Sent to ABC World News Now in response to the Amazon Infanticide story.
Your story on the child who was rescued from infanticide has a small detail included that should raise peoples sense of concern about other philosophies which have spread around the world and possibly tarnished the minds of these people with baseless modern scientific theories. That detail obviously did not seem outrageous to most people because so many people have come to accept the unproven idea that mankind theoretically descended from apes. In a general sense, the child was referred to as having a monkey soul for reasons that i did not quite understand from the story but even so this should raise some questions in the minds of people. One of those questions should be where did they get the idea that monkey traits would be in their child, did that idea come from something they heard from other sources, did it come from some visual similarities with newborn monkeys or had there been instances known to the native populations of cross-specie sexual assults by primates or something like that? I'm not suggesting any current incidents or practices but their are reports, from other regions of the world, of sexual assults upon humans by primates in distant history. You may think this last question is rather obscure but consider for a moment the logic of this line of thinking, in light of the monkey soul rational, and then ask why has there never been found the transitional stages of the proposed evolutionary theory but there have been found limited remains of oddly proportioned human-like creatures. There have been many false claims of the missing link but none have ever been found in any quantity to satisfy the 'scientific' process. The scientific community has come to a consensus but that is not the scientific-process. I would suspect that the theory of evolution would be far less popular if they were proposing the connection between man and ape to be from a breeding perspective rather than a time dependent mutation process. For evolution by mutation to be valid, and take the time they are proposing, there should be large volumes of evidence of the missing links. On the other hand if the connection between man and ape, proposed with the finding of certain remaines of human and ape-like proportions, is instead not an evolutionary one but of a bestiality one, then there is good cause to only expect a limited evidence of intermediate stage and there would be good reason for the line of thinking found in this Amazonian culture. I'm not saying that it is a current practice but their are reports, from other regions of the world, of sexual assults upon humans by primates in distant history. And if your are thinking that i watched planet of the apes too many times you'd be wrong, it did not appeal to my entertainment tastes. If this line of thinking were not so socially taboo, scientists might even admit to this line of thinking but it might cost them their career. So, if we were doing an honest scientific investigation, we should really be asking ourselves what went on in the history of humankind to account for the evidence that is found. But this brings up another reality, the scientific community has been avoiding the evidence that points to this earth and the solar system having gone through a violent transition in the past, far more dramatic in scope than the gradualist theory requires or proposes. Gradualists, also called uniformatarians, got their hold on the sciences in the last century and they have been limiting the scope of acceptable thought in spite of the evidence that calls for an alternative explanation for the history of our solar system and the events that the human race survived. Global Catastrophe, within recent human history was the accepted explanation until the last century and in recent decades catastrophism has been combined with a comparison of all the world's legends to formulate a view of the past that better explains what we see geologically and find as evidence in the ground and carved into stone. A valid scientific process is revealing that the human race has lived through a variety of global catastrophes which involved the rearrangement of our solar system and dramatic interaction with our planetary neighbors at a level of electrical discharge that would make insignificant the common lightning storm, hurricanes and tornados. The earth and our neighboring planets were ravaged and carved by these planetary interaction and the evidence is all around us and spoke of in great volume in the worlds legend and artistic forms, including petroglyphs. During this time of devastation many practices entered into cultures, including infanticide, as people were sacrificing themselves and their children to the gods in the hope of appeasing their anger and abating the violence being displayed in the skies and on the earth. During a subsequent time many warning were recorded in the Hebrew writing of not having anything to do with certain cultures or practicing their traditions. I find myself wonder what all this included. For sure there were various forms of planet worship and idolitry and human sacrifice amoung the Ammonites yet what more might have been included? Associating infanticide with some cultural root or tradition is not unusual but the association of a human deformity with having a monkey soul needs some deeper investigation for an explanation of the rational for it to make any sense. But those are questions that will not be asked since people are quite happy with the evolutionary fiction that is being taught as scientific fact, despite contradictory evidence or lines of reasoning which have not been allowed into the discussion or been taken by evolutionists. At www.electric-spark-scars.com and www.dahlendesigns.com you can find links to catastrophism perspectives which include a comparison of the world's legends and modern scientific investigations into our solar system's history based on what is being found on earth and the planets we've visited with our probes. You can also contact me for further discussion into about other aspects of this note on the infanticide story. dzparker |