Satanarchy embodies two different philosophies. One is called Modern Satanarchy, 
which is the mixture of modern satanism and anarchy. Many anarchists are very close 
to this anyway. The other is called Traditional Satanarchy. It is the mixing of 
traditional satanism with anarchy. 

Satanism: the belief in Satan/Lucifer as either a symbol or an actual 
          deity. In modern satanism, Satan is used merely as a symbol
          of rebellion against the will of the christian god and many
           organized religions; and Lucifer is used as a symbol of      
           enlightenment, wisdom and truth; and they do not believe that
           any demons or spirits exist. In traditional Satanism, Satan  
        and Lucifer are believed to be either an actual deities or
               one deity(depending on the viewpoint). Beyond this is dependent  
           on the individual's personal beliefs but many believe him to 
       be either the current ruler or soon to be ruler of earth.

Anarchy:  the belief that there should be no government or ruling class
          and that this may be achieved through chaos. It is the belief 
          that all should be free to do as they will as long as they do
          not intentionally harm another.

   Most of these things that Anarchists believe in are right. There should be ultimate 
freedom. There should be no government and no ruling class. The only exception to this 
rule should be if it is in someone's nature, defined by their own actions towards this, 
to be ruled by another. Then they of course may be ruled, but the ruling class is defined 
by whom either the submissive chooses or is naturally chosen by. World Peace is absolutely 
not possible though, for it violates the only true laws, those of nature. The existance 
of one thing depends on the sacrifice of another. It has always been that way and it will 
always be that way. In traditional Satanism, it is mistaken as being a religion imposing 
a form of government, but it is not. Lucifer is served by serving yourself. By improving 
yourself to fit your own needs. By being true to yourself and your own nature, you are 
serving Lucifer. It is obvious in the philosphies that, for the most part, modern Satanism 
is opposed to any form of government and requests only that you be true to yourself and 
not oppress yourself or let yourself be oppressed. I is easy to see how these can be 
integrated with Anarchism very smoothly. Mind you, these are my beliefs and my beliefs 
only. If you share them great, if you dont, fine. Just dont be a part of the herd. 
                As always, comments are welcomed. [email protected]

WHY ANARCHISM ISN'T TOTALLY RIGHT (but damn near close)  
by Skull Fukkr

ANARCHY

definition: "1.absence of government, 2.lawless confusion and
political disorder, 3.general disorder."

ANARCHISM

definition: "1.the theory that all forms of government are 
incompatible with individual and social liberty and should
be abolished, 2.the methods of anarchists."

"Anarchism, political theory that is opposed to all forms of 
government. Anarchists believe that the highest attainment
of humanity is the freedom of individuals to express them-
selves, unhindered by any form of repression or control 
from without. They hold that the perfection of humanity 
will not be attained until all government is abolished and
each individual is left absolutely free. One limitation on
on such freedom, however, is the ban against injuring other 
human beings. From this limitation arises another: if any
human being attempts to injure others, all well-meaning 
individuals have the right to organize against him or her,
and the orderly class may repress the criminal class, 
although only by voluntary cooperation and not under any
government organization."
                        -Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia

now, the problem here is one of unintentional hypocracy.
when a group is organized against the criminal class, the
orderly class has momentarily become a voluntary government,
therefore becoming what they speak against. History has shown
that it is not human nature, as much as some people would like
to believe it is, for everyone to live in "harmony" or any-
thing of the like. there will always be warring groups because
of differentiating opinions and views on life and such. there
will always be people willing to stand up for what they believe
in (ie. anarchists) and willing to fight for it to the end.
What is known as "world peace" is a hopeless prayer of the weak
whom are not willing to defend all that they love and cherish.
If they were to fight for world peace, they would immediately
become hypocrites. what i respect about anarchists is there
willingness to stand up for what they believe in. 
BUT ALAS!
there are good things to this philosophy, such as the freedom 
to express yourself without governmental oppresion. minus the 
limitation on injuring others, the philosophy of anarchism is 
nearly flawless. 
please note:                 this does not concern ALL of 
anarchism, for there are many different types that i am not 
fully aware of. if any of you would like to write to me about 
your type and how it differs from this traditional one,  please 
do so and i will be happy to update this file or just make a 
second part to it. please remember, i am open-minded and look 
at all things without a definitive opinion of it until i have 
been given what appears to be all the facts on it (what i've 
found to be the best way to go). that's all, fukkrz. have fun.
oh yeah, misanthropy is a good philosophy. try it every now & then
------------------------------------------------------------------