It seems to me that everybody has excepted the evolution theory as fact. Perhaps we should define this word "theory" according to Websters dictionary, "The philosophical explanation of phenomena, either physical or moral.". If a theory is philosophical, then why do so many people assume that it is fact? I would like to analyze this theory to determine whether it should be considered fact or fiction.

According to the current theory the primordial amoebas evolved into new species through cumulative mutations. A mutation is a mistake in the synthesis of DNA that can occur naturally. DNA polymerase, the enzyme that builds DNA has an error rate of one error per TEN BILLION base pairs. A base pair is a unit in the DNA code. Evolution is supposed to be caused by "good" mutations that code for helpful changes in an animal.

1. The enzymes are so effective at "editing" DNA that mutations are extremely rare.
2. In order for life to exist DNA, RNA, and all the hundreds of enzymes in even an amoebas all had to be formed at the same time, in the same place, and under perfect conditions. This is a basic flaw in all theories of spontaneous generation and no evolutionist has ever dealt with it.
3. All known mutations range from mildly bad to fatal. Cancer is the result of certain mutations, so is Tay-Sachs and other deadly diseases.
4. If one base pair mutates it can kill or severely handicap an animal, therefore even if a mutation does occur that can even be good with further mutations the animal that has it wouldn't last long enough to pass the mutation on through its descendants.
5. Adaptations are impossible on the genetic level because there is no reason for an animal in the jungle to be any more likely on the molecular level to mutate into a variety that can climb trees than an animal living in the arctic tundra. Even if you say that in a selective environment it is more likely that a given mutant will benefit there is still no reason that such mutants should arise in the first place. This makes Darwin's observations fit in perfectly. The different finch strains all were present in the population to begin with. Once they arrived on the Galapagos Islands they found their particular niches. If you accept evolution then you have the problem of how so many beneficial mutations just happened to take place in the relatively short time the finch varieties were there.
6. Because mutations are so rare only one animal may develop a mutation and therefor the children of that animal will only be partially affected by this mutation. In order for a mutation to survive another animal must develop the same mutation. The odds of the same mutation occurring twice naturally is one in 100,000,000,000,000,000,000.
7. Survival of the fittest requires that the majority of a group of animals develop multiple "good" mutations and that they survive and become predominant. I don't have enough (web page) disk space describe the odds against this happening but it has been calculated that the most insignificant change of species in bacteria would take 100,000,000,000 years, assuming that only several base pairs would have to mutate, a ridiculously optimistic assumption.
8. Why do bacteria survive if according to Darwinian standards they are hardly the "fittest"? So many more advanced life forms with far better defense mechanisms have become extinct but bacteria thrive on.
9. There are 3,000,000,000 base pairs in human DNA. The error rate of DNA synthesis is one in 10,000,000,000. Therefore about 30% of all people or apes born have some mutation. There are 300,000,000 different base pairs in the exons, the base pairs that really "count". The odds of a mutation occurring in one of those base pairs is 3% of all births, ape or human. The odds of all of the mutations hitting the right base pairs (exons) is .02 of .02 done three hundred million times! But wait, it gets better. As more "correct" mutations occur the odds fall steadily. When it is half done only one in one hundred mutations is "good". At the 90% mark one in 500 mutations is positive. The odds of the final mutation occurring are one in 3 billion! Remember that a single "bad" mutation can be certain death. Most mutations that affect essential parts of DNA are so severe that they result in miscarriages. If you realize how many billions of years it would take for an ape to become a human assuming that the odds were completely weighted in its favor can you even think of the odds against an amoebas doing that!

The answer is that evolution does away with God and reduces humans to the level of animals. This allows people to do whatever they want without guilt or fear of retribution. The amoral and decrepit society we live in is entirely based on evolution. If people are merely animals in a random world then why be burdened by ethics? Nazism is based on evolution: whoever is not considered the fittest can't be allowed to survive. The philosophy that the world is getting better is a great ego boost for civilization, yet the core of evolution is that nothing has any meaning, life itself has no purpose. The basic value of evolution is animalistic: Doing whatever I feel like doing is the ultimate fulfillment of my existence. For the intelligentsia of the Western world who embrace that idea I will sum up my response: Here Professor, hear boy. Good dog.

Can it be that human life is worthless, a random lump of matter without a purpose? Why are we here? Where are we going? What is the meaning of life? We are not some animal species that walks the face of the earth aimlessly. We are human beings created by God. If you think that is an unscientific statement then please provide a seamless alternative without invoking blind faith in atheism. The very dust of the earth bears witness to the greatness of the Creator. How can any scientist not believe in God?

Disclaimer:
Please remember that I am writing this to influence your thoughts. I will use subliminal messages and an old alien mind trick to alter your sub-consience mind in a plan for Global Domination. If you are reading this disclaimer you have already been affected.