Home Page

Integrated Action Learning Project Plan

 

Development of a Redesign Plan for Placer Court’s Security Network

 

Dan Cunningham

 

TS4990 Integrated Action Learning Project

 

Instructor, Sharon Bender

 

April 26, 2006

 

 

Project Description

 

My IAL project would be to develop a robust series of servers and processes’ revolving around network security to insure Placer Courts has a reliable backup, DR solution and virus management that can be accessed or modified without disturbing Placer’s core network.

 

The initial thought behind this project would be to develop a backup server that can be maintained during work-hours without disrupting any services.  Currently, the backup software is installed on a file server that can’t be brought down during business hours.

 

Since the backup software would be on its own server, disk staging would be initiated.  Disk staging copies data to the backup server’s hard drive allowing one to backup the data to tape at a later time and to more easily recover data utilizing the original stage the media was copied to.

 

Disaster Recovery (DR) would also be brought into the mix and performed automatically on all servers given a ‘critical’ rating once a month or manually when a major change is done to a server.

 

Concerning virus protection, McAfee is installed on most of the servers.  There is no management or reporting function with that software and our license is due to expire.  Previous research revealed Trend Micro’s Small Business Solution would do what we want and has discovered (through Trend’s free scanning on their website), viruses on a couple of IT laptops that McAfee did not detect.  The key to success with this part of the project would be to figure out how to roll it out on all servers and workstations with minimal downtime.

 

In addition, standards will be created on backing up system data, DR and virus protection.

The project will begin in Unit 6 and conclude in Unit 10 of the TS4990 course.  To evidence completion of the project, I would include the following appendixes in the project final report: Appendix A: Pictures of the installed equipment and screen shots of completed work while keeping in mind not to divulge proprietary information.  Appendix B: Letter of Project Completion from Stakeholder, John Mendes, CEO.

 

 

 

Feasibility

 

In performing a feasibility check I examined the following areas:

 

  1. Proposed Change: Define the proposed plan
    1. Is the problem worth solving?
    2. How do end-users and management feel about the problem?
  2. Level of Need: What is the urgency of completing the project?
    1. Measure of how reasonable the project timetable is?
  3. Requirements: Time, money, commitment from CEO, technical items (see items needed below).
  4. Technical: Is the proposed technology or solution practical?
    1. Items needed: (estimated components that will be required)

                                                               i.      Utilize 2 in-stock servers believed to have all necessary components for the project.

                                                             ii.      Tape library backup unit. (compatible with current tapes)

                                                            iii.      Spare unit (for redundancy, tape backup unit can be a lesser model)

                                                           iv.      Upgrade current backup software to latest version.

1.      Purchase @10 client agents for backup software

2.      Upon upgrading software believe to have all necessary components. (open file agents, tape library, DR, Exchange, SQL)

                                                             v.      New virus protection software that can replace current software and provide reporting.

1.      Appropriate licensing

  1. Economic Issues: Measure the cost effectiveness of the project
    1. Cost-benefit analysis
  2. Constraints: Budget, other priority work currently being conducted, time to receive items ordered.

 

 

 

Prototype

 

The following prototype depicts my project.

 

 

 

 

 

Objectives

 

My learning objectives in producing my IAL Project are to:

 

1. Apply what I have learned at Capella to contribute towards a successful project.

2. Improve my understanding of the critical components of building a project.

3. Improve my understanding of the critical components of managing a project.

 

My project objectives in producing my IAL Project are to:

 

1. Produce a finished product that will successfully handle the need described in the project title and description.

2. Provide documentation on server assembly.

3. Provide standards from which to operate by concerning this project.

 

 

Project Schedule

 

In producing my IAL Project I will apply the following project schedule:

 

Tasks

Duration

Research Phase

5/8/06 – 5/14/06

Task 1: Inventory & check existing equipment to be used in project.

Task 2: Research Dell web site concerning additional items needed (tape drive).

Task 3: Research Trend Micro site for appropriate software and licensing to be ordered.

Task 4: Research ArcServe site for items to be ordered.

Assisting Resources:

Literature

Bender, S. L. (2003). Producing the Capstone Project.

 

Internet

http://www.dell.com, http://www.ca.com

http://www.trendmicro.com/en/home/us/home.htm

 

People /Budget

Additional assistance (people) not needed at this time.  Budget set at $20,000

 

Equipment

Dell 2850, Dell SC420

 

Analysis/Ordering Phase

5/15/06 – 5/21/06

Task 1: Review plans on items needed to be ordered. 

Task 2: Determine if everything will work as planned.

