was always sharp and would last the remainder of my life, even if I was sometimes cut (as she'd intentionally cut me repeatedly in the past). I told her the test males are put to is True Love, or alternatively, who will sell out and for what. Passing every test means making peace with everyone having benevolent intent towards others, but similarly, excluding those willing to settle for and/or deliver others less than Love, mutual respect and what has been promised where Jenny and his all lies (sic) will rely on Jenny's "right?" to reestablish a foothold on the human genome given their preference for Jenny's and their own truth (=lies). I knew Benita was The One, but her rejection of me, my gifts and acceptance of the doctrine of liars swearing oaths and/or vows they'd reneged upon years previously with no apology forthcoming from her left me resigned she and I would never be more than eternal adversaries until my desire for self-preservation overcame my Love for her, and of course, her "sisters" possessing similar hubris. I also told her she'd always be "in the music", although like those at Mac, she's unlikely to appreciate how she's portrayed. But at least it isn't my portrait of her, but her true reflection perceived by numerous minds cognizant of choices she'd made. I also referred to her eye colour again, this time with Elton John's 60th birthday concert showing a video montage of a woman's green eyes while Beni and the Jeds (sic*2) followed by "Empty Garden", a song Elton only plays at Madison Square Garden given it was reputedly written for John Lennon since no one can ever take his place. While I'd referred to her in the past as "baby", only the XY pair makes babies, Xx's appear to excel only in rabies (Love is crazy but endless lies and abuse of "friends" is sane and NORML). After I'd hung up, I called her answering machine back and provided my cell phone number with the instructions she could call me day or night, 365 1/4 days per year (actually 365.2422 is required for 10K accuracy). When I was contacted by the New Westminster Police the following day, I recalled the definition of insanity making the greatest sense of Benita's behaviour: "Insanity is repeating the same actions that previously failed to result in the desired outcome while expecting to obtain a different result". Then again, maybe "being saved" by (and saving the worthless genes of lying COPs) is all she should expect from her life given the 5¢/hr salary, assault and false witness she expected "Right!" to content himself with while she got her jollies labelling "Right!" wrong and playing "love games" with a dirty COP having no greater verifiability or respect for others investments than herself, Brenda or most other woman given the tendency among the majority to mobilize their mouths without ever expecting to be held accountable for what they've said or done ("Right!"). I later found and wrote on her facebook site that Dr. Suess wasn't likely referring to jail as "the places you'll go" (I still haven't read it), and after 3 incarcerations owing to Benita imposing her illusory standards on "Right!", she had 3 strikes against her and unless she recants as she expected the author to do regarding his "truly no one in particular" identity, she's out with similarly violent and intractible liars and thieves. I apologised for not having been able to protect her from Jenny's effect on her own libido, but as she said under oath: "I made my choice". Removal of free-will isn't something I'd do to anyone, even if I could. People learn from their mistakes, but appear to consistently make the same errors. A formerly favorite angle (sic) wanting to rule the wor(l)d and failing to acknowledge Love is a familiar story. I also told her if she could forgive no one for his escape as her, Jenny's and the court's "victim" (and recognize herself and other women as top predators operating on instinct with what is generally only short-term rationale governing their "choices" with no thought being given to costs males have always paid to provide women what they need), she'd probably feel better and maybe we could be friends again, or maybe even more than friends. Women choosing to make an eternal enemy of one who'd prefer having them as a friend and wife make choices for not only themselves, but all women (like Danielle's inability to be wrong, hubris has dire consequences when opposing "Right!" by definition) and failure to maintain a close link to their own source isn't something women should do if they want to be welcomed back at the end of their lives. I haven't heard from Benita in nearly a year and her facebook account has disappeared. Loss of face appears to accompany discarding books and their ghostly authors to obtain something she could understand, users and abusers similar to herself. Besides my phone number, she had my website address so losing my number was, is and will be no excuse. The Northern Pikes "Girl with a problem" is fitting (v).

