If you have not heard of testicular descention then you may not-have wondered about the effects of undescended testicles and how the world would be different if there was a little less testosterone at work on the population. Or, you may not have asked how might the population of the planet be different.

I will discuss here a notion, that at some point in time in the not too distant past something changed in mankind's environment to cause greater agression, sexual drive and altered behavior. Prior to this period undescended testies may have been more common. This is a condition that is known of today and in modern cases deliberate measures are taken to initiate emergence in newborns that are not developing according to modern expectations. The relavance of this to world history begins with a search for simple clues of the outcomes of our catastrophic past that we are still living with today and that are easily comprehendable to the public, such is not the case with other pieces of evidence.

I'm launching this theory a little before all the details are assembled and after 10 years of evaluation because i've been told that it is note too far fetched and others have noted suspicion of something ocurring in ancient times based on varied investigations and pondered the cause but primarily from the female point of view. Some views are based on lunar influences and other complex issues and i find that interesting but i believe there is a much simpler potential cause which still has an effect on male sexuality.

The dramatic differences in human behavior now and the descriptions of life in the distant past led to this curiosity. It was further feed by a question that seems to have escaped the discussions of experts, that of gender, and its existance as well as the anomolies which are eradicated in the western world. Few people are probably aware of the percentage of births with ambigeous genatalia. To a small degree my curiousity on this subject was feed by some biblical passages that just seemed to be the tip of an iceburg or suggestive of something that would explain many peculiarities in behavior as well as variations in dispositions.

My overactive imagination may be the only reality to this line of thinking but stranger notions have proven to be worth investigation. Here are a couple of quick details which suggest the common nature of this condition and the results of non-diagnosis which could support the premiss of this thesis.

Most undescended testicles are present at birth. Up to one third of premature male newborns are born with an undescended testicle, and 3 to 5 percent of term male infants are affected.12 By three months of age, the incidence is reduced to 0.8 percent; between three months of age and adulthood, the incidence does not change.13 Watchful waiting is not an option because true undescended testicles rarely descend spontaneously after three months of age.

The retractile testicle is the most important type of undescended testis to distinguish on physical examination because no hormone or surgical therapy is required.

Approximately 20 percent of infants who present with cryptorchidism have at least one nonpalpable testicle.

The condition of being non-palpable is of particular interest when we start to think about fertility. There are also indications of genitic pre-disposition to undescended testicles.

A disturbing consideration is what is going on with newborns that is not reported to parents or understood by them which could have a potential for mental trauma in the infant during all this attention to their genitals. I might contend that treatment of this condition could be regarded as child abuse if it is not an absolute necessity. Who is to say that such conditions are not a natural characteristic that if left alone could lead to a different disposition in the person but i could go so far as to say this should be viewed by the evolutionists as interference in human development.

I have to ask the question; How long have the medical community or parents been encouraged to manupulate the emergence of testicles and what effect is this having of the children from a practicle perspective of genital fixation?

A question came in of the effect on testerone production. At these links, link1, link2, this question is addressed.

From link 2 we have this statement:
The normal male with descended testes demonstrates a transient increase in testosterone at sixty days after birth. This testosterone response seems to be blunted in children with undescended testes. Many other factors both hormonal and mechanical can result in undescended testes.