Task 3: Generate final list of items that need to be ordered.

Task 4: Hand list off to employee responsible for ordering.  Have him order product.

Assisting Resources:

Literature

Bender, S. L. (2003). Producing the Capstone Project.

 

Internet

http://www.dell.com, http://www.ca.com

http://www.trendmicro.com/en/home/us/home.htm

 

People

Gerald Story, Assistant Network Adiministrator

 

Equipment

Tape library backup unit, spare backup unit, 4 Dell 300GB SCSI Drives, Upgrade ArcServe to version 11.0 to 11.5, 10 ArcServe client agents, Trend Micro virus protection

 

Install/Documentation Phase

5/22/06 – 5/28/06

Task 1: Track orders, look out for items to be received.

Task 2: Setup equipment (Configure OS, install software & agents,  configure tape drive)

Task 3: Document work done

Assisting Resources:

Literature

Bender, S. L. (2003). Producing the Capstone Project.

Computer Associates (2005) Brightstor Arcserve Backup for Windows

Trend Micro (2003) Trend Micro Client/Server/Messaging Suite Administration Guide

 

Internet

http://www.ca.com , http://www.trendmicro.com/en/home/us/home.htm

 

People

Greg Harding, Network Administrator

 

Equipment

Dell 2850, Dell SC420, Dell Backup unit, Trend software and licensing info, ArcServe software and licensing info, 300GB SCSI drives

Testing Phase

5/29/06 – 6/4/06

Task 1: Configure ArcServe and Trend Micro

Task 2: Configure DR

Task 3: Test all components configured

Assisting Resources:

Literature

Bender, S. L. (2003). Producing the Capstone Project.

Computer Associates (2005) Brightstor Arcserve Backup for Windows

Trend Micro (2003) Trend Micro Client/Server/Messaging Suite Administration Guide

 

Internet

 

People

Greg Harding, Network Administrator

 

Equipment

Configured servers, tape drive, tapes

Implementation Phase

6/5/06 – 6/11/06

Task 1: Bring new system live

Task 2: Shut down previous systems

Task 3: Seek feedback from the Stakeholder.

Assisting Resources:

Literature

Bender, S. L. (2003). Producing the Capstone Project.

 

Internet

 

People

Stakeholder, John Mendes- CEO

 

Equipment

Configured servers, tape drive, tapes

 

 

Risk Management

 

I have performed a risk management analysis as follows:

 

 

Risk Factor Checklist

Risk Considerations

Low

Risk

Medium Risk

High

Risk

Team Subject Matter Knowledge

X

 

 

Mature Hardware Reliability

X

 

 

Hard Drive Reliability

 

X

 

Clear Performance Objectives

X

 

 

Funding Stability

 

X

 

Untested Disaster Recovery Plan

 

 

X

Security Breach during Implementation

 

 

X

High Risk Analysis

Risk Considerations

Risk Significance and Potential Solution

Untested Disaster Recovery Plan

Problem: Planned Disaster Recovery ‘concept only’ not tested by team. If fails, no formal DR. 

 

Solution: Complete daily backups will be done on all servers at risk, CA assoc. web site and former instructor for assistance.

Security Breach during Implementation

Problem: Current security processes could be put at risk when new processes are introduced. Risk of taking down current security network. 

 

Solution: Backup and virus protection on completely different servers than what is currently being utilized.  Team is very knowledgeable with current system, can rebuild if necessary.

 

My contingency plan is to…

 

After completing a risk analysis it has been determined that the high-level risks to the successful completion of my project are:

 

1.      Untested Disaster Recovery Plan

2.   Security Breach during Implementation

 

Efforts to offset these risks are in place. However, if for some reason my project does not appear to be developing successfully regardless of the efforts made, I would present reasons why I am unable to proceed with the project as planned. Appropriate redirection of the plan would take place upon instructor and/or stakeholder approval and the new direction would be discussed in the final project report. Redirection might be to permit the [analysis, testing, presentation, or other] phase(s) of my project to constitute my project in its entirety. The outstanding phase(s) (e.g., implementation) of my project would in such case be completed outside the scope of the capstone project. Upon approval, such redirection would represent my project in its entirety.

 

Literature Review

 

I performed the following literature review concerning their value in producing my project:

 

Internet

 

1.      University of Denver (2005). Network Security. University Technology Services. Retrieved April 28, 2006, from http://www.du.edu/security/virus.html

 

Dealing with computer viruses has become a way of life for everyone who uses a computer.  Some users tend to ignore virus threats until a virus disrupts their computing world beyond a simple reboot.  For the rest of us who can’t afford downtime caused by malicious code we choose to combat the intruder by utilizing antivirus programs such as McAfee, Norton and Trend Micro.  For those who aren’t familiar with the specifics, a virus is defined as malicious code that damages or destroys data.  A worm is a self replicating virus. 

There are many types of programs that can harm your computer besides viruses.  Spyware is a type of program that gathers and reports information about your computer activities to a system controlling it.  You can most likely discover spyware on your system if it’s unreasonably slow and seems to have an abnormal amount of pop-ups while you surf the Internet.  Such free programs as Ad-Aware will find spyware on your computer and get rid of it.

The Courts will be changing its virus protection from McAfee (the familiar shield with an ‘M’ in it) to Trend Micro (a blue circle with a pulse meter in the middle of it).  Trend Micro, besides cost has many advantages over their competitors, namely a free scanning engine available at http://housecall.trendmicro.com/ . As the Network Security paper points out, “Although this is a valuable and useful tool, it does not provide real-time scanning and is, therefore, not a viable substitute for a full antivirus package” (University of Denver, 2005).  Basically this is a single use method to scan your system for viruses or a try before you buy method to see how it stacks up against virus protection already installed on your system.  For the record, Trend Micro found viruses on the test system that McAfee did not.

 

2.      Computer Associates (2005). The Threats You Face: Why Total Protection Matters. Retrieved April 27, 2006, from http://www3.ca.com/smb/viewpdf.aspx?cid=71763

 

The threats we face as computer users are many and they seems to grow in numbers by the day.  The main reason behind building a security division is to combat what (Computer Associates 2005) calls “the top 5 technology challenges and the solutions you need to address them”.   Though not all will be addressed in this initial phase of the security project, the rest will come in time based on the success of this initial project. 

 

Though the Internet is a great source of information and has become the ‘de-facto’ source for research, there are no real safeguards to police or control the information on the ‘web’.  If you’re not careful you can unknowingly let in hackers, spam, spyware, and virus that can cause all sorts of damages, perhaps even loss data, software and systems.  This in turn could cause loss of productivity and revenue.  According to CA, “dollar losses from virus attacks cost more than twice as much as the next most costly kind of attack” (Computer Associates 2005). 

 

Backing up your data should be a ‘no-brainer’ for any company wishing to stay in business.  However, there are some businesses that rely on un-experienced information technology professionals who don’t know how to properly backup or test their backups for reliability.  According to CA, “companies that suffer outages lasting more than ten days never fully recover financially, and more than 50% of these firms are out of business within five years” (Computer Associates 2005).  To mitigate this threat, a backup and disaster recovery plan will be implemented.

 

3.      Uniblue (2005). Business Continuity or Disaster: The need for Backup among Small and Medium Sized Businesses. Uniblue White Papers. Retrieved April 26, 2006, from http://www.liutilities.com/products/resources/whitepapers/wbzwhitepaper1.pdf

 

A strong backup is more important than most might realize.  Some companies might not consider backing up their data due to a misconception that they can only loose their data should they be hacked.  Data can be lost for many reasons, some including theft, user error and natural disasters.  That on its own should prompt any company, big or small to invest in a formal backup system.  Once businesses venture to form a plan around backing up their data they often come across to issues that they must solve; management and storage and how to recover should a disaster strike.

 

The Uniblue white paper advises companies to examine the impact of lost data and as such to devise a top down approach to protect this data.  This would involve the use of firewalls, antivirus protection and backup and recovery software.  According to studies read in the (Uniblue 2005) whitepaper, the following will provide an idea of the types of data loss that can happen to any given company:

 

  1. Hardware problems and malfunctions (between 44% and 56%).
  2. Human error including accidental deletion (between 26% and 32%).
  3. Software and application corruption (between 9% and 14%).
  4. Viruses (between 4% and 7%).
  5. Natural disasters (between 4% and 7%).

 

(Uniblue 2005) also mentions that other forms of data loss might include faulty software rollouts, driver setting conflicts, lost or locked-out passwords, equipment theft, power surges, intrusion and hacking.  As one might guess, such a loss of data can cause irreparable damage that some companies might never recover from.  As such, data and information assets and those who manage them are arguably the most valuable assets to any business.    

 

 

Appendix

 

The following appendixes would be added to the Integrated Action Learning Project Final Report to provide a sample of my work and to evidence satisfactory project completion:

 

Appendix A: Sample Pictures of the Installed Equipment

Appendix B: Letter of Satisfactory Project Completion from Stakeholder, John Mendes

 

 

 

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1