Ssh Server For Windows Xp



>>> Ssh Server For Windows Xp <<<














































































Power Pack 1 and HP's add-ons make Windows Home Server a real grouch - Engadget Skip to Content Are you prepared for Wrath of the Lich King? WoW Insider has you covered! AOL Tech Europe ↓ Polska Deutschland Asia ↓ 繁體中文 简体中文 日本版 한국어판 Español HD Mobile Engadget Engadget Engadget RSS Feed Contact us Tip us on news! Power Pack 1 and HP's add-ons make Windows Home Server a real grouch by Darren Murph, posted Jul 28th 2008 at 3:04AM If you've experienced some shockingly slow results from your Windows Home Server-based unit, we've one question for you: do you have Power Pack 1 and the HP add-ons installed? If so, you may not be alone in your frustrations. Apparently a number of users have seen dramatic slowdowns that have rendered their WHS devices nearly unusable. It x server event handler seems that all the "bloatware" really takes a toll, as the hard drives are constantly pounded and console menus take ages (minutes, to be more precise) to appear. According to Within Windows, the only real solutions are to install more RAM and / or tweak your pagefile configurations afterwards. Anyone else raging mad about the audit netware server for rights performance issues? What are you going to do about it? [Thanks, Bryant] Read Permalink Email this 65 Comments Filed under: Home Entertainment, Storage Tags: add-on, hp, performance, power pack 1, PowerPack1, whs, windows, windows home server, WindowsHomeServer Relevant Posts Microsoft issues beta fix, enhancements for Windows Home Server (49 days ago - 23 Comments) Windows Home Server Power Pack 1 goes live (8 days ago - 47 Comments) The Bill Day giveaway (part 4) - Windows Vista Ultimate (32 days ago - 5147 Comments) Ask Engadget: What's the best home media server? (33 days ago - 119 Comments) Windows Home Server data corruption fix on the way (67 days ago - 31 Comments) Subscribe to these comments Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2) Highly Ranked dial0g @ Jul 28th 2008 3:11AM The problem is the McAfee add-in, disable it and everything is back up to speed. Reply Highly Ranked Bryant @ Jul 28th 2008 3:28AM Disable one or the other. Check TFA for information on just how you can uninstall it if you've already done the misdeed of loading them both onto your system. Highest Ranked JohnFrum @ Jul 28th 2008 3:41AM Same. I stopped running McAfee years ago on my main system because of poor performance. I decided to give it a try and should have known better. Once I removed it my server was happy once more. Highest Ranked Brad @ Jul 28th 2008 3:44AM McAfee is easily the worst major piece of anti-virus software out there. System intensive, ineffectual, paid-subscription-based, and filled with its own critical security holes. Sometimes you just have to hate shitty software. Highest Ranked Zorque @ Jul 28th 2008 4:37AM I'd argue that Norton's worse, but the fact remains that for some reason, most consumer anti-viruses are terrible software, which sucks because they're so essential. They really need to step it up and find a new way of doing things, because it just doesn't work as is. Highest Ranked BobTurbo @ Jul 28th 2008 6:30AM It is not 1995, antivirus is not essential for many, many people. Their bank doesn't let them transfer externally without some non-computer related authentication, they back up their files, and Windows is relatively secure so they don't need to constantly format from virus attacks. Low Ranked bifbib @ Jul 28th 2008 8:20AM the problem is HP and their inability to make any PC that isn't deficient...they should stick to server rebooting loop printers. If you want a decent Windows server, roll your own and keep away from the AV stuff...buy a hw firewall. Neutral atbnet @ Jul 28th 2008 8:53AM Hopefully people are smart enough not to infect their server with McAfee. Really though you shouldn't even need an anti-virus for your home server unless you are completely incompetent. You shouldn't be downloading and running shady programs on it in the first place. Neutral loosely_coupled @ Jul 29th 2008 2:07AM Who uses Windows home server anyways? If you don't want to run Ubuntu or similar, why not just use Server 2003? Low Ranked Alex @ Jul 28th 2008 4:15AM Now, I'm not usually one to be a linux playstation media server fanboi, but this seems like a case where Linux is the obvious solution. I'm willing to admit that, in many cases, linux is not ready for the desktop, but this sort of home file server is exactly what linux is great at. Looking at the list of features on the official Windows Home Server website, there doesn't look like a single thing that windows could possibly be better at. Case in point: At this very moment, I have a linux box next to me acting as a file server, media center (right now it's piping internet radio through my stereo), freenet and TOR node, and BOINC cruncher. How much did the software cost? $0. I just don't understand why anyone would buy Windows Home Server (or any MS server product for that matter). Reply Neutral Intrepid @ Jul 28th 2008 4:21AM I respectfully disagree. This version of Windows is very well designed, and as pointed out above - it's bloatware that's the issue. All major issues with Windows are driver or bloatware related. Stop ragging on MS because it's the cool thing to do. And as for media centers, Windows Media Center was revolutionary and still is probably the best solution out there... Microsoft's only mistake was letting