|
cercle |
Our
globalisation against the global war Our globalisation against theirs : that’s the
conclusion at which arrive a growing number of anticapitalists. The capital
hardly gives us the choice. Bipolar
capitalism, founded on the opposition of two blocks of capital, but also two
modes of management of the capital, left the place to an unipolar capitalism,
dominated by the USA and their troop of allies. The Islamism, which is presented in the form
of an alternative, presents a double aspect.
By certain sides, it is hardly distinguished from the nationalist
anti-imperialism, such as one knew it since the years 1960. It’s based on the
national capitalist class and petty-bourgeoisie, on the middle-classes
(capitalism cadres), and was addressed to the popular ‘classes’ only one time
its networks and its ideology was formed, i.e. it seeks only an auxiliary
force there (it is a point on which many analysts seems to agree). But, instead of being based on a national
community, it is based on Umma, the community of the Muslims, who includes
countries with Muslim majority, but also of many countries where they are
only strong minorities. It’s based on militant and financial networks
international, and its most known figurehead today is a transnational
capitalist. There is thus an opposition between two transnational blocks, a
confrontation on the scale of globalized capitalism. Strange war, since it shows itself as the
fight of nearly all states in the world against a private and transnational
organization, apparently established in about fifteen countries and on all
the continents, including in South America. The United States announced their
intention to strike in Afghanistan, certainly, but also in other countries,
without revealing the exact list. In any event, we will know rather
early. If nationalism can still seem a solution with
the social ‘classes’ touched by the globalisation (disengagement of the
welfare state, opening of direct competition on world level), a new form of
reaction appears directly on a global scale. It’s an new data enough to try
analyse it. The new worldwide Left is not based anymore
on the state-nation, but directly on the idea of ‘good governance’, i.e. of
democratization of the world institutions. In other words, at the time even
where the neoliberalism justifies the dismantling of the welfare state, the
new left proposes the ideological framework of the world state (not within
the meaning of unified state, at least for the moment, but within the meaning
of a global right supported by a world force and global financial
institutions). This will complicates our (anti-)political
intervention, obviously, since we must fight on a quadruple front : *
Against nationalism, which continues to exist and to which the
globalisation provides its social base.
*
Against reactionary tendencies acting at the total level, such as
Islamism. *
Against neoliberal globalisation, as a major expression of the capital
movement. *
Against neoreformist globalisation, which represents the state control
carried at the global level That’s the way of the slogan "for globalisation, against capitalism" which is used as point of rallying by an increasing number of groups and to individuals in the world. Our globalisation goes beyond and destroy capitalism and state, by a global change of the social relationships. The struggle against war, which prepares under new and difficult conditions, will make possible to many people to become aware of this need, owing the fact that, going in a new phase of development of the capital, we also enter a new phase of the fight for its dissolution and that we must create it’s forms, it’s analyses, it’s methods. Nico
|
