Examples from the Educational Literature

Introduction| Search Terms| Annotated Bibliography| Reflections
Home Page

Article One: Middle School Teachers' Use of On-Line Communications.
Article Two:  Final Guidelines and Procedures for Teacher Development Systems:  Integrating Technology and Instruction.
Article Three:  The Implementation of a Positive Discipline Program to Increase the Social Skills of Middle Grade Students.

Article One (1): Middle School Teachers' Use of On-Line Communications.



Citation

    Alagbe, Agodi F., & Lemlech, Johanna K. (1998). Middle School Teachers' Use of On-Line Communications.  (Report no. IR 019 0135).  SanDiago, CA: American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 419 514)


Quotation.

"Clearly the need for appropriate in-service education is as great and significant as pre-service education.  School districts spend an inordinate amount of time and money preparing teachers to use new technology, new instructional materials, and fail-safe discipline systems designed to protect the authority of teachers.  What a waste!  Experienced teachers need to focus on the "new basics" of constructivist methods by engaging in their own authentic learning projects, collaborating with colleagues, practicing inquiry, and monitoring their own accomplishments." (p. 16)

Explanations and Comments

The Internet is a valuable resource in the modern world of technology.  As I approach a unit, in which I am using and having my students compose on the Internet.  I lead myself to this paper on how Middle School Teachers use the Internet.  The paper focuses on eight essential questions teachers' need to face when dealing with the Internet.
    The first question the paper addresses is "In what ways do teachers use online communications in the classroom?"  I found that online communications were being used to create web pages, collect data and participate in global studies, interactions of email with different parts of the world, to obtain research and graphics, and to act like a virtual museum. This ties into the course work because in this course I learned how to find experts, newsgroups, Listserv's, lesson plans, videos, software, and many online resources I will use with my students in the process of creating online communications.
The second question the paper engaged its readers in was "In what subject fields do teachers use online communications?"  They found that teachers could use online communication in all subjects in some kind of research capacity.  The subject that is neglected the most as far as on-line communication goes is Math because it is felt that on line communications are harder to integrate in the math curriculum.  I feel that this course took us a step beyond the research because we learned to use spreadsheets and databases as a part of math curriculum but go beyond that and look at the sensor data and database calculators on the web.  This is another valuable online resource that the paper did not approach.
  The third question the paper looked at is " What purpose does new technology serve in curriculum?"  There was an overwhelming positive remark that the Internet was a source of wonderful resources that exposed students to different parts of the world and helped to bring instruction to life. This course of study supports that because of my own on hands work, I got to experience and explore many of the web resources now open to students.
The fourth question the paper pushes on with is " What problems do teachers and students encounter when using online communications?"  The problems were broken down into four categories, teachers having enough time, the reliability of technology, integrating technology with the curriculum, and classroom management.    I feel these issues hit home for me as a teacher. When I attempted to use technology in the classroom, I encountered issues from reactions to my plans as wasting class time, and problems with classroom management do make it very difficult to command the fullness that the Internet has to offer.
  The sixth question the paper delves into is "How does the use of new technology affect roles and relationships in the learning environment?"   This simply put means that the teacher can create a student-centered classroom or a drill and practice classroom.  I feel it is important to validate either model, even though the paper discredits the drill and practice model.  If these teachers are changing and are now willing to use technology, I feel they should be applauded for being willing to change.  Any change can create some positive results so I hesitate to condemn teachers just because they have not made the leap to student centered curriculum.
  The final question the paper looks at is "What preparation is needed to use new technology?"  Students and teachers alike need to know how to use the Internet not just why to use it.  This means that they must gain skills in searching and research, as well as invest in reading and comprehension skills.  At this point most training is too complex or to simplistic. This in itself is what led me to choose the Computers in Education class.  I feel it is important to allow teachers to change in their own ways instead of forcing them to conform to a particular model. 
Although this paper supported only a constructivist model of reform, I feel we need to reexamine what our overall goals are, and when this is done as allies to each other then we will accomplished the change and reform that is truly wanted in the school system.

   

Return to the Top of the Page

Article Two (2):  Final Guidelines and Procedures for Teacher Development Systems:  Integrating Technology and Instruction.

    Fleming-McCormic, Treseen; and Others. (1995) Final Guidelines and Procedures for Teacher Development Systems: Integrating Technology and Instruction.  (Report No. IR017 462). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.  (Contract No. RI91002006).


Quotation:

"Technology is a cross-cutting educational reform tool, with the potential to provide opportunities previously unavailable and to expand the knowledge and learning experiences of both teachers and students (O'Connor, 1992; Polin, 1991).  Ideally, technology programs in educational environments support current directions in curriculum and instructional reform.  Technology helps engage students in complex and meaningful tasks and can change the interactions and structures related to learning…"


