|
|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: [pf] Perspectives on ourselves, our world and social change by David MacClement 21 May 2001 17:59 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
· Positive Futures people: I paged-down fairly quickly through this, but my eye was caught by the distinction made between: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - False opposition is a special case of partial opposition. It is an attempt to appear total or radical, while remaining only partial in actual practice. · and: Radical opposition on the other hand attempts to subvert hierarchy and alienation at their roots. It is always a conscious opposition to the totality of the existing social system since it is based on an understanding of how that system operates in an integrated fashion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - · I suspect that's why Tom sent it on just now. · There are several other bits I've included below; one is: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - It might seem obvious that _any_ act of resistance to a repressive and alienating social system is a step (no matter how small) in the direction of creating a new society. [No.] In practice, it becomes obvious that many such acts ... are ... quite compatible with them. They ... begin with a basic _acceptance_ of the necessity for hierarchical power and social alienation, and only resist specific abuses ... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_X_ At 12:20 21/5/2001 -0400, Tom Wheeler sent-on the C.A.L. Press Statement: > >Common perspectives on ourselves, our world and social change. > >This statement is an updated version of what was originally a statement of Columbia Anarchist League positions adopted in the spring of 1985, and revised in late spring of 1989, while the group still existed. > ... > >12. It might seem intuitively obvious that any act of resistance to a repressive and alienating social system is a step (no matter how small) in the direction of creating a new society. However, such an assumption is far from the truth. In practice, it becomes obvious that many acts which superficially appear opposed to hierarchy and capital are in actuality quite compatible with them. These acts of partial opposition always begin with a basic acceptance of the necessity for hierarchical power and social alienation, and only resist specific abuses or injustices within the overall system. Because partial opposition has such a narrow focus on reforming only certain aspects of the social structure, it has the paradoxical effect of strengthening the social system it appears to fight by legitimizing the overall system at the same time as it helps it depressurize and adapt to demands for social change. This depressurization of social forces demanding change is sometimes called "recuperation." By recuperating impulses toward genuine social change, and channeling these impulses toward the real or imagined reform of the existing social system, the system not only eliminates a threat to its continued existence, but it also strengthens its hold on people by giving the impression that fundamental reforms may be possible by a piecemeal process, and that any more radical opposition might threaten reforms already made. Partial opposition is always contrary to any genuinely radical opposition because it always accepts the ground rules of hierarchical commodity society as its own. Liberal reformists, "radical" moralists and social democrats would all prefer that we fought for "realistic" reforms on our knees than for radical change on our feet. > >False opposition is a special case of partial opposition. It is an attempt to appear total or radical, while remaining only partial in actual practice. This type of opposition is especially typical of Marxist-Leninist (and Stalinst, Maoist, etc.) groups. They claim to be revolutionary, but their actual practice reproduces most of the hierarchical and bureaucratic tendencies of the society they criticize. Despite their radical pretensions, they ultimately maintain only a coup d'etat mentality and seek to install themselves in power as a new and "enlightened" ruling class. A further special case of partial opposition can be called "spectacular opposition." Spectacular opposition involves the manufacture of an image of revolt which has few or no roots in any real social existence. In this type of imaginary opposition, celluloid images of revolt are created by media radicals, or by the media itself, whose content is minimal or absent. > >Radical opposition on the other hand attempts to subvert hierarchy and alienation at their roots. It is always a conscious opposition to the totality of the existing social system since it is based on an understanding of how that system operates in an integrated fashion as a whole. This holistic perspective reveals that when only one aspect of the system is challenged, the system as a whole will compensate and recuperate the challenge until it has been sufficiently defused and reintegrated, at which time the system is then able to begin reversing any reforms which no longer serve its purposes. The only type of movement which can ever hope for real change is one which challenges the social system as a whole at all times, even when it is concentrating on particular aspects of that system. > >13. The absolute elimination of all social alienation is probably an impossibility, and those who demand the attainment of such abstract absolutes are most likely dogmatic fanatics to be avoided. They are the would-be Robespierres of future reigns of terror. However, between the Scylla of fanaticism and the Charybdis of an unprincipled and opportunistic reformism, lies what we believe to be a realizable and viable conception of a qualitatively more free, equitable and enjoyable social system. Such a system would not be pure or perfect, but it could involve a genuinely radical re-structuring of society that would change the balance of social relations – ending the historical dominance of hierarchical and authoritarian social relationships, and replacing their dominance with a self-reinforcing system of non-hierarchical social relationships which can be considered a form of anarchy. > >14. Anarchy literally means no ruler. In its best sense it signifies a social system in which political hierarchies and authoritarianism are not tolerated. Instead of hierarchical rule by monolithic institutions over the general public, anarchy in this sense demands the most complete, widespread and effectively direct control possible by all those who are involved. This does not just mean that anarchists have some sort of vague or abstract belief in democracy, or consensus or individualism. This means that anarchists demand explicitly direct and concrete popular participation within and control of every significant social institution by those who are affected by them – not just control over institutional organization and management, but also and just as important, over their direction, ends and very existence. This can only be achieved through widespread and conscious commitment to libertarian social and institutional values and practices (self-management, spontaneity, autonomy, cooperation, human-scale organization, direct responsibility/accountability/action, and maximum flexibility) > ... > >************************************************* >Alternative Press Review - www.altpr.org >Your Guide Beyond the Mainstream >PO Box 4710 - Arlington, VA 22204 > >Mid-Atlantic Infoshop - www.infoshop.org >Infoshop News Kiosk - www.infoshop.org/news.html > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - David. (David MacClement) davd@ihug.co.nz http://www.geocities.com/davd.geo/index.html#top ************************************************ ==^================================================================ EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://igc.topica.com/u/?aVxifP.aVx3Cb Or send an email To: positive-futures-unsubscribe@igc.topica.com This email was sent to: archive+pfvs@csf.colorado.edu T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
Positive Futures List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to Positive Futures |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |