| ROLLING STONE: WHO HAS THE SKANKIER COVER? | ||||||||||||
| We all know Rolling Stone covers are based on sex. We also know both Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera has been on the cover. But the question now is: Who has the skankier cover? | ||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
| I don't like either of the covers, let's just get that straight. They show too much skin from too young females. But in my opinion, Britney's cover has more class than Aguilera's. Why? Unlike some anti-Christina sites, I'll show you why: - Britney's cover is sensual, Christina's is down-and-dirty. - Britney's clothes, the little bit of them, look like they have been bought from Victoria's Secret. Christina's? They look like they've been picked up for sale from some novelty store (particularly the SuperGirl halter top). Heck, they don't even match (bikini and top). - As for the setting, Britney is on a bed with satin on it. Sensual, very comfy. It looks like a night of love with massage and foreplay (that sounded stupid, but that's the impression I had). Christina is on the beach, ready for a quick romp behind the palm trees. - There's a big difference in hair and make-up too. Britney's hair looks soft and not fake blond (it looks brown) and she's wearing brown eyeshadow and natural pink lipstick. Christina's sporting ugly, stringy, bleach-white hair with shiny blue and pink make-up (why can't she stick with colors found in nature?). Eech! - "Come hither and I will please you," Britney's expression seems to be saying. Christina's saying "Come here you big, bad boy and I'll lick you!" - Christina's holding a discman, which at one point during the photoshoot, she puts between her legs You don't see Spears ramming the phone or Tinky Winky in her crotch. - Besides, Britney's body looks like an hourglass in the picture (most of the time she looks like a cheesecake) and Christina looks like a triangle because she thrusted her pelvis out and looked as if her hips are wider than her shoulders (how photogenic). In conclusion, Britney Spears showed more class in her cover than Christina Aguilera. Both look like they are in the sex industry but, then again, you'd have to pay more for Britney (like $3.99 a minute, hahaha). Oh wait, I was wrong. You'd actually PAY for Britney. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||
| Here's the real winner. Although the hair could be better, Britney shows the right amount of skin and doesn't look like a cheesecake (or some weird, bony triangle). | ||||||||||||