|
Online Notes |
||||||||
|
Wisdom for life- there those who appreciate help and those who
do not therefore it is important to know the difference. These are my class notes therefore are not as logical. |
Notes from classThree major parts cpu, IO, and memory. Computers are very literal minded. One day we will see Bio protein memory. We are at the dawn of where ever this thing has gone. The generic computer is a palm computer has everything you could need like word processor, eventually be able to use the pocket computers and we can be wireless and then you have more in your classroom. The glasses could provide a 64 inch screen in your glasses. Inferences help us to make conjecture and so we could see a new technological classroom. We get to choose what we want our culture to become that makes it an astonishing time for us. Tell me a theme of a curriculum for you want to build. Every which way we can integrate this into what you do. How internet magnetizes your ability to use this in teaching. ALWAYS BLAME THE COMPUTER IT IS GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH. students will have the same issues with digital books that you have. There is no guarantee that web links will last forever. getting at the informational problems we will have as educators. Version of Netscape-4.0 on would be recommended. composer is free. email each other- we are writing a question on a piece of paper and passing it down. a model of what we can do in our classroom. de21849 EMAIL ADDRESS WESTERN |
||||||||
|
I feel like I agree with this statement. I also believe like oration is still an important skill learning people use even if the three R's are transformed and take on a different form they will not be forgotten as primary. One of the obstacles of the transformation is fear of losing basic skills. This is why the old system has stayed on as long as it has in my opinion. Response to question in text |
|
||||||||
|
I find it an interesting way to guide since it breaks the process down for the student step by step. |
The lesson plan integrates study of teaching and learning methods and new technologies. Steps are as follows look at the new information, evoke a response in you and others, and third assess different types of interactions. Then you will publish or share with class some aspect of your week's work. |
||||||||
The purpose of Western Carolina is that all instruction to adhere to the belief that the best educational decisions are made after reflection with the interests and welfare of those involved in mind. This course purpose is that students complete competencies so they can participate in the information age. The participant will get functional valuable technology skills or computer information literacy. Also there will be critical reflection on information and computer technology. Exploring the social and philosophical boundaries of humans and the computer. Important because we are the ones leading in the choices our schools make regarding technology. As students we will learn to integrate curriculum and information age tools and draws on technical information regarding hardware and software. The main goal appears to be to fulfill North Carolina guidelines as well as create reflective students. As students we will be exploring integration of models for learning and teaching and computer based technologies. |
|||||||||
|
I have a lot of stress about creating this web site which
is one of the reasons I decided to take the class. I felt like
if I had a guide that I would feel less stressed as I walked through the
process of becoming computer literate. |
There are 14 points that North Carolina wants us to learn in order for us to be competent in computers and the classroom. |
||||||||
|
I think that
the emphasis on testing is going to make it hard to create a more reflective
student. If the goals of our president are to cut money from
schools who are not having high test scores are schools going to be
willing to reform. At this point although reform has to happen
because other wise I think the educational system will fall apart I
think our emphasis on standards and testing is our desire to control
the change and the problems which are being addresses and or solved. |
Because of the relentless pursuit of ideas and systems and the relentless amount of change a system that can address and solve problems and questions has to be there. Purpose of web site is to discover, refine and solve problems while learning and using current technology information. The top of the CROP web site is for two audience's individuals and communities. One of the goals is the integration of school based and work based learning communities. Desire is to reflectively teach others and us. Crop is a web based problem processor to solve problems of you or your community. A personal, classroom and community problem solving model helps to break the mold of learner as a tape recorder or someone who stores, finds and repeats back information. In order to change we have to reassess our educational goals. In this work finding, sharing and solving problems are at the heart of the learning process. Agendas of CROP 1. Pre service teacher reform 2. Educational leadership 3. Authentic learning 4.Technology skills 5. Information literacy 6. Community building 7. School-parent-community building 8. University research that is community based and business entrepreneur ship. It does all this through studying and refining problems not just searching for answers. CROP stands for Communities Resolving Our Problems. It is a model for solving problems from K-12 to adulthood. Some how they are combining the thoughts of one individual with the thoughts of the community. Which while it could be one person solving a problem it sounds like overall desire is a collective working together. This integrates problem processing with school and community resources and provides a model of transition so that more telecomputer resources are available. The three links are people, perspective and process. SUP or sharing problems. This is a discovery through questions. It is an online database for sharing problems and links the user to encyclopedia of problems. Creating a feel of a table of people in cyberspace. THINK or guidance this leads to support which refines good questions. Looking above the fire to get a better perspective. LEAP or solving problems stands for Look, Evoke, Assess, and Perform these steps provide links to help us work through solutions to problems. SUP sharing problems is a key part of the crop model where we find, collect, and share real and still unsolved problems and share our contributions to their solution. The main component is noticing and making the problem clear. It requires a willingness to face the problems and is more a change of attitude than technique. If teachers and students engage in a process of discovery where students are able to solve problems with guidance the student becomes empowered. The secret is to allow students to discover the problem. Problem with FAQ's is that Frequently Asked Questions has become more of a list of trivia on the Internet. To help with the problems of FAQ's the SUP provides a collection of Still Unsolved Problems. This is a database where participants trade and share questions and responses. The main purpose is to raise a negative perception to a positive one of opportunities. The community development of opportunities is a social skill because this is not just a database of questions and answers but of email addresses and individuals. Part of the big picture is that each community have a place for questions as well as there be a master data base. |
||||||||
|
It is interesting to me
that my first computer did not have 16K but actually 4k less than 10 years
ago. I remember when I was a child in my teens having a Tandy and recording
data on a tape player that I hooked up to the computer. In the Mrp watch price trend graph, it looks like the current price is dropping but by looking at the chart it seems that it will drop for a while and then peak and then drop and then peek and drop and then peek but it is consistently going downward. I am not sure that I know other examples of this but I think from this I at least understand input and output and both. If I have a device such as a web camera or something like that which could take my picture and put it into a web page then that is input because it is putting it actually into the web page. If I have a device such as a cd burner with a cd in it then this could be an input out put device because information can go into the cd burner from the computer and information can come off of the cd into the computer. If I am hearing or seeing information on the computer then there is out put because I am getting something out of the computer. If I have photograph paper and I print a photo from the computer that is an output. Response to reading- I feel like the terminology is clearer while reading this but it sounds like we are getting smaller and smaller devices but in doing so we may give up some of the reliability if there is still to much crashing of computers. My question then is at what point are we going to invest in making our new technology more reliable instead of putting all of our resources into faster and smaller makes it better? I was unable to read A Brief history of Computers because my connection was refused will try from on campus or connect with Mr. Houghton. Sent email to Mr. Houghton concerning problem. |
Computer Design and Its History
The design of computers has shifted a lot in fifty years.
The computers hardware serves as the "first system of operation" otherwise
the software operating system could not function. Technology
has developed in three areas of hardware operating system. The
three areas are the CPU, the memory, and the I/O or input and output
devices. If educators communicate needs well then they can influence
the development of these tools. Three areas that a bulletin board could be
made on is the CPU, RAM, and I/O with pictures of what is coming out each
year. The two trends that are continual are that size and cost are
continually shrinking, while the speed a computer runs in increases
dramatically.
Components of the CPU or the central processing unit which is the center of the computer's operation. This CPU processes collections of bits called bytes. A byte is the amount or number of switches that a CPU can receive from RAM/ROM at one time. Examples of how bytes are discussed are the kilobyte or 1000 bytes (K or KB), a megabyte or one million bytes (M or MB), a gigabyte or a billion bytes (GB) or a terabyte a trillion bytes which is followed by petabyte, exabyte, zettabytte, and yottabyte. The speed to which a computer carries out its operations is a megahertz rate. One megahertz is one million operations per second. By the end of the year it will be common to see 1000 megahertz or 1 gigahertzrates. The best test is your stop watch and the basic operation time for saving and running files, so the megahertz by itself is not enough to give speed. The next generation of computers will run possibly on photons which is a hundred times faster than our fastest computers. Components: Memory RAM/ROM/EPROM chips memory contains small on or off or a 1 or a 0. chips are currently what is used to manage these switches. Silicon is one substance used to make memory but serious work is being done to make proteins to create memory or Bio chips. RAM and ROM are most common memory chips and also EPROM. RAM is random access memory and it can be lost if the computer looses electrical power. Current work is in RAM is why you loose data. ROM is read only memory and these can not be erased once they are loaded or programed with specific instructions this is how your computer is able to start up and carry out specific directions. EPROM is erasable programmable read only memory. This way data is stored and not lost when computer looses power but can be erased and start over again. SIMMs and DIMMS chips are a way to purchase additional Ram. I/O and input output devices , this is the computers ability to send and receive bits of information from different devices to the computer. Input information through keyboards, microphones, graphic cards, digital video cards, scanners, cameras, camcorders, and video devices such as vcr and tv sensors. Output information through printer, CD ROM's, monitor and computer screen, headphones, audio speakers, speech synthesizers. Input/output such a as telephone modem, cable modem, phone, digital video cards, ether net cards, mass storage devices. Computer input and speech/voice recognition at this point if you talk you need to pause between words in order for computers to understand it there is new work being done for the computer to understand fluidic speech and although this promised to the public check it out before purchasing. Computer output speech synthesis, production, and talking there are programs the computer will speak text through headphones. Modem I/O connecting computers through telephone and tv cable lines. Modem is the combination of two words modulation and demodulation. This is what happens when eight bits of information are transformed to waves on the phone (modulation) and then these are transformed into a distant computer (demodulation). TV cable companies provide a faster system and telephone companies are increasing theirs as well through DSL technology. With the future digital and analog systems the need to translate will be eliminated. Computer networking I/O wireless networks for your home and classrooms are found in two sources satellite based or Star Net service from Radio shack stores that interact between an uplink or ground station to a satellite on someone's roof or the tower based which links a ground station with a tower on a near by hill this interacts with a "line of sight dish attached to your home or business. Computer telecommunications, recent input/output innovations, during the present time speed at which computers communicate is bits per second. Modem allows your computer to change information with another computer at 28.8KB. They transfer data from a state of a bit to a wave of sound to go on a telephone line called modulation. The other end is demodulated when converged from sound to a bit or switch which is either on or off. The modem is hooked to the back of the computer in a serial port. Everything hooked to your computer including number and capacity effects performance. Computer Output: recent screen display innovations monitors in the past have ranged from 19" which fit school budgets. Flat screens are now popular they use LCD's or liquid crystal displays. One problem is size does not make reading as comfortable a book. This has lead to electronic ink and electronic paper. This has lead to epaper technology called Gyricon. Another option is the head mounted displays (HMD's) which are gradually shrinking to sunglasses or Personal digital Assistants PDA's which we will come to later. Electronic or digital books advantage the Pro readers can search for a specific passage this would make the emphasis on editing and qualifying creations with options for note taking and organizing information. This way creators could include charts, images and raw data eliminated in past for cost reasons. The Con is that books can be pirated easier and it is harder to track and legibility is weak. Electronic Ink and electronic paper advantages are that some kinds of ink can be printed on any surface. The Gyricon product is laminated and is the thickness of four sheets of regular paper. Head Mounted displays (HMDs) is something you can wear like sunglasses and can have the width of a wide screen tv. This will provide confidential personal computer display, and also allow the viewer to have the perception of being in the scene which is called immerse display capability. This can be used infields such as architecture, surgery, and entertainment. Mass storage I/O recent innovations. One critical part of computer development is mass storage. So far this has been accomplished through diskettes, hard drives and zip drives. These require spinning motors and this is the majority of weight of laptop computers. Unfortunately these can be easily broken. Trends are that the cpu, memory chips, and I/O make up to fundamental components of computers. The size and cost will continue to drop. All of the control of the computer is through "chips" . These are made of switches and tiny transistors. These transistor switches can be thought of as bits and can be on or off. This helps the computer handle input and output of bits. The which is either 1 or a 0. Computers used to require the pace of a building but now can be hand held. The new PDA's are referred to as "pen computing "which" means using pen like device instead of keyboard. Eventually the "form factor" or size and shape of computer will be so small where we wear it will be an issue. Nanotechnology is for doctors to use this is also referred to as Bio chip technology. Trend of speed will be that they get much faster. It used to be that one billion floating point operations per second was a super computer. Now this is outdated. Future revolutions will come from biocomputing, optical computing, and quantum mechanics. Currently computers dependent on electrons to move data around. This will probably give way to photons instead. This means that instead of electrical transistors there will be photo transistors, and instead of electrical wires there will be fiber wires. Despite innovations in speed and price our computers crash a lot. Size, cost, and speed are changing the three areas of technology, the CPU, computer memory (RAM/ROM) and I/O. Our learning will increase with the amount of times our computers crash. The importance of the History of computers for education Originally we see the computer as a human being, a person who computes or does calculations. Both the meaning and the function of the concept of computers was tied to calculation. Break through came through nonlinear relationships. Any change can cause long term consequences. The human brain is very interactive with itself. Non linearity became chaos and chaos theory. This forced a new meaning of calculation to emerge. Prior to 1994 only government and education institution and employees were allowed to use the Internet. This therefore has become the world's largest computer. Now with the World Wide Web the computer is taking on the meaning of a communication device. This created a controlled chaos where no individual uses the system to dominate rather everyone uses it to extend influence but no one can control it. Since 1975 when the first word processor was made available placed an accent on concept of composition. Now we have a merger between calculation, communication, and composition. |
||||||||
|
I get frustrated with computers
because it feels like your always having to undo a million times before you
can figure out how to get what should be simple to work. Other feelings deal with time and attitude, and what do you do when the school supports technology but doing innovative work with students is seen as frivolous. It makes it hard to make technology a first priority when the educational system sees testing as the main priority in the schools. My thoughts on this are that any thing in excess does not work. If it is so student driven that nothing is being done because the students mainly want to talk about their lives and peers more then engage in learning then the goal of what you are trying to accomplish falls short. I am definitely for a student driven classroom but I feel like what I need to do this is less pressure from feeling that they are not learning. I feel like if your environment does not support this kind of learning then the kids sense that as well and it is hard to get a student centered learning off the ground. I feel like their is a perception that children are not learning when teachers are being innovative. It seems like what we are doing is frivolous. I feel like it is difficult to prove yourself as a new teacher if you try to be to revolutionary. What is the balance for the new teacher who wants to prove their ideas and at the same time use the Constructivistic way of teaching without losing respect and or support from administration. |
Constructivism, Technology and the Future of the Classroom LearningTheir are many negative effects to this estrangement. The linear didactic education has made school seem rigid, uninteresting, and ultimately alienating. In order for change to happen we need drastic educational reform. One framework for educational reform is Constructivism. In order to have an impact computers can not be seen as secondary. One of the principles is children actively construct their knowledge. In this process where children invent their ideas their ideas gain in complexity and power. I feel this is about increasing their critical insight and what they think and know about the world increases the level of depth and detail. So in this philosophy they are studying how children create their ideas. In this way the curricula can then challenge and match a child's understanding so that can grow and develop their mind. One of the notions is that of play and how in this novel combinations of ideas and hypothetical outcomes of imagined situations and events. Mental exploration allows children to create, reflect on, and work out understanding. The other is actual experimentation, where the child manipulates and tests ideas in reality. This gives the child direct and concrete feedback about the accuracy of ideas and how they work. All of this comes from intrinsic motivation. The other aspect not to be forgotten is when children collaborate they share the process of constructing their ideas, instead of laboring individually. This