those stupid OEMs produce the machines. Neutral Alex @ Jul 28th 2008 4:34AM @Intrepid: "Stop ragging on MS because it's the cool thing to do." Huh? How on earth did I come off as 'ragging on MS because it's the cool thing to do'? I ip port relay server even provided an example of me putting ivy tier server my money where my mouth is (my linux solution). Also, notice that I'm willing to concede that Windows has its advantages when it comes to the desktop. Hell, I'm even posting this from XP Media Center. What I can't understand is why one would choose MS over Linux as a home server solution. "And as for media centers, Windows Media Center was revolutionary and still is probably the best solution out there..." As I posted above, I'm using XP media center on my laptop right now (it came bundled) and I'm not nearly as impressed as you. I uninstalled the media features the same week I got it. Without the one media center program (bloated program to view photos, use a tuner card, and play music) it's basically just XP pro. Neutral Zorque @ Jul 28th 2008 4:38AM I don't think Microsoft's ever said that MCE is anything but XP Pro with a few media features built-in, it's not like it's a secret or anything. Neutral iofthestorm @ Jul 28th 2008 4:43AM You should see Vista Media Center then, it seems a lot better than the XP version. Haven't really tried MythTV or any other Linux media centers to be honest though, but I doubt they could achieve the same level of polish and ease of use. Also I think you're mostly right that Linux is a much better server OS than Windows, except for one little thing that is probably more important to most home users, whom this is targeted at: ease of use. Sure, you and I can download an ISO and burn it and install Linux, but ask most people what an ISO is and they'd probably either give blank stares or mention something about their camera having ISO800 or something. I think HP had a version of this server with Linux that cost about half as much and was a bit smaller, so that's bridging the gap but for the average user Linux is too much hassle (read: it takes some effort and education). Neutral Alex @ Jul 28th 2008 4:44AM @Zorque: Oh I agree. I didn't mean to imply that. I was just trying to show why I don't believe XP Media Center to be quite as revolutionary as Intrepid would have you think. Neutral Chris R @ Jul 28th 2008 5:54AM Now, while I understand what you are saying Alex, you have also shown the exact reasons why HOME Server is better than Linux for a HOME user - while I know Linux can do these things its hardly a case of popping to the shop, plugging it in the network and power - job done. That is the WHS experience for the target audience, locking server its sold as a "white goods" solution IMO hence the hardware tie-in when it was initially released. Linux solution (while it is free, its a lot of hours work to get it right) = find distribution that does everything you want out the box, find the distribution that NEARLY does what you want, download ISO, wonder how you install it for a while, buy hardware to install it on, burn the ISO, connect monitor/keyboard/mouse to install it, read countless geeky posts about how to set up processes to serve the UPNP streams to your Media centre extender (Xbox 360 etc), XBMC, configure folder duplication across disks, configure the remote access to the server from the internet, write special bit of script (or a canned one) for automated backup from the Windows clients to the Linux server... You understand what I mean? Its not a plug and play solution or even approaching one. I buy a WHS machine it does the above out the box, with very little configuration to be done. The target audience for the WHS product is by and large not massively techy IMO. Neutral RCook @ Jul 28th 2008 10:12AM I'll concur that Linux is the better solution for this situation. I was in on the WHS beta program and I used WHS for quite awhile, 6 months or more. But when it got right down to it, when the beta was over, I chose to use Linux -- CentOS specifically -- instead. I am able to do everything that a WHS box can do and more without the headaches that seem to plague this product. I really wanted WHS to work simply because I didn't want the hassle of admining a Linux box at home as well as at work, I wanted brain-dead-easy. I got it, using Linux. Once you do have it setup and configured, and don't respond with how hard Linux is to configure -- Windows has just as many quirks, there just happens to be a GUI to use instead of the command line -- my CentOS "home server" works great. TorrentFlux, SlimServer, File/Print, Remote Access, Web, Ventrillo, Caching DNS, Snort proxy+Dans Guardian=no pron for kids. It's the superior solution. Neutral Aaron @ Jul 28th 2008 10:51AM Linux is not a better solution for a home full of Windows PC's. Until you can show me a Linux app that performs automatic nightly backups of Windows clients that are: * Clustered (no identical file across clients is duplicated in the DB) * Imaged (can automatically restore entire PC to exact same state after failure) * Incremental (only changes are backed up after a full backup) ....Then Linux can't compete with WHS in the area of Windows client backups. Neutral Andir3.0 @ Jul 28th 2008 12:26PM @Aaron: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/info.html Everything you described, some additional stuff, freewow fun server no client software needed, and it's open source. Oh, and it took me a whole 30 seconds with the help of Google to find it. Neutral ds @ Jul 28th 2008 12:56PM @Andir3.0 Your last post was nothing short of linux propaganda. The app you claimed could do image backups of Windows drives says flat out on the damn page you linked that it does not. Read some of the limitations -- It does not play that well with Windows drives. "The conclusion from the last few items is available software for windows server that BackupPC is not intended to allow a complete WinXX disk to be re-imaged from the backup. Our approach to system restore in the event of catastrophic failure is to re-image a new disk from a generic master, and then use the BackupPC archive to restore user files." Highly Ranked Aaron @ Jul 28th 2008 1:00PM Backuppc won't back up any locked files on Windows OS (registry, database files, etc etc). Sorry, not imaged, not even close. Low Ranked Andir3.0 @ Jul 28th 2008 1:54PM So how exactly is that different from the Microsoft solution? How would you re-image a Windows PC with Windows Server? You still need to have the PC up and running to restore from Win File Server whether you do it with a system restore disc or an imaged base of windows... the same way BackupPC works. Highly Ranked Aaron @ Jul 28th 2008 2:09PM Nope, with WHS your failed client PC does not even need to boot into an OS. WHS comes with a bootable CD whose sole purpose is to load the network drivers, and then find and connect to WHS over the network to perform a completely automatic network-based restore of the entire disk. Takes only as long as the files take to copy over the network. Backuppc cannot do this, at least not with Windows clients. Neutral ds @ Jul 28th 2008 2:27PM I get that you don't understand how WHS works, but if that's the case why not educate yourself instead of assuming you understand it. All you are doing is spreading your own ignorance here. WHS will allow you to restore a PC from an image stored on the server. You do not need to install Windows on the target machine before restoring your backup. You boot with a restore CD that finds your server on the network and restores from there. Similar to every other network image app. I'm not sure how you possibly think this is the same as the Linux solution. The Linux solution requires you to reinstall your OS, apps, drivers and will then restore some files (pictures and such). The WHS solution restores your entire OS, apps, drivers, and files with a few clicks and in about ~15 minutes TOTAL. This is an image based backup. Neutral SchmuckyTheCat @ Jul 28th 2008 4:04PM Lunix doesn't offer a Remote Desktop Proxy either. Low Ranked Andir3.0 @ Jul 28th 2008 3:34PM So, let me get this straight... Microsoft uses a proprietary interface (probably undocumented) to back up locked files and create backups without hacks. They most likely disallow access to these docs to third party backup solutions that have to reverse engineer the methods to do this... and somehow it's Linux's fault that it doesn't perform the EXACT same methods (but damn close)? So you stick to the double standard. Just like hardware support. Lack of hardware support in Linux = Linux's fault. Lack of hardware support in Windows = hardware companies fault. Something along those lines, eh? You blame Linux for not supporting what Microsoft doesn't publish openly. Makes total sense... Neutral ds @ Jul 28th 2008 3:44PM It is actually not undocumented. I know how it is done, and so do a lot of people. You just do not know because you are very uninformed. And no one is blaming anything on Linux. The point is WHS offers an incredibly useful feature that Linux does not. If a PC connected to a WHS network needs to be reimaged for any reason, it can be done in a few minutes. If a PC on a newtork with a Linux server is in the same situation, the best Linux can do is store the files while you rebuild the OS, drivers and apps manually. The irony of course is this is a HUGE difference, and one of the main reasons anyone would consider a home server. Neutral SchmuckyTheCat @ Jul 28th 2008 4:32PM Andir, you're an idiot, and every response makes you look worse. First you throw out a "solution" that proclaims itself not to do exactly what you proposed it for as a solution. Then you scream that Microsoft is doing secret. undocumented nefarious things, but sorry Volume Shadow Copy is extremely well documented, has been around, and well used by plenty of third party vendors for several years. You can read wireless- n print server about it on freakin' Wikipedia. Then you accuse people of astroturfing for Microsoft because of what they choose to capitalize in a sentence. Go back to trolling slashdot, please. Neutral Aaron @ Jul 28th 2008 4:39PM Come on Andir3.0, just admit it. For a household of Windows machines, WHS is the superior solution. No one here is "blaming" Linux for anything. We're just stating that in this case, WHS is superior to anything Linux has to offer. By the way, I have a WAMP server running on my WHS box and I'm regularly playing around with the latest distros (mostly out of interest and curiosity). I have nothing against Linux or OSS. But while it may seem that Linux would be a perfect solution for automatic backup, it's not. At least digital mp3 server not for Windows clients. By the way, I'd love to have a free open source solution that can do what WHS does. I'd gladly switch if/when a better solution pops up. But there's a big difference between imaged and non-imaged backups and I refuse to spend another full day (or longer) rebuilding a crashed machine with all my settings/applications/OS/etc. Neutral grug @ Jul 28th 2008 4:26AM Yeah, it was Microsoft's only mistake! Well, that and the whole pesky data corruption bug that it took them 7 months to fix... Reply Neutral Philip Patrick @ Jul 28th 2008 4:32AM I have WHS installed for about a half year - since it was released - and didn't find any problem with performance not than nor after installing PP1 (was during its Beta as well). I have to admit though as my server already has 2 Gigs of memory and there is no McAffess virus scan installed on it either (as posters above pointed out). Reply Neutral Shawn @ Jul 28th 2008 5:29AM I know I'm probably gonna get low ranked for this but what the heck. This is why some of us use a Mac, Front Row is only a million times easier to use and simpler then Media Center, and is included with Mac. Plus Mac's have loads of server functions included like web, ftp, vnc, etc. that you can setup with literally one click. Plus no bloatware included. Reply Highly Ranked Juxtah @ Jul 28th 2008 6:10AM I like Mac software, but that doesn't change the fact they are blatantly ripping their customers off at every possible turn with hardware. Highly Ranked jakem @ Jul 28th 2008 6:28AM You just can't compare Front Row to Media Center. Front Row is like a toy in comparison and is aimes at a different market since it lacks TV features. Anyway, this is about WHS and Apple doesn't have a product that competes with that either IMO. Time Machine is not nearly as flexible or sophisticated. Highly Ranked Brett @ Jul 28th 2008 9:29AM I love my Macs, but I completely agree with jakem. Neutral Chris Wickersham @ Jul 28th 2008 5:44AM I'm one of the rare ones indeed I suppose, but I actually switched from a fedora server that I have had running for almost 10 years (migrated from redhat obviously) to a new machine and went with Windows Home Server. After using the beta and then an eval copy of the production release, I was convinced that for my money (including time) it made more sense. The server console and the plugin architecture are very nice features, well worth the cost by themselves. We are an OS agnostic house for the most part, in that we will use what we find to be the best fit for the situation at hand. We use mac desktops/laptops around the house, our gateway for the house runs on a linux box, we have tivo's feeding our televisions, and our file server is now a WHS. Biggest reason? They got disk management (mostly) right. Like Drobo, when you need more storage you just plug in a disk. A disk fails, you swap it out for another disk and the server rebuilds the array. I know that using a combination of raid and lvm you can get this from a fedora box but I really didn't see the point in putting my time into it. As a husband, father and full time coder I just don't have time anymore to futz around with our file server when I'm home. I hate to say it about a MS product, but WHS just works. Reply Neutral Andir3.0 @ Jul 28th 2008 8:27AM So... Did your Fedora (capitalized in my post... wonder why you capitalized all the MS products in your post, but not Red Hat, Linux or Fedora both times you used it? hmmm ... ) machine just stop working? Ran out of disk space and forgot how to add another drive? You forgot how to add one line to a config file and mount that drive to any folder thereby increasing the space? You could take the 5 minutes to add the drive, but not the 30 seconds to add this one line? Neutral ds @ Jul 28th 2008 12:33PM @Andir3.0 Calm down man. I think game server rental the guy was giving his honest feedback which is completely relevant and could be valuable to the people reading these comments. Your comment on the other hand was completely pointless and absurb. Maybe the guy didn't capitalize fedora, redhat or linux; but chose to capitalize Windows Home Server for readability. The linux words stand alone as in any reading 'redhat' knows he is speaking of the OS, as opposed to a hat that is red. Windows Home Server on the other hand can be tougher to read because the words home and server appear frequently in context that is not referring directly to the WHS OS. Oh and you are a nerd. Low Ranked Andir3.0 @ Jul 28th 2008 12:55PM Nah, I seriously think he's turfing. After reading it again, he didn't capitalize any of the Linux acronyms (LVM), RAID, or Mac. It's a fun little subliminal technique to draw attention to a particular brand or company by pointing them out in text and doing the opposite to a competitive product. Neutral Aaron @ Jul 28th 2008 2:03PM @Andir3.0 Seriously? How does the term "RAID", whether upper case or lower case, have anything to do with promoting Windows? This is not a Linux term. Also, he managed to capitalize the word "Drobo". So tell us, how does your grand theory fit fit in with that? Neutral ds @ Jul 28th 2008 4:19PM @Andir3.0 Yes, Chris here is clearly lying through his teeth about WHS. He must have been bought off by microsoft recently though because this is the first post he has ever said anything nice about MS. I see posts with him speaking about his Apple computers, and his annoyance with the 360's lack of HDMI. Yes, clearly Apple used to pay him off, but recently he switched his allegiance to Microsoft -- of course for money because why else would anyone write anything decent about that evil corporation on a message board. Or perhaps.. he was just giving his honest opinion and chose not to capitalize raid to subtly attack Linux... yeah that's it. Neutral Pete @ Jul 28th 2008 6:08AM I had these problems, and then un-installed "PVConnect Media Server for HP