Explanations and Comments

As a teacher on the brink of introducing technology in a competent way to my classroom, I felt drawn to this paper because the title says it gives guidelines for teacher implementation of technology.  This paper has two main purposes.  The first is to examine how technology enhances instruction, and the second is to see how technology is integrated into instruction.  In order for this to take place the philosophy and commitment of the teachers is foremost in the process.  It takes teachers willing to change and use technology as well as proper support staff for technology to be used effectively and influence content standards and guidelines. 
This directly ties into this course of study because the purpose of this course is to give teachers the confidence and know how to be instruments of competent change.  If we are the leaders of the reform process, then this gives validity to teachers studying technology for educational use.
At the present time, technology is used in elementary schools as a reading, writing, and math tool.  It seems very two-dimensional when stated as such.  I think one of the gains this course of study has shown is how this two-dimensional tool used for reading and writing can be transformed into a composition tool.  This will be accomplished through the implementation of draw and paint programs as well as a process of publishing using a combination of graphics and words.  The paper addresses this quickly almost skimming over this issue of technology in the elementary level.  I felt I had learned a more vivid approach through my class explorations, and that technology has to be more than drill and practice on the elementary level.  If this is one of the most absorbent times that children have, plus they have the desire to learn then, I think a new focus needs to be made on the younger students.
In the middle school arena, which is where I will be spending most of my professional time, technology is beginning to hit the scene as a curriculum.  This means that beyond the classroom where technology is being used for research, making videos, creating virtual reality of the school, and other such projects as well as having independent classes that are solely technology.  These classes can be flight simulation, bridge building, aerodynamics, video production, and modules on laser communications, car building, solar energy, computer-aided design, and small engines.  These are great examples of technology becoming more than a tool and being approached as a legitimate curriculum.  My only concern is that if technology becomes a class, will it then become less valued in the classrooms individually.  In this testing atmosphere where the ruler of student achievement is a socially arbitrated test, my feelings are that this will be turned into an elective and loose the value of the reform it is truly capable of taking on.
In the high schools, technology as a course makes the most sense and has the easiest time of being accepted as a legitimate curriculum.  There are seven areas of advanced technology that can be translated into a year long high school program, computer design, computer science, management information systems, systems technological support, technology applications, ethics and computers, and responsible technology use.  These programs can become internships, which give students a way to connect to the job world.
Will technology truly reform education?  I do not think anyone knows the outcome.  I feel like as we are in flux as educators, so is technology.  Only time will tell if true reform has happened or if the legitimacy of technology courses is only a Band-Aid hiding an elective, job training.  My hope is that technology has the momentum to overcome the packages that social studies and sciences have fallen into in the back to basics movement of today.


Return to the Top of the Document

Article Three (3):  The Implementation of a Positive Discipline Program to Increase the Social Skills of Middle Grade Students.

Citation

   Forbes, Reginald D. (1996) The Implementation of a Positive Discipline Program To Increase the Social Skills of Middle Grade Students. (Report No. PS 024 312).  Altamonte Springs, FL: Nova Southwestern University. Master's Final Report. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 396 833)

Quotation

"Discipline in schools had been a major concern of parents, teachers, and administrators for the past two decades.  A 1995 Gallup Poll, as reported by Elam and Rose (1995), indicated that lack of discipline was the number one problem that Americans feel the local public schools face.  This has been true in 19 of the last 26 Phi Kappan/Gallup Polls."

Explanations and Comments

As a new teacher, one of the biggest frustrations and problems I encountered during my first year was discipline.  I felt that I had a pretty good grasp on the subject matter, but getting that subject matter to my students was a challenge when students spend a great deal of their time ignoring the new teacher and being disrespectful to the new teacher.  In my search for some clarity on dealing with the discipline issue, I found this article.  The title appealed to my sense of need as a first year teacher because it is stating that a positive discipline program can be implemented to improve the social skills of middle school students.  I was ecstatic to find that such a plan existed.
Two factors that I found in the article made an impression on me for why this plan was so well received and effective.  First the writer of the plan, Reginald D. Forbes formally approached his administrator with a plan, and discussed it with the administrator.  Once the administrator allowed the Mr. Forbes to proceed, then he introduced it to the staff.   This created a feeling for me of inclusion.  The staff and the administration are working together for a common goal.  I felt that in another school this plan may not have been as effective if this inclusion of staff and administration did not exist.  The second factor that impressed me was the use of technology by Mr. Forbes to accomplish the implementation of his plan.
On the surface this paper does not appear to be about technology, and yet technology was one of the tools that helped to make his plan a success.  Mr. Forbes used video to track the student's progress as he observed them in the hall and in the cafeteria at the beginning in the middle and in the end of his program.  He used outside video resources to support his program, and had students view the video, "Giving it, Taking it, and Working it Out," on two occasions once with the girls and once with the boys.  Technology was also used in storing the information about the discipline cases so that a print out could go to the teacher's each week and they would feel informed.  Desktop publishing would have been used in the creation of the questionnaire that the teachers were given before and after the project.  The memo that the principal sent to the teachers was sent on email.  All of these technology factors although behind the scenes were really parts of a successful implementation of Mr. Forbes discipline plan.
I feel what I gained from reading this seventy-five-page paper was that technology and cooperation have to go hand in hand in order to have success.  The success of a plan depends on this combination regardless of type of plan the teacher is trying to implement, whether that is a discipline plan, a unit plan, or even a daily plan.
Mr. Forbes uses the word positive in his title, and I feel very strongly that it was the positive attitude and the willingness of the teachers and administration to work with him that made this successful.  He used the video recordings, the questionnaires, and even his meeting with his administrator to calibrate his plan.  His greatest accomplishment may not be the success of the plan but how he learned to modify it for the next year.  Mr. Forbes learned from his experience, and he knew what he need to do next year to make it successful.  He saw that the future success depended on more involvement from the teacher, developing a checklist for monitoring behavior, and starting the program earlier.
I think in a way this is an inspiring paper because the writer did not get it right the first time, but was happy with his results.  He used his results as a springboard, and he recorded his accomplishments on video.  I feel like this video process will be very useful to him in the future because now he can go back each year and see the changes.

Return to the Top of the Document

Page Author:  Danielle Earley
Go to Reflections on Project
Return to Home Page
Return to Annotated Bibliography
Return to Search Terms
Return to Introduction
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1