Any profession having the requirement an oath be sworn prior to assuming a vocation should've been avoided at all costs. Anyone swearing an oath to Apollo, Allah, Buddha, the Devil or any other "name" or description thinking themselves "safe" because they failed to swear "in God's name" might have considered all oaths are sworn to the same logos (Right!=Love+light=Y) and ascertain why the Jews chose to provide God no name whatsoever. There's one SRY locus and it doesn't matter whether Rock et Man, Major toM, toMMy (v), Now here Man, Man or any of thousands of other name tags are invoked to name or describe it. Enlightenment is a single experience and names are themselves irrelevant, however, the source is far from immaterial with the logos existing prior to language to describe the experience, were description possible. Parmenides simply said "it is" however the argument "it is NOT" which he disavowed can also be seen as an anagram for New and Old Testaments with Parmenides also approximating Billy Preston's "Nothing from Nothing" proposition in the surviving fragment of his poem "On Nature" (but see John Stuart Mill's similarly-titled essay). I too found it a difficult philosophical concept, but like a zen koan, it made no one and nobody think about "nothing", particularly given my parent's 5308 103A Avenue address in Fulton Place (read L-R and assorted by age of family- members, I was zero, yet another reason to attempt reading text right to left) was what Preston's song had been designed to do, particularly when the verse 1 Timothy 6: 7 is considered (t). When Benita received the copy of 6 is 9 as evidenced in "Ruse" with the frontispiece of the copy I'd given her having the dedication: "Benita, You'll always mean nothing to me" (t), Billy Idol's "White Wedding" lyrics were the intent of the message, but Air Supply's "...nothing at all" fit equally well. I felt at the time I'd written the dedication that Idol's song would either give Benita an "out" for her "indisecretion" with Jenny and subsequent betrayal of her self-described "friend", or drive home the Truth she should only wear black as befits a RIPper and "under" taker. A silver "Flowers by Grayce" (v) sticker I'd found on a bouquet (boo-K) was affixed to the last page (v). A "no thing" message should be less frightening for women than men (t), particularly since most view themselves to have the world on a string (likely related to "those products..."). Unlike "men" such as Fred, women have "no thing" to lose, with many believing they've every "thing" to gain when possessing the SRY locus and being a fertile female simultaneously is impossible unless the woman has exclusive access to "a good man" and the latter has the woman of his dreams. As for the nothing identity, nothing could ever compare to 19 and was an identity Benita obtained only by transference of scripture and was thus Biblically-based. As for the flowers, Judy Chicago's "The Dinner Party" was my point of departure given the 999 women represented by floor tiles in her exhibition. Benita received Chicago's program as one of the momentos no one could provide. I believe women share a joke relating similarities between floor tiles and men. Ha, Ha, Ha, or is that simply Ho?

Admonitions a long time coming are therefore provided male contractors whose vows and oaths were a similar waste (v) as the Y chromosome they were "loaned" prior to demonstrating they couldn't be trusted with "all the small things" (X and Y gametes) and thus perpetuation and protection of life itself, much less the big thing (Truth=Gnosis). The letter sent to Brian Mulroney during his term of office as Prime Minister (PM) detailing assault at McGill and loss of children BM neglected to acknowledge or reply to contained similar Gnostic terminology as employed in letters no one sent the "men" at Mac and McGill, making the Airbus Affair the least of Brianna's (sic) worries. Going from PM to PMS isn't exactly a promotion, with screwing a reduced number of donors of capital necessary "downsizing", but the genes and ideologies (s)he'll obtain will be an improvement to those demonstrated in 11 years of pubic (sic) orifice (sic) as recipient of the largesse of millions of citizens, any of whom would receive similar regard had they presented him analogous circumstances. I guess it's difficult to get too excited about no one losing years of salary, receiving assault as doctoral "training" and having children stolen by a former wife now daughter when stuffing pockets with cash or defending how the cash was obtained following desecrating the oath PM's swear. Bran (sic) was succeeded by Kim Campbell, Canada's first, and to date, only female PM in a long line of male PM's for whom apostrophe's will be lost (and hymens (sic) gained) if pockets were lined, bank accounts topped-up or similar rakeoffs secured after demonstrating lies and theft had been exchanged for oaths sworn, with the standard Odour of Adanac (sic) awarded for overestimating the gullibility of all of the people paying some share of their salaries. PM's were in violation of oaths sworn if profits beyond salaries and customary perquisites were obtained with the $50KK libel suit Brian launched against the RCMP settled out of court for $2.1KK ultimately vilifying him. Mulroney claimed financial "contributions" estimated at $0.3KK received from Carlheinz Schreiber were "consulting fees" for a "fresh pasta business" ("and called it macaroni" fits but spay get(s) he (sic*3) (v) is more appropriate given his "When Irish Eyes Are Smiling" duets with Ronnie Reagan, "Yankee do dull" indeed) with BM's known illicit payouts representing 16,000 years of one PhD candidate's "living wage". Regarding the court case reprinted in the "Dole" chapter, when factual inaccuracies either were undetected or motives for Jenny's "just about every day" visits and what his "valuable patrol time" achieved went unaddressed by the presiding magistrate with the case not being thrown out of court when Jenny committed perjury, introduced factual innacuracies and bore false witness, no one concluded Smith was either similarly malicious as Jenny or too stupid or ethically-challenged to do his job competently (although these alternatives are not mutually exclusive nor exhaustive either). If Smith didn't detect or question lies sworn as Truth by Jenny in Case 59275 (-25=Y=Case 795) and was too unfamiliar with scripture to consider the identity claimed by no one (and All it implied), he was unlikely to have judged with veracity, sought Truth or fulfilled his oath in any other "Case" he "worked". When a defendant claims he is "fighting for my life" when an identity of "truly no one in particular" had been introduced into evidence as Exhibit 3, the time to "sober up" was long past with judgment transferred into the hands of someone truly Abel. Biologists coined the "Life-dinner Principle" to describe why prey should be ahead of predators in the "Evolutionary Arms Race". Prey stand to lose their lives, predators will only miss a meal (in their cases, a very expensive one given the loss of "membership" they can anticipate). The foundation of the Canadian Justice system (The Bible) prophesized that losing one's life will be the outcome for those who try (what judges presume to do) and save their lives, with those who've lost their lives (no one and nobody) being saved (in the lyrics of songs and plots of books and movies). Judged (sic) Smith may also recall, or if that's not possible, he can review the transcript: "Everyone received letters who was involved, including a fellow by the name of Dr. MacKenzie, which I think will become germane". When the case was continued the following day after the author being apprised on day one that the Crown's "evidence" was "that Revolver" tape's transformation into "that gun" in Jenny's culpable (sic) hands after my legal aid lawyer having failed to obtain Jenny's "Execiitive (sic) Summary" until the morning of the court case to determine the nature of the Clown's evidence (where "earning" hourly wages 6000 times what the author received as a PhD candidate may be responsible for such excellent preparation, worth every penny I paid for his services, although taxpayers who did pay his salary might dispute the Truth of a useless tit claiming to have produced 6 that were useful). Were the song titles on the album examined, one title in particular, "For no one" would have been similarly germane had the inscription of the greeting card been scrutinized and considered, and given "Eleanor Rigby" having coincidences of both "Father MacKenzie" and "no one" in its lyrics, "men" presuming to stand in judgment of others' actions using the authority of an oath sworn without examining the evidence while claiming proven liars like Jenny as allies obtain similar opportunities to be compensated for "expert tease" (sic) and no(a)bility Hell (sic) never hide.

If my former wife got the best of my Love in addition to investments in children awarded in divorce court settlements after receiving 100% of the fruit of my loins following meeting her (and of course, the fruit of any other men's loins she and her maternal lineage may've had time for), other similarly exclusive males weren't likely to greet similar rulings with open arms (where perversion of those making similar rulings will be required to reward magistrates deciding in favor of wives guilty of infidelity after faithfully married husbands losing everything they worked for and Loved based on similar buy assed (sic) verdicts). Prosecutors swearing oaths prior to becoming judges ultimately rule on guilt or innocence based on cash or affiliation when a two-headed coin is unavailable to determine outcome. Why would Truth miraculously become sacred after an oath is sworn and judges robes donned if previous experience revealed a COP's false witness after carnal knowledge was obtained by a female accuser insures not only convictions, but the accuser's continued cooperation with oath-swearing liars and thieves of taxpayer resources? Benita became compliant with both the aims of a state that didn't care whether she lived or died, providing profits were obtained following her adoption of a pschopath's credo after drinking from the cup Jenny provided (v). Only if aspirations of wearing drawers embroidered with days-of-the-week is your goal would trying "Right!" and suggesting its failure to measure up to the lack, lust or "standards" of a lying COP passing off a BA as psychiatric credentials be recommended. When lies, false witness and factual innacuracies went unchallenged in a courtroom where all present were sworn to Truth and discrepancies between "versions" of Truth went unaddressed, the judge fell along with the system re: lied (sic) upon. Oaths were designed to entrap All liars, particularly those believing themselves infallible owing to a relationship with Her Majesty or any other woman whose own intimate relationship with Truth fails to differ from her relationship to the Y chromosome, something All women obtain only from males regardless of the methods they use (given one of their own X's has the same male origin). Whether the thief on one side of Christ or the murderer on his other was closer to the x judges possess is moot