Howard
Dean Should Be Our Next President.
Gov. Dean is the most qualified candidate with the best record,
the best campaign, and the best plans for America. Vote Dean!
After Saddam's capture, there was a weekend of propaganda. We examined
Saddam Hussein for scarlet fever in front of the world. The Pekingese
of the Press raved about the government and its soldiers. Saddam is in
the can. We are safer! On the day he was found, an American soldier was
killed. After that, 10 more were killed in a week. We just lost four more
on Friday. Bring 'em on, Bush the president says. Yes we will, Iraqis
say.
The Homeland Security raised the alert to orange. Planes from other countries
were canceled. Specific passengers were the dangers. There was a baby
with a rattle that they thought could blow up America. All passengers
went undetained and unnamed. If they knew who they are and we know who
they are, who are we keeping it a secret from? The secret keepers could
be the same speechwriters who wrote Bush's State of the Union speech last
year about weapons of mass destruction. I make it 7-5 that they will use
one of these planes as proof of success against terrorists.
On the other side of politics, Howard Dean, Democratic candidate for president,
didn't think Saddam Hussein's capture made us any safer in America. The
other politicians screamed that was un-American. It was John Kerry who
said, How could Dean dare say that we were not safer now? Kerry is so
sure we're safe that he mortgaged his house the other day to have the
money to say Dean is a traitor. This is only before the first primary
and Kerry goes for the roof over his head. He seems ready to go naked
on these primaries.
Howard Dean then said that he was old-fashioned and he didn't think you
could judge or punish Osama bin Laden until you had a trial and found
him guilty. Suddenly, politicians and the news industry shouted, What
are you talking about innocent until found guilty? How can this man Dean
say that bin Laden deserves a trial? They said that this was a perfect
illustration of Dean talking without thought. And completely un-American,
too.
In 1945, they had the Nuremburg trials for Nazis who had killed tens and
tens of millions, and had judges, witnesses, evidence and defense counsels.
Just the other week, one of the Democratic candidates, Wesley Clark, testified
in the Hague at the trial of Slobodan Milosevic of Yugoslavia. Yet Joseph
Lieberman, who is a peripheral candidate now and thus a nasty little man,
said that because he relies on the Constitution, Dean is a weakling who
would melt in the face of George Bush.
John Kerry and Dick Gephardt were wildly opposed. Yet all Dean has to
do in this big Des Moines debate today is ask each candidate, "Are you
in favor of sentencing bin Laden before you have a trial?" [Complete
Article].
DEAN
and the WORLD
By Michael Hammerschlag - The Liberal Slant 1/4/04 (link may change -
excerpts)
Dean's combative honesty is striking a deep chord in voters of all stripes,
after being deluged by the blizzard of lies and Orwellian propaganda created
by the Bush Administration. For 3 years, the Democrats have been getting
steamrolled by Bush and the Republicans, often voluntarily. Only Dean
addresses this sorry state. [Complete
Article].
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Following are brief outlines of the economic proposals
offered by the leading U.S. Democratic presidential candidates:
FISCAL POLICY
Each candidate has proposed rolling back at least a portion of the $1.7
trillion in tax cuts President Bush has signed into law. Former Vermont
Gov. Howard Dean ... would repeal all the tax cuts won by Bush.... The
candidates would seek further budget savings by closing corporate tax
loopholes and cracking down on tax shelters. While most have said they
would aim for reducing the budget deficit, they have offered numerous
spending proposals, most notably on health care.
HEALTH CARE
[Dr. Dean] seeks to vastly expand health care coverage. His plan, estimated
to cost $88 billion a year, would expand federal and state programs to
provide health care coverage to everyone up to age 25 and lower-income
adults. It would also allow higher-income adults to buy into a plan similar
to the plan for federal employees, and provide tax credits.
JOB CREATION
Dean would provide $100 billion over two years to states and localities
to be used for infrastructure investments and hiring and training related
to homeland security.
TRADE
All the leading candidates say trade agreements should have labor and
environmental standards.... Dean has also criticized NAFTA.
SOCIAL SECURITY
All candidates oppose privatization and oppose raising the retirement
age. None has offered a specific plan for long-tern solvency. [Complete
Article].
CNN/Time Poll conducted by Harris Interactive. Dec. 30, 2003-Jan. 1, 2004.
N=604 likely voters nationwide. "Suppose the 2004 election for president
were being held today and you had to choose between [see below], the Democrat,
and George W. Bush, the Republican. For whom would you vote: [see below]?"
Date ------- Bush -------- Howard Dean ----- NotSure
01/04 ------- 51% ------------ 46% --------------- 3%
Past polls, "Among all registered voters":
11/03 ------- 52% ------------ 40% --------------- 8%
09/03 ------- 52% ------------ 42% --------------- 6%
In response to a question by the Union Leader, Dean said a plan was in
the works to bring the House of Representatives into Democratic control
next November. Republicans currently control both houses of Congress.
"There is a plan to change 20 to 25 seats," the candidate said. "The House
leadership will help select a number of swing seats. We plan to target
those and help fund those races."
At his earlier campaign stop at town hall, Dean wasted no time lambasting
President Bush, starting with recent scandals in the mutual fund industry.
"I have said that capitalism without rules is like hockey without a referee,"
Dean said. "Unfortunately, as we have been learning in almost daily revelations,
some of the people who were entrusted with protecting the security of
Americans' savings were exploiting their power for personal gain while
the authorities were asleep at the wheel. We need to restore balance to
our system so that unchecked corporate power is not allowed to run roughshod
over ordinary people. This President routinely appoints people from industry
after industry to oversee their industry." [Complete
Article]
The
Dean Difference: Toughness.
