Re: [pf] the Non-TV, real world. (was: Alternate Realities)

At 13:28 2/12/2001 -0800, Kaleopono sent:
>
>The story about smuggling trucks is modeled after a Sufi teaching story
that appears in one of Idries Shah's preparatory books that are
instrumental in "clearing away the brushwood" of readers' indoctrinated,
confused and wishful-magical thinking: the "wakeful sleep" of normal
existence.  Kaleopono
>
>-------------------------------------
>Alternate Realities
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11987
>
>Alternate Realities 
Danny Schechter, MediaChannel.org
November 29, 2001
>
It is rare when a non-media columnist for The New York Times devotes
precious ink to taking on the media. When economist Paul Krugman did just
that recently, I was startled because it is so uncommon for issue-oriented
commentators even to acknowledge that most people understand the world
through what they see and read, or that the media might be missing key
news. How stories are played, or ignored, is usually not a subject that
opinion-makers think about 
>
>New York Times columnist Paul Krugman blasted TV coverage of economic
issues for ignoring "the whole picture," a reminder of what U.S. business
reporting often overlooks.
>__________________________________________________________________________
>

· The article Danny Schechter commented on is this (below), by the NY Times
Economics writer Krugman; I'm posting it all, since the NY Times only
allows free access for 7 days, which finishes in an hour or two.  D.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
November 25, 2001; "RECKONINGS"

An Alternate Reality
By PAUL KRUGMAN, New York Times 
 
Most Americans get their news from TV. And what they see is heartwarming —
a picture of a nation behaving well in a time of crisis. Indeed, the vast
majority of Americans have been both resolute and generous.

But that's not the whole story, and the images TV doesn't show are anything
but heartwarming. A full picture would show politicians and businessmen
behaving badly, with this bad behavior made possible — and made worse — by
the fact that these days selfishness comes tightly wrapped in the flag. If
you pay attention to the whole picture, you start to feel that you are
living in a different reality from the one on TV.

The alternate reality isn't deeply hidden. It's available to anyone with a
modem, and some of it makes it into quality newspapers. Often you can find
the best reporting on what's really going on in the business section,
because business reporters and commentators are not expected to view the
world through rose-colored glasses. 

>From an economist's point of view, the most revealing indicator of what's
really happening is the post- Sept. 11 fondness of politicians for
"lump-sum transfers." That's economese for payments that aren't contingent
on the recipient's actions, and which therefore give no incentive for
changed behavior. That's good if the transfer is meant to help someone in
need, without reducing his motivation to work. It's bad if the alleged
purpose of the transfer is to get the recipient to do something useful,
like invest or hire more workers. 

So it tells you something when Congress votes $15 billion in aid and loan
guarantees for airline companies but not a penny for laid-off airline
workers. It tells you even more when the House passes a "stimulus" bill
that contains almost nothing for the unemployed but includes $25 billion in
retroactive corporate tax cuts — that is, pure lump-sum transfers to
corporations, most of them highly profitable. 

Most political reporting about the stimulus debate describes it as a
conflict of ideologies. But ideology has nothing to do with it. No economic
doctrine I'm aware of, right or left, says that an $800 million lump-sum
transfer to General Motors will lead to more investment when the company is
already sitting on $8 billion in cash.

As Jonathan Chait points out, there used to be some question about the true
motives of people like Dick Armey and Tom DeLay. Did they really believe in
free markets, or did they just want to take from the poor and give to the
rich? Now we know.

Of course, it's not all about lump- sum transfers. Since Sept. 11 there has
also been a sustained effort, under cover of the national emergency, to
open public lands to oil companies and logging interests. Administration
officials claim that it's all for the sake of national security, but when
you discover that they also intend to reverse rules excluding snowmobiles
from Yellowstone, the truth becomes clear.

So what's the real state of the nation? On TV this looks like World War II.
But though our cause is just, for 99.9 percent of Americans this war, waged
by a small cadre of highly trained professionals, is a spectator event. And
the home front looks not like wartime but like a postwar aftermath, in
which the normal instincts of a nation at war — to rally round the flag and
place trust in our leaders — are all too easily exploited. 

Indeed, current events bear an almost eerie resemblance to the period just
after World War I. John Ashcroft is re-enacting the Palmer raids, which
swept up thousands of immigrants suspected of radicalism; the vast majority
turned out to be innocent of any wrongdoing, and some turned out to be U.S.
citizens. Executives at Enron seem to have been channeling the spirit of
Charles Ponzi. And the push to open public lands to private exploitation
sounds like Teapot Dome, which also involved oil drilling on public land.
Presumably this time there have been no outright bribes, but the giveaways
to corporations are actually much larger. 

What this country needs is a return to normalcy. And I don't mean the
selective normalcy the Bush administration wants, in which everyone goes
shopping but the media continue to report only inspiring stories and war
news. It's time to give the American people the whole picture.


Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
sent by David.
David MacClement [davd @ ihug.co.nz] (remove spaces)
http://davd.tripod.com/GrAPR-011130_titles.html#top
http://www.geocities.com/davd.geo/index.html#top
***********************************************

==^================================================================
This email was sent to: csf@moscow.com

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://igc.topica.com/u/?aVxifP.a2yAZH
Or send an email to: positive-futures-unsubscribe@igc.topica.com

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================