This is G o o g l e's cache of http://csf.colorado.edu/forums/pfvs/2001III/msg00262.html as retrieved on 1 Dec 2003 21:15:54 GMT.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.
This cached page may reference images which are no longer available. Click here for the cached text only.
To link to or bookmark this page, use the following url: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:ljPfw5nXhUkJ:csf.colorado.edu/forums/pfvs/2001III/msg00262.html++%22David+MacClement%22+site:csf.colorado.edu&hl=en


Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted: david macclement 

RE: [pf] process, building hydro dam ...
< < <
Date Index
> > >
RE: [pf] process, building hydro dam ...
by David MacClement
10 July 2001 02:46 UTC
< < <
Thread Index
> > >
Re:
http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=11394&newsDate=2-Jul-2001
>>          Vietnam assembly wants further study of dam project
> ;
at 09:41 9/7/2001 -0500, Diane wrote, {at:
http://csf.colorado.edu/mail/pfvs/2001III/msg00237.html } :-
>
>Our city includes a large lake that is man-made.  It was done as a way to
provide a good water supply and recreation.  I still know people who mourn
the family farm at the bottom of the lake.
>
>Some people -- I'm one of the them -- become very attached to a particular
geographical place. ...  While the above project is probably for the best,
the people who are moved may still grieve.
>
>Diane Fitzsimmons
>Norman, Okla. 
>

· Say Oklahoma is considered mostly Plains, verging on Desert.

· Further, say that it's ethically right for people to live there in large
numbers, in that part of the continent.

· Lastly, say that Oklahoma, the USA, and the world, have enough food that
those farms on good soil are not quite-clearly-needed.

· Given those, I would agree with Diane that the small number of farms "had
to be" sacrificed to make way for the greater good, i.e. to "provide a good
water supply and recreation."


· But what if those conditions apply to a lesser degree, or don't apply at
all?

· Where (in what circumstances) are the conditions _not_ right for the
replacement of (i) plains grassland by farms, or later (ii) farms by a city
lake?

· There's a gradual change, but I think it's easy to imagine a river valley
in northern Canada where there is _insufficient_ justification for the
human development of building a lake and a city. (For one thing, the
transport, heating and other energy costs are too great when one includes
the environmental costs.)

· So once again, _where_ along this multi-dimensional continuum do you draw
the line and say "people; stop! it's not worth it!"? Or even "This is bad!"

David. (who's been interested in multi-factorial optimization all his life)
David MacClement [davd @ ihug.co.nz] (remove spaces)
http://www.geocities.com/davd.geo/index.html#top
***************************************************

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://igc.topica.com/u/?aVxifP.${encoded_sub_id}
Or send an email To: positive-futures-unsubscribe@igc.topica.com
This email was sent to: archive+pfvs@csf.colorado.edu

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

< < <
Date Index
> > >
Positive Futures List Archives
at CSF
Subscribe to Positive Futures < < <
Thread Index
> > >