Estuarine Flooding and Dewatering Simulation |
| gbriv-mesh.gif (15.7kb) | Finite element grid (10223 nodes and 18710 elements) |
| gbriv-bat2d.gif (25.0kb) | Color map of bathymetric depth |
Comments:
Dynamic analysis time series of current and sealevel measurements
at a location near the middle strait shows that the principal force
balance is between the frictional stress and the pressure gradient
frocing (swift and Brown, 1983). Hence, the kinematic assumption is
confirmed. The computational grid, named
gbriv for the
Great Bay Estuary system is created using linear equilateral triangles
fitted to the shoreline boundary. There are 10223 and 18710 elements.
The bathymetric depth contour
reveals a center channel running north to
south and tidal flats in the southern part of the domain.
M2 tidal forcing is specified as a Dirichlet elevation boundary condition
across the northern inlet boundary at the top. The
amplitude is 0.83m. The
simulation was started with fluid at rest and was terminated after
five M2 tidal period (62.10hrs). The simulation setup is
given below. All the simulation parameters are summarized in Table below.
| Description | Parameters |
| Bathymetry range | 0 - 21.80m |
| Porous layer thickness | 0.25m |
| Hydraulic conductivity | 0.0003162 |
| Drag coefficient | 0.0025 |
| Time increment | 111.78sec |
| Time steps per tidal period | 400 |
| Tidal periodicity | 12.42hrs |
| Duration of simulation | 62.10hrs (5 cycles) |
| Numerical implicity | 1 (fully implicit) |
| Number of nonlinear iterations | 7 |
| gbriv-mb2.gif (12.1kb) | Time series of the total fluid volume and the cumulative transport across the five transects |
| gbriv-ts4.gif (14.4kb) | Time series of normal velocity, normal transport, normal bottom stress, and normal sediment transport across five transects |
Comments:
Time history of the total fluid volume and the cumulative transport across
five selected transects as shown in
gbriv
show the system establishes a dynamic equilibrium rapidly, and mass
conservation is thereafter maintained throughout the simulation after
the initial tidal period. The maximum normal velocity across the transects
increases then decreases as one moves southward with maximum level across
the middle strait, while the normal transport across the same transects
decreases to maintain mass conservation. Both quantities decreases sharply
at the two tidal flat cuts. It is noticed that asymmetry exists
between flood and ebb.
Residual transport:
| gbriv-resq.gif (19.8kb) | Great Bay, Little Bay, Oyster River and Bellamy River |
| gbriv-resv.gif (24.5kb) | Great Bay, Little Bay, Oyster River and Bellamy River |
| gbriv-ress.gif (18.0kb) | Great Bay, Little Bay, Oyster River and Bellamy River |
| gbriv-rest.gif (14.1kb) | Great Bay, Little Bay, Oyster River and Bellamy River |
Comments:
Residual transport vectors are directed inward from the top inlet along the shore
boundary and the shoreline tidal flats down the upper channel into the lower bay
and return outward throuh the deeper channel.
gbriv-resq.gif shows
there is a counter clockwise gyre around a pit at the middle part of the channel
just inside the inlet boundary. This causes residual transport out of the inlet
at its middle portion.
Simulation results indicates that the residual bottom stress is intensified
within the channel especially in the vicinity of the upper boundary
inlet and the middle narrow strait.
With M2 forcing, the residual sediment transport is observed to be the most
intense near the narrow strait directed southward.
| gbriv-ebb.gif (17.9kb) | Maximum ebb at dynamic equilibrium. |
| gbriv-fld.gif (19.4kb) | Maximum flood at dynamic equilibrium. |
| gbriv-hv.fli (0.57Mb) | FLC animation of tidal time transport (H*v) |
| gbriv-v.fli (1.07Mb) | FLC animation of tidal time velocity (v) |
Comments:
The above transient solutions are numerically well-behaved and appear to
describe the realistic dynamics of the tidal flooding and dewatering process
in this complex domain.


Last modified:September 21, 1998 (Safak Nur ERTURK)