MediaSmart" which I've since come to the conclusion is a crippled version of Twonky 4.4.4. Re-installed proper Twonky 4.4.4 and everything's cool. Reply Neutral chris fredette @ Jul 28th 2008 12:46PM After you install PV connect it goes through all you media for streeming. This makes the server dog like no tomorrow. The problem is that it dosen't really show you it is working. With about 90GB of stuff it took over several hours but by the next day it runs like normal. I never installed the Mcafee crap because I assumed it was crap. Neutral jakem @ Jul 28th 2008 6:33AM Yeap, I uninstalled PVConnect and McAfee and my WHS's performance returned to normal. Additionally, PVConnect was crashing when I logged into the server via remote desktop so it's buggy as well as bloated. I wish HP wouldn't include this 3rd-party software. Their hardware is brilliant but there attempts to improve the software are lacking. I don't even think they should include the iTunes server software as I can't delete it and have no need for it. Allow users to install it if they want it - don't force it down our throats. Reply Neutral Neal @ Jul 28th 2008 10:09AM Yep, and this is why it serves Apple so well to own and lock down their products from 3rd parties. More times than not, OEM's (in an attempt to make things better) introduce all kinds of problems with the bundled garbage they add on. Neutral Russell @ Jul 28th 2008 7:55AM I experienced similar problems, and raised a discussion thred on the Microsoft Home Server Forum: http://forums.microsoft.com/WindowsHomeServer/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=3666844&SiteID=50 What I concluded though was that some of the existing add-ins I had installed were not 100% compatable with PP1, so having uninstalled the HP upgrades, PP1 the all the add-ins, I then installed PP1, downloaded and installed the latest versions of my existing plugins then finally the HP upgrades. Once the PVConnect indexing had completed everything was running fine. The only other issue I came across was with installing & un-installing add-ins which became extremely slow, generally taking an hour to install or un-install any add-in, the solution to this I found was to install the Microsoft WHS Toolkit and delete all the Home Server log files, which fixed it. Russell Reply Neutral ShadowKain @ Jul 28th 2008 8:16AM When will these people get a clue and build their own bare bones server for the same ammount or less, OR buy a simple NAS...this product has garnered nuthin but bad press. Maybe they will release a new model with no bloat? Doubt it, its HP and Windows. Reply Neutral inteller @ Jul 28th 2008 8:22AM let me know when these things are 64-bit. Otherwise the solution to upgrade the RAM sorta falls short when you have to stop at 4Gb. Reply Neutral atbnet @ Jul 28th 2008 8:46AM You really don't need 4 GB for this server. I had been running it with the stock 512MB until this weekend. The HP MediaSmart only has one RAM slot anyhow. Low Ranked chickenator @ Jul 28th 2008 8:34AM zzz... Reply | 1 | 2 | Most Recent | Next 50 Comments Add your comments New Users Name E-mail Current Users E-mail: Password Remember Me E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment Add your comments: Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are opensource firewall socks server pptp client required to confirm your comments. When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password. To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags. Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated. Previous Sony Ericsson pushes out a trio of new Walkman phones, right on cue The only iPhone 3G review you need How to reveal blocked caller ID info: a video guide to risky behavior iPhone Dev Team unleashes Pwnage Tool 2.0 Netflix on Xbox 360 and fall's revamped Dashboard / Guide details Sony cutting 80GB PS3 price to $400 in September Next Play Pause Breaking news Feed iriver's touchscreen Spinn gets priced for pre-order Microsoft multi-touch Sphere surfaces in Redmond Dell's new Inspiron 13 and Inspiron 518 are after your back to school dollar Dell debuts Studio Hybrid line of "petite" desktop PCs Sirius and XM merger approved by FCC, extreme partying commences Nokia and Qualcomm bury the patent hatchet, start making out FCC tentatively approves XM / Sirius merger Optimus Pultius: because Maximus just isn't enough Method devised for pwning first-gen iPhones running 2.0 via Windows iPhone Dev Team unleashes Pwnage Tool 2.0 Featured stories Feed How would you change MSI's Wind? Ask Engadget: What's the best iPhone 3G alternative? Palm Treo 800w gets reviewed on Engadget Mobile Hands-on with Samsung's new holiday lineup iPhone 3G and firmware 2.0: one week later Ask Engadget: Best LCD monitor under $400? Poll: How's your iPhone 3G reception? Rock Band 2 hands on, live shots, Ion drum kit, first impressions: woot! Apple's lawsuit against Psystar examined SCEA CEO Jack Tretton dishes: DRM is in, backwards compatibility is out, and video UMD lives on RIM finds security flaw in BlackBerry Enterprise Server Verizon willing to shed 15 percent of Alltel base to make merger happen Nokia 5800 gets touched in the wild -- again LTE, WiMAX vie for ITU's love and affection FCC Fridays Your eyes don't deceive you, Mirage speakers has a new look Popular Mechanics gets wise to HD compression Boxee launches for Ubuntu 7.10 and 8.04 HDTV Listings for July 27, 2008 First US-based aloft hotel opens in Rancho Cucamonga, California Solar Mini-Clip Fan Attaches to Your Hat Super Efficient