"Howard Dean's fighting spirit has more in common with Harry Truman than
George McGovern." - Tough Guys by Robert Kuttner - The American Prospect,
December 19, 2003. (excerpts)
New Hampshire TV spots -- organized by associates of Dick Gephardt and
John Kerry -- began warning that Americans live in "a new, dangerous world,"
in which "Howard Dean cannot compete with George Bush on foreign policy."
Dean, unrepentant, declared in his latest foreign policy address, that
"the capture of Saddam has not made America safer." He just might be right.
Three other Democratic candidates then excoriated Dean. The conservative
National Review's current cover shows Dean in full cry, with the headline,
"Please Nominate This Man." Dean remains the odds-on Democratic nominee.
But can he possibly win in November?
Dean has already achieved something revolutionary. Grasping the potential
of the Internet as a tool of mobilization and money-raising, his campaign
has been self-confident enough to let supporters organize their own web
activities and meet-ups, even as the candidate and his campaign manager,
Joe Trippi, are clearly in charge.
This trust in volunteers, combined with Dean's principled opposition to
Bush's foreign adventures, has energized an ever-growing base to open
hearts and wallets. The Democratic Party has craved this grass-roots energy
since, well, since George McGovern. And there's the rub. Dean could certainly
galvanize 45 percent of the electorate -- guaranteeing radical Republican
dominance for a generation.
But is Dean just another McGovern? One difference: Dean generates excitement
not just as a energizer of volunteers or war critic, but because he is
tough. Recent losing Democratic nominees were diverse ideologically, from
center-right (Carter, '80) to moderate liberal (Gore, '00) to liberal
(Mondale, '84; Dukakis, '88) to left-liberal (McGovern, '72.) But all
these losers had common trait: softness. Despite intermittently brave
rhetoric, not one came across, first and foremost, as a fighter. Dean
does, like Harry Truman and John Kennedy. [Complete
Article.]
Dean
a Resounding Winner in 'Money Primary'
Other Democrats can't match his annual fundraising total of $40 million.
Wesley Clark is a distant second in the fourth quarter.
By Nick Anderson, Los Angeles Times, January 1, 2004.
WASHINGTON - With more than $40 million now raised in his run for the
White House, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean posted a resounding victory
Wednesday in the yearlong dash for cash among Democratic presidential
candidates, cementing his status as the contender to beat in the race.
For all the importance of the Jan. 19 Iowa caucuses and the Jan. 27 New
Hampshire primary, some analysts say the results of the "money primary"
in the year before a presidential election are an even better guide to
who will become the nominee. Since 1980, no major-party candidate who
led in donations received by Jan. 1 of an election year has failed to
clinch the nomination. [Complete
Article].
Dean:
Decisions involve diagnosis, intuition
IN THEIR OWN WORDS: HOWARD DEAN
By Howard Dean, The Boston Globe 1/1/2004
(Wonder what the Globe took out where they put . . . instead?)
Dean was asked how he makes decisions. His wife, also a doctor, had once
said he approaches decisions like a physician.
"THAT'S FAIR, that's very fair. I mean, she's been with me a long time,
and she's a very smart woman, so I'm sure that's exactly how it works.
I mean, the two of us are different in that she, oddly enough, proceeds
more logically from spot to spot to spot, and I tend to be more intuitive
. . . appearing to bypass things, which gets me in a little trouble on
the campaign trail because I often shorthand things and don't explain
them fully. . . But that doesn't mean the thought doesn't get done." [Complete
Article]
GEORGETOWN, S.C., Dec. 30 -- Howard Dean took a detour Tuesday from the
cold winds of Iowa and New Hampshire, where he is leading in most polls,
to this balmy state that barely knows him but will have a major influence
on his presidential prospects.
Focused largely on jobs, education and health care, Dean sketched out
his case for how a northeastern liberal can win in the more conservative,
heavily black South. Coming just days after the Iowa caucuses and the
New Hampshire primary, the Feb. 3 contests here and in six other states
are likely to trim the nine-candidate Democratic field - if not outright
establish the nominee.
"We are not going to beat George Bush by being ashamed of being Democrats,"
Dean told about 300 people at a midday rally here. "I want more than anything
to bring South Carolina back to its proud tradition of voting Democrat
year after year after year." [Complete
Article]
Now Dean is turning the tables according to this report: Dean
Labels Bush "Reckless" by Ceci Connolly, Washington Post, December
30, 2003 (excerpts)
From Iraq to homeland security to public health, President Bush's "reckless"
habit of placing "ideology over facts" has resulted in "the most dangerous
administration in my lifetime," Democrat Howard Dean charged over the
past two days.
"National security and economic security are the touchstones of the election,"
he said in the interview after a rally Monday in Green Bay, Wis. "I think
the president has been fairly reckless in just about every area I can
think of."
Dean accused Bush of taking "enormous risks" by refusing to negotiate
with North Korea, permitting "warlords" to control much of Afghanistan
and failing to address the most serious threats to homeland security.
"We've made progress" on strengthening defenses at home, he said. "The
problem is, on the things that are enormously important to us we have
apparently made no progress. That is the ultimate nightmare of the so-called
dirty bomb or a terrorist nuclear attack on the United States."
In Midwest campaign stops and an interview, the former Vermont governor
said developments both abroad and at home give credence to his assertion
two weeks ago that the United States is "no safer" with the capture of
former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. "If we are safer, how come we lost
10 more troops and raised the safety alert" to the orange level, Dean
said Sunday night in Ankeny, Iowa. [Complete
Article].