provides a means for peers to be resources instead of competitors. This is child centered because they are the governor of their own knowledge. What we are looking for is a "child driven learning environment (CDLE) This is a more active work environment because the children are driving the learning process and the teacher is playing a role of guide. The teacher is one that is circulating and operating with the group as a whole. Technology and the child driven learning are important to one another because these engage the students interests. They can be used as writing tools, spreadsheets, and mathematical problem-solvers. Because of technology information can be exchanged between classrooms as well as students. It provides multimedia technical resources and allows for reuse of educational materials in novel ways. This is a way for print materials to reach more people with more efficiency. How does this new CDLE classroom look ? It is saying that in a traditional classroom teacher lectures about a procedure while students listen and take notes. Assigned readings dominate medium. Class held in a computer lab and work is turned in. Competence in programing is assessed through written tests and through evaluation of weekly programs. On the other hand the CDLE is not a step by step instruction to procedures instead the class is organized by student oriented projects that use the HyperCard system as an expressive medium. Instead of a series of smaller exercise their is one complex problem. The students must conceive and execute an entire program by the end of the course and this provides a rich, open ended, self directed task and this is based on exploration. The end product grounds children in a meaningful task. The class is organized into a four step process. The first part is exploration when the children find the MacIntosh system and explore various Hypercard programs so they are familiar with language and capabilities. The second step is conceptualization where they devise a "story board" or "flow chart" of their own. The third is production where the children assemble materials and make attempt to develop program. This includes time on their own where children compose text or assemble images and sound. The students summit a first draft. Then they have feedback and then they create a final product. In the end they have a public presentation of their product. This is good because it opens up what can be done as a project and it also promotes active collaboration among children. This enables the teacher to take on various roles as a team member, project manage, tutor, and lecturer as well as allowing students to instruct teacher. How do we get there from here is from the collective vision of the community. That would require educators to integrate technology into a more reflective self directed activity. Problems are the lack of awareness of how important technology is in our schools today. Some of this is due to limited budgets others to limited experience on the part of educators and administrators. A sour educators we have treated it more as add-ons or "electronic workbooks." One thing that would help is if teachers are treated like professionals and allowed to use their creativity as a positive educational change. The other problem in the reconceptualizing of educational practice is there needs to be new forms of assessment. Their needs to be a way to assess children's learning as they are occurring maybe through video. Or the other possibility is through the use of portfolio. They are more demanding for the teacher but are worth the effort. |
||||||||
|
If you have more than one operating
system that creates competition. This way microsoft has to meet computer
demand for quality. Otherwise they could put anything out and we would
have to buy it. |
Linux for Education
Linux is an operating
system which is competing with Windows and OS8. This helps us explore
the question of why do we need another operating system. One reason
is that education is price sensitive and Linux is free. At this time
we do not know if the support or crashing of the computer system Linux is
inferior. It seems like the important question is will it run the
applications that matter to schools. Important to know the weaknesses
which are in video, animation, audio, and virtual reality. Dpi
will work with districts using it. It is growing and developing.
They feel that it will be made capable.
|
||||||||
|
I have strong feelings that
we are as a nation supporting those teachers that drill because of our emphasis
on testing and scores. This promotes formulas in education and does
not address whether or not the children are learning or if learning is an
enjoyable process. Many educators take the children out of the equation
and what the end result is more important which is scores. This brings
me to resent the implications of what one person feels a low performing school
is. Are we taking into account where the school came from academically
, what the needs of the students are in that school, and other internal factors
that are going on with those students. In a sense students that are
numb could be more prone to violence. Are we as educators numbing our
children just as much as video games because of what we are teaching makes
it seem pointless or trivial? I feel like my bias is toward the progressive model, and I think that if I were shopping for a type of school that where my bias lay would effect my choice of model. I think that it is difficult for me to say that traditionalism is reform because it is just a way to blame teachers for the failings of the system instead of that if we are repackaging the same ideas in a different wrapper does not make it successful or a worthwhile investment. I saw an example of Accelerated learning when I visited our local city schools. It was very interesting to see children actively engaged in reading with the expectation of having to have read a book in two weeks. I like the idea that they can handle this responsibility. I saw that the majority of the children were very engaged in this and it seems like a quiet and restful learning environment. After seeing this I would definitely implement independent reading as a part of my curriculum because I feel it is powerful and important. My reaction to choice is that I already see the benchmark system being put into place in North Carolina. It promotes formula writing because it is so vital to pass the benchmark that teachers are afraid to not implement formulas that will help the student pass the test. The positive is that on some levels technical writing or writing about literature analysis has a formula to it. I feel like on many levels what it takes away from children as far as creativity it gives something to them because in learning a structure they have a basis for writing. It is kind of disappointing that the Coalition of Essential Schools did not do well in their evaluation because I like a lot of the ideas presented in their model. I wonder if the limits that the school has on it from other forces keeps schools from adapting this model to the extent that it would be effective. Or is this just an ineffective model? In response to Core Knowledge, I feel like there are benefits to having facts included in instruction and that some direct whole class instruction is necessary. I think what we are coming to as far as educationally is that the classroom has really taken a little bit of this model and a little bit of that model. In North Carolina are we really following one model or a mixture of models? I do not totally disagree with Hirsch some prior knowledge is necessary to have an understanding of reading and or inferences. There is some culturally shared knowledge that is important, but that does not mean that progressive educators do not see this or want to use this information in their lessons. It is interesting to me that it seems the schools used progressive approaches along with the Core Knowledge. My reaction to direct instruction is that it makes you feel like a monkey could teach it so why become a teacher. It devalues the power of the interaction between student and teacher. It devalues the student as a computer just absorbing and spitting out information. Do we want an autobot running and making decisions in our world? What would happen if we created students who could not think for themselves but must be scripted all information. It makes me feel of a very Control oriented future where the ones in power would dictate all the knowledge and is all the knowledge being dictated accurate or socially correct as far as the diversity of the US. Positives I see in the Edison Project are that all students have computers. It seems that they are trying to balance out the traditional and the progressive education which also may be useful. It is hard to say if this is successful since there is no data. I feel like the outward bound is one that prepares kids to be better workers because of the emphasis on teamwork. I see a lot of positive things that come from discovery, and it still leaves room for the teacher to guide the students. I have not successfully implemented the multiple intelligences into my teaching yet but I see the value of experimenting with presenting material to different intelligences. I feel like it is important because no two people learn the same way. I guess that is why I do not favor direct instruction even though it has been successful as far as results go. I feel school development program is the most appealing that I have read about so far because atmosphere is so important to happiness. In a sense if the teacher is not happy neither are the students. This sounds like a very productive environment that meets the needs of the staff, students, and parents without losing the desires of the state or teacher. Although Success for All does not appeal to me because it is scripted and direct instruction if it works then it is at least worth trying. I find it difficult to find a happy medium between being result oriented and child oriented which is my true nature. The truth is there is a lot f pressure put on teachers to be result oriented. I do not yet know how to reconcile this with in me. |
Better By Design Graduate Reading List
In the forward Chester Finn
discusses what the essay contains which is America's desire for "school wide"
strategies and "whole school reform" so that low performing schools can just
adopt a design from a list and therefore fix their problems by shopping for
the best model. The ten of the best known design are America's Choice,
the Coalition of Essential Schools, Core Knowledge, Direct Instruction, the
Edison Project, Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound, Multiple Intelligence's,
Success for All, and the (Corner) School Development Program.
The organization that has done the research on these schools is American
Institutes of Research or (AIR). Two schools did not get included in
the report the Edison Project and Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences
model. It seems like since they were looking at the "bottom line" the
two styles they were most impressed with were Direct Instruction and Success
for All. These systems hold rigorous methodology and showed positive
results. They tended to favor designs that have been around longer.
How do we make school a fundamentally different enterprise? The emphasis on school reform has been on "the system" because the school is unequal to the demands we are placing on it. There have been three waves of reform. First we tried to raise achievement through course and testing mandates, second we tried to improve schools through teaching and teacher education, and finally we have focused on defining more challenging standards for learning through restructuring of schools to produce better outcomes. It is our desire to make the school a fundamentally different enterprise. It is a little archaic to think that laziness is the reason reform has not happened. The only things about reform we have found consensus on are "more challenging standards" and "improvements in teacher education." No one truly knows whether individualized instruction or collective class instruction is better or what the competencies and skills or habits "the educated citizen" needs. That is why they studied ten of the school wide models not because they have the answers but because they are in wide use. Most models come from a persons individual vision. Each has attached some kind of child development, cognitive psychology, pedagogical techniques, effective governance or others. Whole school reform is a creation of the Last evade. In 1920 Bertrand Russel attempted to create his romanticized view of childhood. John Dewey started the progressive movement based on his vision of pedagogy and child development. 1960's Herbert Kohl, Ivan Ilych, and John Holt created "alternative schools" this was one of the first model schools which came with operating instructions. Also in the late 1960's came James Comer's School development Program and Siegfried Engalmann's Direct Instruction pedagogy. Ted Sizer began the Coalition of Essential Schools in 1984. George Bush created (NAS)New American Schools Development Corporation in April of 1991 this was for the private sector and was modeled after the business model. Its focus was to create students who had world standards with core academics which operated at cost and addressed school's operations. Others doing comprehensive reform are the Edison Project, Direct Instruction, and Core Knowledge. These believe that schools must be rethought and rebuilt from the ground up. NAS and RAND base on intellectual taxonomy. These give a hands on guide outlining what should be learned, how it should be learned and how instruction should be delivered. It is their belief that the "loose coupling" where teachers are left to do their own thing in the classroom is the problem. Most of the emphasis is on "world class standards" and schools that are purposeful and focused. Under the heading of Profoundly Different Assumptions the essay discusses the principal of whole school reform models because the belief that excellent students will come if it is conscientiously implemented as long as other like state don't get in the way. It is believed in schools that textbooks and vague guidelines created bu the state and local authorities are the problem. The solution is the devising of a curriculum and connecting that to explicit expectations will bring improvement. In a sense any concerted attention can make a school better or everything works up to a point. If the problem lies in classroom practice then the change will happen in what is being taught and how one teaches. There is no consensus on how this should be done. Comer wants the "moral, social and psychological development" of children first before academic matters. Direct instruction "Children learn what they are taught" . Comer's reform is in the sphere of child development and socialization. Engelmann's sphere is in cognitive development and learning theory. In the middle are those who would change school structure, governance, and classroom practice equally and those are the Coalition of Essential Schools and the Edison Project. Other arguments regarding reform come from Expeditionary Learning Outward bound which traces its origin to Kurt Hahn a german educator who wanted a change from the warlike and spiritually hollow ethos. ED Hirsch has argued for an "anti fact" bias which progressive educators feel have ruined schools. Core Knowledge is a "fact rich" curriculum approach. Gardner has used "multiple intelligences" and favors critical though. Hirsch believe skills are before knowledge and can not be taught directly. Progressives advocate "coaching and teacher prompts. Traditionalist believe in varying degrees in direct instruction. Success for all learning is scripted and spoke in unison. All models are "standards" driven but the meaning is different. The Edison Project and the America's choice model have detailed volumes of standards and this includes the Core Knowledge model. The Coalition of essential Schools let the school implement the standards because of its desire for community. In other words it is easier to make a good school than a good school system because a good school usually has one gifted teacher that leads. Therefore it is difficult to reproduce. A design that works only on extraordinary leadership can not have the quality in all schools. Need a design that works with ordinary human material. It is because of this that many models have training like the Accelerated School Project which has thirteen satellite centers around the country. Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound model gives technical assistance. Coalition of schools has accreditation. Even with all this training you can not instill culture and if not allow for innovations that schools will resist them. Cost is a factor and that means that a school could institute because it is cheap. Yet the comprehensive reform is better than incremental reform it is just a messy way to discover. In this guide schools are rated on a five point scale ranging from "strong" evidence of positive effects to "no research." Things that affected the ratings are sample size, duration of the study, appropriateness of comparison groups, and relevance of measurement instruments. Student achievement was measured by standardized tests, statewide assessments, and assessments embedded in specific curriculum, teacher designed assessments, reading inventories, and the national assessment of educational progress. Also assessments were students' course taking patterns, daily attendance rates, graduation rates, within grade retention rates and letter grades. The ratings reflect access to appropriate types of support, frequency and duration of support, availability of tools to help schools implement model. Installation costs include how much staff needs to be hired, curriculum and other materials and staff development. If a system has only been in a school for five or less years there has not been enough time to get good data. The categories are Promising evidence, Marginal evidence, Evidence of mixed or weak or no effects and no research. The other categories are strong implementation support, Promising implementation support, marginal implementation support, and weak implementation support. There is a graph provided by James Traub on page 12 and 13 of his article. The first group they look at is Accelerated Schools and this is Levin 1980 approach to spend up learning children are expected to read books on their own, and to empower the parents and the community. This is based on a high expectations philosophy where the faith in the children and the parents, and the teachers closes the gap not the slowing down of creating a "self fulfilling prophecy." In his schools parents, teachers, and administrators forge a shared vision of what their school should be. Define the problems and create change through inquiry and analysis. They have a "unity of purpose" which was to create a self governing community. His desire is to tap the resources of teachers, administrators, parents and wider community. His philosophy makes students active subjects in their learning rather than passive objects. He had five constitutes of powerful learning "authentic," "interactive," "learning centered," "Inclusive" and "continuous." This is a system that integrates curriculum, pedagogy, and context. It is a hands-on model favored by progressive educators, where the child guides learning through curiosity. He feels the skill orientation is a failed remedial model. This model is relatively inexpensive. It is a process familiar and broad enough teachers do not find it threatening. This allows children to write and be interactive in their learning by designing paragraphs, book jackets, or making a booklet. Decisions in this program are made by school in whole school meetings and steering committees which consist of parents, coaches, teachers, and non teaching staff. There are five "cadres the school follows safety, school climate, parental involvement, data and assessment, and standards integration. The rating that it got was marginal at least 1 study uses a rigorous methodology and shows positive effects, and promising as far as school support by developer schools receive some on-site technical assistance and a variety of types of support. Cost is less than 50,000 dollars. It has been in schools since 1986 and 1,220 schools it affects grades k-8. The second group is choice and this emerged from the feeling that standards are to low or too vague, so the job would be to reform all subjects and all grades. Young children judge their work through "rubrics." In 1989 the National Center of Education and Economy spawned the National Alliance for Restructuring Education. The goal was to foster change at district and state levels by using new standards and assessment tools with techniques of corporate management in the schools and school systems. The core of this is the idea of the standard. The educational system needs detailed academic standards. This fostered "Applied Learning: which is extensive examples of actual student work accompanied by commentary so that a teacher would know an appropriate expectation for writing and what does not meet that expectation. These new standards require assessments. Therefore students need reference examinations in fourth, eighth, and tenth grade and this would be given in multiple choice and open ended questions. Also portfolios would be developed so that are as such as "conceptual understanding" and "problem solving." This is so that uniform standards in judgment occur. This is translated into benchmarks, and this means lesson plans are designed collectively to develop and reach goals. Purpose of the curriculum "thinking curriculum "is that it requires a deep understanding of subject and the ability to apply that understanding to the complex, real world problems that student face as adults. Underlying body of facts combined with "apprenticeship "or real world experience. This is following a european model of study with a focus on total quality management. One of ways this is promoted is through writing workshop where students use rubrics and evaluate each others work. This is a standard based writing process but it has some holistic aspects. They have ambitious literacy standards but that maybe a good place to start. No research on positive effects on student achievement, but it does seem to have strong support with on-site technical assistance for implementation period. It costs about 170,000 or more. The next group studied was the coalition of Essential schools founded by Theodore Sizer who found that schools were governed by docility and low expectations. He saw the solution as respecting adolescents more and patronizing them less. Teachers played the role of coaches and students were engaged in long term projects aimed at "mastery" rather than factual grasp. There competence is shown through "exhibitions" involving speeches, papers, and experiments. He was one of the leading progressive thinkers in 1973 with his tract called Places for Learning, Places for Joy. He thought their should be an unanxious expectation where standards are challenging, not threatening, energy producing rather than defense producing." The best respect is high expectations, and a level of accountability aimed at the adult. The change was in the terms of relationship between student, teacher, and subject matter. The teacher is the coach who circulates among students and students are problem solvers doing projects on their initiative. Teachers encourage instead of tell. This was set up for high school cirrocumuli. The change was to help student obtain a deeper understanding and mastery over a small range of topics. To get away from the paper and pencil test to more projects. A force behind this would be the block scheduling so that students had more time in each class. This was a small unit where students had teachers who stayed with them. Teachers are treated like professionals where they are entrusted to construct curriculum and the principal is the "instructional leader. This is a school driven reform with portfolios as assessments. From the park view report they did not have much success implementing this program because they focused on student achievement and not the culture of the school. They had limitations on their curriculum and although they gave less worksheets and did more presentations they did not successfully implement the program. Therefore few mastered what they need. Evidence of positive effects on student achievement is mixed and weak as far as studies with rigorous methodology and show inconsistent or no affects. There is marginal support during the first year. It was introduced in 1984 1200 schools use it in k-12 and it costs about 135,000 to implement. The fourth group is Core Knowledge founded by E.D. Hirsch a professor of English Literature, who argues the need for facts or a fact rich curriculum. He believes in direct whole class instruction. He blames progressive teachers for decline in schools. They need to secure knowledge and skills that will enable them to improve their condition. It is important to know the authors intentions, background information, and relevant prior knowledge. This way they can draw inferences by recognizing references in texts. He believes that "higher order thinking" and "deep understandings" will create a substantive and procedural schemata. There is important culturally shared knowledge. The learning is a spiral in all subjects so that students are not learning same material year after year. There is an emphasis on whole class teaching and memorization's. Schools tend to take this approach and mix it with progressive techniques which have kept this from declining into a drill and kill technique. The children do appear to know more, but this is not a guarantee of higher order skills. The students want easier readings than the Core Knowledge promotes which means that want to redo on grade level. One critical thing said is there is a reason certain books are read at certain ages and this is not taken into account. It was given a promising rating as far as school achievement and rigorous methodology is concerned in at least three studies. It is also give promising school support. Costs about 50,000. Introduced in 1990 about 968 schools use it k-8 and it does improve test scores. The next course examined was direct instruction. The founder of direct instruction was Siegfried Engelman. "If presentation is consistent with one and only one interpretation students will learn concept." The whole class is scripted and can not leave skill until all kids master. This is a system biased on behaviorism. The assembly line approach that breaks learning down to units. Every thing is based on the principle that "Only mastery of a concept or operation provides the student with information about how to organize rules, facts, and operations. Everything is scripted to the teacher and presented in small units. Everything is reinforced over and over. It is based on the break down of narrative knowledge into discrete hierarchically structured units called "fact systems." This can be seen with charts boxes and cells. This is an ugly method of teaching that is effective. Teachers aren't given time to plan because they have no input. They have to fill out detailed day to day reports on children. They always know where kids are on 67 or 131. This is considered to have a strong positive effect on children with at least 4 studies using rigorous methodology and showing positive effects. They get a lot of support from developer and it is labeled promising. Some on-site technical assistance and a variety of types of support. It cost under 150,000. It came about in late 1960's. 300 schools use it for K-6. The next model examined is the Edison Project started by a profit making company. Cirrocumuli is dictated by detailed standards to promote understanding as well as factual grasp. It incorporates "student centered" and direct instruction. The school is divided into "academies" to mark out broad intellectual stages, as well as having still smaller "houses" to promote a sense of community. Technology is central. If you are above grade two you have a computer. This system has not failed and it has also not turned a profit. Instead of being designed by an individual it was designed by a "core team" The designers were successful professionals no prior education. They used polling and focused groups and found parents are more willing to change then you think. The designs are similar because they oppose tracking, keep high expectations for all children, envisioned a curriculum organized around clear standards, and proposed an integrated and student centered place that still used direct instruction. This supports portfolios and performance assessments as well as standardized tests and advanced placement courses. They have a longer school day with the emphasis on teacher professionalism and lean administration. They use off the shelf packages such as Success For All and the University of Chicago School Mathematics Project for math instruction Emphasis was on standards for all subjects for all age levels. They have a very structural design and usually operate with local districts and charter schools who can set their own calendar and go for 200 to 205 days a year eight hours a day. Students remain with the same teachers and the same group of peers for two to three years in what is called academies. School culture is an important part of design and teachers are institutional as well as intellectual leaders. They are given up to two hours to plan which is spent with colleagues discussing instructional issues as well as concerns for children. The day is broken down into Specials spanish, art and music in the morning followed by ninety minutes of reading instruction the Success For All program and then an hour of math and an hour of writing. Students then use science, history, social studies and gym as special two or three time a week classes end at 4 pm. The teachers go home at 5:30. Students wear blue and white uniforms. There are no door separating the classrooms. It did not appear that the computers were being used to their full potential it is nice that kids are exposed early to them. There is an emphasis on character and ethics and someone who serves as an "intervention specialist" They think of themselves as a unit. There is not any information on effectiveness and cost. It was first introduced 1995. They have about 79 schools grade levels range from k-10. Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound is founded by the german educator Kurt Hahn. He placed the ability to experience joy, teamwork, and arduous physical test at the core of the school experience. This is a school of active self discovery. The curriculum is based around an expedition which is the root to learning personal, and physical experience. He based his ideas on inspiration found in Plato and the need for a moral regeneration. The spirit of physical and moral fitness and the new spirit of service. In 1920 the Salem school sponsored by Prince Max von Baden, germany's last imperial chancellor. He had "The seven Laws of Salem: 1. "Give children the opportunity for self discovery" 2. "Make the children meet with triumph and defeat." 3. "Give the children the opportunity of self effacement in the common cause." 4. "Provide periods of silence." 5. "Train the imagination" 6. "Make games important but not predominant." 7. "Free the sons of the wealthy and powerful from the enervating sense of privilege." He is a modern progressive because of his emphasis on imagination. The main idea that a child could test himself and come to his own through discovery. The purpose of mastering fears, strengthening the will and learning an ethic interdependence. Expeditionary learning is a form of the interdisciplinary project based and usually took a semester long. "The base camp" is the classroom and the journey gives kids a reason to acquire skills. Each child has a crew of 25 or more that are their unit. They allow experience to grow organically and there is a seems of community. The results look promising from at least 3 studies use a rigorous methodology and show positive effects. Their is strong support from the developer. It cost less then 100,000 and was introduced in 1992. There are about 60 schools using it k-12. The next model is Multiple intelligences designed by Psychologist Howard Gardner. Humans have more gifts than just "logical mathematical" and "linguistic intelligence." Therefore he added to this "musical," "spatial," "interpersonal," "interpersonal," "bodily kinesthetic," and finally the "naturalist's intelligence." They feel not enough tests have been done to prove this and still many are faithful to "g" or general intelligence. Educators are more receptive because this is a way to see what way people are smart. Evert child should be given an opportunity to discover his or her own genius. He wants an end to standardized testing and traditional paper pencil assessment. This is a highly individualized and "child centered" pedagogy. He wants to change the way we measure human worth. At this point effectiveness and cost and stated information is not available. School Development program created by Psychologist James Comer has written that cognitive development "will not be possible for many students until the social, psychological and moral growth, interpersonal skill development and social conditions are adequately addressed. In his system children's developmental needs are a part of school policy, and this is done through a spirit of "consensus, collaboration, and no-fault." His ideas are that children will not learn unless they are ready to learn. His ideas formed in the late sixties with notions of a system organized into three teams. The parent team which gives parents a means to be involved with the school, and coordinates their volunteer activities in the school. The student staff and the support team which consists of the school psychologist, counselors, special ed teachers, and institutional expression f Comer's "development centered" model. The governing body is the School Planning and Management team which is parents, teachers, administrators and support staff. The SPMT guides the school and creates the curriculum and pedagogy. The main aspect is atmospheric because of the principles of consensus, collaboration, and no-fault. This models respective conversation to children. This is a very friendly culture. The classroom is left to the teachers. The curriculum is determined by the state. They create a healthy environment for learning where they do what they believe in and at the same time what the state dictates The evidence of positive effects on student are promising with at least 3 studies use a rigorous methodology and shows positive effects. They have promising support because their is some on site technical assistance. It cost less than 50,000. It was introduced in 1968 with 721 schools participating, and it is grade level k-12. Success for All is crisis intervention program by Robert Slavin. He created because he wanted all children to feel successful as readers. He sees reading as " a complex process that involves decoding of words, tracking of words across the page, and constructing meaning from individual words as well as sentences in nineteen areas of performance. The students are homogeneously grouped and regrouped as they progress. Students having problems are given twenty minute sessions of one-on-one tutoring. This is direct instruction with a scripted performance. The difference is that slavin also supports cooperative learning so students do work with their partners. The truth is it's ugly but it works. The results are there when there were no results before. Evidence is that this is strong positive effects on student achievement with at least 4 studies use a rigorous methodology and show positive effects. There is strong support and schools receive frequent on-site technical assistance and a variety of support for the full implementation period. It costs less than 150,000 and was introduced in 1987. The number of schools are 1,500 and used for Pre K-6 grades. |