Material Converts Car Exhaust to Energy Guy Turns Nintendo Game System Into a Belt Buckle Congress Considering Ban on MySpace and Facebook in Libraries 'Moby Dick' Shows Up on Twitter -- 140 Letters at a Time Resources About / Masthead Media / Press / PR FAQ Engadget Software Contact us Sections Announcements Ask Engadget Cellphones CES Desktops Digital Cameras Displays Gaming GPS Handhelds HDTV Home Entertainment Household Interviews Laptops Media PCs Meta Misc. Gadgets Networking Peripherals Podcasts Portable Audio Portable Video Robots Storage Tablet PCs Transportation Wearables Wireless We'd love to know about your electronics purchasing habits. Please take this brief marketing survey. There’s so much more you can do when your phone runs Windows. See it all at StartDoingMore.com. Weblogs, Inc. Network Autos Autoblog AutoblogGreen Autoblog Spanish Autoblog Chinese Autoblog Simplified Chinese Technology Download Squad Engadget Engadget HD Engadget Mobile Engadget Chinese Engadget Simplified Chinese Engadget Japanese Engadget Germany Engadget Korea Engadget Polska Engadget Spanish Switched TUAW (Apple) Lifestyle AisleDash DIY Life Gadling Green Daily Luxist ParentDish Slashfood Styledash That's Fit Gaming Joystiq DS Fanboy Massively Nintendo Wii Fanboy PS3 Fanboy PSP Fanboy WoW Insider Xbox 360 Fanboy Big Download Entertainment Cinematical TV Squad Finance BloggingBuyouts BloggingStocks WalletPop Sports FanHouse Main NFL NBA MLB NCAA Football NCAA Basketball NASCAR NHL Golf Fantasy Football Also on AOL African-American Culture Cars Games Maps Money Movies Music News Radio Sports Television Travel All contents copyright © 2003-2008, Weblogs, Inc. All rights reserved Engadget® is a member of the Weblogs, Inc. Network. Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Notify AOL, AOL News Engadget AOL News Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in: Molyneux talks three new Fables and a secret project Pachter: Nintendo has not abandoned the core audience Blackwater mercs say 'make music, not war' Calgoo goes free: sync Google Calendar, iCal, and others for free Pismo File Mount turns any ZIP or ISO file into a virtual drive Jing turns one, offers 10x more storage space for screencasts TUAW Tip: exclude your Time Machine disk from Spotlight indexing Mac 101: Disabling automatic login Apple stores issue 'golden tickets' for iPhone 3G buyers Kraft, United Natural & Hain Celestial: Organic gains 3 blue chips to watch, the one stock to buy now & car stereos disappearing - Today in Money 7/29 Biggest U.S. refiner, Valero's profit falls 67% Alien Hominid owners get alien in Castle Crashers Confusion surrounds $130 GoW2 Lancer bundle Silver Live members get free cross platform domain name server title playtime through Fall Fiat 500 makes trek across America Buick Enclave gets passport for sale in China Volvo recalls 1,000 C1 platform cars for steering fault C&C: Red Alert 3 beta requirements revealed PAX 2008 pre-registration ends Thursday; 45,000 attendees expected Princess Bride game now comes in Mac flavor: Linux coming later Fantasy Sports Girls in the 'House AJC Blows ESPN's Cover -- Valdosta, Georgia Is Titletown, USA FanHouse Minute: Rumorville
gateway server create own everquest server
OSNews > Thread > "RE[3]: Great!" by Tom K OSNews Forgot Password · Register Login to OSNews Username or EmailPassword Search OSNews Advanced Search Submit News RSS Home Originals Conversations News Archive Resources Topics FAQs Contact Mac OS X Server: The Basics of Share Points and Home Directories Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sun 22nd Jan 2006 23:02 domino server shutdown utility UTC Want to share your stuff with Mac OS X Server? If you need to understand the basics of file sharing using Mac OS X Server, Ryan Faas walks you through both the underlying concepts and the actual steps involved in setting up file sharing and share points. This article is everything you need to know about creating a file server using Mac OS X Server: from the basics of share points to customizing user home directories and everything in-between. 0   22 Comment(s) Thread beginning with comment 88503 To view parent comment, click here. To read all comments associated with this story, please click here. RE[3]: Great! by Tom K (1.92) on Mon 23rd Jan

installing sql server instance

2006 02:06 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Great!" Member since: 2005-07-06 Fans: 9 Where the hell do you get your information? Linux FUDster Magazine? Q: Is there a maximum number of compute nodes that I can configure in a cluster based on Windows Computer Cluster Server 2003? A: There is no limit to the number of nodes in a Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003 cluster except for the number of hardware systems and node interconnects available, and the demands placed on the infrastructure by the applications running across the nodes. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/ccs/faq.mspx ReplyParent Bookmark Score: 4 RE[4]: Great! by dylansmrjones (2.6) on Mon 23rd Jan 2006 02:16 in reply to "RE[3]: Great!" Member since: 2005-10-02 Fans: 21 I don't think the poster is a linux user, considering his statements. He appears to be a Mac user, unless of course he's actually trying to bring Mac users in discredit. This is not entirely unlikely IMO. [edit: added 'think' in first line.] Edited 2006-01-23 02:17 ReplyParent Bookmark Score: 1 RE[5]: Great! by Tom K (1.92) on Mon 23rd Jan 2006 05:38 in reply to "RE[4]: Great!" Member since: 2005-07-06 Fans: 9 Yeah, I'd say you're right. In any case, he's an effing moron. He continues to claim that WCCS2003 has a limit of 8 nodes, even provided the link to the FAQ. ReplyParent Bookmark Score: 1 RE[4]: Great! by Peragrin (1.68) on Mon 23rd Jan 2006 02:21 in reply to "RE[3]: Great!" Member since: 2006-01-05 Fans: 0 So while X-grid can be used on every machine in the office at night Windows Cumpute cluster requires a dedicated hardware and separate copies of the OS bumping up the price tremendously. OS X allow existing hardware to be gateway server used at no additional cost, creating a render farm at night for projects, with hardware you already have. Q. Is licensing different for Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003? A.Licensing for Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003 will be restricted to computers that are used as dedicated computational servers only. Customers wishing to use compute nodes for other purposes (for example, using a cluster head node as a database server) should purchase the appropriate version of Windows Server 2003 x64 Editions (Standard, Enterprise, or Datacenter) for installation on those nodes. The cluster management components encapsulated in the Microsoft Compute Cluster Pack support installation on all editions of Windows Server 2003 x64. ReplyParent Bookmark Score: 4 RE[5]: Great! by Tom K (1.92) on Mon 23rd Jan 2006 03:24 in reply to "RE[4]: Great!" Member since: 2005-07-06 Fans: 9 I'm not comparing licensing costs or office-use capabilities. Yeah, OS X has X-grid in the client versions of their OSes, but WCCS2003 is not a client OS for office workers. It's for datacenters and businesses wishing to do heavy-duty cluster computing where there are >8 nodes. You're comparing apples could not connect to server project to oranges. Hell, this should not have even been a reply to my statement. I was save sandbox on demo server only correcting a clueless troll about what WCCS2003 can/can't do. ReplyParent Bookmark Score: 2 RE[4]: Great! by hraq (2.52) on Mon 23rd Jan 2006 03:13 in reply to "RE[3]: Great!" Member since: 2005-07-06 Fans: 1 Dear Friend You msi k7n2 delta-ilsr server review seem unable to read my previous posts. Windows Computer Cluster Server 2003 that you appreciate is not a product yet, I meant windows server 2003 Enterprise and DataCenter versions, those two support only 8 nodes; and by the way these nodes are mainly designed for redundancy purposes not performance unless of course you choose load balancing with web services. Clustering with OSX improve performance for all kind of

messenger server fails to start

applications not just web services and on all kinds of OSX computers, Can windows do this NOW?! Notice NOW ReplyParent Bookmark Score: 0 RE[5]: Great! by Tom K (1.92) on Mon 23rd Jan 2006 03:27 in reply to "RE[4]: Great!" Member since: 2005-07-06 Fans: 9 Dear Friend, This is what you said -- "Well the recently announced grid computing from MS is ot server pathetic, it just supports 8 nodes while OSX grids support thousands of nodes.". The "recently canape server announced grid computing" from Microsoft is Windows Compute Cluster Server 2003. Dear friend, you lose. Sincerely, Someone who read their FAQ PS: Clustering with OS X will automatically improve performance for iTunes encoding? Photoshop filter rendering? iMovie processing? If not, specify what you mean by "all kinds of applications". PPS: WCCS2003 is basically MPI + Windows. MPI-aware applications will take advantage of your Windows cluster. ReplyParent Bookmark Score: 3 Read more of this thread... Recent Original Stories The Coco Bidet and Toilet Technology posted 2008-07-23 The VTronics iMedia100 Internet Radio posted 2008-07-22 Multiple Return Values in Java posted 2008-07-17 Recent Comments RE: Stupid InfoWorld editor by phoudoin RE: Editor's Note? by amjith RE[2]: I can't vista home dns server imagine saying "oh, wow!" about by ShlomiFish not server enterprise edition activation code standard boot by collinm RE by judgen Headlines OSNews Staff Blog OSGalaxy Gnomefiles Go! Great Expectations by Eugenia Loli-Queru Fiona and Alanis by Thom Holwerda Random Stuff, Part 22 by Eugenia Loli-Queru Twin Peaks by Eugenia Loli-Queru Consumer AVCHD caught up with the HV20/30 by create own everquest server Eugenia Loli-Queru Random Comments RE[3]: Whats better than an iPod? posted 2005-07-19 18:53:46 by Anonymous Oh dear posted do it yourself media server 2006-11-04 22:17:10 by Philby RE[6]: free windows proxy server Good thing this idiocy was rejected posted 2006-06-09 18:42:18 by archiesteel RE: Why? posted 2005-08-27 20:15:12 by Anonymous RE: IE7 is NOT better than firefox. posted 2006-10-19 12:52:42 by eMagius Random Stories Competition Is Actually Good posted 2007-08-31 Watching the Evolution of Arch Linux posted 2006-07-03 Common Usability Terms, pt. IV: Fitts' Law posted 2007-11-07 Random OS Links IOS TriangleOS Ubuntu Solaris X MenuetOS OSNews Privacy Statement  |  Notice to Bulk Emailers © 1997-2008 OSNews LLC. All Rights Reserved. OSNews and the OSNews logo are trademarks of sms server software OSNews. Source Code © 2007-2008, Adam Scheinberg Reader comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for them in any way. All trademarks, icons, and logos shown or mentioned in this web site are the property of their respective owners. OSNews.com uses icons from the Tango Project and FamFamFam. Reproduction of OSNews stories is permitted only with explicit authorization from OSNews. Reproductions must be properly credited.		  



