The purpose of this page is to provoke an assesment of how little evidence has been released supporting the advertised events of a day that has set in motion a series world destabilizing events with countless tragedies.

look at the columns on the front of the building, only the ones hit by the alleged 'fuselage' are broken in, but the wings didnt shear off, and they arent on the lawn, not a single fin broke off...if only there was some evidence of the plane that wasnt 'vaporized', but some human remains were recovered- wow for that much damage to the ground floor- their lawn looks better than mine! those religous fundamentalists are good pilots. This diagram below from a govment briefing, looks to me to desrcibe blast damage [cracking, spalling around exit hole], rather than a physical impact against the concrete encased beams.

that high tail fin must have vaporized too, id expect 2' thick exterior walls to shear it right off and leave it on the lawn...

with so little debris out side this hole, isnt it likely it was caused by a warhead designed to diredct blast forward? the plane made this hole but theres no wreckage. i would belive what they told me if there was even a little evidence to back it up...

skin looks alittle thin to me for a 757...

and these guys too!- looks like everything is making sense...no coverup of high performance materials in sight!

These experts,however,have offered no explanation for why the building known as #7 World Trade Center - a conventional steel-framed highrise structure that was not hit by a plane- became, at approximately 5:20 PM on Septembe 11 2001, the third highrise structure in recorded history to suffer a complete collapse due to fire. FEMA struggled to find an explanation to include in a report on the collapses, but came up short: “The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. (http://www.fema.gov/library/wtcstudy.shtm) the floors in building 7 werent open like the twin towers. To go real high, the towers had a structure like a flower stem[with light connecting truss], Blg7 did not have exceptionally long spans- a collapse of this kind will never be seen again, until the next televised controlled implosion.

World Trade Center #7 hit the ground, reduced to a neat pile of rubble, in approximately seven seconds. Like the twin towers, it was in virtual free-fall. Also like the towers, WTC7 collapsed into its own footprint with absolutely uncanny precision. It is no accident that the American people, although bombarded with images of the collapsing towers, have never seen footage of the collapse of WTC7. It is nearly impossible to watch video footage of the collapse and fail to recognize it for what it is: a deliberate, and perfectly executed, controlled implosion. [Click on the two small animated gifs to view video clips of the collapse from two different vantage points.] foundhere: http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr69.html

~25 floors with a serious rotational inertia which is either corrected by an ingenious design taking into account dynamic forces, or the lower floors are offering virtually zero impediment to the toppling section.

On September 24, 2001, People Weekly published an interesting witness account provided by Louie Cacchioli, one of the first firefighters to enter the south tower: "I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building."

video found here: http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm this looks to me like a missile with high tailfin, bc of the solid fuel contrail, and evidence of an oxidizer in the explosive molecule-like the army uses by the bright, round initial explosion