given every mother's and most women's status as both murderers and thieves of male-produced gametes and energy. A hanging judge is simply closer to the murdering mother than Smith in Case 59275 who preferred theft of Love letters I'd written and given Benita which she claimed she no longer wanted, while the X of the man in the middle belonging to no one was ignored and informed his testimony was not relevant, not unlike the author's rejection of Judge(D) Smith's honour and veracity regarding the oath he'd sworn. When no one in court knew Truth, showed regard for Love and possessed any sense of "Right!" (again not mutually exclusive), Queen and Archbishop also fell (v) with her majesty's x chromosome something every male possesses a valid representative of. "Her majesty's" y chromosome was a "loaner" obtained from Prince Fillup (sic) and any other males she's consorted with, not intending any disrespect to Phil. The latter makes the Crown's "jewels" a commodity borrowed at best (although given my own experience, stolen is closer to the mark after Danielle claiming Cleo and Frankie with her lawyer's and the court's blessing). Truth alone can avoid having deception uncovered with only Love revealing professional oath-swearing dupes as mercenaries and parasites motivated more by hourly "wages" approaching the salary of a "sex trade worker" (or alternately, 2 years of a PhD candidates "time") than Truth. Bible verses commanding "do not swear" weren't written to prohibit profanity in God's name (t), but warn on the consequences of discovered duplicity for oath-, vow- and promise-ER's who, when the Ass ID (sic) test was applied (v), accused The Word of failing to "measure up" to exemplars of "right" provided by a woman in Great Britain parasitic on an entire nation and any "men" who donated her their gametes, a COP lying under oath to conceal gamete loss acheived following derilection of duty concealed by perjury and bearing of false witness, and an accuser hiding carnal knowledge incapable or unwilling to examine her own motives, the motives of her paramour who'd leave her accusing "Right!" of wrong, or what she failed to have between her own thys (sic) to determine WAD "lacked". Salaries of taxpayers contributing to the "lifestyles" of predators and parasites of children are better flushed down toilets than paying for flawed and factually innacurate testimonies (t) vilified by desecrated oaths sworn by a COP whose karmic self-assessment was viewed a threat (v). After misrepresenting my wrath, Jenny read further in his "notes": 'If someone harms me they are actually inflicting harm' "-- sorry -- " 'inflicting that harm on themselves, and at New Year's the payoff occurs. The past 18 years (the) people have done their deeds will be repaid, and those who did good will be compensated and those who did evil (and) acted in their own self-interest with no regard to the feelings and welfare of others, will also be compensated. I believe if it ends for me it will end for everything and everyone. I would never consciously hurt anyone, but the absence of my help (lucky = love) could result in misery. Things will get worse before they get better. This represents the end.' "That caused me some concern". When my lawyer asked Jenny: "How precisely did you regard that as a threat?", Jenny's reply revealed what he was certain 13 years on the farce (sic) "servicing" and "projecting" had earned him: "There was no doubt in my mind that that was a threat". Even my grade 4 mouthpiece was surprised by Jenny's admission of selfishness, lack of regard for the feelings and welfare of others and commission of evil on his "valuable patrol time". The similar self-assessments of judges and politicians accepting payola after swearing oaths promising selflessness are unnecessary to convict them of similar blatant self-interest, choosing to harm others, failing to honour oaths they'd sworn and in all likelihood, any similar vows. The logos defines "Right!" (Day 0) and measures down to All presuming to either measure or accuse "Right!" of wrong. When bearing of false witness by a peace of Ass officer was revealed after carnal knowledge had been obtained by no one's accuser (v), failure to determine if "affairs" existed between Benita and "Eric" as he was referred to by Benita when sworn to truth and rule out the possibility such a collusion had occurred indicated another frame of the accused was attempted (v). When the "enterprise" (Jenny's Badge number was 1701) was financed by taxpayers after an identity of no one claimed by the defendant went unquestioned, it implied if no one was guilty, who was? I took Benita's hand while eschewing sexual involvement with her, yet was forced to defend words she revealed to Brenda, Jenny and the courts while my intent was twisted by an ass for whom 5Â¢/hr wages and assault, not to mention loss of my children were something Jenny "didn't view it as a problem" ("it" becomes a problem when a Jenny is neutered like the animal his surname, actions and testimony revealed, "-- sorry --" doesn't cut it). Before it's decided what is "fair treatment" for no one to receive, Jennie (sic) and his "bothers" (sic) should've surmised the repercussions for opposing "Right!" using perjured testimony, providing false witness and using factual innacuracies following the swearing of oaths. For some obscure reason, those who pontificate most on what is "fair" (such as Fred) are unlikely to be "just" with claims of the Courts of the land that they dispense "just ice" something I've come to expect of refrigerators with "normal" a cycle on most washing machines. As for Benita's claim she could keep a secret, it'll be on the list below the $1500 sixpack she promised to repay based upon 2005 figures for a Canadian professor's average yearly income, the equivalent of 10 years salary at Mac as a PhD candidate in Wildlife. When Love was ridiculed and ruled illicit (v) by those swearing oaths at the outset of careers to serve God (=Love) and Crown (=King), anyone involved in a similar "enterprise" shouldn't have expected it would be the last time selling "love" (sic) turned them or those in their lineage a tidy profit, with no one fulfilling the promise of "Right!". Benita launched a preemptive strike using sex as a weapon with Jenny's complicity intended to result in nobody Loving her no longer caring whether she and her lineage fell prey to similar bastards bearing false witness under oath so gamete exchange remained hidden. Benita's pursuit of status and cheap thrills obtained at no one's expense with Jenny convincing her Love was dangerous when repeated lies under oath and bearing of false-witness were employed was proof Jenny didn't believe no one dangerous, otherwise he would've spoken only Truth when sworn being motivated by the fear his duplicity would be discovered. All Benita knew about Love and friendship were no less dangerous (to her) than all Jenny knew about Truth, with those supporting Jenny's accusations and intent obtaining similar status as the rapists (sic). While others might view Benita as "damaged goods", Jenny's "Execiitive (sic) Summary" revealed ideologies "damaged beyond repair". When "that Revolver" of The Beatles became "that gun" in his "some ma(r)ry" with Benita herself providing the accusation I "had a revolver" with Jenny either convincing her of either the truth of that statement (and I'd prefer not to imagine what else) or that his lies under oath would protect her and her rancor, Jenny proved himself no ordinary "brainless flatfoot" as all COPs were pegged and described to Benita prior to my meeting him (knowing all oaths are sworn to "Right!!"), but a COP (=thief) so thoroughly malignant no one concluded "men" possessing similar veracity and ethics too dangerous to ever possess a "gun" again. "Revolver" had similar temporal coincidences as "Rocky Raccoon". Tracks 3 & 4 on Side One of the UK version both had 301 times, with Tracks 2 & 3 on Side Two having 201 running times. The probability of two songs following one another having identical times on a single album having 14 songs total (14 - 4 = 10) might be calculated by "a" judge(D) like Smith whose familiarity with probability theory was obtained by numerous previous coin tosses with the alternatives being guilty without, or guilty with explanation the possible outcomes, but if the coin of the realm failed to rise to the challenge Smith alluded to when he used the word "probabililty" to describe the likelihood the author would fail to recognize his "Honour" or verdict that the author have no further contact with Benita for 2 years ("Right!" always obeys those "wrong" from Day 1 following the swearing of an oath no one could fulfill and similarly listens to those using vocabulary they have no expertise in actually computing beyond "heads I win, tails you lose"), all involved in a similar "enterprise" as Jenny engineered will fail to have anything in their possession rise again. Funnily enough, the time observed on the 3rd song on side 1 of the UK release titled: "I'm only sleeping" had been 3:01 in early 2009 as indicated in the previous jpeg, however by May 2009 the time was 3:02 as if Heisenberg's Uncertainy Principle was operating and simply by my observation of the coincidence, the time had altered (not the first time that changes have occurred to media after my observations, for everyone else the world remains unchanging, for someone in The Word, all is fluid and ever changing with coincidence being everything). "For No One" was Track 3 on Side 2 with its discovery by the author explaining why Benita received the cassette tape only after the greeting card had been given to her claiming the author was "truly no one in particular" subsequently becoming Exhibit 3. At the time Benita was given the card, the author was unaware of the song with only scriptural verification providing the identity claimed, and only later interpreted in the letter to MacKenzie to have its basis in the author's breakup with Danielle, although Jenny's and the court's intervention insured Case 59275 had a similar outcome (where it appears Exhibit 3 and Track 3 on Side 2 coincide). Regardless of whether the coincidences are logged as 2 songs following one another having the same time, or 6 songs in 3 separate groups having times within a single second (or less) of the next song to follow on the album (1=I'm only sleeping-Love you to; 2=And your bird can sing-For no one; 3=I want to tell you-Got to get you into my life), any statistician will be willing to verify the temporal coincidences defy probability. Dr. Robert(a) appeared on Side Two Track 4 of the UK release having a time of 215 (where 24 is implied by Side 2, Track 4, hence the letter "x" expressed alphabetically, with 15 corresponding alphabetically to the letter O). Only Benita can justify her actions and rationale, and of course, absolve herself of responsibility as all women ultimately do when "thinking by proxy". After all, Benita was only placing her faith in "men" society sanctions who swore oaths promising perfection since swearing became fashionable. If Jenny told Benita "citizens" having 13 additional years invested in postsecondary education than herself, him or Brenda and a greater investment in postsecondary training than all 3 of them combined deserve assault and 5¢/hr wages while furthering the reputations of liars claiming to have contributed to finding the Truth he discovered (that they were all liars and thieves), why would she believe anything different despite having seen and read copies of the letters I'd written and knowing most of the details? Furthermore, COPs probably get paid so little for their "valuable patrol time" protecting "a (female) citizen with a problem" and system where assault can be provided to individuals seeking Truth without reprisal, that oath-desecrating centurions should share their "unique genetic perspectives" with every female respondent they save from "a rival male" providing "dangerous" gifts and writing "just ramblings". It's a good thing all Benita had to worry about was flipping the same coin judges flip where an acceptable suitor is determined by heads "he's too weird for me", tails "he's got a nice bulge in his genes" (sic). Fitting-in is very important and likely requires a much larger bulge than the author had in either the front of his jeans or hip pocket to satisfy Benita with "know room at the in" a familiar story. Maybe Benita will feel better about she and her extended family being "out" in perpetuity. She once told me she wanted to become a lawyer. Her test case will involve defending herself after wronging "Right!" 3x to join the world's oldest profession (woman) so a lying COP could lose gametes to her and subsequently bear false-witness against The Word with 2 judges finding Love letters and gifts illicit, but sex between so-called consenting adults simply "good business" if no one was found guilty (with both judges in Case 59275 obtaining a payoff similar to Jennie's (sic) own for Victoria's Secret). Those surrounding themselves with liars should expect to be tarred with the same blush (sic). No one is surrounded by friends he's never met in the flesh and is eternally grateful to.

When perjury, factual inaccuracies and false-witness sworn as Truth by a COP who provides a taxpayer-funded stud service on "valuable patrol time" go unquestioned by a judge failing to determine whether "just about every day" visits to Benita's "house" was a metaphor for sexual relations between she and Jenny, a problem exists. Having the hubris to prosecute in a case where gift-giving and writing Love letters is considered criminal while sexual perquisites obtained on "valuable patrol time" taxpayers picked up the tab for was simply "business as use you all" (sic) insured no one's and nobody's intent to call the oaths of all in professions where oaths were sworn as a condition of employment to determine if they were not only a similar waste of breath to Jenny's own, but a waste of any "share" in a Y chromosome whatsoever. Sex is sacred, it brings nearly everyone into existence and with Benita becoming "nothing", she'd been identified by "Right!" as sacred. Beauty is Truth and Truth Beauty despite Beauty's "choice" to profane "Right!". The Bible refers to "a stumbling block" and 19 (=S) references exist in King James' Bible to the "stumbling" occuring in an arena where no one possessing the logos faced accusers having only hubris, false-witness and the endogenous Y possessed by a woman in Great Britain willing to compare their hands to the deck no one Helled (sic). Judging Truth requires many "facets of life experience" if oath-swearing judges are to avoid similarly being "in cunt role" for successive incarnations. Benita who accused no one of being "dangerous" was either a lamb led to slaughter (19's laughter) lacking sufficient acumen to distinguish between a tape and a rape (v), a sexual predator herself failing to differ from Jenny or simply viewing her own reflection. Any woman accepting gametic contributions who'd suggest reading Love letters, being paid $10/hr to watch videos and obtaining gifts was more dangerous than running risks of pregnancy (prior to the pill which Benita would be a firm advocate of), contracting numerous sexually-transmitted diseases or accusing a man innocent of any malicious and having only benevolent intent towards her while her choice was to be party to groundless accusations and false-witness borne under oath probably won't be surprised if a lack of malev(i)olence isn't extended to her partners in crime. Endless theft of gametes belonging to males has always typified Venus and "the weaker sex" attempting to ascend Jacob's ladder (v), but "men" whose words can't be banked upon and oaths were not only a waste of breath, but years of taxpayer-funded salaries shouldn't have obtained any share in a Y chromosome to begin with and are severed from obtaining the SRY. Jenny whose bastard father made an ASS of him with donation of his surname and flawed ideologies that oaths sworn weren't binding or his Word held as sacred as Love itself and whose self-assessment revealed recrimination his due may enjoy his cameo as the rapist (sic) for whom day-of-the-weak (sic) bikini briefs will look rosie given the hand (s)he'll be holding. Jenny and his A1 lies (sic*2) will share similar fetes (with any war requiring the taking of one side or the other despite the Dutch preferring to remain neutral in the last with neutrality no longer an option). No one put a value on Benita exceeding the world and all on it to insure "Jenny" and other "players" putting a negligible value on her as a representative woman obtains wad (sic) they've got coming despite the negligible value she placed on the author and herself (v). Contrary to the author's initial supposition that Jenny attended University of Winapig (sic), Jenny claimed Ottawa U his Alma Mater. When I met her in hospital, "B" lived 2 blocks from Alma Street on Mayfair with the chapter "Mayfair Lady" obviously a misnomer. Benita proved herself no "lady" by exhibiting arrogance and disrespect qualifying her as a she COP. Morrissey shot the Alma-related video in a "meat packing plant" despite being a vegetarian himself. With "Eric" and his "meat-packing" supporters transferred to the receiving end of pubic (sic) spectacles, "valuable patrol time" will seem as much a waste of his tail end (sic*2) as being a COP when only a BA qualified him to perform psychiatric assessments, bear false-witness against no one and reinterpret song lyrics with the omission of key nouns when dully sworn (sic). When both an oath sworn on the day he provided testimony after a previous oath sworn 13 years earlier had no effect on curbing Jenny's malignant behaviour (Danielle had 13 publications on Feb 14th 1992 and doesn't fair (sic) well in my book or in band names for that matter, "Steal eh Dan"? is an example), obtaining "perfect information" becomes possible only when worthless opinions are replaced by open yonis to test the veracity of enough "information donors" until protecting male and female gene products equally is recognized a stipulation of any oath. Losing gametes through subterfuge on "valuable patrol time" is something not only those who paid Jenny's salary and recipients of his "genetic treasure" can place a value upon, but anyone who backed, was aware of, or engaged in a similar "enterprise" who shouldn't expect a different dispensation. Any big brother would rewad (sic) similar exhibitors of hubris with the hole (where) he goes as suitable compensation for being overpaid to do no one's work (who should judge?). After mounting the bench when oaths sworn to "Right!" were repeatedly violated so payoffs could be obtained at the expense of those assumed wrong without examining evidence, my "Right!" is something those in similar professions have lived and can die without but their confidence in Jenny's "information" means they can count on his "right?" for a ticket to get back on the human genome (v). Those at the outset of careers swearing oaths subsequently pursuing somnolence (v) or providing "stud service" to (female) "citizen(s) with a problem" while projecting false-witness on man (=999=III) "deserve" more than pubic scents sure (sic*3) provides, but it's a good start (and End). Abuse of family-members by oath-swearing males results in their elimination from the Y "tribe" and being ostracized from further access to the SRY locus at conception, although subsequent access is granted once the age of majority is attained when accepting "donations" (x-communication) becomes not only desirable, but profitable if similar mercenary zeal is carried over from current livelihoods. The SRY initiated a 3-piece suit useful for manufacturing X and Y "love packages" many males enjoy dispensing nearly as much as worthless opinions no one rejects in equal measure to their derivitive originators. Oath-swearing predators and parasites needn't have entertained expectations of obtaining more than reciprocal derision and anatomical correctness so geography (and geology) to the south reflects the emptiness of their hearts. Playing against no one isn't pity and despite chasing endogenous Y and X factors possessed by males surpassing Regina in every respect seeming thin, purse suit (sic*2) will definitely be worth wile (sic).

I wish I had the same confidence in the methodology Hollywood as an institution uses to verify the source of its Gnosis as I do independent artists and musicians. The former has a tendency to twist Truth so profits are obtained, but doesn't appear to provide more than bred and circuits (sic*2) to moviegoers while grist for movies like Back to the Future (with 88 indicating time distortion, being locked in the trunk of a car (v) and holes burnt in carpet all "borrowed" from the author's past) indicating more "involuntary sharing" (=theft) with the "Enchantment Under the C" dance where Marty's mother finally got together with his father something I'd related to Beni as "Enchantment Over the B". I'd guess the cosmic joke is that while nearly everyone earns "a living wage" selling bits and pieces of his story (with many becoming fantastically rich), the author has never had a job paying more than $1/hr for each year of postsecondary education obtained, and may never recover his debt from 5 years spent receiving 5¢/hr identifying liars, thieves and violent men as ideal candidates for "the world's oldest profession", but in this life, financial considerations should always take a backseat to "Right!" otherwise life would resemble "Pulp Fiction" with the almighty dollar in the driver's seat so children can be traded for worthless paper conferred by equally worthless liars and thieves, but at least those who've provided the "perks" I've obtained can anticipate the rewads (sic) earned. Hollywood's motives don't appear too different than church and state who remain joined at the hip, but at least Hollywood doesn't pretend: "We do it all for you" unlike the representatives of Macdonald, McGill and other bullshit perpetrating institutions including government, the courts, COPs, and the RCC whose promises, and oaths were not just the price of admission to obtain security for life, but day-of-the-week panties in perpetuity. I'm gratified more music appears on film soundtracks, which is good for musicians, but as usual, doesn't do a blessed thing pour moi. But I thought the Feb 14th 1991 Wayne's World opening coinciding with the restraining order Danielle served was a nice touch, with no one appreciating more than a few of the "in" jokes including references to Wayne's "nametag collection" and "heir nets" appearing in the film. Being owner of Wayne's World and surviving in it appear to be entirely different given the tendency for most individuals to place "Right!" as a commodity no one has access to that only can be purchased by having sufficient cash, when owning the SRY locus is what "Right!" provides in addition to determining individuals who should never have had access to a Y chromosome from the outset (and of course Loving women as "no thing"). As for the government of the United States to the south (where States in 6 is 9 is relevant), I've received few indications over the past 50 years Love, and therefore God, has been placed in a position of more than a "B" Side on US $1 currency, with one dead president or another gracing the "A" side. Every child in the US eh? should aspire to becoming a dead president or emulate a living past-president whose resourcefulness in reconstituting a cigar when no humidor was available something only a Rhodes scholarship can confer (v). Where's the Love? or are spectators to "the greatest nation inaction" (sic) conclude Love is the backup plan that'll be implemented if prevarications regarding the upright intentions of past US Presidents, "men" in the CIA facilitating MKULTRA and McGill's experiments on mind- control using native Canadian children as subjects and the military-industrial complex whose important work on pork BBQ supported research at Mac and McGill aren't successfully hidden? No one is convinced their ideologies identify individuals cut from the same bolt as Fred and Jenny (where being "cut" from the bolt (of Shingon Buddhism or "Right!") has farther-reaching consequences than being cut from lit dull (sic) league where "The Big Leaks" is more descriptive of receiving perpetual access to "a friend" making its presence known on the crotches of panties every 28.3 days. Seeing the current Obama nation to the south indicates the disenfranchised may finally have an opportunity to replace the lawlessness and lip service paid to Love in the US and elsewhere since the author's birth. Past persecution of worldwide Islamic factions has been a reenactment of the Crusades, but there's only Love or its absence and hence, Christ or anti-Christ, life or anti-life. Males produce life, women kill or entrap life males provide them only rarely producing children (making mother-nature not unlike justice, a travesty), but if energy can neither be created nor destroyed with the energy from gametes males supply females being parasitized (free energy eh?), the free "Right" wasn't without costs I stopped paying after Dan's betrayal. If it's true that "Love's the only engine of survival" as related in Leonard Cohen's "The Future", those placing a "cash value" on women's reproductive equipment shouldn't expect to rise above it. The few months I spent with Frankie and Cleopatra were the best part of being married to Danielle and all that spending over 18 years with her was worth. Neither she nor her x lineage deserved my long-term commitment, gametes, or Gnosis, none of which they'll have any additional part of despite Danielle retaining status as a daughter. Rarely are children raised having ethics making them a credit to the race. Failure to instill ethics in children is not something women can easily dismiss with raising of children under their purview as Danielle demonstrated by kidnapping Frankie and Cleopatra with the blessings of the courts thereby prequalifying all in the legal profession as Dan's allies deserving of the same status and reproductive equipment Dan "enjoys". Danielle had similar input into Cleopatra's coneception as her mother did her own (dick) and Cleopatra received and uses her father's X as her own active X, a commodity numerous other women appear to have obtained despite my reluctance to disperse my gametes (Danielle became pregnant only after the arrival of the purple strobing presence after years of infertility, I knew she was pregnant owing to spirit, not gametes alone). Dan's mother's claims as a crusader for peace failed to curb both her and 3 of her daughters waging war against 3 different sources of gametes who brought them only good (children and grandchildren) so both she and Danielle could continue having liars, thieves and violent men pay their salaries "on the side" they'd chosen. The dark side having only stolen Love and light (v) with no further access to either. Like Danielle, oath-swearing personnel of the courts, police and government can always count on having "my friend" willing to provide years of regular monthly "companionship" coinciding with an heavenly body shining only by reflected light so those lacking accountability and/or veracity similarly lack cojones. Obtaining delayed access to "Right!" while taking suitable donors for gametes (as liars and thieves have always done) with the takers claiming they're deserving of preferred treatment and "protection" compared to their producer paid 5¢/hr and provided assault amid accusations no one failed to "measure up" to liars, thieves and murderers is an inter-resting take (so obtaining anatomy where taking is second-nature has been assured). Professional oath-swearing bullshit artists can dream on, if they're able to sleep. If not, they'll stay out of my dreams in perpetuity which don't currently and will never include those for whom my investments (themselves) were, are and have always been found dealing from the bottom of no one's deck.