PC World - Alcatel-Lucent CEO and Chairman Resign Search Browse All Home News Reviews How-To Blogs Videos Downloads Shop & Compare Community Business Center Magazine Subscribe & Get a Bonus CD Customer Service Find a Review Select Category Cell Phones Desktop PCs Cameras Graphics Boards Hard Drives MP3 Players Monitors Notebooks Optical Drives Printers Projectors server ntp windev Televisions Sort By Rating Rating Date Performance Price Get Reviews Close Everything About: Back To School Gift

lamp server

Guide Audio & Video Business Center Cameras Cell Phones & PDAs Consumer Advice Desktop PCs Gadgets Gaming HDTV Laptops Macs & iPods Monitors Printers Software Spyware & Security Storage Tech Industry Tech Events Upgrading VoIP Windows Vista & XP Resource Centers Asus Notebook Center CDW Virtualization Center Cisco Small Business Center HP Ink Center Lenovo Laptop Showcase Microsoft Servers Center Try It Free White Paper Library Webcast Library Most Popular Search Terms Laptops iPod Nano Backup Printers Memory Tablet Wireless Storage Most Popular Products Sharp AQUOS LC-52D62U 52" LCD HDTV Canon PIXMA MP600 All-In-One Inkjet Printer Sony Bravia KDL-40V2500 40" LCD HDTV Samsung LN-S3251D 32" LCD HDTV Vizio L37 37" LCD HDTV Most Popular Downloads Spybot Search & Destroy Windows Movie Maker AVG Anti-Rootkit DVD Shrink Free Newsletters Receive the latest reviews, how-to's, news, and more. Weekly Brief Daily Downloads Daily Technology News Go See All Newsletters WiFi Finder Locate wireless services by a specific address, city, state, country, airport, or zip code. Get Connected Now RSS Feeds Get our latest content via convenient RSS feeds. Latest News Today @ PC World See All RSS Feeds Become a PCW Member Join the community and start fax man server error enjoying the benefits: Get tech ups server stock advice from thousands of PC World Members Rate and recommend the latest tech products Share your thoughts in blog and article comments Get free excerpts best world of warcraft server and yahoo incoming server address exclusive discounts on Super Guides Signing up is free and easy. Alcatel-Lucent CEO and Chairman Resign Peter Sayer, IDG News Service Email Print RSS 0 Comments 0 Yes 0 No Recommends Alcatel-Lucent's CEO Patricia Russo plans to step down before the end of the year, and Chairman Serge Tchuruk will quit on Oct. 1. Russo will stay on until the board finds a replacement, the company said Tuesday. With the two-year-old merger now complete, the company needs a replace server cluster cluster smaller board and new management aligned to its business going forward, according to Tchuruk. He has decided to lead by example and resign, he said. The departure of the Alcatel-Lucent's two figureheads, each CEO of one of the pre-merger companies, will allow the new company to acquire a personality of its own, Tchuruk said. Other departures from the board will surely follow, as the company seeks to slim down the board while simultaneously introducing new members with industry expertise. The first to go is Henry Schacht, CEO of Lucent before Russo took over, who will leave with immediate effect. Russo, meanwhile, said she is pleased with the progress the company is making on its cost-cutting program and on growing revenue in a difficult market, but had decided the time was right for her to step down. Alcatel-Lucent's second-quarter revenue dropped 5.2 percent year on year, to €4.1 billion (US$6.47 billion), dragged down by currency fluctuations. At constant exchange rates, revenue would have risen 1.7 percent, free newsgroup server the company reported Tuesday. Recommend this story? 0 Yes 0 No Email Print RSS Comment "Alcatel-Lucent CEO and Chairman Resign" Comments Posting comment ... SMB Networking Center Learn how the networking products from Cisco can give your business a competitive advantage. Cick here. PC World Membership Free tech advice, discounts and more. Register Today! Tags at server based gaming machines a Glance Patricia Russo - Serge Tchuruk - Alcatel-Lucent - Henry Schacht - Science and time server address for router Technology - WiMAX - Technology Related Articles The Tale of Two Busted Spammers Being a technology reporter, my e-mail inbox is a crowded

windows home server add-ins

place. India Developing US$10 Laptop hpc server India is developing a laptop that will cost US$10, for use in higher education. Alcatel-Lucent Revenue Declines, CEO and Chairman Leave Alcatel-Lucent's second-quarter revenue dropped 5.2 percent year on year, while its reported net loss doubled due to... Oracle Issues Warning Over Dangerous WebLogic Flaw Oracle is scrambling to create configuring router for apache server an emergency patch for a severe vulnerability in the server group policy management console download company's WebLogic server, as exploit code... Infineon in Talks to Sell Stake in DRAM Maker Qimonda Infineon is in talks to sell its 77.5 percent stake in DRAM maker Qimonda. More Related Articles CDW Virtualization Center What is Virtualization and how can it help you save money? Click here to find out. Cisco Small Business Center Does your network give your business an advantage. Click here to find out... HP Ink Center houston server support Bring improved color and brilliance to your printed material. setting up a mangos server Visit the Resource Center for more info... PC World's Marketplace PC World's Free Whitepapers Name City Address 1 State Zip Address 2 E-mail (optional) Canadian Residents | Foreign Residents | Gift Subscriptions | Customer windows profile xp server Service | Privacy Policy Search QUICK LINKS: cheap laptops cell phones laser printers HDTV setting up a home server reviews LCD TV Plasmas digital cameras laptop reviews security antivirus windows vista reviews digital camera reviews inexpensive desktop LCD wide screen monitors tech news tech blogs community & mail server components forums laptop prices downloads RSS Feeds About Us Contact Us Advertise ASME Guidelines Newsletters FAQ Magazine Customer Service © 1998-2008, PC World Communications, Inc. Terms of Service Agreement Privacy Policy Community Standards PC

vpn server setup

World PCW Business Center Macworld MacUser Mac OS X Hints iPhone Central Visit download sql server express edition other IDG sites: Select One CIO Computerworld IDG Connect CSO DEMO GamePro Games.net InfoWorld ITworld JavaWorld LinuxWorld Macworld MacUser Network World PC World The Industry Standard hp dl380 server power cords IDG Knowledge Hub IDG TechNetwork IDG International Sites 1
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws