The Truth About Evolution
Introduction
Darwin’s Theory of Evolution has long ruled the classroom and the academic forum as the accepted explanation for human life. This broad acceptance belies the fact that the theory is a complete crock.
“But how can you say that???” you splutter, blinking over your worn copy of Dawkins. “Why would these intelligent men mislead us? And why would anyone let them?”
The answer to your question is simple but profound: Darwinism is not a science, but a religion. It is based on suppositions which are not and sometimes cannot be proven through observation or experimentation, and its followers cling to it with a blind intensity worthy of any group of zealots you might name. To better understand why this is, you should check out the life cycle of the common scientist.
The adherents of Darwinism want nothing more than to deny the existence of God. Ideologically speaking, there is no better tool for this than the theory of evolution, which seeks to overcome nature’s tendency to “declare God’s glory.” The Bible states that the earth itself is testimony enough to God’s existence and essential greatness. Naturally, then, an atheist desperately wants something else to think about when he looks at nature. Therefore he is willing to cling to his belief in Darwinism in the face of substantial evidence that it is fatally flawed.
The only real theory opposing Darwin’s is Intelligent Design theory, which allows for Creation as a real possibility. But wait! With Creationism comes God, and with God comes universal standards: good and bad, right and wrong. And from that springs – oh, dear – personal responsibility for one’s actions.
That’s not a world that a lot of people would like to live in, and these atheistic scientists are no exception. As you may have noticed, the past decade or so has been all about finding particular genes that are the true cause of some behavior or other, so that eventually no one can be blamed for anything they do. Can’t lose weight? Little drinking problem? Don’t worry – we’ll find a gene for all that faster than you can say “Denial”.
There's a reason I'm explaining this now. None of this is in these articles. With the exception of some historical information on Darwin and the advancement of his theories, everything in these articles is concerned with the scientific reasons that Darwinism doesn't work. So check it out - there's a lot of information here, so the odds are good you'll find something you didn't know before.
|
|
|
||
|
This was originally a research paper, meaning that it's organized and extensively sourced. I've reworked the bibliography so that you can find the books I used at an online retailer. There are some meaty arguments in here, and it's better to have read this so you have the context for the other page. You should also know that this is pretty l o n g. But I couldn't stand to leave out anything more than I already had - and as you'll see in the second part, I'm still finding things I'd like to include. |
This section is much more informal than the first page - it's really nothing more than a few distinct points of conflict between Darwinian theory and scientific reality. However, this page contains some really important information that I consider vital to a full understanding of Darwinism's failure. Think of this page as the frosting on the cake. If necessary, you can even think of it as the low-carb frosting on the low-fat cake. Either way, I think you'll find it interesting, and a fairly easy read. Enjoy! |
||
|
|
|
||