|
|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
[pf] excerpt from "Anarchism as a Scapegoat of the 21st century" by David MacClement 12 December 2001 21:59 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
At 11:53 12/12/2001 -0500, someone at rcn.net sent-on: http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=01/12/12/3759544 >Anarchism as a Scapegoat of the 21st century: violence, anarchism and anti-globalisation protests > > ... we tend to overlook that the anti-globalisation movement has much radical, anarchist potential. For a start, the movement is largely organised along decentralised anarchist lines, a fact often completely ignored. These big protests have largely been organised without leaders by networks of autonomous groups. These groups network together, inform each other of their plans, create their own actions or join in on someone else's. A whole host of organisational forms are used, from websites listing actions, Independent Media (IndyMedia) centres, to small affinity groups. Affinity groups are temporary groups of like-minded people who come together for a specific aim such as forming a carnival-like drum brigade. All these groups then co-ordinate their activities with one another from the bottom up at large "spokescouncil" meetings of delegates from the various groups. It is assumed by many that what is needed is a central body to direct the protests from above. ... The success of the largely non-hierarchical organising of the anti-globalisation movement proves that such a method of organising is possible and desirable. It allows for much flexibility and diversity. People feel like they are actually participating in a protest of their own creation, rather than being herded like sheep by marshalls on loudhailers. A lack of central control does not mean every group will go off and do their own thing in antagonism with each other, as these autonomous groups have shown a real ability to come together and co-ordinate their activities in massive, large-scale demonstrations. Imagine if a whole society, and not just a protest, was organised along such decentralised lines. People would voluntarily come together and form and re-form groups for whatever need, whether artistic or social or economic or whatever, and would co-ordinate their activities with other like-minded groups. Of course, this federalist organisation run by direct democracy is not enough ... >****** The A-Infos News Service ****** >News about and of interest to anarchists > >************************************************* >Mid-Atlantic Infoshop - www.infoshop.org >Infoshop News Kiosk - www.infoshop.org/inews > >Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed >www.anarchymag.org/ > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - sent-on by David. ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: csf@moscow.com EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://igc.topica.com/u/?aVxifP.a2yAZH Or send an email to: positive-futures-unsubscribe@igc.topica.com T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
Positive Futures List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to Positive Futures |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |