Extended-Spectrum
b-Lactamaces (ESBLs): An Overview
Introduction
Cephalosporins are a group
of antibiotics produced by a mold "Acremonium (Cephalosporium)
spp" which are resistant to penicillinase and are
active against both gram positive and gram negative
organisms. They are separated into "generations"
based upon their spectrum of activity against bacteria.
Table 1 shows the classification of cephalosporins. The
introduction of "third generation" cephalosporins
has resulted in several resistances that have compromised
their clinical use.
What are ESBLs?
Some members of
Enterobacteriacae (commonly, E.coli and Klebsiella
pneumoniae) have TEM and SHV beta-lactamases conferring
resistance to various antibiotics. A point mutation which
alters the configuration around the active site of the TEM
and SHV type enzymes has led to b-lactamases that are now
known as "Extended Spectrum b-Lactamases" (ESBLs).
ESBLs can hydrolyze cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam and
other expanded spectrum cephalosporins to varying degrees.
Ceftazadime and aztreonam
are affected the most, while cephamycins (cefoxitin and
cefotetan) are hydrolyzed to a lesser extent. ESBLs do not
hydrolyze imipenem. Genes for ESBL are distributed on large
plasmids, which confer multiple drug resistance (e.g.
aminoglycosides, tetracyclines, chloroamphenicol,
trimethoprim). They are inhibited by the beta-lactamase
inhibitors such as clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and
tazobactam. In vitro, the organisms with ESBL may appear to
be resistant to third generation cephalosporin and
susceptible to second-generation cephalosporins. ESBLs are
most commonly seen in E.coli and K.pneumoniae
but also have been described in other Enterobacteriacae as
the resistant plasmid can be readily transferred among
Enterobacteriacae.
Extent of the Problem
The first Klebsiella
isolate with plasmid mediated resistance to broad-spectrum
cephalosporins was reported in the Federal Republic of
Germany in 1983. Since then this has been a growing problem
all over the world. In the United States, the frequency of
resistance to ceftazadime has increased from 1.5% (1987 to
1990) to 3.6% (1990 to1991) as reported by the National
Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system. A surveillance
trial involving 102 medical centers in the United States
detected 10.3% and 23.8% ceftazadime resistant E.coli
and K.pneumoniae respectively. Hospital outbreaks of
ESBL have been reported from the United States and other
countries. The gastrointestinal tract of patients is the
probable reservoir for these organisms.
Detection of ESBLs
The problem of resistance
mediated by ESBLs has been compounded by the lack of
detection methods of ESBL. One approach had been the
disk-approximation method. This method works by the
placement of cefuroxime and/or ceftazadime disks close (20
or 30 mm) to an amoxicillin-clavulanic disk on a plate
inoculated with the test organism. Enhancement of the zone
of inhibition or a so-called ghost zone between either of
the cephalosporins disks and clavulanate containing disk
indicates the presence of an ESBL. A modified
three-dimensional susceptibility test method has also been
used to recognize ESBLs. This method has reported a
sensitivity of 95% for ESBL detection compared to disk
approximation test, which has a sensitivity of 79%.
The newest approach has
been to use commercially available products of ESBL
detection. The Vitek (bioMereiux Vitek, Hazelwood, Mo.) ESBL
test and an ESBL screening Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden)
strip are based on recognition of a reduction in ceftazidime
MICs in the presence of a fixed concentration (2 ug/ml) of
clavulanic acid. Both of these commercially available tests
have not yet been approved by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). However, the National Committee for
Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) has recently published
performance standards for screening and confirmatory tests
for ESBLs in publication M7-A5, January 2000.
Treatment
There are very limited
drugs to choose from to treat a patient with an ESBL
producing isolate (see Table 2). Although penicillins,
cephalosporins, or aztreonam will appear to be susceptible
in vitro, ESBL producing E. coli or Klebsiella
spp. may be clinically resistant to therapy with these
antibiotics. Infectious disease specialists are good
resources when consultation for therapy of ESBL producing
organisms is needed.
TABLE 1: Classification of
Cephalosporins
| First Generation |
Second Generation |
Third Generation |
Fourth Generation |
Cefadroxil
Cefazolin
Cephalexin
Cephalothin
Cephapirin
Cephadrine |
Cefaclor
Cefamandole
Cefatazole
Cefonicid
Cefotetan
Cefoxitin
Cefprozil
Cefuroxime
Loracarbef |
Cefexime
Cefoperazone
Cefotaxime
Ceftibuten
Cefpodoxime
Ceftazadime
Ceftizoxime
Ceftriaxone |
Cefepime |
TABLE 2: Impact on Therapy
| Activity
poor/lost |
Activity retained |
Cefotaxime
Ceftazidime
Ceftriaxone
Aztreonam
Tiarcillin
Mezlocillin
Piperacillin |
Imipenem
Meropenem
Cefoxitin(?)
Cefotetan(?)
Piperacillin/tazobactam(?) |
|