Bukhari's Authenticity
David Bradly (DB) :
2)Is
all of Sahih al-bukhari accepted to be 'sahih' ?
If
not, who declared the new evaluation of sahih al-bukhari ?
Rahman :
Yes it is all accepted as SAHIH.
DB : Bearing in mind, Rahman accepted Nasiruddin Al-banee as his scholar. Let us now see Al-banee's valuation of sahih al-bukhari :
Hadith: The Prophet (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam)m) said: "Allah says I will be an opponent to 3 persons on the day of resurrection: (a) One who makes a covenant in my Name but he proves treacherous, (b) One who sells a free person (as a slave) and eats the price (c) And one who employs a labourer and gets the full work done by him, but doesn't pay him his wages." [Bukhari no 2114-Arabic version, or see the English version 3/430 pg 236].
Al-Albani said that this Hadith was DAEEF in "Daeef al-Jami wa Ziyadatuh, 4/111 no. 4054". Little does he know that this Hadith has been narrated by Ahmad and Bukhari from Abu Hurayra
So Rahman, did Al-banee make a mistake or did bukhari make a mistake ?